cogema canada limited burntbush river project … · survey (1990) at 14 080 hz, believed to be a...

32E85NW93H 29 HOBLITZELL 020

COGEMA CANADA LIMITED BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

FINAL REPORT 1992 FIELD PROGRAM

VOLUME 1 OF 2

Ref. no. 92-CND-47-01 by :\ /John Learn 'April 1992

l i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

SUMMARY OF RESULTS. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Two holes (BUR-56, BUR-57) drilled to test the down-plunge (eastern) extension of Au mineralization previously discovered in hole BUR-19 (7.9 g/t AuX4.5m) failed to intersect the anticipated zone. Maximum Au result intersected was 2.0 g/t over 1,5m in BUR-56.

2. K^O/^O results from the two holes suggest the zone may have been narrowly missed by BUR-56, and that therefore, the trend of the zone has very likely been correctly interpreted.

3. Nevertheless, drill density in the immediate vicinity would suggest that even if the zone is present, its volume (tonnage) is insufficient to be of economic interest down to a depth of about 300m.

4. IP results in the immediate vicinity of BUR-55 reveal a chargeability anomaly to the west of anomalous Au previously discovered in that hole (2 g/t Au/Sm). The location of the IP anomaly corresponds to high quadrature values of the MaxMin survey (1990) at 14 080 Hz, believed to be a direct indication of the quartz-rich zone.

5. Hole BUR-58 intersected a silicified pyritic tuff(?) and minor quartz veining which gave Au results averaging 400 ppb/gm within which 1m gave 1.13 g/t Au.

6. It is recommended that future work be undertaken and that the following topics should be addressed:

* re-evaluation of the Spade Lake shear, with emphasis on areas with low drill density and on a possible eastern extension;

* compilation of existing database and additional drilling in the vicinity of, and to the east of holes BUR-55, BUR-58;

* reconnaissance drilling in the eastern part of the Burntbush grid (east of the Burntbush River).

l l l l l l l l l l l i l l l l l l l

TABLE OF CON 32Ee5NW9311 29 HOBLITZELL 02OC

SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS page

1. INTRODUCTION.................................. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2. WORK PROGRAM... .. ... .... .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

3. RESULTS................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

3.1 Ground geophysics........................ .. . . . .. . . .. 43.2 Diamond dr111 ing.................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63.3 Analytical results............ . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 12

4. DISCUSSION................................................ 14

4.1 Spade Lake shear zone........ . . ....... . . . . . ... . . . . . . 144.2 BUR-58...................................... . ....... 14

5. CONCLUSIONS........................ . ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

6. RECOMMENDATIONS............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

LIST OF FIGURES page

Figure 1: Location Map (1:250 000).......................... 2

Figure 2: Drill hole locations (1988-1990) andIP survey location (1992) (1:50 000)......... 3

Figure 3: Geophysics results near hole BUR-55 (1:2500)...... 5

Figure 4: Collar locations BUR-56, BUR-57 (1:5000).......... 8

Figure 5: Geological section 4600W (1:2500)................. 9

Figure 6: Longitudinal section 4600W to 4800W (1:2000)...... 10

Figure 7: Geological section 1500W (1:1000)................. 11

Figure 8: Au and O/NaO profiles in BUR-56, BUR-57......... 13

lll l l l l l l l l l l l l i i i i

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Diamond drill summary,

page

7

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix l: IP survey specifications and results

Appendix l l: Summary logs.

Appendix III: Field logs (1:100)..................

Appendix IV: Analytical methods and results......

volume

1

1

2

2

l l l l l ll l l l l lll l l l l l

1. lNTRODUCTl ON

The property (see Figure 1) is located 20km west of the Ontario- Quebec border in northeastern Ontario, 90km northwest of LaSarre and 100km northeast of Cochrane. Access is by winter road. It consists of 312 claims covering about SOknr in Noseworthy and Hoblitzell townships.

During February, 1992, a small ground geophysical program (consisting of about 5km of IP) and drilling of three boreholes (for a total of 796m) was undertaken. This is the first work performed on the Burntbush River property since winter 1990, when thirty diamond drill holes were performed (for a total of 6353.4m). See Figure 2 for a summary of drilling undertaken prior to this program.

Cogema Reference no. 90-CND-47-01 summarizes and describes all exploration results compiled and interpreted prior to this program; these will not be repeated in this report except where directly related to the 1992 program.

2. WORK PROGRAM

The IP survey was performed on a small part of the Burntbush grid in the immediate vicinity of hole BUR-55, to aid in spotting one follow up drill hole in this area.

The remaining two diamond drill holes were spotted east, and down- plunge of the trend interpreted from previous intersections in holes BUR-19 and BUR-51.

Recall that hole BUR-55 (1990) intersected a 20m section of anomalous Au in quartz (737 ppb) within which 5m grade about 2 g/t Au at 47 to 67m.

Holes BUR-19 (1989) and BUR-51 (1990) intersected anomalous Au at the upper contact of a dyke of Spade Lake porphyry near the footwall of the Spade Lake shear. In BUR-19, 7.9 g/t Au was intersected over 4.5m in tuffs immediately above the dyke, along with results of 1.86 and 1.39 g/t over 1.5m within the dyke; in BUR-51, 1.53 g/t Au was intersected over 2m in tuffs immediately above the dyke, along with results of 3.67 and 2.13 g/t over 1m within the dyke. These intersections show near identical geologic setting and are interpreted to occur along a lineation showing orientation consistent with that observed for minor fold axes in outcrops to the east.

The lineation trends approximately 350 @ 080, or alternatively, pitches 450 E in 105/65N in this area.

-1-

l X l T E R R I T O

"TV^,,,, '^^•Ji:i-i.

COGEMA CANADA L t** X LtdBURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

LOCATION MAP

Report no' -92-CND-47-OI | Flgurt'

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

LEGEND

A STRIPPED OUTCROPS

REVERSE CIRCULATION drill holes

PRE-COGEMA DRILL HOLES

1988-89 DIAMOND DRILL HOLES

1990 DIAMOND DRILL HOLES

METASEDIMENTARY DOMAINt

MIXED METAVOLCANIC DOMAIN

GRIDS: 1986 to 1990

SODIC INTRUSIVE

SHEAR ZONES

I.P. SURVEY LOCATION (1992)

t

9s^•MV

HOBLITZELL TP "TOMLINSON TP"

NOSEWORTHY JTPHURTUBISE TP

BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

SUMMARY MAP

of

EXPLORATION WORK

FIGURE' t


3. RESULTS

3.1 Ground geophysics

The IP survey is shown in Figure 2. Pseudo-sections are presented in Appendix l (this volume). The interpretation of the target area is as follows (see Figure 3):

* two chargeability anomalies (black bars on Fig. 3) are present:

a southern east-northeast trend which was drilled in BUR-55. The IP response is explained by disseminated pyrite-pyrrhotite in a mafic volcanic. Maximum Au result from this interval was 6 ppb Au;

a western east-northeast trend (previously untested).

* the contour lines (on Fig. 3) represent the quadrature component of the MaxMin survey at 14 080 Hz. We believe that these contours may be a direct expression of the quartz vein drilled in BUR-55. These data suggest that the vein has east-northeast orientation to the east of BUR-55, and east-west orientation to the west.

* from the above, we interpret a junction between the untested IP chargeability anomaly and the quartz vein on L1500W at about 850S. Hole BUR-58 was collared north of this point and drilled south.

-4-

LEGEND

MAXMIN quodraturiContour(l4080Hz)

l .P

Quartz vefn(interpreted)

MOOOS

COGEMA CANADA Ltd


GEOPHYSICS RESULTS

NEAR BUR-55

SCALE 1=2500

50 TOO

Report'92-CND-47-OI l Flgur*'150m


3.2 Diamond drilling

Drill statistics are given in Table 1. The locations are shown in Figures 3 and 4. Summary logs are given in Appendix li (this volume); the field logs are given in Appendix III (volume 2).

Hole BUR-56 was drilled along L4600W at 150m east of BUR-51 and collared at 040N to intersect the upper contact of the Spade Lake porphyry dyke near the footwall of the Spade Lake shear at a targeted depth of 285m (vertical depth 230m). This target was arrived at using an interpreted trend of the mineralized zone of 350 at 080, determined using a stereonet.The hole collared in predominantly feldspar-quartz crystal tuffs until the shear zone was encountered at 191.2m. The shear zone resembles strongly most other holes drilled into it. The Spade Lake porphyry dyke was intersected at 271.0 to 283.0m. There was no quartz veining at the upper contact and it was presumed that the target had been missed. The footwall of the shear occurs at 295.4m and the hole was stopped at 303.9m (see Figure 5).

Careful comparison of hole BUR-56 with the other nearby holes was undertaken and it was interpreted that there was a striking similarity between this hole and hole BUR-28. Since the interpreted trend passes about 50m below hole BUR-28 (see Figure 6), it was postulated that the trend may have been offset by a cross fault and might occur 50m below hole BUR-56. For this reason, hole BUR-57 was also spotted on L4600W, but collared at 125N to intersect the upper contact of the Spade Lake porphyry dyke at a depth of about 335m (vertical depth 280m).

Hole BUR-57 collared in mafic volcanic, then traversed the feldspar-quartz crystal tuffs seen in the previous hole and entered the shear zone at 268.9m. The shear zone resembles strongly most other holes drilled into it. The Spade Lake porphyry dyke was intersected at 345.0 to 362.2m. There was no quartz veining at the upper contact and it was presumed that the target had been missed. The footwall of the shear zone was crossed at 365.7m and the hole was stopped at 371.1m (see Figure 5).

Hole BUR-58 was drilled on the IP anomaly as discussed earlier. It intersects mafic volcanic rocks similar to those described in hole BUR-55. The hole did not intersect any quartz veining such as was seen in BUR-55, but close to the target depth a zone of pyrite mineralization, weak to moderate silicification and minor quartz veining occurs (see Figure 7).

-6-


TABLE 1; DIAMOND DRILL SUMMARY

DRILL HOLE

BUR-56

BUR-57

BUR-58

STARTED COMPLETED

10/02 - 13/02/92

14/02 - 18/02/92

18/02 - 19/02/92

GRID CO-ORDINATES

X:Y:

X:Y:

X: Y:

4600W 040N

4600W 125N

1500W 800S

AZIMUTH INCL.

1800 -63. 50

1860 -64. 50

1800 -46. 50

TOTALS

0/B BEDROCK

11.8 292. 1

8.2 362.9

17. 1 103.9

37.1

TOTAL

758.9

303.9

371.1

121.0

796.0

CUMULATIVE TOTALS 1988 - 1992 12 486.7m

COGEMA CANADA Ltd


COLLAR LOCATIONS

BUR-56,57

SCALE h 5 000

Report'92-CND-47-OI

porphyry Spade Lake shear zone Intermediate volcanics

Figure 5 : Geological section 46+00 W

Scale : 1 : 2500


4Overburden

Bedrock

250

200

150

J! 100 g

50

-50

BUR-19

BUR-28 A

BUR-51 BUR-37

BUR-48

BUR-29

BUR-57

BUR-56

Rgure 6: East-West vertical longitudinal projection of upper contact of Spade Lake porphyry dyke in the Spade Lake shear zone near holes BUR-19, 51, 56, 57.

Scale: 1 : 2000

300

250

200 MF : Mafic and intermediate volcanics Py : Silicified pyritic tuffs

-900 -850 -800

Figure 7 : Geological section 15-fOO W

Scale : 1 : 1000

-750


3.3 Analytical Results

A listing of the results is given in Appendix IV (volume 2) along with a description of the analytical methods used. We tested all samples for Au; all samples from holes drilled into the Spade Lake shear were tested for fyO and Na20, selected samples were analyzed for Cu.

Highlights are as follows:

BUR-56: two sections in the shear give anomalous Au MOO ppb:

* 231.0-240.5m: 520 ppb (max 2000 ppb 237.5-239.0);* 252.5-264.5m: 225 ppb (max 760 ppb 254.0-255.5);* the latter section also averages 0.31* Cu

(max 0.80* Cu 254.0-255.5).BUR-57: the shear shows weakly anomalous Au from 307.5-345. Om,

averaging about 175 ppb (max 640 ppb 328.5-330.0);

Cu results average 0.18* from 316.5-340.5m.

BUR-58: the silicified pyritiferous section at 79.0-88.Om averages 400 ppb (max 1130 ppb at 80.0-81.0);

also of interest in this hole:

* 465 ppb Au at 92.0-94.Om in rock similar to the above zone but showing strong calcite and weak to moderate hematite alteration;

* 490 ppb Au at 46.5-47.5m and 105 ppb Au at 55.0- 56.0m in zones of mm thick semi-massive pyrite laminae;

* 115 ppb Au at 116.5-118.1m in thin quartz veins with minor pyrite.

In addition to Au and Cu analyses described above, fyO and Na^O were analyzed in holes BUR-56, BUR-57 (see Figure 8). As described in 1990, these data seem to quantify the degree of alteration in the shear zone. Of particular interest is the fyO/^O ratio: as this ratio increases, sericitization becomes more intense.

Alteration in hole BUR-56 is very strong; the 1^0/^20 ratio generally remains above 10 in the lower part of the shear. This profile compares well with those plotted for holes BUR-19, 29, 51. Only hole BUR-28 shows significantly stronger alteration than the above four drill holes. The above observation applies to all holes drilled in the Spade Lake shear and not just to those holes in this immediate vicinity.

Alteration in hole BUR-57 is also quite strong, but is noticeably weaker than in BUR-56. The profile more closely resembles holes BUR-37, 48 and other drill holes along the shear zone.

-12-


10000

1000

•3 100E

-O

8:10

0.1

10000

1000

s 100Efe

JDa10

0.1

22O

BUR-56

240 26O 28O

Depth (meters) K2O/NQ2O + Au(ppb)

BUR-57

28O 3OO 32O 34O 36O

Depth (meters) D K2O/N02O * Au(ppb)

Figure 8: Au (p p b) and K2OSNa2O (ratio) resultin Spade lake shear zone drill holes BUR-56,57


4. D l SCUSS l ON

4 . l Spade Lake shear zone

It was hoped that the mineralization intersected in BUR-19 could be intersected by one or both of the two holes drilled into the Spade Lake shear during this program. Unfortunately, Au results are very similar to most holes drilled to date; although the shear zone shows strongly anomalous Au lithogeochemical values, nothing of economic value was intersected. Cu results are similar to other holes drilled in the immediate vicinity.

On the other hand, fyO/^O profiles suggest that the plunge of the mineralization has been correctly interpreted. This in turn suggests that the target may have been very narrowly missed by hole BUR-56. Unfortunately, even if this is true, the probable volume of the vein in the immediate area would not be sufficiently large to be of economic interest given the density of drill holes and the single intersection reported from BUR-19.

4.2 BUR-58

Anomalous Au results from hole BUR-58 complement those intersected in hole BUR-55 in 1990. These intersections differ markedly from those in the Spade Lake shear zone:

* the host rock is an undeformed or weakly deformed mafic to intermediate volcanic;

* the core length of anomalous Au lithogeochemistry is much shorter, in the 10 to 20m range, however average Au over the 10 to 20m is higher (eg. 400 to 800 ppb Au vs. 100 to 200 ppb over 60m in the Spade Lake shear).

It is suggested that these two intersections may be part of the same trend (mostly based on the MaxMin quadrature contouring) even though they do not particularly resemble one another. Further examination of the existing database may be of use in evaluating this relationship.

-14-


5. CONCLUS l ONS

Although the interpreted trend of the mineral ization intersected in hole BUR- 19 appears to have been confirmed by fyO/^O results, Au values are not encouraging. Drill hole density in the immediate vicinity is considered adequate to rule out possibility of an economic deposit down to about 300m depth.

A second structure defined by drilling in holes BUR-55 and BUR-58 has been demonstrated. The importance of the zone is not yet well understood, however, Au values intersected to date are in the 400 to 800 ppb range over 10 to 20m and include results up to 2 g/t Au/Sm (BUR-55) and 1.1 g/t Au/lm (BUR-58).

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

With respect to the results of the program described herein:

* additional drilling in the immediate vicinity of hole BUR-19 is not recommended at this time.

* further drilling is warranted in the vicinity of, and to the east of, holes BUR-55 and BUR-58.

Future work on the property should therefore be undertaken with the fo l low i ng pr i or i t i es:

* re-evaluation of the Spade Lake shear, with emphasis on areas with low drill density and on a possible eastern extension;

* compilation of existing data base and additional drilling in the vicinity of, and to the east of holes BUR-55, BUR-58;

* reconnaissance drilling in the eastern part of the Burntbush grid (east of the Burntbush River).

-15-


APPENDIX l

IP SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS AND RESULTS


IP SURVEY

Line rehabilitation and IP lines were run by Val d* Or Qeophysique Ltee from February 1 to 4, 1992. The dipole-dipole array was utilized with a^25m and ns1 to 6. The instrument used was the EDA IP-6 six dipole time domain unit. Instrument specifications are given at the end of this section.

In total, 5.5km were surveyed. The IP pseudo-sections follow. See Figure 3 of the report for our interpretation of the results.

/\

.1'

j/t\\\Vn1

/l/' \\V

^^

.t

Ofm

im M

^

——

——

— ^™

H ™

~™

"™

ti6 8

CO

O

CL o

o

-'.•^

——

——

——

——

V

l^GD

-i ——

——

— i

T

JCOsCOSiVI

13COsCOg PS

i

CO1COiCOEcoCO8CO".

COlCOf~

8 s

g g

IS 5

g ft/7

a s\

8*.s

g 9

S 9

g g•\

8 SJ

H 'k

5 H•^

9 CDs

f i\

Q

D8 1S

2

K w1

8 S\

B i

* e

!fl s

K S/f

ffi 5J

5 3"

0 ffi

Sfcp M***,

fi S

8 B

i t

P— *t

"ix-

\6-

t

\m]

1i8V

SL16t5^

\

0|0

\\Sy(O/

ftr\Senm

\\f 's.1/fS^g?

Sxfe

5i

s M

X fî

S/•//S

Vâ\i

g g

Va

17-

s' IS

el S

co

1 5

l 1

gsJL

j-k

s^ _ g

S^ÎOR

CO

8 j i S ' 3

"i /i("X"

^ \

g i\

c.v

HI y S

"T

\

Ul

^

0)

^

*\i 1ED

\ *"

K \

K co

5 \B

|

S B

\ 5f B

w\s /s

|,S \

l^/

X ffi^

^9

5 co

^ 5

g\E

ft

S

S' S

/-5

/g

8*

; B *

/y ,

s /s/

P /8

J

S \ fe

; B i'i y 5^

w(fc

8 g

j ^- *-\e

ea

w

s s

|s

xR

w•~

CO ^

U)

1C

LO

"t "

|"

"' h "\ R

7- 1

-m

m/

—*

1 B

— '

*-* ^-'

i .

\r? y ^|^rt*

5 1 -y

YnJ

S f\ 5

^^

*^^3\-!:-B~

" /a/^V

H/

2 \\^-^S*'/o

— ''A

1* \8^y

. —

' —

\

y N

T"

2 } 8 }

eB.

3 yB

'^" s^

-7/1

? ^

"V8

m

S IS

~-*lf

a\ r

~ f

\*~

^r

~'

1}

f ^../^ y^

6!

8 S

^^-^^s (

2/^/ C^^S

1R

5*-^/ Bpyijlj]!

x'"1?/'

5-^*^

H 8

i \^^^^.

B-'^

9

5

D'

S *

"f .

. *i

o

n

inf

fS

s

R

"!i'

r 7

9r T

9 o

B G)

i' r

rS

R

8r

i' r

s s

e e

t* i*

i* i'

4e

e ^^

80

8 ^^"^

*-W J

^

j *^F

/*

/—

X rtx

3 "A

\rt 3

v\* *V ^

N *^^s^\"s'

*! ?â\3

* Û

SB

s

irt3\\\\^

^'ij i\5

" ^^^"V

.•^

nn^^

- 3

-^5 y^

J5 S/ 1///*?

10 l IO

I/O

m

w

\M

7 7 ~

. .X

N- !W

k

\ iH

— 3R

"

*

r- |S|

fO

^

ip

Ip

fe t

t t

t l

tF

-4

u.

sCOgCOsCOiCDCO1iBtoCOCO1(OE'

CO-

CO1'COg-.

w6'COg.*~

"" 9

s DI

aR

r

K

W fc

R C

R

R w

ta a

R ra

E

S

S

o

se ffi

z ; o

—

o

D

OD CM

"

. "~.

O

fc

0

0

2

Sj o

o

2 9

10 SK

0

E~

.

"^

s n

o—

m

S3

o

H

o

2

*

o

W

se f,

9b

a fa

92

9m

(D

O

)O

M

~

"^

0

™

"14

1

O

j—

J/i

i" r

i*ff

Wr

i'9989

w ^

si*

i1 r

9

? R

sW

' iS

'i"

r x*

B^

—x-

o

— /w

-^

9 -^'^ /-'

*

0^x^S

--

'x-^X

Î:

* ^S

2 y

| S

3 /B

By)

*N ^s

t x

^^V

*

j

^8^-^

Bx

x

^

'.""•^'d

9 K

\B

aw

9

ft \B^*

oJ

fv

in

m

m•-m

"~,

~

O

Q

M

Fn tfi

o

ffi

\ W

Q

l

^vt*

^

'

' -.

- ;s

D""^\^

t' w

D ^V

V-(

"N

—

(n*

**- N

CO

^

ip

IDi

t fc

t fc

1: l

i— l

^

..wD jbjsj4JI53bjS3A ))))

RES

LtOOO

IP.30

MF

.10 .1

L-10 t-1

TOPOGRAPHY

5*OD S 4*90

os

24

RES l ST lV lTY793 706 . 6Z3 58 S7 fl]ter JQ^ . ^

329 34)4S7-— -~Sr\

76 866SB 664 SP

~ tfiaTj fflO^-722 607

BS 1264 -\ 640

334

216

1IB4

n-2

n-3

n-4

n^

n-6

5*908 &OD S 4*90 b CHARGEABl L lTY 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.5 .1 filter CmV/V)

5KP S . . 4*90 '.15 .19 .23 .25 .31 *

.26 .34 .42 .46 .S

INTERPRETATION

METAL FACTCR (ip/res * IDD)

n-1

.18 .28 .28 .26 .40 n-2

.11 .20 .20 .17 .20 n-3

.11 .23 .12 .M n-4

O O .24 O n-5

O .30. n-^i

Line 1 6+OO WD i po 1 e— D i po 1 e Array

no

x s a " 25 M

X®' n - l. 2, 3. 4, 5. 6 plot point

— ,. F a 1 terFilta~ed PVoPiles

Resistivity — — — —Poler izaticn ———————Ntetal Factcr ——————-

Logor-ithmicContcxjr-s "' ' - 5 '. ^ d" a- 7 ' 5- 1O"

Instrument: GOD 1400, BRGM IP-6Time cycles 2 sec.

Operator 1 Daniel Lapointe

lNTERPRETATl ON

B Increase in polarization associated to a relative decrease in apparent resistivity.

O Increase in polarization uiitn little or no associated decrease in apparent resistivity.

D Weak or poorly defined polarization anomaly, no resistivity signature.

V Loui resistivity feature.Bedrock volley or tnick overburden.Structural causes?

Induced Polarization SurveyCOGEMA CANADA LTD.

Burntbush R i ver Pro j ect Hob 1 i tze 1 1 Tcxunsf i i p

Date : 92/02/02 Interpretation by* Scale 1 * 2500

VAL D 'OR GEOPHYSIQUE LTEE

T

WMW(0W)

91 5 g

9 R

S S

s a

st a

S

s s

s s

a

S IB

x.

H 8V

i

l-/S

l//

5 l

I//8

s53

9-

1 SQ

N^8

yrvm

—

y *

iv K:/

vi

COCOVi

9CO

W 5,' l

fi

IRa

a\

\ o

- ~\

\

'

a

mK

s 9

o W

9

9

o

K) 9

in

? s

wfs

9 a

*

r ;

te s

' /S

8 R

oT

ir-

fsi m

^

in

m

t t

l t

t

1i

t mtl

— N

en ^

tn CD

i i

fc t

'c t

5:

RES JOCK

.1000

.10

IP K-F-30 -3

-10 LI

L-10 L-l

5*CO S 4+SQS

TOPOGRAPHY

RES l ST l V l TY431 380 342 313 mter

224

\

^JTO__160 172 rt-1

23D 288-^246 rr-2

438 BB'-'SZ 334 ry-3

410 477,^448 rr4

KB 578 rv-5

TO n-6

4c

-478-"

PS 5*0081.1

t.S

1.3 U ..4 1.4CHARGEABlL lTY

filter CmV/V)

rr*

OS 5*00 S.S .C .42 .S3 .57

.73

.40

.11

.30 .26

IS .18

O .22

.15

.40

lNTERPRETATl ON

ÊTAL FACTORfilter cip/res - 1OO)

n-l

rr2

rr3 n-4

rr6

Line 15+00 WDipole-Dipole Array

a na o

a - 2S M© n -

plot point

FilterFiltered Profiles

Resistivity — — — ——Pdlaîzaticn ——————Ntertal Factcr ——————-

Logev-ithvnic 1 i 5 2 3 5 7 5 1O Contours ' ' bl 2 ' d' 5' 7* bf 1O ' '

Instrument' GDD 1400, BRGM IP-6Time cycle: 2 sec.

Operators Daniel Lapointe

lNTERPRETATl ON

Increase in polarization associated to o relative decrease In apparentresistivity.

Increase in polarization with little or no associated decrease in epperent resistivity.

Week or poorly defined polarization anocnaly.no resistivity signature.

Low resistivity feature.Bedrock valley or thick c*êrbvj~den. Structcr-al causes?


Burntbush River Project Hob l i "tze 11 Touunsh i p

Date* 92/02/02 Interpretation by* Scale 1 ' 2500

VAL D'OH GEOPHYSIOUE LTEE


3-

.

1.

.

-i J

IR 3CL

10.

-10J

n-3

n-4

n-5

n-6

filter-

n-1

n-2

n-3

n-4

n-5

n-6

11-00 S 10*508 1CHDS 9*50S 9-ODS B-SDS 8*003 7*00 s 6*50 S 6*ODS 5*5DS S*CDS 4*50

filter- '99 ZD5 199* l SP 1980 1903 1640 1748 IBC 143* 1233 aB797SSSSZa4394A)4l24B7447422337.4DB743**29B

n-1. 1272 1385^ 1315 1175

n-2 23U la*493__,718

Z5HJ 2(30

1545 221 198 252 225 221-^.186

1251 1111 .1719 2027 ^ 1316"""*-*! \ 931^~-467^ 428 3BO"\—278'^' 347 3*0——-237 430 33 \ 274,—-312"^ 351^"""--2BS 248 239

I805\ 1230 \I8B6. 2474 " 18D9. V 746-^ 90S \fflS 575\ 367 450 360 455 397 f 565 \ 331 334 411 420 311

493 4B5 57Di^~—4B2\. 575^*^-470 465 463 433 370

I3DB \ *644 ^792x SZB . 591 99* B7B ^483 899 522 y 477 4E2 493

1*12 ' 918 x 667. 896 G43 516~~—————934

^ 2270 \ 1675. 12BS\ 1974 2939 J 1348 1037 1109 v. 749N N\\ l >•—v x^ " ~ —— ^ —- —— ^

2126 1735 ^3129 3617 \ 1935 1745 . 1192 v 2178 ZHO — 2KB

1869 -^ 383

\

\

x\I3DB \

11-038 1O90S 1CMBS 9*90S 9OOS 8*908 7*008 6*508 6*ODS 5*5DS SKDS t 4*9013 16 4.4 s.9 ag as s. s 4.1 11 2.5

7.6

1.6 I.S t.9 1.9 2.8 4.S 5.1 4.4 19 12 3.3 14 12 Z. 6

2.3 13 -O. I.S 1.9 —— 1.8 , 1.3

2.6 i\ 1.4 1.2 \ 1.7

Z3V 1.4 /.ffl

9.7 ae a* ai 4.1 4.3 IS \ 2.6 \ 1.3

8.9 8.7 g.4 as ag az* \t-.9D

-l———-———l———————4———'———t-

11*00 S 10*90 S 10*00 S 9*50S 9*00 S 860S 8*00 S 7*03 S t 6*9D S | e*OD S t 5*^0 S-19 -W .23 .33 .71 .73 .30 .21 .16 .K .16 .15 .30 .3 .30 .95 1.1 1.1 1.1 .70 .65 .75 .85 .79 .69 .57 .53

22 .IS .11 .10,, 1.3 1.3 i.. .21 .27 .17 .21 .36 .53 .78 .77

-is -'8 .re .21 85 v .18 .S/ ,. .S2--.47--.S5/ 1 — -- \

.SB .70 — — .61 .5 l -T6 -8* • 79 . -U .12 .10 .IS .12 .26

.17 .12 O .26 ^ .73^

.42 .50" .30 .23 .45 .47 .19 .IS .11 1.4 X .72-" .91

.22 .36 .12 .70

RES IP MF J.100K 30 J

l

1

LlOOO .10 .1- —— _ j———— ———— ————————— t L

l. — H... -, . .1 , , ,lm -m i-i

, , , , , , , , , TOPOGRAPHY

i , , Sf 8, , , 41D " RFRI.STIVITYB *4 344 z* a, fnt^r C0hm . mj

S 225 Z21 v^lffi 2tB n-l

P 361^^- BE 246 238 n-2

111 0) 311 — -314 n-3

O 433 70 n-4

77 C 433 n-5

—— - ——— BM n-6

, , .5-00 S , , *fJS rMARRFARII 1 TY^2 " 2 1.7 1.5 filter CmVXV )

i9 —— ..1.8 i 1.3 1.5 I.? n-1

Z.G \ 1.5 1.2 1.3 n-2

fjN. 13V 1.4 /rt) n-3

aS^XZ-S iS^ 1.3 n-4

IS 3,4 X 2.8 n-5

15 n-6

i.

, , , , . 1NTFRPRFTATION

, 5^DS , i t^33 MP-AI FACTORW .89 .57 .58 S filter t Ip /res " 1QO)

n ^.16 .61 -~.B3 .SD n-1

/CTI .52 --.47 --.55 n-2

*' .S ^.46 .27 n-3

.75 .61 ^ .36 n-4

94 \73 .57 n^

J .70 n^

Line 1 4-HDO WDipole-Dipole Array

t a i no i a iST\ rf*7vr^ r^

"s x' s s \ s

S vs f ' a - 25 M

V n - 1, 2, 3. 4. 5. 6 plot point

FiltGned FroPiles,-. , , r 1 1 "ter*

Resisti^ty — — — — * *Fblerizaticn ——————— * * *

Logor-ithmic 3 Contours ' ' 5 ' Z ' ' 5* ' 5* 1O"--

Instrument* GOD 1400, BRGM IP-6 Time cycle: 2 sec.

Oper a tor ' Dan i e 1 Lapo i nte

1 NTERPRETAT 1 ON

B Increase in polarization associatedto e relative decrease in apparent resistivity.

n Increase in polarization with little or no associated decrease in apparent resistivity.

d Weak or poorly defined polarization enomaly.no resistivity signature.

V Lou) resistivity feature. Bedrock valley or thick overburden. Structure 1 causes?


Burntbush R i ver Pro j ect Hob 1 i tze 1 1 Toounsh i p

Date: 92/02/02 Interpreted i on by* Scale 1 * 2500

VAL D 'OR GEOPHYSIOUE LTEE

—s

Sf H \ tt rr 1 s (r n

in fe.

to K*

~- W

*

o

~

o

o

o

0

B

o

w

q5

5

ix

6 M

e w

-s

ixis

isk

s ±

'3s

0•4

'O

-*

--

U

O

U)

a

a

o

o

o

o

00

o

o

K

r:

W 8! ^

8 W

H

W ff

S

^ft

t7

in

*j

,*

w

O"*

'

tt *

a 7

Mx 6

W W

Wy

aw

M b

y'n

o

o o

o

o

o

fi) W

W

^|

KS b

* B

is is

i iits

' w

,ic

wI

m

(/i

A CD

KJ

~-

i-* ct-"^

i-Ol

* e

a s

is a

~ l

*^*

/*//'

*f /

/^. h y ^

CO

111 li

l

8 \i

/'s

i xs

g

y

—*

l7 /

S -\

sl

^ 9

g

' /i

Vi S 7

CO 8v

8 Ni

s i

i s

iV

ft l- *

/-/*9

/3

i u.

RES IPJOCK

Li 000

JO

MF .3

.10 L1

.-ID L-1

7*ODS 6*EDS BKDS 5*SDSl 629 931 473 453 440 4CB 415 377 339 310 SB

TOPOGRAPHY

RES l ST l V lTY COhm * m3

.^__Bl^ 317. IS' ZG7 239 234 334 233 196 222-196 224 n-1\ 276 -— ""32B ~— 305

401 416 361 366 335 376 421 314 —— 308

864 "786^ 616 703 EGO 624 530 936 494

n-2 n-3 n-4 n-S n-6

6-SDS 6*O3S S*OOS1.4 1.8

CHARGEABILITY1.9 1.9 1.9 2 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.5 filter CmVXV3

1.2 1.1 i 1.1 1.2 n-1l.Z l.?**- .SUr 1.2

.2 1.2 k.90^ 1.3^-1.6

7^005 6*ODS

.29 -36 .49 .43 .42 .43 .45 .46 .48 .46 .80 .51

INTEFPRETATION

METAL FACTORllt*r Up/res - 1OO)

f ^,.SB —-.54 .74 ..47

J.27 .24 ^49 A

j .11 .36 V^) -*

r O .35 .rt 43

t -a l'*i '* -*

l .2B .41

.52--.51 .46 .52 .57 , .46 x .56 .52 n-1

.32 .34 .33 .38 ~~.O?~~ .45 .50^ .61 n-2

.21 .33 .44 ^fX .43 .40 .44 n-3

.45 .32 .29 .46 ^.49 .C .40 n-4

.50-"^""Tse"^.48.^.49,. .43 n-5l .53 .SB n-6

Line 13+00 WDipole-Dipole Array

na

/ a - 25 M^ n - 1. 2, 3, 4. 5. 6

plot, point.

Filtered ProPiles c . ,.F11ter

Rasistivity — — — —Polarization ——————Mstel Fectcr ——————-

Logar-ithmic . i c ? 3 e 7 c in Contour-s ' K5' 2 ' 3* 5' 7 ' 5* 0"

Instrument: GDD 1400, BR6M IP-6Time cycle: 2 sec.

Operator: Daniel Lapointe

NTERPRETATl ON

ase in polorizotion iated

D

to o relet,i\^e decrease in apparent, resistivity.

Increase in polarization with little or no associated decrease in apparent resistivity.

Weak or poorly defined polarization anomaly, no resistivity signature.

Loui resistivity feature. Bedrock velleu or thick overburden. Structural causes?

nduced Polarization SurveyCOGEMA CANADA LTD.

Burntbush R i ver Proj act Hob l i "tze 11 Touinsh i p

Date: 92/02/03 Interpretation by* Scale 1 '2500

VAL D'OR GEOPHYS/OUE LTEE

3-

1.

.

-1J

IP. RES, 100K-,

10.

-l O J

;oooJ-~

ioJ.

14*90 S 14*03 S 13*5DS 13*03 S 12*90 S 12*00 S 11*5DS 11-*QOS l OSO S 1OCDS 9*5DS i 9*038-

n-2

n-3

n-4

n-5

n-6

iwo 20* Z4SD'BBS 1063—1039 163*^1366^2100 212

801 80S 10BB /WBOV 1376 3346 ^ 1305 \ 2333 Z774

Ai*l.1251 m9 ^.945*^ 1253 ^989 \ 571'j 262/1

2272 — 1873X^-^1743 I4S3 \ 775 7 ;3B1

1272 \923' i 1933 2339 2676 2B23\ 13H) \2fl3B 25D1 425B 299* 20(4

1469 3564 4303 2^1 ^" 1282 I4Z6 — ISO 2265 4312 ^ ZE8 77\B -\ IS19 "N. 2484 . 319* ~S3B 293? --" ~5*ffl \ 2256 1549 / 857

- - \ x iam —.— iQjfi V ' -TOB ———-— jBRi 3)03 ^- S1SO3610 1361

U/O -^ 1/43 1*3 l 775 l *1 V IBS

-a^i- )ljj^(i/

""\™\ f/A " "111 l l ' K*

14*505 14*008 13*50 S 13KDS 12*90 S 12*00 S 11-SDS 11*038 1OSD S 10-OD S 9*5D S 9KDS

n-1

n-2

n-3

n-4

n-5

n-6

f? llter- 2.1 2.3 12 2.1 1.6 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3

2 2.3

2.3 2.4Z3 27 2.1 \ 1.9

2 2.3^ 1.6 1.7- 1 1.6^^1.6 \,-8D i l.S v. 2.S ——— L.*^/ AB i

i4 ( 1.7 1.6 f 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 ^**1 1.7 f 6—-^3.6 3

V ' ^~—— ' n l ^\*f 2.8

2.4 2.2 2 1.6-^.1.4 ;w: v.44 l J 1.3 ^1.6/^tS 13.6\ 7.6 \"^2 Z J

1.9 2.3 \l.8 1.8 \ 1.2 l .TO---:?) \.f S t*——'li IS A 9.7\\

1.9 2.2 ' ' l ' 1.4 ' ' 17 13—————' X 3

1.6 1.9 a2 4.9 as IS

12

14*SOS 14*00 S 13+SDS 13*00 S 1MDS 12*005 11*5DS 11*005 10*903 10*00 S 9*SDS 9*COS

filter-

n-1

n-2

n-3

n-4

n-5

n-6

.14 .12 .14 .10 .15 .14 .13 .15 .11 .K) .10 .26 .22 .21 .14 .12 .12 .24 .45 1.2 2.6 6 11

6.6 t 14.16 .10 .24 .17 .y .29 .21 .32 .22 .17 .15 .47 .15 .21 .12 .16 .11 .28 .21 .16 O

.10 .17 .10 .11 .24 .14 .22 .14 .11 D .10 .36 .1? .14 O O .11 .14 O -O

.22 O O O .13 .16 O O O O O T^\ .14 .10 O O O O\ \

.12 O O D .IB O O 00 O .14 N.SBv .11 O O O O O .44 7/1.4

O ,S7\ .14 .10X \

.14 N.9B V .11V X

.13 O O O O O O O O .15 .13 \ .6* x .11 O O O O

.10 .11 .12 .10

heosort i)ortwoi~e r or the earth

RES JOOK

IP

lOOO

MF-3

.10 LI

-10 L-1

9*00 8*5D S B*CP S 7*SD S 7*CD S B*9D S 6*00 S 5*5D S 5*00 S 4*33 S

TOPOGRAPHY

RES l ST l V l TYBCE SEE 105B 90 tP6 TOo tt BED SB1 5C 478 46B

639 443 —— 454^^361 372 3C -.266__.291——244 282 228 Z37 20 235- 333 n-1

\(* 311 634

-^662 631 6DB 580 631 \433

7BZ 839 X SB5 BB11103 \ I87B 1747 N. 1232 \BJP3C 3E 3B

9*(DS 8*50 S 8KB S 7*50 S 7*00 S 6-50 S CHARGEABILITYEl " 5.2 2.6 1.5 .70 -70 .TD .70

.BO -.JO— .1.3- 1.2 n-r^'x^p1 -5 ^l 17 N-a2Vsi.1 1.6

9*COS e*5os 8*OOS 66D SKDS 5^05

INTERPRETATION

VETAL FACTOR11 .12 .14 .15 .IS .29 .25 .33

.29 .35 .39 .43 -.^ .54-^.66

.13 .17 .15 .22 JO .22 "".SO'' .21

y .

.30

4S

.32 .33 .46

.35 .32 .96\

.31

Q o O .10 .14 O .13 .31 O .30 .34 .41 .33

Q Q o O O O O O .33 O .29 .41 .31

O 0000-00.45-0.34.32

O O O -O .47 .25

••41 -Filter- dp/res - IDD-}

.35 n-1n-2

n-3

n-4

n-5

n-6

Line 12+OO WDipole—Dipole An~ay

,a naa

plot point

o — 25 M

1 . 2/3, 4, 5. 6

Filtered ProPiles

Rssistivity — — - — —RDlerizsticn ———————Mstai Rsctcr ——————

LogaritHnic 1573575r* , i*i. O* *c* O* w* x * 3*

c . , . Filter

Instrument: GOD 1400, BRGM IP-6Time cycle 1 2 sec.

Operator' Daniel Lapointe

l NTERPRETAT l ON

Increase in polarization associated to e relative decrease in apparent resistivity.

D

ase in polarization with little or no associated decrease in apparent resistivity.

Weak or poorly defined polarization anomaly, no resistivity signature.

Loui resistivity feature. Bedrock v/olleu or thick overburden. Struct^r-el causes?


Burntbush R i ver Proj ect Hob l i "tze 11 Totunsh i p

Date: 92/02/03 Interpretation by* Scale l* 2500

VAL D'OR GEOPHYSIOUE LTEE

l

5iS(L m

oT—i T

i(n

^r u)

u)i

*- tv

m

*r ifi

tol t i i i l

it-

M

rn 'j

LO m

fc

l t

t t

t

vi:*- 0 CO-PO tA O

RES ,JOCK

IP

Litioo

JO

MF.3

.10 L1

.-10 L-1

9*0)8 8*508 8*00 S 7-5DS 6-SQS 6*ODS 5*5DS 5*OOS 4*5DS

ZHD !3Z 131 90 327 y23B4 f i l~tef-

278.^ 316 ZBe 2S4 276 n-1

TOPOGRAPHY

RESISTIVITY (Ohm * m)

9*00820

8*00 S 7*5D S t t 7*00 S - 6*50 S^ ^ 6*00 S 5*50 S | 5*00 S 4*50 S CHARGEAB l L l TY

-9 '-9 filter- CmVXV)12- 6.5 3LS 1.3 I.I 1 1,3 1.5 1.5

\ ^H \vxs-K) -1 vx l —^J.3 1.1 i.:

/. .. ^^^ILV-'^'-^l s^^^a, YxsS^- ^-.-' ::o-*. \

'/\*~~\ 21/7 \ \

3, * ^0y /s^^ \ \ 7 *//,"^ \ "^ \-^ 1Z ' 3 \ 2\ m ^x—~]\ 13 ' 23

.30 -x .70 1 1.5 1.5 1.7^ \ S

.ffl .20 \ .90 L* kU-6 ^-1-5XSA

.10 .20 \ \ 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.4

8*SOS 8*035 7*50 S 7*00 S s-scs 6*ODS 5KP 4-9D S

lNTERPRETATl ON

N-ETAL FACTOR4 1.6 .18 .B -M .17 .20 .24 .3 .40 .46 .52

.22 .27 .32 .S -r .24 .27 .39 .54 .75 .72 .72

O .10 .13 .19 .12 .1* .3 .26 .27 .4?^^.ft .SB

O O O D .17 .24 .21 .22 .25 x

Jit. -O O O D .1! .r .20 .3D .16 .B

.14 .15

•S .57 niter Cipyres . 100 )

.88 .67 n-1

.61 n-2

.61 n-3

n-4

n-5

n-6

Line 11+OO WDipole-Dipole Array

a na a

N S^ S\ S

plot point

e - 25 M

1. 2. 3. 4, 5. B

Filtered Profiles

Resistivity — — — —Polarlzaticn ———————

Fectcr ——————— -

,. 1 ter

1* 3, 2. 3, 5. 7.5, 10....Contours

Instrument- GOD 1400. BRGM IP-6Time cycle: 2. sec.

Operator: Daniel Lapointe

lNTERPRETATl ON

Increase in polarization associa'ted to e relot-iv^! deer-ease in apparent resistivity.

in polarization mith littleor no associated decrease in epperent resistivity.

Weak or poorly defined polarization anomaly.no resistivity signature.

Lou) resistivity feature. Bedrock volley or tnick overburden. Structural causes?

nduced Polarization SurveyCOGEMA CANADA LTD.

Burntbush R i ver Proj ect Hob i i tze 11 Toujnsh i p

Date: 92/02/04 Interpretation by* Scale 1 ' 2500

VAL D'OR GEOPHYSIQUE LTEE

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

MAJOR BENEFITS

9 SIX DIPOLES SIMULTANEOUSLY MEASURED

9 10 WINDOWS AVAILABLE

9 CHOICE OP ARITHMETIC OR LOGARITHMIC WINDOW WIDTH

* PROGRAMMABLE ARITHMETIC WINDOW WIDTH

* HIGH INPUT VOLTAGE

* WEIGHS ONLY 8.5 KG.

* EXTREMELY USER FRIENDLY

l

SPECIFICATIONSscsccccc s:s ssscs:

Dipoles ............................ Six simultaneous input dipoles

Input Voltage (Vp) Range ........... Standard: - 8 volt maximum foreach dipole

- maximum sum of 12 volts from the second to the sixth dipole

AdditionalSetting: - attenuation of up

to 40 volts on first dipole

Input Voltage Protection ........... Up to 1000 volts

Vp Resolution ...................... l microvolt

Vp Accuracy ........................ D.3% typical;maximum l* overtemperature range

Chargeability Resolution ........... l millivolt/volt for Vp greaterthan 10 millivolts0.1 millivolt/volt for Vp greaterthan 100 millivolts

Chargeability Accuracy ... .......... Q.6% typical; maximum 23; for Vpgreater than 10 millivolts over temperature range

Automatic SP Compensation ... ....... ^ l volt with linear driftcorrection up to l millivolt/second

Input Impedance .................... 10 megohm

Sample Rate ........................ 10 milliseconds

Automatic Stacking ......... ...... .. l to 999 cycles

Synchronization .............. .. .... Minimum primary voltage level of40 microvolts

Rejection Filters .................. 50 and 60 Hz power line rejectiongreater than 100 dB

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

l l Grounding Resistance Check ......... 0.1 to 128 kilo-ohms

I Compatible Transmitters ............ Any time domain waveform transmitter

with a pulse duration of 1,2,4 or 8 seconds and a crystal timing stability of 100 ppm.

l Programmable Parameters ............ Geometric parameters, timeparameter, intensity of current,

I type of array, line and station number and dipole length, window width and delay time (mode 2)

I Display ............................ Two-line, 40-character alphanumeric liquid crystal display protected by an internal heater for low

jm temperature conditions

Memory Capacity .................... 1800 sets of readings

I RS-232C Serial I/O Interface ....... 300 to 19,200 baud rate, 7 or 8 data bits, l or 2 stop bit, odd, even, no parity

I Console Power Supply ........ ....... Six- l.5V "D" cell alkaline batteries with auto power save feature; 20 hours of operation

l at 20 C

Operating Environmental Range ...... -40 C to +60 C;

1 0 to 100% relative humidity; weatherproof

m Weight and Dimensions . ......... .... 8.5 kg.(with batteries),l 300 x 200 x 240 mm

Standard System Complement . . .. ..... Instrument console with carrying

I strap, batteries, data transfer cable and operations manual

Available Options ..... . .. .. ..... . .. Stainless steel transmitting

electrodes, copper sulphate receiving electrodes, alligator clips, bridge leads, multi dipole

l wire cable, wire spools and m software programs

Displayed Parameters ............... Primary voltage, partial and total decimated chargeabilities, running and cumulative average of total

. chargeabilities (in fixed modes), l standard deviation of primary voltage and total chargeability,

self potential, number of cycles, B dipole being measured, contact resistance,

APPENDIX M

SUMMARY LOGS

1111111111111111111

0

GEOLOGY ;

SUMMARY LOG BUR-56

0 - 11.3m overburden/casing

11.3- 16.5

16.5 - 84.7

84.7 - 127.4

127.4 - 142.4

142.4 - 163.4

163.4 - 175. 1

175. 1 - 191.2

191.2 - 295.4

191207266 269271283

295.4 - 303.9

303.9

MAIN SULFIDE

chalcopyrite

MAIN INJECTED

mafic volcanic

feldspar-quartz crystal tuff

mafic volcanic


Spade Lake porphyry dyke



Spade Lake shear zone

.2 - 207.1 sheared mafic (magnetic) unit

.1 - 266.0 sheared crystal tuffs

.0 - 269.0 banded tuffs

.0 - 271.0 sheared crystal tuffs

.0 - 283.0 Spade Lake porphyry dyke

.0 - 295.4 colour banded tuffs

Spade Lake porphyry

END OF HOLE

SECTIONS: 191 - 201 1-5* DV225 - 235 2-7* py

observed 236 - 240253 - 258262 - 264

SECTIONS: 231 - 248253 - 258


MAIN ANALYTICAL RESULTS;

231 - 240.5 (520 ppb Au);

sheared, weakly pyritic (locally 5 - 1095) felsic crystal tuffs, local garnet, weak to moderate quartz impregnation and a few chalcopyrite sights;

maximum 2000 ppb Au at 237.5 - 239 shows trace to 1& pyrite, weak quartz impregnation, few garnets.

252.5 - 264.5 (225 ppb Au):

sheared, weakly pyritic (^95) felsic crystal tuffs, weak quartz impregnation, numerous chalcopyrite sights: section assays 0.3135 Cu.

COMMENTS; pyrite and chalcopyrite mineralization as well asintensity of quartz impregnation judged to be less interesting than BUR-57; however, both Au, Cu and also 1^0/^20 results are stronger in this hole.


SUMMARY LOG BUR-57

GEOLOGY!

O - 8.2m

8.2 - 101.6

101.6 - 162.9

162.9 - 198.2

198.2 - 253.7

253.7 - 268.9

268.9 - 365.7

overburden/casing

mafic volcanic


mafic (and intermediate) volcanic



Spade Lake shear zone

268.9 - 281.3 sheared mafic (magnetic) unit281.3 - 340.3 sheared crystal tuffs340.3 - 341.9 banded tuffs341.9 - 345.0 sheared crystal tuffs345.0 - 362.2 Spade Lake porphyry dyke362.2 - 365.7 colour banded tuffs

365.7 - 371.1

371. 1

Spade Lake porphyry

END OF HOLE

MAIN SULFIDE SECTIONS:

chalcopyrite observed

MAIN INJECTED SECTIONS;

286 - 294294 - 307328 - 335342 - 345

317 - 322325 - 328333 - 339

330 - 345

1* py596 py

1-2* py 3-5* py


MAIN ANALYTICAL RESULTS;

307.5 - 345 (175 ppb Au):

sheared, weakly pyritic (trace to 2* exceptlowermost 3m at 3-535) felsic crystal tuffs, very local garnet, generally moderate quartz impregnation, numerous chalcopyrite sights from 317 - 339m;

maximum 640 ppb Au at 328,5 - 330 in weakly pyritic (i19S) section with weak quartz impregnation, chalcopyrite not observed (D.13% Cu);

Cu averages 0.18& from 316.5 - 340.5 and averages 0.24* from 333 - 339m.

COMMENTS; very strong pyrite (5*) at 294 - 307 gives low Auvalues (maximum 85 ppb).

1111111111111111111

SUMMARY LOG BUR-58

GEOLOGY ;

0 - 17.1m overburden/casing

17.1 - 79.0 mafic and intermediate volcanics

79.0 - 83.3 silicified pyritic tuffs

83.3 - 121.0 mafic and intermediate volcanics

121 .0 END OF HOLE

SUMMARY OF MAIN SULFIDE SECTIONS AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS:

46.8 - 47.4 and 55.2 - 55.7:

mm to 1cm semi-massive to massive pyrite laminae andstringers mostly parallel to Sj ; total 5-10* py;

Au results are 490, 105 ppb over 1m.

79.0 - 83.3:

generally 5-1036 pyrite in silicified volcanic (tuff?

Au results range from 285 to 1130 ppb; 1m samples.

83.3 - 88.0:

pyrite mineralization as above continues but is much 1intense ;

Au results range from 70 to 420 ppb; 1m samples.

92.0 - 93.8:

);

ess

pyrite mineralization similar to 83.3 to 88.0 reappearsbut lacks silicification and is accompanied by hematstain ;

Au grades 465 ppb over 2m.

116.5 - 118.1:

30cm quartz vein followed by ten 2cm quartz veinlets wvery minor pyrite;

Au result is 115 ppb over 1.6m.

ite

ith

COQEMA CANADA LIMITED BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

FINAL REPORT 1992 FIELD PROGRAM

VOLUME 2 OF 2

Ref. no. 92-CND-47-01 by: Jo'Kn LearnAp^il 1992

APPENDIX l

FIELD LOGS

FIELD LOGS

following notes should help the reader understand the manner In which core was logged, and also includes an explanation of information which is given in the logs in abbreviated form:

COLUMN TITLE

DESCRIPTIONEXPLANATION OF ABBREVIATIONS

BOX:

DEPTH:

f. REG:

LOG:

GRAIN SIZE:

TEXTURE:

STRUCTURES:

FRACTURES AND VEINS:

- Density:

- Angle:

core box number as received .from drillers

depth in metres (from drill floor)

J, recovery; generally given in 3m intervals, i.e. measured length of core between driller tags expressed as Tt. However, if drill core can be fitted across drill bag, zone of core loss can be more precisely determined, and wo have made every effort to do so

graphic representation of drill log; the legend we use is still ab a preliminary stage and will be presented in full ab a laber birne

visual estimate of grain size; where porphyroblastic or porphyritic rock types occur, grain size of groundmass and coarser minerals given separately

macroscopic rock texture

foliations measures in degrees to core axis, folds and other features also reported here

F B fracture V - vein

where fracture or vein density prohibits individual description (eg where 10 or more fractures of same orientation occur in limited depth Interval), density of fractures (or veins) are given: number of fractures (or veins) per metre

angle of fracbure (F) or vein (V) bo core axis as suffix to feature eg. F40 is a fracburp ab 40* to core axis; in some cases where more than one Identical fracture occurs in restricted interval, we prefix with the number of fractures eg 2F40, rather than report in density column

FIELD LOGS (cont'd)

COLUMN TITLE


- Nature:

GEOT:

- F:

abbreviated description of fractures and veins including 'description of fracture eg

RO, R: roughSH : smoothSS : striations, slickenslidesV : vuggyH, HE : healed, recemented

and also Including description of minerals associated with fractures or veins, eg

cbcceh, cblcicpyepfs, fsprhemkaollimmtmu, museox

peg popy Q. qserSitm

carbonatecalcitechloriteclaychalcopyriteepidotefeldsparhematitekaolinitelimonitemagnetitemuscoviteoxides eg limonite, or generallyrusty surfacespegmatoidpyrrhotitepyritequartzsericitevery fine silica cementtourmaline

other common abbreviations used:

Bl, bl : bleachingbkn : zones of broken core, probably

natural but perhaps locally dueto drillers

bx : brecciation; dense fracturationof no apparent regular orientation

ft : 'minor fault

finally, we emphasize that fractures appearing on log are interpreted to be-fractures; breaks parallel to foliation are generally not recorded (unless they are interpreted to be fractures) and places where the core has been broken by drillers to fit into core box are not recorded

Geotechnical parameters

friability - a qualitative measure of rockcompetenceF " friable eg core can be broken with barehandsVF B very friable eg core easily brokenEF a extremely friable eg claywhere this column is not filled out, hammer isneeded to break core

FIELD LOGS (cont'd)

COLUMN TITLE


- R:

COLOUR:

MINERALS AND ALTERATIONS:

SAMPLE f:

TS #:

DESCRIPTION:

rock quality designation (RQD); a measure of fracture density commonly used in rock mechanics studies where the length of core in box in lengths of 10 cm or greater is expressed as J, of one 3m run in very fractured rock, RQD value is low. In non-fractured rock, RQD is 100; where this column is not filled out; RQD is

colour of core when wet

lower case letters are tones: l a light m a medium d a dark

capital letters are colours:B * blackBLs blueBNa brownG a greyGC- greyish green/greenish greyGNa greenO a orangeP a pinkPGa pinkish greyR a redW a white

f a two colours which alternate repeatedly- a colour transitional between two colours

a representation of occurrence of minerals of specific Interest, abbreviations as for fractures and veins

location and number of, sample

location and number of thin section

description given by logging geologist, we have also recorded Au analytical results here

DIAMOND DRILL HOLE RECORD

_______DURNTDUSII RIVER PROJECT._______

DRILL HOLE NO.; BUR- 56

CLAIM NO(S)

TOWNSHIP

DATE BEGUN

COMPLETED

LOGGED BY

L789268

Hoblitzell

CONTRACTOR : Forage Hercicr

CORE SIZE : BO__________10/02/92 DRILL FLUIDS; GS550(OB)H9013/02/92J.L.

COLLAR CO-ORDINATES

GRID UTM

X: L4600W_____gS83Q5QmF

Y:

Z:

40N =5483Q5QmN

284m

DEPARTURE; AZIMUTH:

INCLINATION:.

CHECKED BY:

180

-63.5

M.P.

DEPTH60m

120m180m240m303m

DEVIATION RECORDAZIMUTH DIP METHOD

H—M--

-62. E•61.5-61.0-59.5-57.0

H F 41H F 41IIP 41

Mii

CHECKED BY: , . T r u.L.jl.L.

DEPTHS; OVERBURDEN:

END OF HOLE: 303.9mHORIZONTAL COMPONENT:

VERTICAL COMPONENT !

147.5m265.5m

REMARKS; Casing left in hole.drill floo to casing:0.3m

LOCATION SKETCH l i 5000:

CANADA Lfee/Ltd. .SURKTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

Drii, hoi* no.. Geologists.1LOG l/ loo

Minerols and Alterations

---~--

'•••""'ri'i.Vi™ 7'*'"."-""'' V*- - ".''-".'-'

CANADA Liee/Ltd. RIVER PROJECT

COGEMA BURNT

Drii! hoi? noGeo'ogistis!

end Alterations l l l l l l

Descript'or

t:::::.^:--!!.:::!.:..;.::..;.::-::.:-:: —i;~:i-"-:-.-, :-::-^4^^:i;

COGEMA CANADA Ltee/Ltd. BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

DrII' hoi* no.: C-eo!o?isfisi

CANADA ^fee/Ltd. RfVER PROJECT

Drill hob no.: Geologists! : J L

COGEMA BURN

, Structure* ; ex)u ' e o co-e oxts

and Alterationsi i r**i

30GEMA CANADA Ltee/Lld. BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

Drii! nek no.. Geologist!*! : J L

Structures exture o co-e cxte

ond AlterationsDescription

l l I l I l ! ! !

::::-'':::'::JV."".:: .v.-j^ -- -•-. ::-':v: •.v.::~: .-i—:

• — ^.^j; ^ ..' . .^.!- ^^u;..:.:: .::^-,.:u-—,^.-,——L....

: - - . -..--. - . - - : - ; -. - -

CCGEWA CANADA L?RIVER PROJECT LOG l/ 100

-roct'jre; endD e s c - ; p l ' o n

31.5 -S*,2. ;

. T ,:.:.--.::i i::;r"-:rt:;::-:.:- ...;.T '.' ' ,:.r:: ::r: -i;:..: .-J

. M**-..—*~- — -^ .- *" ,. - ~.. -.. , -*-T—"--—. . .-f . .u. . J -. ,~^-- --t ..,,.*-. ..W——*^^w,

r--i-:-:,::-r:::r:r::-j:7t:tr^r.tr3:

.4:^-:::.- .j::r;r.T

COGEf/A CANADA L+ee/Ltd. .BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

hoi* no.: Geo:ocistis)

Minerals end Alterations l i l .. t .—.L i

i^H^^::-!: - :::.:.:: . :::..:::.-;.;:::---r::. r

ICOGEMA CANADA L'ie/Lfd. •.BURNTBUSH RFVER PROJECT LOG l/lop

Drii: hole no.. W t'St Geologists)

Lot,

•••^\-

'r\v\m

m

Dot* l f/' Z/ f i

TSUSH RIVER PROJECT13'ructu-es:

xtlre o core cxisMineral: and A!:e'otions

i f:-.: -j -::-i- ••;-;:; -i' :. : ;.--;

i n-|d^-:T:J::::4.:::.::.

COGEMA CANADA L'ee/Ltd.BURNTBUSH PJVER PROJECT LOG l/loo

c.-oir, size mr-cyi.-- (Msft c

Minerols ond Alterationsi t i \se.v; \ D e s c r i ~ t : c rDens. An;!? fvo'ur*

COGEVA CANADA L'ee/Ltc. BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

-.-'O,r s;7e mn-(\J^-Mir S

JCOGEMA CANADA ^Tee/Ltd. LBURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

ho!: no.:GeoicgisfisJ

Groin size mr^

J , -.....,..-,-^~-.- .--, * —-- '-u.-- l :

COGEMA CANADA L .BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT LOG l/\00

. Structures exture 'o cere axis

H t: : -,^5~

J . ' '-: . j ..---..-..., . i .. ..,—

iMK^'M/'.^iMi

IP: rL: t:; : ':;.*"i:::.; .'.''.'l':'

COGEMA CANADA ^tee/Ltd. BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT LOG l/ioo

27I.O- —28-3vO?--: : --r:

....-....:. - ....__

••-•-•-•'•-••••-•-•••' ' - - - - - -- — ';~"""-i-"r~r —j-.--....,^. ...^..... ... .., . . .

2gi.o-2.ei,

:rrr~':~ ; * : "rv."-—.i?*"*'t!.!"—*

Form SDG-45Canada Ltee/Ltd,


BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT..

DRILL HOLE NO.: BUR- 57

CLAIM NO(S).:

TOWNSHIP :

DATE BEGUN :

COMPLETED :

LOGGED BY :

L789268Hoblitzell14/02/92

CONTRACTOR : Forage Mercier

CORE SIZE : Bfi————————-—— DRILL FLUIDS: GS550(OB)H90

18/02/92J.L.

COLLAR CO-ORDINATES

GRID UTM

X: L4600W______^583Q5QME

Y:

Z:

125N

284

DEPARTURE: AZIMUTH: 186

INCLINATION: -64.5

DEPTHS:

CHECKED BY: M.P.

OVERBURDEN: 8.2m

DEPTH

60m

120m

180m

240m

300m

360m

DEVIATION RECORD

AZIMUTH DIP METHOD

_

w

-

~ i

-

-61

-54

-53.5-53

-53

-52.5

H F 47.

H F 42

HF 42H

M

ii

3HECKED BY: j. L., I. C.

END OF HOLE: 371.1m

HORIZONTAL COMPONENT: 210m

VERTICAL COMPONENT 305m

REMARKS; Casing left in hole,drill floor to casing: 0.5m

LOCATION SKETCH l

COGEMA CANADA Ltee/Ltd. .BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

Drii; hoi* no.: GeoloC'Sf'si : j U

Gr oii size r-rr Minerals and Alteration:, , , , , , ,

COGEVA CANADA Ltee/Ltd. BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT LOG I/loo

Drill hole no. 6vK-* Jc

Dote /7/OZ./-J2Poos il^o' 11

COGEMA CANADA L^ee/L'd. BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

hoi* no. Geoiogistls: . J L-

v."cr si:e r-. T Structures ex ' u ' efo cc^* oxb

Alteration: Pi i i

Description

i i r .r.i"l:'U:

r i li:!-!-f:- - ; -i i l - I--

COGEMA CANADA Ltee/Lrd. BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

ho): no.:GeoiocisMs! . JL Pace 4. o' Zl

^;;;-j~.;;;i.

•r. ;::r:rr:^rrr:^n:::i:::::UJ:-U^lii:n:

H T ;s;;s!6o|039

COGEMA CANADA Llee/Ltd.BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT Geologist!:;) . J C,

Grain size mm -eviio -cv)ir O

"TTJHE E^^— .7771"'

COGEfv'A CANADA Ltee/Lrd. .BURNTBUSH RfVER PROJECT LOG I/loo

Dril' hoi* no.: B Uf Geologistls) . J L

Do-e.

::~-:!-:~ : "7r:r~rnT::":~-

::' i.~:: '.i: 1 ;:: ~~:

COGEMA CANADA Ltee/Ltrj. [BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

i f^n , y i LOG |/ (00

hoi* no.: gf* -Geologists: .

COGEMA CANADA Ltee/Llc. BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT LOG I/loo

Minerals and Alterations l l l l l l l

Description

,. ^ - . ;"'~ ' ' ' ' '."'l -••' ~ ' - ' - - - ' - '^ i --. - .-..-.-...-..,

COGEMA CANADA Ltee/Ltc. JURNTSUSH RIVER PROJECT

Drill hob no.: Geologists) J L

-r,..::::, r. ;i:::.i..: i.. .. *—.. ~..

COGEMA CANADA Ltee/Ltd. .BURNTBUSH RtVER PROJECT

Drill hole no. Geologist's) . J L

Minerals and Alterations l l l l l l l

Description

...i,. .L.i, ^

.. --:- ~ l-::::.:: :.T.~ f"'

'^^--^; — ; _J,7 ';; ,' ; " " -~ 7

COGEMA CANADA Ltee/Lis. .BURNTBUSH RtVER PROJECT

Drill hoi* no.. Geologistis! J L

Description

"~~"~"

COGEVA CANADA L+ee/Lld. .BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT LOG l X /OD

--.-----f

-^^^^—^^m^^^^^^^^i^

immimm:LT.-L^^"- :F^"- ;^ :.:.,: -.:: :::r:-:r-::rT-:

COGEWA CANADA Ltee/Lrd. S'JRNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

Oral hoi* noGeologists!

G'3;-i size nrr

COGEMA CANADA .BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

COGEMA CANADA Ltee/Lrd. .BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT LOG Dril, hole no.: 6vg -F?

Geologist's; Jf,

ifj^jj^i^

SDG-44

COGEMA CANADA Ltee/Ltd. BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT LOG l/loO Dri;; hoi* no.:

SeoiogisKs) : J L-

D e s c r i p f i o n

5 — ~

:r;:.:-..: :::-::-r.:4 . . . . . . - .- . .,,. 4

-----EH!-;

L;x^i;;: : i:r:-:;H:-; :-^:-::^.:;;:;^?MHBM

Form SDG-45

Canada LtSe/Ltd.


BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT.

DRILL HOLE NO.: BUR- 58

CLAIM NO(S).:

TOWNSHIP :

DATE BEGUN :

COMPLETED :

LOGGED BY :

L789320Hob l i t zel l

18/02/92

CONTRACTOR : Forage Mercier

CORE SIZE : BQ———--————

DRILL FLUIDS: GS550(OB)H 9 019/02/92

J.L.

COLLAR CO-ORDINATES

GRID

X: - L1500W

Y:

Z:

UTM

-580650mE

800S ^5482300mN

289m

180DEPARTURE: AZIMUTH: ______

INCLINATION: -46.5

CHECKED BY: M.P.

DEPTH

60m

120m

180m

DEVIATION RECORD

AZIMUTH DIP METHOD

_

-44

-43

IIP 47.

l! F 47.

H F 47.

:HECKED BY: j. L., l. C.

DEPTHS: OVERBURDEN:

END OF HOLE:

17.1m

121.0m

HORIZONTAL COMPONENT:

VERTICAL COMPONENT :

86.5m

84.5m

REMARKS; Casing left in hole,drill floor to casing: not measured

LOCATION SKETCH 1:5000:

COGEMA CANADA Lree/Ltd. BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

Drii; ho!* no.: Geoiogistis! . J L

Minerals and l l l l l t

~...---. - - - -- ...... -.. -..-~-*. -.-- ....^.-....-- -- -- — i - - - ' - - - - - ' - - - ——— *-**—r— * ' -

-~.....; . ...:... - .. /.l-i:^.;rj.:^::rt-" :::: ' : ry-- : jj -^L-lj^Li.' -vi; :'^f^-^^ —zz.y ;. iW^^gS 5S^: ::f5^!^iI^ggjj:::^^'.:" r . r yfTi?3T7~^r:^::-cr :~::r r ";.:r : ;:::"' :: :' : ; :T : ;;' :~;-:::: irH:--

2i-y- ^ : ;•••:.;m^

COGEMA CANADA Ltee/Lti. BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT LOG l/100

Orili hoi* no Geologists; J L

Srructu-es . exture,0 Descriptor

. . : . . ' .;... l .. J-l^.J^ ;: -':.: A: - ; :

COGEMA CANADA L^ee/Ltc. .BURNTBUSH R?VER PROJECT

Drill hoi* no.: Geologislls) JL

COGEMA CANADA Ltee/Ltci. TBUSH RIVER PROJECT

Drli: hole no.: Geologist?;) J LLOG I/I oo

D e s c r ; p t l o n

^x-vU^J-r

COGEMA CANADA Ltee/Ltd. BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT LOG l X 100 Drii; hole no.:

Geologists; . J L

Groin size mm—: w. "P — CM in Q

f r* r - -"

COGEMA CANADA L+ee/Lfd. .BURNTBUSH RIVER PROJECT

APPENDIX IV

ANALYTICAL METHODS

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

All analyses were performed by Chemex Labs, Ltd. Sample preparation was performed in Rouyn-Noranda, analytical work was done in Mississauga. Procedures and detection limits are as follows:

Au:

CU!

Fraction:Method:Detection

l i m i t:

Note:

Fraction: Extract ion: Method: Detection

limit:

K;0. Na.O:

Fraction: Extract ion: Method: Detection

limit:

-150 mesh (two stage crushing, grinding) fire assay - atomic absorption

5 ppb

500g is pulverized, 30g is analyzed

-150 mesh HClC), - HN03 atomic absorption

0.01*

-150 meshHC104 - HN03 - HFatomic absorption

0.01*

HOLE

BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR- 5 6BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56BUR-56

SAMPLE

83468347834883498350848584868487848884898490849184928493849484958496849784988499850086818682868386848685868686878688868986908691869286938694869586968697869886998700

FROM

(m)

222.5224.0225.5227.0228.5230.0231.0232.0233.0234.5236.0237.5239.0240.5242.0243.5245.0246.5248,0249.5251.0252.5254.0255.5257.0258.5260.0261.5263.0264.5266.0267.5269.0270.0271.0280.0281.0282.0283.0284.0285.0

TO

(m)

224.0225.5227.0228.5230.0231.0232.0233.0234.5236.0237.5239.0240.5242.0243,5245.0246.5248.0249.5251.0252.5254.0255.5257.0258.5260.0261.5263.0264.5266.0267.5269.0270.0271.0272.0281.0282.0283.0284.0285.0286.0

Au

(PPb)

51070604040

150350380225120

20002603585504530152525

32576095

13510060

190155351015502555

105

509010

Cu KjO Na0

0.280.800.170.270.230.160.280.310.060.010.02

55,5,

55,5,5,5,5,4,

5, 5, 5,5,

55

4,24,

2.242.76,9070

4.454.25

58402080

33

3.4. 4, 4,5.10

302070

5.2500608020402590

5,10.00.403035

4.854.95

4570

6.305.354.553.122.76

707260

5.454.60

3.622.470.640.590.360.410,190.230.260.200.200.160.130.160.351.520.720.200.270.500.771.170.48

2235

0.260.200.160.170.210.700.580.192.324.514.561.604.550.460.502.11

l O

HOLE

BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR-57BUR- 57

SAMPLE

235123522353235423552356235723582359236023612362236323642365236623672368236923702371237223732374237523762377237823792380238123822383238423852386238723882389239023912392

FROM

(m)

288.0289.5291.0292.5294.0295.5297.0298.5300.0301.5303.0304.5306.0307.5309.0310.5312.0313.5315.0316.5318.0319.5321.0322.5324.0325.5327.0328.5330.0331.5333.0334.5336.0337.5339.0340.5342,0343.5345.0361.5363.0364.5

TO

(m)

289.5291.0292.5294.0295.5297.0298.5300,0301.5303.0304.5306.0307.5309.0310.5312.0313.5315.0316.5318.0319.5321,0322.5324.0325.5327.0328.5330.0331.5333.0334.5336.0337.5339.0340.5342.0343.5345.0346.5363.0364.5366.0

Au

(ppb)

30105

10808035404040304585

1652507070

3001654203402751001159585

2056408585

15513075

1358015

195105

55

1010

Cu

Ck)

KO

0.270.180.290.160,160.150.150.130.130.110.100.210.260.210.290.11

23232

4 4 5,5, 5, 5

5, 5, 5,5.6. 5, 5,5.6. 5,

24.

5800441696

3.344.004.204.303.804.704,454.254.704.805.10.60,90,30.30.30.90

6.056.20

50306075209090702085

6.156.855.255.15.56.00

5.255.35

Na 2 0

3, 23, 2,1. l,

387948781003

0.520.460.420.310.250.280.280.280.310.73

7022

l l0.91 ,34 05

l, l,0.400.690.650.571.130.440.300.210.500.471.020.350.160.230.280.170.345.4531.

3054

1.54

HOLE

BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58BUR-58

SAMPLE

17341735173617371738173917401741174217431744174517461747174817491750189518961897189818991900

FROM(m)

19.220.746.552.053.054.055.056.071.072.078.079.080.081.082.083.084.085.086.087.092.093.0

116.5

TO(m)

20.722.247.553.054.055,056.057.072.073.079.080.081.082.083.084.085.086.087.088.093.094.0

118.1

Au(ppb)

1035

490101010

1051055

40290

113036058528542032070

140440490115

DI AA32E85NW9311 29 HOBLITZELL

TOYVNSHtP: HOBLITZELL .

WORK PERFORMED FOR: Cogema Canada Ltd.

RECORDED HOI DER: SAME AS ABOVE

OTHER ( J

010

REPORT NO: 29

CLAIM NO.

L789268

L789268

L789320

note NO.

Bur- 56

Bur 57

Bur 58

fOOTAGE DATE

303.9m

371 .1m

121 .1m

mm13 feb 92

18 Feb 92-

19 Feb 92

NOTES;(1) Report of Work # 9280 000291

Northern Development and Mines

nepuii ui vvurK conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Act

Transaction Number

flBollecled on Ihls form Is obtained under the authority of the Minlt h^ro

Personal InforimIhls collection shro be directed to the Provincial Manager, Mining Lands, MlnlslrSudbury, Ontario, P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.

3aE05NW9311 29 HOBLITZELL 300nslructlons: - Please type or print and submit In duplicate.

- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment work or consult the Mining Recorder.

- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form In duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work Is assigned to, must accompany this form.

lecorded Holder(s) C06-6MA

\ddressC A A/ ArfS A M h

4**'^ S f- w^sf 5/KK/vtooAJ , ^k 5?jc: ?xSfining Division

bates Work From: Performed

Township/Area

Client No. II *?4^^

Telephone No. (304)144-^54

M or Q Plan No.

To:

/ork Performed (Check One Work Group Only)Work Group

f

Qeotechnlcal Survey

Physical Work, Including Drilling

Rehabilitation

Other Authorized Work

Assays

Assignment from Reserve

Type

o( 1 O/vn-trrnjA (lv in '\t*-fy jO

-

"f3NTARIO*G*rO'"OG^;:)1 L '•'•"^yf-YGIS - AS c'FJ; f W! r," filES

MAi' V o : ;-Li

rt i,..- f*i i-- t v if-- tj-^nfcCrn'r.LJa,,, w.jj^.j-CTjm^***—"— •"•--••••"- •••-.- f—-

3tal Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs $ ^ cv .^5 f?

ote: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

arsons and Survey Company Who Performed (he Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address

^45^ ^ î

LU LI.l 5/T5 Ti. 253\jt, ovt) C*

tach a schedule If necessary)

notification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse sidecertify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered In this work iport were recorded In the current holder's name or held under a beneficial Interest y (he current recorded holder.

Dale Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

rtlflcatlon of Work Reportcertify that l have i completion and•ne and Address of

a personal knowledge of the facts set forth In Ihls Work report, having performed the annexed report Is true.Person Certifying

JfAr^y loo -IV?' n'K KIT'it't tfyt Ktw^rt-\.9pone No. Da"VIÛv Certified By (Signature)

^

work or witnessed same

i r\tfv^fUfvÂ Lxc

Û^l^t^

during anoVor after

)1X 3C 3

r Office Use OnlyMining Recorder.• Receivedotal Value Cr. Recorded Date Recorded

Deemed Date

ate lor Amendments Sent

Dale AporovedDO) 18 199?

rl-

por-

Q

.• ai

i it f I*

00.

'j J CT-

t^^

^/"

l

oO

Value

of

Assessment

Work

Done on this

Claim t

l

HJ

Cred

its y

ou a

re c

laim

ing

in th

is re

port

may

be

cut b

ack.

In o

rder

to m

inim

ize th

e ad

vers

e ef

fecls

of s

uch

dele

tions

, ple

ase

indi

cate

from

wh

ich c

laim

s yo

u wi

sh to

prio

rize

the

dele

tion

of c

redi

ts.

Plea

se m

ark

(^)

one

of th

e fo

llowi

ng:

1. 0

Cre

dits

are

to b

e cu

t bac

k st

artin

g wi

th th

e cla

im li

sted

last,

wor

king

back

ward

s.2.

D C

redi

ts a

re to

be

cut b

ack

equa

lly o

ver a

ll cla

ims

cont

aine

d in

this

repo

rt of

wor

k.J.

D C

redit

s ar

e lo

be c

ut b

ack

as p

rioriz

ed o

n the

atta

ched

app

endix

.

'n th

e ev

ent t

hat y

ou h

ave

not s

pecif

ied

your

cho

ice o

f prio

rity,

opt

ion

one

will

be im

plem

ente

d.

,

•le 1

: Ex

ampl

es o

f ben

efic

ial I

nter

est a

re u

nrec

orde

d tra

nsfe

rs, o

ptio

n ag

reem

ents

, mem

oran

dum

of a

gree

men

ts, e

tc.,

with

resp

ect

to th

e m

inin

g cl

aim

s.

le 2

: If

wor

k ha

s be

en p

erfo

rmed

on

pate

nted

or

leas

ed la

nd,

plea

se c

ompl

ete

the

follo

win

g:

certi

fy th

at th

e re

cord

ed h

olde

r had

a b

enef

icial

Inte

rest

In th

e pa

tent

ed

T le

ased

land

at t

he ti

me

the

work

was

per

form

ed.

Sign

atur

eDa

te

Wn Development rflnes

rilnlstere duDtfktppement du Nord

mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

Etat des couts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Loi sur les mines

Transaction No./N" de transaction

Personal Inlormation collected on this form Is obtained under the authority of Ihe Mining Act. This Information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining clalm(s). Questions about this collection should be directed lo the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.

Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la presente formula son! recueillis en vertu de la Lol aur lea mines at servlront a tenlr a jour un reglstre des concessions mlnleres. Adresser toute quaslton sur la collece da ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains mlnlers, mlnlstere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines, 159. rue Cedar, 4e elage. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.

1. Direct Costs/CoQts directs

Type

Wagea Salalrea

Contractor'a and Consultant's FeatDrolta da ('entrepreneur at da ('expert- consell

Suppllea Used Fournlturea utlllaaea

Equipment Rental Location de malarial

Description

Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain

Typo c f r.// Uv/j-'icf

i/no/y y/c'i-t

Type

6'l-f Aox^5 r,'?^

(h\ji\ pK-t^'jS'i**

/W'^./'y.AVv/U

Type

Amount Montan)

;/ t 7.3

42 #.12

111 "'

53065-3

3*i

Total Direct Costs Total des coOts directs

Totals Total global

/K?3

3nss

#5?

Wti}

2. Indirect Costs/CoQts Indlrects* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not

allowable as assessment work. Pour le remboursemenl des travaux de rehabilitation, les couts Indirects ne sont pas admlssibles en lanl que Iravauxdevaluation.

Type

Transportation Transport

Food and Lodging Nourriture et hdbergementMobilization and Demobilization Mobilisation et demobilisation

Description

Type

60rHvrn**7i4CAA*'v-n

Amount Montant

W

Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partlel des coOts Indlrects

Amount Allowable (not greater than 20H of Direct Costs) Montant admissible (n'excedant pas 20 H dea coflts directs)Total Value of Assessment Credit Valeur totals du credit Total of Direct and Allowable devaluation ndlraet co*l*) (Totil dal eoOla dlraela

Totals Total global

y.f-*'.;'' .W;y.; ;'-V-'.'- i-1 ; r" '

• ' ' -- - '- 'v :i *:s".'f' :"

^T

frXt,it Indirect* •dmlMlblei

Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification Is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Note : Le titulaire enregistre sera tenu de verifier les ddpenses demandees dans le present d tat des couts dans les 30 jours sulvant une demande a eel effet. Si la verification n'est pas effectude, le minlstre peut rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux devaluation pr4sent6s.

Filing Discounts

1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 10007o of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

Remises pour dep6t

1. Les travaux deposes dans les deux ans suivant leur achievement sont rembourses a 100 0A de la valeur totale susmenlionnee du credit devaluation.

2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at SQo/b of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed

x 0.50 "

2. Les Iravaux deposes trols, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achievement sont rembourses a 50 0A de la valeur totale du credit d'evaluatlon susmentionne. Volr les calculs cl-dessous.

Valeur totale du credit devaluation

x 0,50 -

Evaluation totale demandee

Certification Verifying Statement of Costs

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were Incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.

that as ojjsW-t(Recorded Holder, Agent,

tA )S'tIn V^stmnatIn Company)

to make this certification

Attestation de I'^tat des couts

J'atteste par la presents :que les montants Indlques sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer les travaux d'evaluatlon sur les terrains Indlques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-jolnt.

| am authorized Et qu'a litre de )e suis autorlse(lltulaire enreglstre, representant, posle occupe dana la compagnle)

a falre cette attestation.

Signature Dale

0212 (04/91) Nota : Dans cette formule, lorsqu'll deslgne des personnes, le masculln ait utilise au sens neutre.

cogema canada limited burntbush river project … · survey (1990) at 14 080 hz, believed to be a...

Documents