classroom demonstration of experimental method using levels of processing theory laura a. powell and...

18
Classroom Demonstration of Experimental Method using Levels of Processing Theory Laura A. Powell and Jack Shelly-Tremblay University of South Alabama, Department of Psychology

Upload: mercy-bradford

Post on 16-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Classroom Demonstration of Experimental Method using

Levels of Processing Theory

Laura A. Powell and Jack Shelly-TremblayUniversity of South Alabama, Department of Psychology

Levels of Processing Theory (LOP) Craik and Lockhart (1972)

depth of processing Sensory analysis (Structural) Pattern recognition (Phonemic) Stimulus elaboration (Semantic)

Depth of processing leads to increases in retention

Craik and Tulving (1975) Experiment 9: A Classroom Demonstration

PSY 320 Research Design and Analysis II Writing Component Course Four progressively longer APA manuscript

papers Paper 1- Results section (Chi Square) Paper 2- Methods and Results sections

(Correlation) Paper 3- LOP literature review Paper 4- full APA manuscript on LOP experiment

One Credit PSY 321 lab course attached R statistical program

LOP Demonstration

Informed Consent Intentional learning- “take a short test”

Answer sheet instructions Structural- upper vs. lower case

Craik and Tulving, 1975 Phonemic- counting syllables Semantic- pleasant vs. unpleasant

Hyde and Jenkins, 1973

Answer Sheet Instructions

Structural Answer Sheet You are about to see a list of 20 words. Your task is to

determine whether the word is written in uppercase or lowercase letters. Below write U for uppercase and L for lower case. Please mark your decision next to the appropriate number for each word. Look carefully because each word will only be presented once. Do not discuss this task with others until the task is complete.

You are about to see a list of 20 words. Your task is to determine whether the word is written in uppercase or lowercase letters. Below write U for uppercase and L for lower case. Please mark your decision next to the appropriate number for each word. Look carefully because each word will only be presented once. Do not discuss this task with others until the task is complete.

1. ______ 2. ______ 3. ______ 4. ______ 5. ______ 6. ______ 7. ______ 8. ______ 9. ______ 10. ______ 11. ______ 12. ______ 13. ______ 14. ______ 15. ______ 16. ______ 17. ______ 18. ______ 19. ______ 20. ______

Answer Sheet Instructions

Structural Answer Sheet You are about to see a list of 20 words. Your task is to determine

whether the word is written in uppercase or lowercase letters. Below write U for uppercase and L for lower case. Please mark your decision next to the appropriate number for each word. Look carefully because each word will only be presented once. Do not discuss this task with others until the task is complete.

Phonemic Answer Sheet determine the number of syllables in each word as it is

presented. For example, if the first word has three syllables, write 3 in the first space.

Semantic Answer Sheet rate each word as it is presented in terms of how pleasant the

word is to you. Below write U for unpleasant and P for pleasant.

Stimulus Words

problem TOMORROW enemy MILK religion air CHIEF friend journal machine

winter saturday OCEAN LIBERTY WOUND sister HISTORY MEDICINE rest bear

LOP Demonstration

Recall task Turn your sheet over and write as many words

as you can remember. Debriefing and Paper Assignments

Paper 3- LOP literature review Analysis of data using “R” statistical program

One way ANOVA with post hoc tests if LOP is significant

Two way ANOVA if you add other IVs Paper 4- full APA manuscript on LOP

experiment

LOP Results Spring 2013

Post hoc comparisons

Structural – Phonemic p = 0.085

Structural – Semantic p < 0.001

Phonemic – Semantic p = 0.054

• N = 30 • 19 Females and 11 Males

LOP Results Fall 2008-Spring 2013

Post hoc comparisons

Structural – Phonemic p < 0.001

Structural – Semantic p < 0.001

Phonemic – Semantic p < 0.001

• N = 737

Gender Results Spring 2011-2013

Gender Total

Female 83

Male 50

Total 133

Gender Results Spring 2011-2013

Levels of Processing

Gender

Structural

Phonemic

Semantic

Total

Female

28 26 29 83

Male 17 18 15 50

Total 45 44 44 133

LOP Results Spring 2011-2013

Post hoc comparisons

Structural – Phonemic p = 0.022

Structural – Semantic p < 0.001

Phonemic – Semantic p < 0.001

Interaction Spring 2011-2013

Conclusions

Levels of Processing can be a successful demonstration the experimental method one or two way ANOVA and post hoc tests Full APA manuscript

Encourage students to encode information at the Semantic level

Limitations

PSY students may have some knowledge of Levels of Processing PSY 120 - General Psychology PSY 416 - Cognition

Some PSY students may have encountered LOP experiment in other classes

Contact Information

Laura Powell [email protected]

Jack Shelly-Tremblay [email protected]