cmi 05 annual report...requested material for the professional’s page on . th roughout the year...

CAN MANUFACTURERS INSTITUTEAnnual Report & Can Shipments Report

2005 Annual Report

3 Images from 2005

4 CMI Mission & Goals

5 Letter from the President

6 Government Relations Committees

8 Food Can Marketing Committee

10 Food Can Business-to-Business Promotion Program

12 Market Data Committee

14 Beverage Can Public Relations Committee / Aluminum Can Council

Can Shipments Report

16 About This Report

16 CMI Market Data Committee

16 Acknowledgements

16 Participants

17 Defi nitions

18 Metal Can Shipments: 2003 - 2005

19 Metal Can Shipments by Material / Technology: 2005

20 Food Can Shipments: 2000 - 2005

21 General Line Can Shipments: 2000 - 2005

21 Beverage Can Shipments by Size: 2003 - 2005

22 Aluminum Can Shipments, Exports: 2004 - 2005

22 Aluminum Can Shipments, Imports: 2004 - 2005

22 Steel Can Shipments, Exports: 2004 - 2005

22 Steel Can Shipments, Imports: 2004 - 2005

23 Subscription Information

Table of Contents

Images from 2005

1. Bob Woodward, Keynote Speaker, CMI Annual Meeting 2005.

2. Paul Boykas, Pepsi-Cola Company, and William Barker, CMI Chairman, Rexam Beverage Can.

3. Bill Brandell, Rexam Beverage Can Americas, and Andrew King, Novelis Inc.

4. Matt Witte, Silgan Containers Corporation, and Dave Bittner, Th e Valspar Corporation.

5. Pat Franc, ARCO Aluminum Inc., and Tony Bhalla, Metal Container Corporation.

6. Dave Eigner, Silgan Containers Corporation, Randy Klug, Rexam Beverage Can Americas, and Dave Bittner, Th e Valspar Corporation.

7. Craig Covert, Alcoa, Inc., and Dave Hoover, Ball Corporation.

8. Lars Emilson, Rexam, and William Mansfi eld, Th e Valspar Corporation.

1 2 3

4 5

6 7 8

02 / 03Can Manufacturers Institute 2005 Annual Report

CMI Mission & Goals

Th e Can Manufacturers Institute’s mission is

to represent its members’ interests before state

and federal legislative and regulatory bodies.

Additionally, CMI provides members with

market development programs within the

parameters of anti-trust law. To fulfi ll this task

in 2005, CMI maintained and strengthened its

commitment to the following CMI goals:

• To provide the industry with eff ective

representation in Congressional and

Administrative policymaking on those issues

with specifi c impact on or important to the

overall success of the can making industry.

• To collect and disseminate industry statistics

to provide an accurate assessment of the

industry’s production and to collect and

analyze consumer market information to

promote the growth and economic welfare of

CMI’s members.

• To promote the industry with trade, local

and national media and within state and

local governments by publicizing overall can

benefi ts and industry achievements.

• To serve, on an as-needed basis, as a

facilitation resource for the discussion

and resolution of joint industry technical,

operational or regulatory challenges.

CMI’s dedication to these goals is evident in

all that has been accomplished this year. Th is

Annual Report provides a summary of the past

year’s accomplishments, as well as a look at our

strategy to fulfi ll these goals in the coming year.

Letter from the President

What seems to be a renewed environmental consciousness will increasingly aff ect purchasing decisions, as consumers look to responsible products and renewable packaging. Th is trend is taking hold to a great degree in Europe and is settling in among some major retailers and consumer product companies here in the States. Our customers may feel the need to promote environmentally friendly products and use packaging that employs low-impact methods and materials. It is thus increasingly important that we position the can as the environmental package that is produced by an industry committed to conserving resources, providing renewable materials, and instilling an environmental ethic through education programs.

As can makers, we should be proud of our achievements. In recent years, we have reduced Volatile Organic Compounds which make smog by 33%, Hazardous Air Pollutants in coating by 50%, and the amount of solvent in coatings by 75%. We utilize ever lighter metals in order to minimize the impact on natural resources; and since the early 1970s, the weight of the can and end package have been reduced by approximately 40%. Cans are currently the most recycled container in the marketplace. Since 1991, 245 billion steel cans and 937 billion aluminum beverage cans have been recycled. Additionally, the closed-loop aluminum recycling process requires 95% less energy, generates 95% less emissions, and creates 97% less water pollution than producing new metal from ore.

We should be equally proud of our contributions to community programs, including the promotion of local recycling eff orts and involvement in environmental education for children. CMI has fulfi lled over 8,000 environmental curriculum requests from teachers who have a combined potential of reaching 240,000 classroom students and setting up aluminum can recycling programs in those schools.

In the coming years we will hear more about sustainability. As the model for other packages, we need to embrace this concept and globally maintain our commitment to a clean, healthy and sustainable future.

Best Regards,

Robert R. BudwayPresident


Government Relations Committees

ENVIRONMENTAL

Last year’s successful removal of Ethylene Glycol Mono Butyl Ether (EGBE) from the list of regulated air toxics under the Clean Air Act minimized costly and unwarranted pollution controls on most can plants. Th e Regulatory Committee is now working with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to remove EGBE from the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting requirements and plans to fi le the EGBE petition with EPA in the summer of 2006.

Th e Committee has completed its work on the EPA Standards for the Surface Coating of Metal Cans technical corrections rule. Shared drafts of the rule indicate that the industry has received most of what it asked, especially in terms of fl exible monitoring and reporting requirements. CMI has worked closely with EPA offi cials in developing the industry’s MACT to establish reasonable air emission standards for the industry. Industry compliance is required by November 2006.

A potential problem involves new ozone and air quality standards being implemented by EPA. Th e regulations are driving states to look for additional volatile organic chemicals (VOCs), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) reductions; these air emission issues and trends may result in more stringent permit limitations for can makers. As the issues develop, strategies will be developed to address each on a case-by-case basis.

HEALTH & SAFETY

Th e Health & Safety Subcommittee fi nalized an update of the CMI Noise Control Feasibility Manual. Th e report provides a valuable resource for can makers as they measure administrative and engineering noise controls.

Th e Subcommittee has commenced work on CMI’s Health & Safety “Accepted Practices” Manual. Th e manual addresses the top fi ve OSHA issues/standards of concern to can makers. Th e CMI guidance will provide can makers another valuable resource as they address various OSHA compliance requirements.

CMI collects and publishes an annual injury and illness survey of the industry. Th ese statistics allow participating companies to compare their injury and illness statistics with the membership as a whole, and to the overall injury/illness data collected by the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics. Th e survey results show a 13% decrease in continuing injury/illness cases for 2004. In particular, beverage ends and food/general line facilities showed signifi cant declines.

LEGISLATIVE

Packaging related bills, including deposits, tax and recycling measures, continue to be introduced in state legislatures. Currently, eleven states have enacted beverage container deposit systems. Expansion activities among the existing northeast deposit states, particularly Connecticut, Massachusetts and New York, remain key concerns.

Th e new Hawaii Deposit Beverage Container Program became fully eff ective in January 2005. It imposes a 5-cent refundable deposit on most carbonated and non-carbonated beverages in glass, metal, PET and HDPE containers holding 64 ounces or less. Th e key implications for can makers are the required refund value labeling provisions. CMI has updated its Beverage Can Labeling Guide for members.

In California, CMI worked ten bills relating to (AB 2020) Beverage Container Recycling Act changes, school foodservice/vending prohibitions, recycling rate defi nitions, as well as labeling and curbside system modifi cations. No provisions passed that were contrary to CMI’s interests.


Food Can Marketing Committee / CFA

Th e Canned Food Alliance (CFA) is a partnership of the American Iron and Steel Institute’s Steel Packaging Council, the Can Manufactures Institute (CMI) and select food processors. Th e CFA program positively impacts consumers, as well as culinary and nutrition infl uencers, by educating them about the nutritional value, convenience and modern-day appeal of canned foods. Th e CFA also undertakes eff orts to ensure that canned food is fairly represented in governmental food-related programs.

Th e 2005 marketing program was built on a three-pronged outreach platform to Editors, Experts and Equals.

EDITORS OUTREACH

In March 2005, the CFA held its premier events of the year: Th e 2005 CFA Symposium and Editors’ Luncheon with Tyler Florence. Th e Symposium focused on nutrition and consumer trends from around the world, and featured speakers like Fran Carpentier from PARADE, Tyler Florence, Mintel, the Food Products Association and a host of consultants and leaders in nutrition and dietetics. Th e fi ndings from the Symposium were used to refi ne media messages, perform outreach to media and guide program direction.

CFA spokesperson, registered dietitian and cookbook author Roberta Duyff , discussed how canned food’s nutritional profi le echoed current dietary guidelines. Th e luncheon built a solid foundation for ongoing media outreach activities throughout 2005 and yielded coverage on canned food recipes, the nutritional value of canned food and the CFA’s relationship with Tyler Florence.

EXPERTS OUTREACH

In 2005, the CFA continued to create opportunities and platforms to deliver key nutritional messages to infl uencer audiences, such as chefs, dietitians, nutritionists and supermarket consumer aff airs representatives. Activities included participation in the American Dietetic Association meetings, sponsorship in Nutrition News Forecast, SCAN and Weight Management, and the creation of new dietitian-requested material for the Professional’s Page on

www.mealtime.org. Th roughout the year infl uencers received ongoing communications such as the new CFA brochure featuring nutritional information, research, data, recipes and several issues of the “Today’s Table” newsletter that promotes trends and nutrition around canned food.

EQUALS OUTREACH

Th e goal of the 2005 Equals Outreach was to create opportunities, via mealtime.org, for increased peer-to-peer dialogue and a sense of community among the CFA’s target audience. Aligned with consumer demands for quick and easy recipes, the CFA augmented the site’s database to provide fresh, new recipes that showcase the nutritional application of canned food for breakfast, lunch and dinner, along with a perfect pantry checklist. In addition, the site has served to house information on the Dietary Guidelines, MyPyramid and seasonal information, as well as featured new functionality such as visitor polls and “rate-a-recipe” interaction. In 2005, www.mealtime.org reached its goal of more than one million unique visitors.

PUBLIC POLICY INITIATIVES

Another ongoing eff ort of the Canned Food Alliance is engaging legislative and agency departments to ensure that canned food is included in any food related government programs. During 2005, the CFA lobbying eff orts included: ensuring the USDA honored Congressional intent to include canned foods in awarding funding under the Specialty Crops Competitiveness Act; making sure that more canned food choices were included in the updated Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (“WIC”) program; continuing our eff orts to ensure that “level playing fi eld” language was

included in any authorizing legislation that may be considered during the writing of a new Farm Bill; and continuing eff orts to secure funding for canned food related marketing and research through congressional and USDA research grant funding.

Furthermore, in 2005 the CFA became a member of Produce for Better Health (PBH), whose mission is to be the catalyst for creating a healthier America through increased consumption of a variety of fruits and vegetables. PBH is chair of the National 5 A Day Partnership, consisting of government agencies, non-profi t organizations, and industry working in collaboration to expand 5 A Day eff orts to increase consumption of fruits and vegetables for improved public health. Th e CFA joined PBH to ensure that canned food was represented in the 5 A Day program, which gets part of its funding from the federal and state governments.


Food Can Business-to-Business Promotion Program

In 2005, the Can Manufacturers Institute Food Can Marketing Committee’s Business-to-Business Initiative launched a multifaceted campaign that worked to position CMI as the authoritative voice for safe, environmentally-friendly and cost-eff ective packaging.

MEDIA SUCCESS

Th e media strategy for 2005 generated more than 189 million media impressions in 56 business and trade media outlets. Some of the media highlights included articles in Th e Wall Street Journal, MSNBC.com, Packaging Digest, Packaging Strategies, Food and Drug Packaging, Th e Philadelphia Inquirer, Food Engineering, Food Packaging and Th e Morning Cup. Also in 2005, the Food Can Marketing Committee launched the inaugural issue of the Packaging Trends Report at the Pack Expo 2005 trade show in Las Vegas. Th e Packaging Trends Report provided a comprehensive view of metal packaging, including executive quotes and the latest stories on the economic, innovative and environmental benefi ts of the can.

MAXIMIZING SPEAKING OPPORTUNITIES

Pack Expo 2005 provided an opportunity for the Committee to discuss the enduring value and ongoing innovation of the metal can; the “Sustainable Metal Can: Packaging for Today and for the Future” presentation had more than 40 attendees. Pack Expo also provided CMI the opportunity to hold a series of meetings with eight packaging schools, participate in one-on-one and phone media interviews to secure media coverage, and create opportunities to meet with key infl uencers in the packaging world.

INFLUENCING THE INFLUENCERS

Th e CMI Food Can Marketing Committee undertook a new tactical initiative in 2005 that focused on infl uencing the “who’s who” in the packaging world – a small, but important group that included academics, association members, brand managers, industry analysts and top-tier trade and business media employees. Th e Committee created a 150-name database in order to communicate with this select group and worked on building relationships, creating a network of informed, enthusiastic supporters and, ultimately, earning message buy-in. Th e Committee reached out to the database of infl uencers several times during the year with the Metal Packaging Alert, an e-mail newsletter that features trends, news and packaging previews, a special invitation to Pack Expo and the Packaging Trends Report.

Another key initiative in the infl uencer program focused on building a foundation for relationships with premier packaging schools. Our goal as a Committee is to ensure that the metal food can continues to be a core part of the curriculum; we want students to view the industry as progressive and member companies as potential employers. As part of our outreach, we held face-to-face meetings with Michigan State University and Clemson University representatives, and identifi ed ways in which we could provide talent, time, materials and knowledge to their program. During Pack Expo, CMI surveyed many of the attending schools to fi nd time to work together.


FOOD, DRUG, MASS MERCHANDISE & CONVENIENCE

STORES COMBINED PACKAGE MIX SHARE BY UNITS - 2005

FOOD STORESPACKAGE MIX SHARE BY UNITS

- 2005

FOOD, DRUG, & MASS MERCHANDISE STORES

COMBINED PACKAGE MIX SHARE BY UNITS - 2005

24.0%

1.3%

74.7%

17.3%1.2%

81.5%

Cans Plastic GlassCans Plastic GlassCans Plastic Glass

17.3%1.2%

81.5%

Market Data Committee

In 2005, the CMI Market Data Committee continued to provide statistical collection and market analysis services for the industry.

Th e Committee decided to begin breaking out beverage can shipments by size on a quarterly basis. Th e size breakouts are: 8oz; 12oz; 16oz; all others less than 12oz, excluding 8oz; and all others greater than 12oz, excluding 16 oz. Shipment data according to these sets will be available in 2006.

In an eff ort to clarify the reporting of carbonated and noncarbonated soft drinks, the Committee decided that each company should look into its coding of carbonated and non-carbonated beverages. Th e intention is to classify drinks on how they are marketed. For instance, even if an energy drink has some carbonation, it should be included in the energy drink section of the non-carbonated category; the same goes

for carbonated water. Th e carbonated category includes beverages such as Sprite, Coke, Pepsi and Dr. Pepper.

During the past year, the Market Data Committee revisited the defi nitions of which data should be included in the CMI Can Shipments Reports. Th e reports should cover the actual number of unfi lled can bodies produced and shipped from a location within the U.S. or U.S. controlled territory invoiced for sale or

2005 Beverage Can CSD Market Share by Channel

IRI Data

DRUG STORESPACKAGE MIX SHARE BY UNITS

- 2005

IRI CHANNEL BREAKDOWNCSDs IN ALUMINUM CANS

MASS MERCHANDISE STORES(EXCLUDING WAL-MART)

PACKAGE MIX SHARE BY UNITS - 2005

Food Convenience

Drug

Cans Plastic GlassCans Plastic Glass

Mass Excl. Wal-Mart

24.0%

0.2%

75.8%

11.9%1.0%

87.1%

13.4%

4.7%

77.9%

4.0%

for own use. Exports include the actual number of unfi lled can bodies shipped from a location within the U.S. or U.S. controlled territory to a location outside of the U.S. or U.S. controlled territory invoiced for sale, which is included when reporting shipment data. Imports are can bodies shipped from a location outside the U.S. or U.S. controlled territory to a location inside

the U.S. or U.S. controlled territory invoiced for sale, which should not be included when reporting shipment data.

In the coming year, the Market Data Committee will continue to provide the members of CMI with information in order to assist current and future business goals.

IRI Data


Beverage Can Public Relations Committee /Aluminum Can Council

Th e vision of the Aluminum Can Council (ACC), a joint eff ort of the CMI Beverage Can Public Relations Committee and the Aluminum Association Can Committee, is to be the voice of the aluminum can industry, to promote and foster recycling solutions, to educate consumers and customers about the aluminum beverage can’s positive attributes and to explore new markets for aluminum beverage cans.

ALUMINUM CAN MARKETING

In 2005, the ACC organized a think tank in Washington, DC to further develop promotional strategies. Th e attendees, including ACC working group members and executives from ACC member companies, determined that ACC promotional eff orts should take into consideration the goal of protecting the base and halting carbonated soft drink erosion, as well as exploring and creating new can growth opportunities.

Th e ACC hired the Sterling-Rice Group (SRG) to conduct a series of carbonated soft drink customer interviews to solicit feedback on current and future marketing campaigns and to identify areas of potential collaboration with our customers. After the interviews, SRG suggested that the ACC partner with retailers for an aluminum beverage can promotion campaign, focusing on the positive attributes of the aluminum beverage can.

Th e CMI public relations eff orts continue to educate beverage manufacturers about new trends and innovations for the beverage can. On September 26, 2005, Ball Corporation’s Jim Fisher, Chairman of the CMI Beverage Can Public Relations Committee, and CMI’s Robert Budway attended Pack Expo in Las Vegas, Nevada. Th eir presentation, “Aluminum Beverage Containers: Innovations and New Markets,” can be downloaded from www.cancentral.com.

ALUMINUM CAN RECYCLING

Th e Curbside Value Partnership, off ered to cities, waste haulers, and municipal recycling facilities, is designed to increase the economic value and payback of local curbside recycling streams. By learning from the best practices of other communities, focusing on cost-eff ective communications and highlighting the valuable commodities in the curbside stream, local programs can increase participation and revenue. Th e program boosts aluminum pounds

recycled in curbside programs through targeted consumer communications. Additionally, the partner programs report their monthly collection by material to help improve the return on investment (ROI) for local stakeholders. Th e targeted goal is to achieve better than a 10% increase across the participating communities in order to yield a 1% lift in the national UBC recycling rate. Signifi cant states for the program include: Florida; Pennsylvania and New Jersey; leading cities include: Denver; Kansas City and Dallas. In 2005, the Curbside Value Partnership (CVP) signed on nearly 50 curbside cities, exceeding its goal of reaching a third of the top 100 national curbside city programs.

Another key component to the ACC recycling programs is the Recycle Challenge, funded by the ACC and run by Anheuser-Busch. Th e Recycle Challenge provides drop-off containers at schools and churches to collect aluminum beverage cans; local schools earn money for what is collected and communities learn about the recycling and the environment. Th e program includes St. Louis, Dallas, Cincinnati, and Indianapolis.

ACC recycling programs continue to focus on the value of consumer education, believing that educating young consumers is vital to the future of recycling and that an in-school program is the most eff ective way to reach this audience. In conjunction with the Keystone Center, the ACC conducted workshops that used the new middle school Talkin’ Trash with ABCs and the revised intermediate school ABCs of Environmental Education curriculums at the National Science Teachers National Conference and regional area conventions. Other curriculum events were held at the National Earth Science Teachers Conference, PTA National Convention, National Recycling Coalition Congress, and the National Boy Scout Jamboree.

On November 15, 2005, the ACC celebrated the third annual America Recycles Day Aluminum Can Challenge, an intra-industry competition that proactively raises recycling awareness while donating the aluminum can recycling proceeds to local charities. Th e Challenge reinforces the industry’s message concerning the importance of recycling and encourages employees to share the can recycling message with their communities. It also builds on the industry’s sustainability philosophy and demonstrates the value of aluminum cans. Fifty-eight can manufacturer and aluminum supplier facilities participated in the 2005 Challenge, recycling a record 307,258 pounds of beverage cans and generating $141,386 for charity. Th e ACC plans to hold the fourth annual competition in 2006.

And the 2005 Winners Are…

ALUMINUM / SUPPLIER / CAN MANUFACTURER CATEGORY1. ARCO Aluminum, Louisville, Kentucky2. Rexam Beverage Can Americas, Fremont, Ohio3. Rexam Beverage Can Americas, St. Paul, Minnesota

ALUMINUM RECYCLING OPERATION CATEGORY1. Novelis Inc., Berea, Kentucky


Can Shipments Report

ABOUT THIS REPORT

Th e Can Shipments Report is compiled directly from reports received from can manufacturers unless otherwise noted. Th is statistical program is sponsored by the Can Manufacturers Institute and is under the direction of the CMI Market Data Committee.

CMI MARKET DATA COMMITTEE

Astrid Belt, Ball CorporationTom Slauter, Metal Container CorporationErica Korovilas, Rexam Beverage Can AmericasCarolyn Takata, Silgan Containers CorporationSean Reilly, CMI

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Th e Can Manufacturers Institute gratefully acknowledges the cooperation of all industry participants, especially the assistance of the members of the CMI Market Data Committee for their eff orts in the compilation of this annual report.

PARTICIPANTS*

Allstate Can CorporationBall CorporationBertels Can CompanyBWAY CorporationCrown Holdings, Inc.Impress USA, Inc.Metal Container CorporationRexam Beverage Can AmericasSilgan Containers CorporationU.S. Can CorporationVan Can Company

* Participants in the CMI Can Shipments Report manufacture over 97% of the metal cans in the United States. In order to represent the entire domestic can industry, CMI estimates can shipments for non-reporters in its reports.

Defi nitions

GENERAL DEFINITIONSA metal can is a single-walled container constructed wholly of tinplate, blackplate (including tin-free steel), waste plate, aluminum sheet or impact extrusions, designed for packaging products. It excludes steel pails defi ned as single-walled shipping containers having capacities of one to 12 gallons inclusive, that are cylindrically constructed of steel of 29 gauge and heavier.

Shipments for use by the same company, an affi liate, subsidiary, or parent company are considered as shipments FOR OWN USE. All others are considered shipments INVOICED FOR SALE.

Coverage of this report is confi ned to metal cans and ends shipped for use on metal cans by metal can manufacturers.

PRODUCT DEFINITIONSShipments: Th e actual number of unfi lled can bodies produced, invoiced for sale and shipped from a location within the U.S. or U.S. controlled territory.Exports: Th e actual number of unfi lled can bodies produced, invoiced for sale and shipped from a location within the U.S. or U.S. controlled territory to a location outside of the U.S. or U.S. controlled territory. Alcoholic Beverages: A two-piece aluminum container containing beer, non alcoholic beer, wine/spirits, or wine/spirit coolers.Non-Alcoholic Beverages: A two-piece aluminum beverage container. Includes all carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks, iced tea, tonic, waters, juice beverages, milk or dairy-based beverages, and isotonic/energy drinks.Baby Food: Self Explanatory. Includes all milk or soy-based baby formula and baby food products.Dairy Products: Includes butter, cheese, eggs, milk, milk-based products, ice cream, etc. Also includes non milk-based puddings. Does not include milk or dairy-based beverages in two-piece aluminum beverage containers.Fruit/Vegetable Juices: Self Explanatory. Does not include fruit and vegetable juices in two-piece aluminum beverage containers.

Fruit: Includes all conventional fruit items: apples, apple sauce, peaches, pears, pineapple, etc. and all citrus items. Does not include fruit juices which are in Fruit/Vegetable Juices.Meat & Poultry: Includes all conventional meat and poultry items: ham, luncheon meat, potted meat, vienna sausage. Also includes chili and meat stews. Does not include soup or spaghetti with meat which are in Other Foods (Including Soup).Pet Food: Includes cat, dog and fi sh food.Seafood: Includes fi sh and shell fi sh.Vegetables: Includes conventional vegetable items: peas, green beans, corn, tomatoes, etc. Also includes dry line items: baked beans, kidney beans. Includes mushrooms and pickles. Does not include soup which is in Other Foods (Including Soup). Does not include vegetable juices which are in Fruit/Vegetable Juices.Other Foods (Including Soup): Includes all food items not otherwise enumerated. Includes soups, edible oils and solid shortenings, spaghetti, spices, baking powder, extracts, yeast, sandwich spreads, jams, mayonnaise, snacks, cocoa, dough, fl our, honey, nuts, popcorn, popped corn, potato chips, pretzels, rice, noodles, sauces, syrups, cake, candies, cereals, loose tea and canned bags. Also includes drugs intended for human consumption except milk-based drugs which are in Dairy Products. Does not include iced tea which is in Non-Alcoholic Beverages.Aerosol: Th is is the only category restricted by can type. Includes food and nonfoods.Other Nonfoods: Includes all other nonfood items not otherwise enumerated. Includes adhesive strips, alcohol, tennis balls, cements/dressings, chemicals, cleaners, cosmetics, dentists’ supplies, disinfectants, dyes, ether, wood fi llers, games/toys, germicides, gasoline, lubricating grease, grinding compounds, insecticides, pencils, photographic supplies, plaster of paris, fl oor/shoe/leather/other non-automotive polishes, body/cleanser/talcum powders, roofi ng cement, grass seed, shaving preparations, soaps, solvents, stamp pads, tobacco and automotive products such as motor oil, anti-freeze, brake fl uid, gasoline, radiator additives and automotive polish.


Total Metal Cans Shipped

BY MARKET

For SaleBeverageFoodGeneral PackagingFor Own UseBeverageFoodGeneral Packaging

BY PRODUCT

BeverageAlcoholicNon-Alcoholic

FoodBaby FoodCoff eeDairy ProductsFruit/Vegetable Juices**Fruit (Excluding Juices)**Meat & PoultrySeafoodVeg. (Excluding Juices)**Other Foods (Incl. Soup)Pet Food

General PackagingAerosolOther Nonfoods

-1.3%

-2.9%-3.2%

-8.4%--

-0.7%-0.8%-0.6%

-3.3%-11.2%-5.7%-3.0%

-22.8%-5.6%-8.9%-0.8%-4.2%2.8%

-3.0%

-3.2%-2.4%-5.4%

134,594

*27,7014,361

*2,785

0

99,74731,76467,983

30,486810470

2,184

1,9571,9581,215

10,5904,7326,570

4,3613,1351,226

134,770

*28,1434,454

*2,362

0

99,81131,77568,036

30,505688291

1,992345

1,5971,9701,632

10,3504,8286,812

4,4543,2211,233

132,957

*27,3284,309

*2,163

0

99,15731,50667,651

29,491611274

1,933266

1,5081,7941,6189,9154,9656,607

4,3093,1431,166

% CHANGE2003 - 20052003 2004 2005

Metal Can Shipments: 2003 - 2005(Millions of Cans)

* To avoid disclosure of individual company data, this category has been omitted.** Starting in 2004, Fruit & Vegetable Juices were broken out into a separate category.

Total

BEVERAGE

AlcoholicNon-Alcoholic

FOOD

Baby FoodCoff eeDairy ProductsFruit/Vegetable JuicesFruit (Excluding Juices)Meat & PoultrySeafoodVeg. (Excluding Juices)Other Foods (Incl. Soup)Pet Food

GENERAL PACKAGING

AerosolOther Nonfoods

17,097

000

12,893*

2741,398

**

387*

5,9911,4581,520

4,2043,1431,061

*

000

***********

4,3093,1431,166

*

99,15731,50667,651

***********

000

115,860

99,15731,50667,651

16,598*0

535**

1,407*

3,9243,5075,087

1050

105

TOTAL CANS BY MATERIAL BY TECHNOLOGY

132,957

99,15731,50667,651

29,491611274

1,933266

1,5081,7941,6189,9154,9656,607

4,3093,1431,166

STEEL ALUMINUM 2-PIECE 3-PIECE

Metal Can Shipments by Material / Technology: 2005(Millions of Cans)

* To avoid disclosure of individual company data, this category has been omitted.

© Ball Corporation.


2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

585(-25.2 %) 489

(-16.5 %)

820(68.0 %)

810(-1.4 %)

688(-15.0 %)

BABY FOOD COFFEE

DAIRY PRODUCTS

FRUIT (EXCLUDING JUICES)**

SEAFOOD

VEGETABLE (EXCLUDING JUICES)**

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

432(-31.8 %)

433(0.3 %)

512(18.2 %) 471

(-8.1 %) 291(-38.2 %)

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

1,838(19.0 %)

2,295(24.8 %)

2,436(6.1 %) 2,185

(-10.3 %) 1,992(-8.8 %)

1,933(-3.0 %)

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

2,098(-8.9 %)

2,037(-2.9 %)

2,081(2.2 %) 1,957

(-6.0 %)1,597

1,508(-5.6 %)

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

1,631(0.0 %) 1,509

(-7.5 %)1,189

(-21.2 %)

1,215(2.2 %)

1,632(34.3 %)

1,618(-0.8 %)

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

9,545(-2.4 %) 8,685

(-9.0 %)

10,350(19.2 %)

10,591(2.3 %) 10,350

9,915(-4.2 %)

MEAT & POULTRY

OTHER FOODS (INCLUDING SOUP)

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

1,651(-9.4 %)

1,798(8.9 %)

1,894(5.3 %)

1,958(3.3 %)

1,970(0.6 %) 1,794

(-8.9 %)

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

5,566(-3.3 %)

5,579(0.2 %) 4,810

(-13.8 %)4,732

(-1.6 %)4,828

(2.0 %)4,964

(2.8 %)

611(-11.2 %)

274(-5.7 %)

FRUIT / VEGETABLE* JUICES

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

345266

(-22.8 %)

Food Can Shipments: 2000 - 2005(Millions of Cans)

* Starting in 2004, Fruit & Vegetable Juices were broken out into a separate category.

** 2000-2003 Fruit & Vegetable (Excluding Juices) Data does include juices.

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

4,356

3,002

1,354

4,232

2,969

1,263

4,346

3,083

1,263

4,361

3,135

1,226

4,454

3,221

1,233

4,309

3,143

1,166

Total Aerosol Other

Less Th an 12 Ounce 12 Ounce Greater Th an 12 Ounce

2003 2004 2005

2,845

92,692

4,210 3,710

91,368

4,733 4,045

89,580

5,532

General Line Can Shipments: 2000 - 2005(Millions of Cans)

Beverage Can Shipments by Size: 2003 - 2005(Millions of Cans)

© Ball Corporation.


12 Ounce or LessOver 12 Ounce & Less Th an 1 GallonOver 1 Gallon

27.4%34.6%76.1%

1,041.9126.3105.9

1,327.2170.1186.5

% CHANGE2004 - 20052004 2005

12 Ounce or LessOver 12 Ounce & Less Th an 1 GallonOver 1 Gallon

28.3%-66.8%-7.8%

682.970.5

206.6

876.423.4

190.4

13.21 Gallons or Less(Closed by crimping or soldering)

-8.3%965.7 885.7

% CHANGE2004 - 20052004 2005

13.21 Gallons or Less(Closed by crimping or soldering)

38.4%110.4 152.8

% CHANGE2004 - 20052004 2005

% CHANGE2004 - 20052004 2005

Aluminum Can Shipments, Exports: 2004 - 2005(Millions of Cans)

Aluminum Can Shipments, Imports: 2004 - 2005(Millions of Cans)

Steel Can Shipments, Exports: 2004 - 2005(Millions of Cans)

Aluminum Can Shipments, Imports: 2004 - 2005(Millions of Cans)

Source: U.S. International Trade Commission




Subscription Information

Intended for survey participants and members of the Can Manufacturers Institute, monthly Can Shipments Reports are mailed approximately 45 days after the end of each month. Quarterly reports are available on a subscription basis to government, public and private organizations, and individuals upon request. SUBSCRIPTION RATES:$600 per year for domestic annual subscriptions; $180 for a single annual report. Rates include taxes, postage and handling costs and pre-payment is required. Mail subscriptions to:

Can Manufacturers Institute1730 Rhode Island Avenue, NWSuite 1000Washington, DC 20036

BALL CORPORATIONR. David HooverJohn Friedery Ray Seabrook

METAL CONTAINER CORPORATIONJoseph SellingerTony Bhalla Allan Copestick

REXAM BEVERAGE CAN AMERICASLars EmilsonWilliam BarkerHarry Barto

SILGAN CONTAINERS CORPORATIONJames BeamJohn WilbertTom Snyder

CAN MANUFACTURERS INSTITUTERobert Budway

CMI Executive Committee

ALCOA, Inc.ARCO Aluminum Inc.Ball CorporationBWAY CorporationDarex Container Products, W.R. Grace & Co.Dofasco Inc.ICI Packaging CoatingsImpress USA, Inc.INX International Ink CompanyMetal Container CorporationMittal Steel USANovelis Inc.PPG Industries, Inc.Rexam Beverage Can AmericasSilgan Containers CorporationSonoco-Phoenix, Inc. Th e Valspar CorporationU.S. Can CorporationUSS-Posco IndustriesUnited States Steel Corporation, Tin Mill ProductsVan Can CompanyWatson StandardWise Alloys LLC

CMI MemberCompanies 2006


t 202.232.4677 • f 202.232.5756 • www.cancentral.com

cmi 05 annual report...requested material for the professional’s page on . th roughout the year...

Documents