clayton thyne ps 235: world politics spring 2010 note: this is best viewed as a slide show...
DESCRIPTION
Why write a lit review? Gives a general overview of lit that is not familiar to you Reveals what has already been done Gives you new ideas on your research Tells you what holes you can fill Helps you place your research in a broader context Notes based on Knopf (2006)TRANSCRIPT
Clayton ThynePS 235: World Politics
Spring 2010
Note: This is best viewed as a slide show (otherwise the animations will be screwed up). Hit F5 now to proceed.
What is a Lit Review?A lit review summarizes and evaluates a body
of writings about a specific topic2 key elements:
1. concisely summarize the key findings/claims from prior research2. reach a conclusion about how complete/accurate the knowledge is (what’s right/wrong, conclusive/inconclusive?)
It is not a summary list (i.e., annotated bibliography)
Notes based on Knopf (2006)
Why write a lit review?Gives a general overview of lit that is not
familiar to youReveals what has already been doneGives you new ideas on your researchTells you what holes you can fillHelps you place your research in a broader
context
Notes based on Knopf (2006)
Types of Lit Reviews1. End in itself – excellent if you can find them2. Preliminary stage in a larger project – what
you’re doing3. Component of a finished research report –
finish project by addressing previous literature
Notes based on Knopf (2006)
Your Contribution to KnowledgeMay be theoretical or empiricalMay overthrow previous theories and/or
findings, or may support themRegardless, the reader must know the
current state of knowledge in order to understand your contribution
Notes based on Knopf (2006)
How to Create an Effective ReviewConsider your sources – peer-reviewed is always the
best; avoid biased sourcesImitate published workSummarize each work in 1-2 sentencesFocus on what is relevant; avoid tedious detailsNo item-by-item lists; group into ‘camps’ or ‘schools of
thought’Look for review articles – Annual Review of
International Relations; Annual Review of Political Science; PhD dissertations are a great sources; textbooks often do a decent job; journal articles often skip the lit review or make it very brief
Notes based on Knopf (2006)
Nuts & Bolts: What the Lit Review Should Accomplish1. Be clear about the purpose of each article (in terms
of theory, DV, and Ivs)2. Identify main argument; did the author find support?3. Summarize articles from steps 1-2 in terms of
1. Areas of agreement2. Areas of disagreement3. Gaps/holes that need filled – may be theoretical (new
way of thinking about an issue) or empirical (new way of testing the issue) or both
4. Evaluate the overall state of knowledge; consider…1. Assumptions2. Logic3. Evidence4. Methodology
Notes based on Knopf (2006)
What if there are too few/many sources?Think in terms of 2 tiers:
Tier 1: studies that directly address your research question
Tier 2: studies that overlap somewhat w/ your question
Begin w/ tier 1……if too few sources, broaden to tier 2…if too many, consider…
Leading authorities (e.g., only journal articles) Recent studies (e.g., published since 2002) Studies most relevant to your topic
Notes based on Knopf (2006)
Some examples
Notes based on Bartilow & Eom (2009)
Quickly identifies 3 areas of lit
Then point to the hole in the literature
Clearly states both a (1) theoretical and (2) empirical contribution
Notes based on Bartilow & Eom (2009)
Morey & Kadera’s contribution is primarily theoretical, so they review the literature on dynamic modeling.
They conclude by pointing to the hole in the literature – the need to use a dynamic model to approach this question.
Notes based on Kadera & Morey (2008)
Thyne & Moreno focus primarily on policy.
Notes based on Thyne & Moreno (2008)
They note a disjuncture between policy expectations and reality…
…and then critique previous scholars’ attempts to explain this disjuncture.
Notes based on Thyne & Moreno (2008)
Wallace reviews the dominant literature in this area, which focuses on domestic factors.
He then critiques the literature for its methodology.
Notes based on Wallace (2008)