Code AdministrationCode of Practice

Tim Davis

KPIs Q2 2011

Critical Friend• Number and percentage of survey respondents who stated they

were ‘satisfied’ or better with the assistance offered by the JO– 38 responses, 97% satisfied or better

Quality of assessmentQuarter 1 Ofgem

Implement Reject

PanelImplement 9 1

Reject 0 1

4 Self-Governance Modifications have also been implemented)

No Reports “sent back” by Ofgem18 Ofgem 2011 Decisions accord with Panel (75%)

Quarter 2 Ofgem

Implement Reject

PanelImplement 5 3

Reject 2 3

Effective communication

• Glossary and plain English summary to be provided with reports– Part of standard documentation

Quarter 1 Quarter 2 YTD

Number of Consultations 16 8 24

Average number of respondents

9.1 9.6 9.4

Efficient administration (1)Percentage of papers published outside of modification rules requirements

Quarter 1 Quarter 2 YTD

% UNC Modification Papers (Mods, DMRs, FMRs)

0% 0% 0%

Quarter 1 Quarter 2 YTD

Meetings 71 91 162

Papers 366 419 785

% Late 23% 16% 20%

Efficient Administration (2)

Quarter 1 Quarter 2 YTD

Number and percentage of reports submitted to the authority in line with original timetable

1 1 2

Quarter 1 Quarter 2 YTD

Number of extensions to timetable requested

14 21 35

Efficient Administration (3)Average time between:

Quarter 1 Days

Quarter 2Days

YTDDays

Proposal being raised and submitted for decision

137 145 141

Proposal being submitted for decision and decision being published

112 78 95

Decision and implementation (separately identifying systems and non-system changes)

3 (no central systems changes)

2 (with one central

systems change)

5 (one central systems change)

Implementation costsQuarter 1 Quarter 2 YTD

Number and percentage of reports for which implementation cost estimates were available for consultation

100% 100% 100%

Accuracy percentage difference (whether higher or lower) between estimated and actual implementation costs

n/a n/a n/a

Code AdministrationCode of Practice

Tim Davis

KPIs Q2 2011