"coal: energy for the 21 st century and beyond” gasification and btu conversion of coal
DESCRIPTION
"Coal: Energy for the 21 st Century and Beyond” Gasification and BTU Conversion of Coal. Martin Considine Chris Hagedorn Washington University Chemical Reaction Engineering Laboratory (CREL) “Energy: From Molecular Transformation to Systems” October 25, 2006. BTU. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
"Coal: Energy for the 21st Century and Beyond”
Gasification and BTU Conversion of Coal
Martin ConsidineChris Hagedorn
Washington University Chemical Reaction Engineering Laboratory (CREL)
“Energy: From Molecular Transformation to Systems”
October 25, 2006BTU
2 BTU
World Oil Reserves May Have Peaked
Growing Gas Demand Requires Unrealistic Imports
America is Short on Oil & Gas & Very Long on Coal
U.S. Coal is the Cornerstone to U.S. Energy SecurityU.S. Coal is the Cornerstone to U.S. Energy Security
…For Advanced Power Generation
…For Substitute Fuels: Gasoline, Natural Gas & Hydrogen
…For the Reindustrialization of America
…For Environmental Improvements
Coal: Cornerstone toAmerica’s Energy Security
3 BTU
The Resource: 27% of the World’s Coal is in the United StatesThe Resource: 27% of the World’s Coal is in the United States
U.S. is Home to 27%of World’s Coal Reserves
5 BTU
Imbalance Forecast in U.S. Gas Supply & Demand
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
22.018.2
21.121.0
26.920.9
U.S
. C
on
sum
pti
on
(T
rill
ion
Cu
bic
Fee
t) U.S
. Pro
du
ction
(Trillio
n C
ub
ic Fee
t)
Source: Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review 2003, 1970-2000; Annual Energy Outlook 2006 Reference Case, 2005-2030.
Imports Unlikely to Close the GapImports Unlikely to Close the Gap
6 BTU
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
Ele
ctri
city
Gen
erat
or
Del
iver
ed C
ost
/ M
M B
tuHigh Oil and Gas Prices Magnify
Coal’s Competitive Advantage
Delivered cost of fossil fuel at steam electric utility plants. Source: Platts Fossil-Fuel Receipts at Steam-Electric Utility Plants through June 2005. EIA November 2005 Short-Term Energy Outlook, July – November 2005. NYMEX HH Futures December 2005 – December 2010, ino.com on Dec. 2, 2005.
Coal Deliveries
Natural Gas Deliveries
Natural Gas Futures
Oil
1998 1999 200220012000 200520042003 200820072006 2009 2010
Coal Opportunity
7 BTU
NCC Sees Coal Converted toNatural Gas, Other Energy Sources
Study determined that clean coal technologies are available to turn abundant U.S. coal into multiple energy forms including electricity, natural gas, transportation fuels and hydrogen
By 2025, new capital investments of $515 billion (present value of $350 billion) in Btu Conversion technologies would create:
– 100 GW in new generation capacity
– 4 TCF of coal-to-natural-gas facilities
– 2.6 million barrels per day of coal-to-liquids
U.S. coal production would more than double to 2.4 billion tons of coal per year
8 BTU
Southern States Energy Board Sees Coal Converted to Transportation Fuels
SSEB calls for 5.6 million barrels per day of oil from U.S. coal
Would require an additional 1 billion tons per year of production
Bipartisan council includes governors and select legislators from 16 states and two territories
9 BTU
Btu Conversion Technologies Expand Markets for Coal
STEELELECTRICITY
INDUSTRIAL GAS
PIPELINE SYNGAS
SPECIALTYCHEMICALS
ETHANOL
DIESEL
JET FUEL
HYDROGEN
10 BTU
What is Gasification ?
Gasification is a controlled partial oxidation of fuels, such as coal, to produce primarily carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen (H2), called syngas; rather than complete combustion to carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H20).
– Combustion: (Cm Hn) + O2 CO2 + H20
– Gasification: (Cm Hn) + 1/2 O2 CO + H2
11 BTU
What Can You do with Syngas ?
Combustion: CO + H2 + O2 CO2 + H20 (for fuel)
Water Gas Shift: CO + H20 (steam) CO2 + H2
(for hydrogen and CO2 recovery)
Methanation: CO + 3H2 CH4 + H20(for SNG)
CO2 + 4H2 CH4 + 2H20
Fischer-Tropsch: nCO + 2nH2 (-CH2-)n + nH20 (for diesel and naphtha)
+ hydro-treating / refining
12 BTU
Gasification for Btu Conversion to Gas or Liquids is a Multi Step Chemical Processing Facility
Heat Exchanger
Air Separation Unit
Gas Cleanup
Steam
Methanation Process
Or
Fischer-Tropsch Process
In-plant use of electricity
Pipeline-quality Synthetic Natural Gas
or
Ultra-low Sulfur Diesel / Jet Fuel
Coal-to-BTU Conversion Process Elements
13 BTU
Gasification Technology Differences
Moving Bed Fluid Bed (Transport) Entrained Bed
Process Description Coal feed at top of gasifier and moves down through reactor by gravity. Steam and oxygen fed through bottom of gasifier.
Solid coal particles are fluidized with syngas, and the syngas and remaining solids particles are separated. Usually operates in a low temperature (non-slagging)
Solid coal and syngas flow together in an “entrained” bed. Short residence time and high operating temperature (slagging mode). High carbon conversion through use of high-purity oxygen
Technology Providers Lurgi, EPIC Southern/KBR CoP, Shell, GE
Installed Capacity 18.7 GWth (42%) 0.9% GWth (2%) 25.4 GWth (56%)
Advantages Low ranked coalLow O2 demand
Low ranked coal High reliability / provenHigh purity syngas at high pressureMinimal bad byproducts Low ranked coal (dry feed)
Disadvanteges Tars and other bad by-products (additional capex)High O&M
Low carbon conversion (high recycle)Leachable slag
High ranked coal (slurry feed)
14 BTU
Emerging Markets Include Gasification, Liquefaction & Hydrogen
Coal’s Long-Term Markets Expanding from Two to Five
15 BTU
Details Regarding Potential Gasification Project Types
Industrial Syngas
Synthetic Natural Gas
IGCC
Power
Fischer Tropsch Liquids
Project Size(units of output)
4,000 - 10,000 mcfd equivalent
100,000 mcfd 600 MW 40,000 - 80,000 bpd
Coal Usage
(MMTPY)
0.1 - 0.2 3 2 15
Total Project Lead Time (Yrs)
2 – 2 ½ 5 ½ - 6 6 – 7 7 - 9
Indicative BTU Conversion Project Characteristics