clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · bridging in patients with af:...

29
Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of anticoagulants Eleni M Arnaoutoglou, MD, PhD Professor of Anesthesiology University of Thessaly Chief of Anesthesiology Department University Hospital of Larissa

Upload: others

Post on 03-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of anticoagulants

Eleni M Arnaoutoglou, MD, PhD

Professor of Anesthesiology

University of Thessaly

Chief of Anesthesiology Department

University Hospital of Larissa

Page 2: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs
Page 3: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

• VKA patients: who to bridge?

• DOAC patients: when to stop and resume?

• Urgent procedure: how to reverse?

Learning Objectives

Page 4: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

• A 78-year-old man is scheduled for EVAR

• He is receiving acenocoumarol (Sintrom) for stroke prevention in paroxysmal AF, Hx of DM

• No Hx of stroke, or HF

• Metoprolol for hypertension

One doctor told he needs to be assessed for heparin bridging

Another doctor told he does not need bridging

Page 5: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

What is the thromboembolic risk?

CHADS2Cardiac failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75, Diabetes, Stroke (Doubled)

Page 6: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence

• 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE)

– non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs. 0.3%

– superior for major bleeding: 1.3% vs. 3.2%

(17% with prior stroke/TIA, <5% with CHADS2 5-6)

• >10 non-randomized observational studies

– low rates of ATE (<0.5%)

– higher rates of major bleeding with bridging (4-7%)

Douketis J, et al. Arch Intern Med 2004 Dunn AS, et al. J Thromb Haemost 2006 Kovacs MJ, et al. Circulation 2004 Douketis J, et al. Thromb Haemost 2004 Spyropoulos A, et al. J Thromb Haemost 2006 Schulman S, et al. J Thromb Haemost 2014Douketis J, et al. N Engl J Med 2015

Page 7: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

Bridging in Patients on VKAs with MHV

• 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging: PERIOP-2

– post-op bridging vs. no bridging (all bridged pre-op)

– study complete (~1,300 patients)

Page 8: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

Bridging in Patients on VKAs with VTE

• No RCTs of no bridging vs. bridging

• 2 non-randomized studies of bridging vs. no bridging– most patients with VTE >3 months ago– low rates of recurrent VTE (<0.5%) without

bridging

Clark NP, et al. JAMA Intern Med 2015Skeith L, et al. J Thromb Haemost 2012

Page 9: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

We recommend that for low–moderate thrombotic risk patients:

• VKA should be stopped 3 before surgery (acenocoumarol)

• No bridging therapy is needed

• Measure INR on the day before surgery and give 5 mg oral vitamin K if INR exceeds 1.5 1C

Page 10: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

• We recommend bridging therapy for high thrombotic risk patients;acenocoumarol: 3 days before surgery, last dose; 2 and 1 day before surgery, LMWH (last dose 24 h before surgery) 1C

• We suggest that the therapeutic dose of LMWH or UFH should be tailored for each patient, depending on the respective thrombotic and bleeding risk. 2C

Page 11: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

• We recommend that for moderate to high thrombotic risk patients, prophylactic doses of heparin (UFH or LMWH) should be started during the evening or the day after the procedure (at least 6 h after) and given for up to 48 to 72 h, and then therapeutic anticoagulation should be resumed

• VKA can restart at that time or later, only when surgical haemostasis is achieved. 1C

Page 12: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

•75-yr, 65-kg old female, with AF on

apixaban, 5 mg BID

–hypertension, diabetes

–CrCl = 59 mL/min

•Scheduled for EVAR Monday 9AM, for incidentally found AAA…

She needs to be off apixaban for 2 days

…NO, she needs to be off apixaban for 5 days and needs heparin bridging

Page 13: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

• Lack of high quality data(perioperative management,laboratory monitoring of anticoagulation, urgent surgery)

• Individualized management after communication.....

• Need for a consensus of the surgeon, anesthesiologist, cardiologist, hematologist whoshould weigh the relative risk of bleeding versus prevention of thrombosis

• Development of institutional guidelines and hospital policies for the perioperative management of DOACs

Page 14: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

Practice Guidelines: Perioperative Anticoagulation

Page 15: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs
Page 16: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

1) When is it safe to interrupt?2) When is it safe to resume?3) Is heparin bridging needed?4) Is coagulation function testing needed?

How to manage DOAC-treated patients perioperatively?

Page 17: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

Pause study• Design: Multi-centre prospective cohort

study

• Patients: 2,961 patients with atrial fibrillation (987 per DOAC – dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban)

Secondary: to demonstrate that a high proportion of patients (>90%) have a minimal pre-procedure residual anticoagulant level (<50 ng/mL)

Pre-procedure blood sample to measure:-dilute thrombin time (dabigatran patients)-anti-factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixabanpatients)-PT, aPTT, TT (all patients)

Primary: to demonstrate that this protocol is safe, defined by low rates of major bleeding (1.0%) and arterial thromboembolism (0.5%)

Page 18: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

Methods: Patient Eligibility and Intervention

Consecutive adults (≥18 years) with atrial fibrillation:- receiving DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban)- require DOAC interruption for elective surgery/procedure- can adhere to planned DOAC interruption

Excluded if:- CrCl<30 mL/min (dabigatran, rivaroxaban)- CrCl<25 mL/min (apixaban)- cognitive impairment/psychiatric Illness- non-consenting- previous participation in study

Blood sample: day of (just before) surgery/procedureFollow-up: weekly for 4 weeks post-procedureNo heparin bridging (low-dose heparin as VTE prophylaxis OK)

Surg./proced.classified as

HIGH or LOW bleeding risk

Page 19: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

Pause study

Outcome (%, 95% CI)(expected)

Cohort

Apixabann=1257

Dabigatrann=668

Rivaroxabann=1082

*Arterialthromboembolism (0.5%)

0.16 (0-0.48)n=2

0.60 (0-1.33)n=4

0.37 (0-0.82)n=4

**Majorbleeding (1.0%)

1.35 (0-2.00)n=17

0.90 (0-1.73)n=6

1.85 (0-2.65)n=20

Results: Primary Outcomes (ITT Analysis)

Page 20: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

apixaban dabigatran rivaroxaban

<30 ng/mL 30-49.9 ng/mL ≥50 ng/mL

93.1% <30 ng/mL

98.9% <30 ng/mL

85.3% <30 ng/mL

98.9% (823/832) with DOAC level <50 ng/mL

High-Bleed-Risk: 2 days off pre-op

Page 21: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

This strategy with no bridging was associated with low rates of major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism

98.8% had a residual anticoagulant level <50 ng/mL

Page 22: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

The bleeding risk of the vascular procedure

Page 23: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

Renal function

Renal function

Page 24: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

High-bleed risk surgery/procedure

TIME Thursday

Friday Saturday Sunday Monday 8 AM

8 AM Ø

8 PM Ø Ø

Ø

Low-bleed risk surgery/procedure

When to stop DOACs? (dabigatran/apixaban)

Page 25: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

High-bleed risk surgery/procedure

Low-bleed risk surgery/procedure

When to stop DOACs? (rivaroxaban)

Page 26: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

Managing an urgent surgery(DOACs)

• Time since the last dose is an important

consideration in someone who requires urgent

surgery with high risk of bleeding

• A delay of 8–12 h is likely to be sufficient to

enable major surgery

Page 27: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

Available Reversal Agents

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 19;70(24):3042-3067

Page 28: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs

Take home message…

• VKA patients: who to bridge?– selected atrial fibrillation

– mechanical mitral (and most aortic) valves, VTE <3 mts

• DOAC patients: when to stop and resume?– omit 1 day before/after low bleed risk procedure

– omit 2 days before/after high bleed risk procedure

– no bridging, no testing

• Urgent procedure: how to reverse?– Dabigatran can be reversed selectively with idarucizumab

– 4F-PCC first line for the reversal of factor Xa inhibitors

– 4F-PCC first line for the reversal of VKAs plus 5 to 10 mg IV vitamin K

Page 29: Clinical case scenarios on perioperative management of ... · Bridging in Patients with AF: Evidence • 1 RCT of no bridging vs. bridging (BRIDGE) –non-inferior for ATE: 0.4% vs