classification of partially edentulous arches · why we need classification for rpd ? 6....
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Ref: McCraken’s Removable partial prosthodontics.
![Page 2: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
CONTENT & REFERENCE
2
i. Introduction of classification (B.p.no. 19-23, A.p.no.1)
ii. Requirements of an acceptable method of RPD classification (B-p.no. 9-10; A-p.no.8)
iii. Kennedy classification of partially edentulous arches (A-p.8; B-p.20-23)
iv. Applegate’s modification for the Kennedy classification (A-p.10-13; B-p.20-23)
![Page 3: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
INTRODUCTION• Consistent decline in prevalence of tooth loss has increased tremendously in tooth
supported as well as tooth – tissue supported partial dentures (PD).
• Classification is needed for these situation for better treatment options finding.
• Many classifications has been introduced for RPD;
• Kennedy
• Cummer
• Bailyn
3
![Page 4: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
TOOTH SUPPORTED • For tooth supported situation first option is;
• Implants
• Implant supported Fixed partial denture (FPD)
• FPD
• RPD.
• These options depends on number & location
of missing teeth.
4
Tooth supported
FPD RPD
![Page 5: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
TOOTH TISSUE SUPPORTED • For tooth tissue supported situation first
option is;
• Implants
• Implant supported Fixed partial denture (FPD)
• RPD.
• These options depends on number & location
of missing teeth.
5
Tooth Tissue supported
![Page 6: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ?
6
![Page 7: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION
I. Should permit immediate visualization of the type of partially edentulous arch.
II. Should permit immediate differentiation between tooth-supported & tooth & tissue-supported
RPD.
III. Should be universally acceptable.
IV. Serve as a guide to the type of design to be used.
7Ref: McCraken’s Removable partial prosthodontics. P.no.19.
![Page 8: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
KENNEDY’S CLASSIFICATIONKennedy classification was originally proposed by Dr. Edward Kennedy in 1925.
Kennedy divide all edentulous class in four basic classes.
Edentulous area other those determining the classification were designated as
modification spaces.
8Ref: McCraken’s Removable partial prosthodontics. 11th Ed. P.no.20.
![Page 9: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
KENNEDY’S CLASSIFICATION
I. Class I: Bilateral edentulous area located posterior to the natural teeth.
9Ref: McCraken’s Removable partial prosthodontics. 11th Ed. P.no.20.
![Page 10: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
KENNEDY’S CLASSIFICATION
II. Class II: A unilateral edentulous area located posterior to the remaining natural teeth.
10Ref: McCraken’s Removable partial prosthodontics. P.no.20.
![Page 11: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
KENNEDY’S CLASSIFICATIONIII. Class III: A unilateral edentulous area with natural teeth remaining both anterior &
posterior to it.
11Ref: McCraken’s Removable partial prosthodontics. P.no.20.
![Page 12: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
KENNEDY’S CLASSIFICATIONIV. Class IV: A single, but bilateral (crossing the midline) edentulous area located anterior to
the remaining natural teeth.
12Ref: McCraken’s Removable partial prosthodontics. P.no.20.
![Page 13: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
KENNEDY’S CLASSIFICATION
Advantage:
a. Permits immediate visualization of the situation.
b. Easily differentiation between tooth & tooth tissue supported.
c. Permits logical approach to the design.
13Ref: McCraken’s Removable partial prosthodontics. P.no.20.
![Page 14: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
HOW WILL YOU CLASSIFY THIS?
14
![Page 15: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
APPLEGATES’S RULES FOR APPLYING KENNEDY’S CLASSIFICATION
Kennedy classification is difficult to apply to every situation with out certain
rule for application.
Applegate provide eight rules which governing Kennedy’s classification.
15Ref: McCraken’s Removable partial prosthodontics. P.no.22.
![Page 16: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
APPLEGATES’S RULES FOR APPLYING KENNEDY’S CLASSIFICATION
Rule No. 1: Classification should follow rather than precede
any extraction of teeth that might alter original classification.
Rule No. 2: If third molar is missing and not to be replaced, it is
not considered in the classification.
16Ref: McCraken’s Removable partial prosthodontics. P.no.22.
![Page 17: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
APPLEGATES’S RULES FOR APPLYING KENNEDY’S CLASSIFICATION
Rule No. 3: if third molar is present and is to be used as a
abutment, it is consider in classification.
Rule No. 4: If second molar is missing and not to be
replaced, it is not considered in the classification.
17Ref: McCraken’s Removable partial prosthodontics. P.no.22.
![Page 18: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
APPLEGATES’S RULES FOR APPLYING KENNEDY’S CLASSIFICATION
Rule No. 5: The most posterior edentulous are area (areas)
always determine the classification.
Rule No. 6: Edentulous area other than those determine
classification are referred to as modifications & are designated
by their number.
18Ref: McCraken’s Removable partial prosthodontics. P.no.22.
![Page 19: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
APPLEGATES’S RULES FOR APPLYING KENNEDY’S CLASSIFICATION
Rule No. 7: The extent of the modification is not
considered, only the number of additional edentulous area.
Rule No. 8: There can be no modification area in Class IV.
19Ref: McCraken’s Removable partial prosthodontics. P.no.22.
![Page 20: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
SUMMARY
Without learning classification and implication of it
during all steps of RPD fabrication, the communication,
designing of RPD and other steps will be very difficult.
20
![Page 21: Classification of partially edentulous arches · WHY WE NEED CLASSIFICATION FOR RPD ? 6. REQUIREMENT OF ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION I. Should permit immediate visualization](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040400/5e70ca9fad49ee7f617e5a22/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
THANK YOU