cloud interoperability infrastructures for governments: the government service utility (gsu)...

24
University of the Aegean Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach Yannis Charalabidis Industrial Open Excellence Workshop Quality and Performance of Business Services in the Cloud” 21 st March 2014, Athens

Upload: yannis-charalabidis

Post on 01-Dec-2014

624 views

Category:

Social Media


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Currently, public services are neither user-driven, nor sufficiently sophisticated to support seamless, real-time collaboration between the service consumers and the service providers. They are provided in a rigid, linear manner, without taking into consideration the individual characteristics and needs of each beneficiary. Such traditional public services have not delivered their promised added value or lived up to the expectations of citizens and enterprises for actual cost-effective, one stop-shop provisions. A Government Service Utility (GSU), or an Interoperability Service Utility (ISU) operating in the Public sector, is a vision of the Internet of the Future, where public organisations, citizens, enterprises and non-profit organizations can collaboratively shape public services at design-time and runtime, in order to be delivered as a utility-like offering at their own ends, to the channels they prefer and in the context and situation they are. As public services increasingly bridge real with virtual life, new value proposition models embracing the Utility Concept shall emerge, enabling a win-win collaboration among many of the stakeholders. Several models of operation of the ISU within the public sector are presented, allowing for the introduction of shared infrastructures in different levels of engagement. The roles that different ISU implementations can play in digital public service creation and provision are contemplated with relevant business models, prescribing little, significant or full outsourcing of operations from the public sector towards private enterprises of all sizes

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

University of the Aegean

Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Yannis Charalabidis

Industrial Open Excellence Workshop

“Quality and Performance of Business Services in the Cloud” 21st March 2014, Athens

Page 2: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Your speaker for the day Studied computer engineering, at the National Technical University of Athens. PhD in complex information systems, NTUA

7 years a researcher in RTD projects for businesses and governments

7 years in the software industry (Greece, Netherlands, Germany Poland). Managing director of Baan-Singular ERP company

Already 6 years in University of the Aegean and the Greek Interoperability centre, teaching and researching on information systems & interoperability in Public and Private sector, governance models and social computing.

The next 7 years ?

My aim for the day: to give you food for thought. Hold on …

Page 3: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Part I

The Interoperability Landscape

Page 4: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

European Union initiatives concerning public service provision and interoperability [1]

European Commission (2010), European Interoperability Framework (EIF) for European public services Version 2, European Commission / ISA, http://ec.europa.eu/isa/documents/isa_annex_ii_eif_en.pdf

Page 5: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

The generalized public service provision scenario in Europe

Page 6: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

The conceptual model for public services provision

Page 7: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Part II

The Governance Service Utility

Page 8: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Characteristics of Electricity and Governance utilities

Page 9: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Services of a Government Service Utility

Page 10: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Core components of a Government Service Utility

Page 11: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

ISU application example in the public sector

Page 12: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

The Contents of the extended Interoperability Registry

Page 13: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Interoperability Registry Architecture

Web Services

XML Schemas & Core Components

Services, Documents, Systems &

Organizations Metadata

BPMN Process Models

Process Modeling

Tools (incl. COTS

software)

Ontology Management,

Population & Reporting

Tools

XML Management

Tools (incl. COTS

software)

Services Registry

(Authorized Access)

Common Access Control and Application Engine

Interoperability Framework Web Site

(Free Access)

Registry UDDI Interface

(Limited Access: Systems)

Relational Database Management System

Page 14: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Key stakeholders in ISU operation

Page 15: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Business models for GSU implementation scenarios

Public Sector resource Business Model

Infrastructure

(IaaS)

Software Platform

(PaaS)

Service Provision

(SaaS)

Base Registries Own (PS) infrastructure

Own (PS) Platform

Own (PS) Provision

Public Sector centric / No

Outsourcing / Contracting only

Interoperability facilitators

Own and Cloud(IaaS)

vendors

Own (PS) Platform

Own (PS) and Service providers

Partial Outsourcing / PPP model 1

External service providers

Cloud (IaaS) vendors

Own (PS) and Software-as-a-

service providers

Own (PS) and Service providers

Partial Outsourcing / PPP model 2

Secure data exchange

Cloud (IaaS) vendors

Cloud (PaaS) vendors

Own (PS) Service providers

Partial Outsourcing / PPP model 3

Service aggregators

Vertically integrated ISU operators

Full Outsourcing / PPP model 4

Page 16: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Part III

Further Research Issues

Page 17: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

The Crossroad Project on GSU

The research challenges that take the GSU concept further:

• Research Challenge 1: User-driven innovation shaping Public Services

• Research Challenge 2: Change the “DNA” of Public Services

• Research Challenge 3: Digital Public Services Value Proposition for All

• Research Challenge 4: Massive Public Information as a Service

Page 18: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Research Issues (The CrossRoad Project)

Page 19: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

More Research Issues (The CrossRoad Project)

Page 20: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Even More Research Issues

Page 21: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Research Issues (The CrossRoad Project)

Page 22: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

Service Delivery Platforms

Mobile Government

Online Opinion Mining

Instant, proactive Service Delivery for all services

eVoting

(Automated) Argument Visualisation

Federated eID

Gov Cloud (SaaS)

Science Base for ICT-enabled Governance

Gov Cloud (PaaS)

Social Media in Policy Making

Semantic Interoperability

Agent-based Societal Simulation

eParticipation

Model-Based Decision Making

Visibility

Inflated Expectations Disillusionment Productivity

Linked Data

Visual Analytics

Legal Informatics

Service Co-creation / Web Services for all basic services

Open data

ICT-enabled history / prognosis

Gov Cloud (IaaS)

Technical Interoperability

Organisational Interoperability

Web Services /SOA in core registries

Governance Model Composability & Reuse

(Seamless) Identity management & trust mechanisms

Internal, Static Workflow Mgt

Dynamic, External Workflow Mgt

Available for application

Should be around, soon

Will take many years

Government Service Utility

Serious Games for Governance

Participatory Sensing / IoT

Open Source Software for Service Mgt

Municipality ERP

Readiness, over time

Page 23: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

References • European Commission (2010), European Interoperability Framework (EIF) for European public services Version 2, European Commission

/ ISA, http://ec.europa.eu/isa/documents/isa_annex_ii_eif_en.pdf

• European Commission (2010), The European Interoperability Strategy (EIS) for European public services, European Commission / ISA, http://ec.europa.eu/isa/documents/isa_annex_i_eis_en.pdf

• European Commission (2010), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions 'Towards interoperability for European public services’, European Commission / ISA, http://ec.europa.eu/isa/documents/isa_ip-10-1734_en.pdf

• European Union (2010), A Digital Agenda for Europe, Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52010DC0245R(01):EN:NOT

• European Union (2009), Ministerial Declaration on eGovernment, 5th EU Ministerial Conference on eGovernment, Malmö, Sweden, http://www.egov2009.se/wp-content/uploads/Ministerial-Declaration-on-eGovernment.pdf

• European Union (2010), Granada Ministerial Declaration on the European Digital Agenda, EU Informal Ministerial Meeting in Granada, Spain, http://www.eu2010.es/export/sites/presidencia/comun/descargas/Ministerios/en_declaracion_granada.pdf

• European Commission (2008), Enterprise Interoperability Research Roadmap Version 5, European Commission /DG INFSO / FInES Cluster, ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/enet/ei-research-roadmap-v5-final_en.pdf

• CROSSROAD Project (2010): “A participative roadmap for ICT research in Electronic Governance and Policy Modelling”, European Commission Support Action, http://www.crossroad-eu.net

• Rappa, M. A. (2004), The utility business model and the future of computing services. IBM Systems Journal, 43 (1), pp 32-42.

• Charalabidis Y., Lampathaki F., Psarras J. (2009), “Combination of Interoperability Registries with Process and Data Management Tools for Governmental Services Transformation”, 42nd Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 3-5 January 2009, Hawaii. (Best Paper Award Nominee)

• KIU (2009), Danish e-Government Project, InfoStructureBase, http://isb.oio.dk/info

• SEMIC.EU (2010), Semantic Interoperability Centre, European Commission / ISA, http://www.semic.eu

• BenoîtOtjacques, PatrikHitzelberger, FernandFeltz (2007), Interoperability of E-Government Information Systems: Issues of Identification and Data Sharing, Journal of Management Information Systems, Volume 23, Number 4 / Spring 2007, pp.29 – 51

• STORK Project, Secure Identity Across Borders Linked, European Commission / CIP Programme, https://www.eid-stork.eu/

Page 24: Cloud Interoperability Infrastructures for Governments: The Government Service Utility (GSU) Approach

References • ebXML, http://www.ebxml.org

• RosettaNet, http://www.rosettanet.org

• Charalabidis, Y., Askounis D., (2008), “Interoperability Registries in eGovernment: Developing a Semantically Rich Repository for Electronic Services and Documents of the new Public Administration”, Hawaiian International Conference of System Sciences, HICCS-08, January 7-10, 2008, Hawaii

• Cabinet Office (2009), UK GovTalk Schema Library, http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/schemasstandards/schemalibrary.asp

• German Government (2008), KBSt unit at the Federal Ministry of the Interior, SAGA Standards and Architectures for e-Government Applications Version 3.0, http://www.kbst.bund.de/

• HKSARG (2009), Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Interoperability Framework, Common Schemas, http://www.xml.gov.hk

• Barone A., Di Pietro P., Semantic of eGovernment Processes: a Formal Approach to Service Definition (Arianna), in Proceedings of eGovINTEROP 2006, Bordeaux, France

• CEN/ISSS eGov Share Focus Group on “Discovery and Access to eGovernment Resources”, www.cen.eu/ISSS/

• US National Information Exchange Model, NIEM, http://www.niem.gov/index.php

• The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, http://dublincore.org/

• ISO-3166-1 (country code list), http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/iso3166ma/02iso-3166-code-lists/list-en1.html

• ISO-4217 (currency code list), http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/popstds/currencycodeslist.html

• UN/CEFACT Core Components Technical Specification (2007), Part 8 of the ebXML Framework, Version 2.01, http://www.unece.org/cefact/ebxml/CCTS_V2-01_Final.pdf

• UNECE Units of Measure used in International Trade, http://www.unece.org/cefact/recommendations/rec20/rec20_rev3_Annex2e.pdf

• Greek Government Service Gateway ERMIS, http://www.ermis.gov.gr

• COIN FP7 Project on “Enterprise Collaboration and Interoperability”, http://www.coin-ip.eu/

• Gusmeroli, Sergio (2011), “From Enterprise Interoperability to Service Innovation: an evolutionary path from COIN to MSEE FInES Integrated Projects”, Samos Summit on Future Internet, July 4h 2011http://samos-summit.blogspot.com

• Srdjan Komazec, Davide Cerri, Klaus Fischer, Ingo Zinnikus, Francisco Javier Nieto, PierfrancoFerronato, EliaConchione, Antonio Panazzolo (2011), “The COIN Generic Service Platform for Enterprise Interoperability and Collaboration Service Provision”, http://www.coin-ip.eu/

• COIN Project (2010), Deliverable D6.2.1a “Integrated EI Value Proposition” http://www.coin-ip.eu/research/coin-results/public-documents/all-public-documents/COIN%20D6.2.1a%20First%20Integrated%20EI%20Value%20Proposition%20v2.0-FINAL.pdf

• Skopik F., Schall D., Dustdar S., Sesana M. (2010): “Context-Aware Interaction Models in Cross-Organizational Processes”, Fifth International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services (ICIW), May 2010, Barcelona

• Facca F.M., Komazec S., Guglielmina C.; Gusmeroli S. (2009): “COIN: Platform and Services for SaaS in Enterprise Interoperability and Enterprise Collaboration”, IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, ICSC '09, September 2009, Berkeley.

• Patrick Sitek, Sergio Gusmeroli, Marco Conte, Kim Jansson, Iris Karvonen (2011): “The COIN Book : Enterprise Collaboration and Interoperability”, ISBN 3-86130-713, Verlagsgruppe Main publications, 2011.

• Simple Knowledge Organization System(SKOS): http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/