climate and energy: a view to 2040 - ivp-pensioeneducatie · source: exxonmobil 2017 outlook for...
TRANSCRIPT
Climate and Energy: A View to 2040 Peter W. Trelenberg
Manager, Environmental Policy and Planning
June 8, 2017
ExxonMobil Annual Outlook for Energy
0
250
500
750
Quadrillion BTUs
1.4%
-0.1%
OECD Non-OECD Total
2040
2015
Average Growth/Year 2015 to 2040
0.9%
0
50
100
150
200
250
Oil Natural Gas
Coal Other Renewable*
1.5%
-0.1%
2.6%
Nuclear
0.7% 2040
2015
Solar & Wind
5.8%
0.6%
Source: ExxonMobil 2017 Outlook for Energy: A View to 2040. * Includes hydro, geothermal, bio-energies.
• Developing nations will lead gains in GDP, energy use, driven by growing middle class
• Energy demand grows by 25%, well below GDP due to efficiency gains
• Oil and natural gas expected to meet about 55% of energy demand in 2040
• Lower GHG sources of energy expected to grow fastest
Global Energy Demand
0
10
20
30
40
2000 2020 2040
Energy-Related CO2 Emissions by Region
Billion Tonnes
CO2 Emissions Plateau Energy-related CO2 Emissions Peak in 2030s
Rest of Non OECD
OECD
Sources: ExxonMobil 2017 Outlook for Energy; UNFCCC COP21 Synthesis Report 2015, EM analysis
Range of 3rd party estimates of Paris
submissions
China
India
The 2°C Challenge
0
10
20
$0K $25K $50K
South Korea
0
10
20
$0K $25K $50K
0
10
20
$0K $25K $50K
0
10
20
$0K $25K $50K
Sources: EIA International Energy Statistics, ExxonMobil 2015 Energy Outlook; GDP per capita is PPP, constant 2005 $
GDP per Capita
CO2 Emissions and GDP per Capita 1980-2011
Tons CO2
per capita Non-OECD
2050 2°C scenario
2100 2°C
scenario
2015 Global Average 2°C Requires Immediate and Rapid Decarbonization
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Moderate Mitigation Reduces Tail Risk
Sources: MIT Joint Program, Analysis of Climate Policy Targets Under Uncertainty, Webster, Sokolov, Reilly, et al, Sept. 2009
Probability Distribution of Temperature Increase 2000 to 2100
Average Global Surface Temperature Increase
No policy beyond 2005
450 ppm CO2
2°C Case
650 ppm CO2
°C
Significant Tail Risk Reduction
Options to Lower CO2 Emissions
Coal Natural Gas
Oil
Nuclear
Hydro
Biomass Renewables
• Efficiency • Fuel switching to natural gas
• Efficiency • Fuel switching to natural gas
• Efficiency • Fuel switching to natural gas
• Efficiency • Fuel switching to natural gas
• Electrification
• Electrification
• Electrification
• Carbon Capture and Storage
• Carbon Capture and Storage • Biofuels
• Biofuels
• Nuclear • Hydro, biomass, solar, wind, geothermal
• Biofuels
Source: ExxonMobil Energy Outlook 2017
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
Non-Carbon Share of Energy Flat Since Early 1990s
Modest Growth Anticipated Through 2040
Sources: 2017 ExxonMobil Energy Outlook; IEA World Energy Outlook 2015; MIT 2014 Energy & Climate Outlook
Hydro
Nuclear
Geothermal
Solar, Wind, & Bio
IEA New Policies MIT
2016
Non-Carbon Share of Energy
Excludes primitive biomass
Hydro
Nuclear
Geothermal Solar, Wind, & Bio
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
Hydro
Nuclear
Geothermal
Solar, Wind, & Bio
EM EO
IEA 450 “2°C”
IEA New Policies MIT
Non-Carbon Share of Energy Flat Since Early 1990s
Modest Growth Anticipated Through 2040
Sources: 2017 ExxonMobil Energy Outlook; IEA World Energy Outlook 2015; MIT 2014 Energy & Climate Outlook
EM EO
2016
Non-Carbon Share of Energy
Excludes primitive biomass
Complexity and Scale Limit Rate of Transformation
Source: IPCC AR5 WG3, Ch 10 (2014)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2015 2040 2040 Demand 2040 Demand by Sector
All Scenarios Require Reinvestment
Liquids Supply/Demand, Moebd
Source: Based on IEA sources, excludes biofuels
Existing Supplies
Natural decline in absence of further
investment
Existing Supplies
+87 Moebd
IEA New Policies
Scenario
Passenger Vehicles
Commercial Transport
Industry
Buildings
Other
Power
+57 Moebd
IEA 450 Scenario
0
500
1000
1500
Gas Oil Coal
Resources
Optimizing Carbon Budget – Advantages of Natural Gas vs Coal
Contained Carbon
Source: Kheshgi et al., Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2003; IEA WEO, 2014; IPCC AR5, 2014
GtC
Reserves
No Carbon Capture No Reforestation
0
5
10
15
2000 2100 2200 2300
0
5
10
15
2000 2100 2200 2300
0
5
10
15
2000 2100 2200 2300
0
5
10
15
2000 2100 2200 2300
Emissions, GtC/yr
Remaining Carbon Budget
Remaining Carbon Budget
Remaining Carbon Budget
~2020
~2050
~2075
Peak Year
650 ppm 450 ppm
1000 ppm
0
4000
8000
12000
Gas Oil Coal
Optimizing Carbon Budget – Advantages of Natural Gas vs Coal
Source: Kheshgi et al., Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2003; IEA WEO, 2014; IPCC AR5, 2014
0
5
10
15
2000 2100 2200 2300
0
5
10
15
2000 2100 2200 2300
0
5
10
15
2000 2100 2200 2300
0
5
10
15
2000 2100 2200 2300
Emissions, GtC/yr
Remaining Carbon Budget
Remaining Carbon Budget
Remaining Carbon Budget
~2020
~2050
~2075
Peak Year
650 ppm 450 ppm
1000 ppm
Coal
Natl Gas
NOx SOx Particulates
85% 99.98% 99.8%
Mercury
100%
CO2
57%
Emissions Comparison
Reduction
Coal
Nat.Gas
-50
50
150
250
ImprovedGasolineVehicles
Gas intoPower
Nuclear HybridVehicles
CarbonCapture and
Sequestration
Wind E85(corn)
Solar Electric Cars
Relative Cost of CO2 Emission Reduction Options Average U.S. CO2 Abatement Costs – Transport and Power
2016 - Dollars per tonne 500+
Source: ExxonMobil Energy Outlook 2017, EM Calculations
Carbonate Fuel Cell
Technology Helps Us Do More With Less
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
Global Average Intensity
Index
2015
Energy / GDP
CO2 / Energy
CO2 / GDP
Minimizing the Impact of our Operations
GHG -12%
Flaring -35%
NOx, SO2 and VOC emissions -46%
Cogeneration +28%
% Change 2015 vs 2006
Key Environmental Metrics
Net Equity CO2 – equivalent emissions
Millions of metric tons, cumulative
GHG Emissions Avoided from XOM Actions
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
'11 '12 '13 '14 '15
Flare & vent reduction
Energy efficiency & cogeneration
Power Generation without Emissions
Natural gas
Exhaust (CO2) CO2 to storage
Power generation
Carbon capture Electricity Electricity
Today’s approach: Power consuming, complex
Our research: Natural gas power generation without CO2 emissions
Low Emissions Transportation Fuel
Sunlight
+ CO2 + H2O + Photosynthesis
Bio-fuels
Today’s approach: Small scale, competes with food and water
Our research: Large scale, global solutions, non-competitive with food and water
CO2 Capture Using Carbonate Fuel Cells
Source: ExxonMobil
Electricity Methane
Air
Power Turbine Electricity
Steam Generator
Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust
CO/H2 ~95% CO2 to Storage
Separation
Exhaust 100% CO2 Vented
Electricity
Methane
Carbonate Fuel Cell
Exhaust ~5% CO2 Vented