Col Craig Olson and Michael Tkach

NAVAIR PMA-27518 January 2004

V-22Program Brief

NAVY-INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL DIALOG

Disclaimer

This briefing may contain references to projected U.S. Government plans and potential system capabilities.

Mention of them in no way guarantees that the U.S. government will follow these plans or that any of the associated system capabilities, if developed, will be available or releasable to foreign governments

Flight of the OspreyFilm Clip

• 2 mishaps in CY 2000

• Operational pause– 12 reviews incl BRP, NASA, GAO, DODIG, Engineering

– Redesign of electrical and hydraulic line clearances, flight control software, and cautions / warnings / advisories

– Most extensive Flight Readiness Review in 2002

• O-6, 1 star, 3 Star

• 18 organizations incl NAVAIR, ASC, COMOPTEVFOR, SOCOM, AFOTEC, HQMC, AFSOC

• Restructured JPO and flight test program– Gov’t / contractor collocated IPTs

– Event driven flight test

• Frequent EXCOMMs

• Returned to flight on May 29, 2002

Reviews / Redesign / Restructure

BRP & NASA Summaries

• BRP Conclusions– "…the Panel recommends that the Department proceed with

the V-22 Program, but temporarily reduce production to a minimum sustaining level to provide funds for a Development Maturity Phase."

• NASA Conclusion– "There are no known aeromechanics phenomena that would

stop the safe and orderly development and deployment of the V-22."

• Specific recommendations to flight test program

V-22 Joint Program Office

SustainmentLtCol Scherer / Mr. Burcham /

LtCol Tavares

MV-22 IPTMr. Raggets LtCol GrossMr. Peasley

MV-22 TestMr. Byrne / LtCol Witzig / LCDR

Stuart

CV-22 TestMr. Sisterman / Maj Weber / Maj

Pittman

Integrated Product Teams

Leadership Team

Legend:

ContractsMr. J. Gerber Ms. Whitling

BFMMr Lowien

Ms. Whitling

Cost AnalysisMs. Ryan

Ms. Whitling

LogisticsMr. BernardMr. Burcham

OperationsMr. Wellmann / Mr. Dykes

MS III/FRP/S&TCDR Roof Maj Harris

FMS / Bus DevMr. Moritz / Mr. Goode

Block AMaj Cox

Block BMs. Herold

Block CMaj Rumsey

Development / ModsMr. Merritt / Mr. Goodley

Mr. Weaver

Development / ModsMr. Jackson/ Maj White /

Mr. Frazer

Block 0 / 10Ms. Jackson

Block 20TBD

SustainmentLtCol Peters / Mr. Burcham

EngineeringMr Baile

Mr. Moorman

CV-22 IPTCol. Garvin

Ms. CaldwellMr. Griffin

ProductionMr. Hite / Ms. Sanders

Mr. Porter

WSICAPT Black / Ms. Bose

Mr. Groenenboom

IT CM AffordabilityRisk

V-22 PM Col Olson / Mr.Tkach

V-22 DPM Col Taylor / Mr. Buyers

Special Staff to PM PAO Mr. Carroll

Counsel Mr. BiglinSecurity Mr. Lyons

Concurrency IntegrationMs. Paris

Training

LtCol SchuelerMr. Sullivan

System IntegrationCapt Oyama

Draft

Multi-Mission Tiltrotor AircraftJoint Service

USMC USNUSSOCOM

PERSONNEL RECOVERY

FLEET LOGISTIC SUPPORTAERIAL REFUELER

CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

LONG-RANGE SPECIAL OPERATIONS

SPECIAL WARFARE

SUSTAINED LAND OPERATIONS

SELF-DEPLOYMENT

AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT

EVACUATIONS AND MARITIME SPECIAL OPERATIONS

360 MVs 50 CVs 48 MVs

V-22 General Description

Medium lift replacement for CH-46E and CH-53D

Versatility of a helicopter....

…. with the speed and range of a turboprop

+

• Plus significant operational enhancements– Susceptibility and vulnerability reductions– Frontline survivability– Reliability and maintainability improvements– Availability and Dependability

0

4,000

8,000

12,000

16,000

20,000

24,000

28,000

32,000

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

Airspeed - Knots

Alt

itu

de

- ft

.

0 350AirspeedKts

32,000

AltitudeFt

C-130

H-60

V-22Tiltrotor

16,000

Standard Day

MV-22 Mission: Vertical-lift, assault support of combat troops, supplies, and equipment

Landing Zone Distance 7575 nm

CH-46 MV-22

Sorties: 82 Sorties: 41

12 Aircraft: 8-9 waves 12 Aircraft: 4 waves

12 hrs 33 hrs

Landing Zone Distance 200200 nm

CH-53D MV-22

Sorties: 41 Sorties: 41

12 Aircraft: 4 waves 12 Aircraft: 4 waves

16 hrs 8 8 hrs

Lifting a 975-Marine Battalion

MV-22 vs CH-46E vs CH-60 Combat Mission RadiusMV-22 vs CH-46E vs CH-60 Combat Mission RadiusMV-22 vs CH-46E vs CH-60 Combat Mission RadiusMV-22 vs CH-46E vs CH-60 Combat Mission Radius

CH-46 Operational Limit75 nm Combat Radius

CH-53D Operational Limit200 nm Combat Radius

V-22 Operational Limit 240+ nm Combat Radius

MV-22 Mission: Vertical-lift, assault support

of combat troops, supplies, and equipment

1/6/05 10

Time Now

V-22 Schedule

MV-22

Development

Block A Safe & Operational

Block B Enhanced Maintainability

Block C Mission Enhancements

CV-22

Development

Block 0/10 MMR/SIRFC/DIRCMBlock 20 SOCOM Mission Enhancements

Block 20 Air Force Mission Enhancements

Aircraft Procurement

Block 0/10 (QTY)

Block 20 SOCOM (QTY)

Block 20 Air Force (QTY)

Lot 8

Decision Review

T&E

Aircraft Procurement

Block B Production (QTY)

Block B Mod/Retrofit (QTY)

Block C (QTY)

Decision Review

Lot 9 Lot 10 Lot 11 Lot 12 Lot 13 Lot 15Lot 14

FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11 FY11Lot 17Lot 16 Lot 18

OT-IIF OT-IIG OPEVAL

FOT&EFOT&E

MS III IPR (Blk C)IOC

OUE IOT&E

FOT&E

FOT&E

IPR (Blk 10) IPR (Blk 20) S IPR (Blk 20) AF

ATAPRTVs

V-22 Spiral Development Evolutionary Acquisition

• Two development processes to implement Evolutionary Acquisition Strategy– Incremental development: End-state requirement is known,

and requirement will be met over time in several increments.

– Spiral development: Desired capability is identified, but end-state requirements are not known at Program Initiation. Requirements for future increments dependent upon technology maturation and user feed back from initial increments.

• Evolutionary acquisition strategy is the preferred approach to meeting operational needs

• Spiral development is the preferred process

MV-22 Description

• Block A – Safe and Operational

– Line clearance improvements

– Flight control software changes

• Block B – Enhanced Maintainability

– Effectiveness and suitability improvements for the fleet

• Block C – Preplanned Product Improvements

Below Threshold0 – 5 % Margin Above 5 % Margin

Remarks

Max MCP Cruise Speed

Self – Deployment (3 x 430 gal)

Pre - Assault Raid

Amphib Assault - Troops

Amphib Assault – External Cargo

Land Assault - Troops

Land Assault - Ext Cargo

SD-572 Mission

MV-22 Mission Performance Summary

240 KTAS

2,100 NM

200 NM

50 NM

50 NM

200 NM

50 NM

Thresholds

264.8 KTASX

2,384 NM1X

268.6 NMX

82.2 NM

130.1 NM

245.9 NM

63.3 NMX

@ Block A Projected Wt

KPP

With Block B WAT, MAT kits

MV-22 Performance

1Pending latest performance estimate with forward MAT only 80% full

Ref: Jul 04 Aero/Perf Summary

• Multi-mode Terrain Following / Terrain Avoidance Radar

• Additional internal fuel

• Suite of Integrated RF Countermeasures

• Directional IR Countermeasures (Laser Turrets)

MV & CV Commonality

• Airframe 90%

• Avionics 40%

• Propulsion 100%

CV-22 Description

CV-22 Performance

Below Threshold0 – 5 % Margin Above 5 % Margin

Max MCP Cruise Speed

Self-Deployment (2 x 430 gal)

Special Operations Mission Radius

230 NM

2100 NM

500 NM

X

2231 NM2X

552 NM1X

235 KTAS

CV-22 Mission Performance Summary

Operational Environment

Operational Environment

Interoperability

Payload (Troops/Cargo)

RemarksSD-572 Mission Thresholds

@ Block 0/10 Projected Wt

KPP

300 ft. TF/TA VMC/IMC

DECM (SIRFC RWR)

Satisfy Top Level IERs

18/8000

Currently testing 200’ airplane/100’ conv mode TF

X

X

X

X

DIRCM, SIRFC jamming

Retractable Air Refueling Probe

Change in MAT design

Ref: Nov 04 Aero/Perf Summary

Pax• 7 MV-22s

– Flight control system software– Line Clearance– HROD– Low airspeed combat

maneuverability– Shipboard compatibility (incl

roll on deck)– Emergency landing profile

demo– Aerial Delivery– Ice Protection System– Formation flight

Edwards• 2 CV-22s

– CV performance– Terrain following– Suite of Integrated Radio

Frequency Countermeasures

Safe, Methodical, and Event Driven – 1969 hours

DT: Aggressively Kicking Over Every Rock

Operational Assessment vs Operational Evaluation Comparison

OA (OT-IIF)

• Event driven

– Started 18 May; Completed on 2 July 04

• 3 acft – 120 + flt hrs

• Limited scope

• Test areas– Day / VMC– IAW published restrictions

• Risk reduction for OT-IIG

• COTF recommendation to Milestone Decision Authority “Effective and Suitable” supports full rate production decision (Nov 05)

OPEVAL (OT-IIG)

• Event driven – 5 months

– Feb to June 05

• Up to 8 acft – 400+ flt hrs

• Complete formal evaluation

• Test to TEMP / JORD

COTF

Fin

al re

port

Issu

ed

VMX-22 Build-up Summary

Accomplishments from Nov 2003 stand-up to date• Accepted 14 aircraft • Flown over 2900 hours• Completed OT-IIF (May-June 04)• Austere landings (Sept-Oct 04) Nellis AFB • Validation & Verification of IETM’s• Mission area training

– Air Refueling– Para Ops– External lifts– Cargo drops– Fast rope– Formation– Carrier qualifications– Night Vision Goggle

• All in preparation for OPEVAL start in Feb 2005

Operational Test -IIG

MCAS NR

Tes

t A

ircra

ft

China Lake

TacticsSurvivability

3 Wks 3 A/C

MCAS Yuma

Shipboard

Sel

f-d

eplo

y

Sel

f-d

eplo

y

3 Wks 8 A/C 4 Wks 8 A/C 2 Wks 8 A/C

– Scenario based Asslt Spt, Tactics, Self-deploy, and Interoperability

NEW RIVER–Final OPEVAL

training –Non-scenario

JORD, KPP and specific events items if req’d.

– Shipboard JORD profiles

– Scenario based testing andTTP development

1 Wks 2 A/C

– Environmental Compatibility, Cold TTP development

Bridgeport

Sh

ipb

oar

d 2

-3 A

/C f

or

Ris

k M

itig

atio

n

1 Wk 2 A/C 1 Wk 8 A/C

China Lake

4 Wks 8 A/C

– Scenario based Survivability, TTP development

MC

AS

New

Riv

er f

or

Tes

t cl

ean

-up

Summary

• Since return to flight May 2002 we have had 4 years of successful Event Driven, Development and Operational Testing

• Currently, 4,869 hours of DT and OT in preparation for OPEVAL

• We have every confidence in handing the aircraft over to VMX-22 for OPEVAL

• The JPO believes the V-22 will be judged Effective and Suitable for Full Rate Production decision this fall