coherent referral process · coherent referral process . 10/19/12 kate nichols 98536 beth mauch tim...
TRANSCRIPT
5/3/2013
coherent referral
Process
10/19/12 Kate Nichols 98536
Beth Mauch Tim Knoster
SPECED 483 Poor/Insufficient Classwork
Not typing assignments, minimal work completed
Student conference, explicitly re-explained course expectations
1
5/3/2013
Faculty Referral Database - Example Last Name
First name
BU ID # Faculty Source Date Sem/ Year
Behavioral Concern
Comments Actions/Interve ntion
Follow‐up
Holl Tiffany 599483 Starkey, Charles 9/26/12 Fall 2012
Missing clearances; Failure to/ Tardiness in Correspondence with Faculty/Staff
Delays in responding to e‐mails
Tier I: Reflection Papers
Adequate Response to Intervention
Smith Char 993876 Feather, Ralph 3/14/13 Spring 2013 Absent from Required Training
Missed Symposium
Tier I: Meeting with Advisor and Dept. Chair & Made up Meeting
Adequate Response to Intervention
Rock Sam 144531 Knoster, Tim 1/15/13 Spring 2013 Poor/Insufficient Classwork
Minimal Effort on Assignments
Tier II: Targeted Skills Instruction
Continue Tier II Intervention
Thom Brock 845698 Nichols, Kate 2/2/13 Spring 2013 University Policy Violation
University Conduct Violation
Tier III: Behavioral Contracting & Check In Check Out
Taking break from school
Pierce Jack 722221 Kemper, Charlotte 1/11/13 Spring 2013 Disrespectful Interaction with Faculty/Staff
Oppositional toward instructor
Tier I: Increased Meetings with Advisor
New Advanced Tier I intervention
Pierce Jack 722221 Kemper, Charlotte 1/31/13 Spring 2013 Disrespectful Interaction with Faculty/Staff
Oppositional toward instructor
Tier I: Reflection Papers
Adequate Response to Intervention
Jacks Matt 834991 Andrezze, Crystal 2/9/13 Spring 2013 Failure to Register for Courses
Did not register for Spring Semester
Tier I: Meeting with Advisor and Dept. Chair
Withdrew from Major
Pierce Jack 722221 Nichols, Kate 2/2/13 Spring 2013 Tardiness/Missing Scheduled Appointments
Failure to attend scheduled meeting
Tier II: Behavioral Contracting
Adequate Response to Intervention
Rock Sam 144531 Knoster, Tim 3/3/13 Spring 2013 Unprofessional Demeanor
Disrespectful during Field Experience
Tier II: Reflective Papers and Peer‐based Supports
Continue Tier II Intervention
Fall 2012 Referrals
• 60 referrals were made to the Dept. of Exceptionalities Chair • 10 students had multiple referrals (total of 23 of 60 referrals)
• Majority of Referral Issues: • Failure to attend scheduled meeting/event • Class attendance/performance • Advisement Concerns • Failure to respond in a timely manner to contact from BU faculty or
staff
• Tier I Interventions Implemented: • Informal progress monitoring • Communication/meeting with faculty and/or Dept. Chair • Meetings plus additional interventions (e.g., reflective journals)
2
5/3/2013
3
Spring 2013 Tier II Referrals
Student 1 • Multiple referrals:
• Attendance
• Course Performance
• Failure to maintain clearances
• Advanced Tier I Interventions: • Progress monitoring and weekly
reflective journaling
• Tier II Intervention: • Progress Monitoring in all courses
• Formal Behavioral Contract
Student 2 • Multiple referrals:
• Attendance
• Failure to to Communicate with Faculty
• Advanced Tier I Interventions: • Met with Faculty and Chair
• Referred to BU Counseling Services
• Tier II Intervention: • Progress Monitoring
• Daily contact (texts) with Chair
• Private Counseling Services
self-evaluation
& action planning
5/3/2013
Higher Ed MTSS BOQ
• BOQ has been adapted to assess MTSS implementation at Higher Ed Level
• To be completed by Institute’s coreresearch & practices team during summer 2013
• Results will be utilized to track level ofimplementation and establish an actionplan to continue to expand the impact of the efforts of the Institute
• BOQ has been adapted to assess MTSS implementation at Higher Ed Level
• To be completed by Institute’s core research & practices team during summer 2013
• Results will be utilized to track level of implementation and establish an action plan to continue to expand the impact of the efforts of the Institute
Emerging MTSS
Processes in coe
4
5/3/2013
MTSS: Tier II
• Student referral process for MTSS • MTSS manual for faculty • Progress Monitoring Database • Tier II Team (COE Intervention Protocol)
• Tier II Interventions • Additional Training on Professionalism Standards
(emphasis on particular rules targeted groups of students are having difficulty with)
• Remedial activities to address concepts not mastered in course
• Increased progress monitoring
• Student Referrals to MTSS • Tier II Supports Progress Monitoring (student
performance) • MTSS Evaluation
Systems
Practices
Data
Outcomes: Academic
Achievement & Professionalism
MTSS EBP’s Tier II
1. Tier II Interventions Targeted Skills Instruction Horner, Sugai, & Anderson (2008)
2. Increased Progress Monitoring and Guidance/Advisement Horner, Sugai, & Anderson (2008) Bray, 1985; Brophy, 1984; Glennen & Farren, 1990; Glennen et al., 1996; Holmes, 2000; Nichols, 1986; Shultz, 1989; Spears, 1990
3. Peer-based Supports • Mentoring • Peer tutoring
Budge, 2006; Miller, 2005; Pagan & Edwards-Wilson, 2002/03; Thomas & Ward, 2010;Ward, Thomas, & Disch, 2009; Ward, Thomas, & Disch, 2010; What Works Clearinghouse, 2012
4. Explicit Expectations for Accountability & Performance • Text Messaging to Improve Attendance/Timeliness • Behavioral Contracting
Bicard et al., 2012 Bristol & Sloane, 1974; Kehle et al., 2000; McCoy et al, 1977; Newstrom, McLaughlin, & Sweeney, 1999; Ruth, 1996; Wilkinson, 2003
5. Student Counseling Services Bishop & Walker, 1990; Campbell, 1965; Frank & Kirk, 1975; Vermeersch et al., 2004; Whipple et al., 2003
5
5/3/2013
MTSS: Tier III
Systems
Practices
Data
Outcomes: Academic
Achievement & Professionalism
• Student referral process for MTSS • MTSS manual for faculty • Progress Monitoring Database • Student intervention team (COE Intervention
Protocol)
• Competing Behavior Pathway (Self-reflection by student)
• Tier III interventions (Behavior Contract, CICO, Intensive Faculty/Chairperson Advisement
• Individualized, explicit standards for Professionalism targeting deficit areas
• Extensive remedial activities to address concepts not mastered in course
• Student Referrals to MTSS • Tier III Supports Progress Monitoring (student
performance) • Student Grades and Levels of Performance • MTSS Evaluation
MTSS EBP’s Tier III
1. Check & Connect Anderson, Christenson, Sinclair, & Lehr, 2004; Cheney et al., 2009; Christenson et al., 2008
2. Behavioral Contracting with CICO (Hybrid) Bristol & Sloane, 1974; Kehle et al., 2000; McCoy et al, 1977; Newstrom, McLaughlin, & Sweeney, 1999; Ruth, 1996; Wilkinson, 2003
3. Meetings & Intensive Guidance/Advisement Bray, 1985; Brophy, 1984; Glennen & Farren, 1990; Glennen et al., 1996; Holmes, 2000; Nichols, 1986; Shultz, 1989; Spears, 1990
4. Change of Major (when warranted)
6
5/3/2013
Future Institute/MTSS
Activities
Year 2 Actions (2013-14)
• Continue to support year two implementation in Exceptionalities Programs and facilitate roll out MTSS in Early Childhood/Adolescent Education and Educational Services/Secondary Education Departments
• Commence research projects to evaluate effectiveness of MTSS
• On-going implementation and research planning with MTSS core team
• Develop COE-wide MTSS manual and referral process
• Initiate completion of PBIS modules assigned to core courses
• Establish collaborative relationship across Bloomsburg University to identify need for MTSS (not limited to COE)
7
5/3/2013
Year 3 & 4 Actions (2014-15)
• Evaluate longitudinal impact of MTSS on student retention and graduation
• Completion of PBIS modules associated with 5 core courses completed by all education undergraduate majors
• Establish collaborative relationship with higher education institutions seeking to implement MTSS
• Sustain MTSS with fidelity within College of Education
• Integrate MTSS into graduate education programs
Final Thoughts
Forcopies ofmaterialsoradditionalinfo:www.bloomu.edu/mcdowell [email protected]
8