cold atoms and stable lasers: the clocks of the future today · tanya ramond →ball aero. ... john...
TRANSCRIPT
Cold Atoms and Stable Lasers: The Clocks of the Future Today
Leo Hollberg National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) , Boulder CO
Optical Synthesizer
Optical Frequency Reference
µ-wave out
optical out
fr
0
I(f)
f
Ca Oven
fn = nfr
Optical Frequency Measurements GroupTime and Frequency Division, NIST, Boulder
Cold Ca & YbOptical Clocks
Chris OatesChad Hoyt
Zeb Barber (CU) Guido Wilpers (→ PTB)
Anne Curtis (CU → London)
Fs Frequency CombsScott Diddams
Albrecht Bartels → KonstanceKyoungsik Kim (CU)Tara Fortier (LANL)
Eugene Ivanov (UWA)L-S Ma, Z. Bi, (ECNU-BIPM)
L.Robertson (BIPM)Tanya Ramond → Ball Aero.
•$$ NIST, DARPA-MTO, ONR-CU-MURI, NASA-microgravity physics, LANL
Mercury StandardJim Bergquist, Windell Oskay, S Bize → SYRTE, W Itano, D Wineland, and others
Cs fountain and NIST time scaleSteve Jefferts, Liz Donley, Tom Heavner, Tom Parker
Chip Scale Atomic DevicesJohn KitchingSvenja KnappePeter SchwindtHugh Robinson
Vishal Shah (CU)Ying-Ju Wang (CU)
Vlady Gerginov (Notre Dame)
Diode laser and length metrology Richard Fox
Types of Clocks
Ruler Clock
Decay
Stable Oscillator
Atomic Energy Levels
∆E ≡ h ν ∆ t = n / νE1
E2
• require predictable vs. time and measurable
L
Resonator ∆ t = 2L / c
A=a0e -(t/τ)
quartz
e+α
Ue-
t
t
∆ν
Ca
Detector
Local Oscillator
High-Q resonatorQuartz
Fabry Perot cavity
Feedback SystemLocks LO to
atomic resonance
Microwave SynthesizerLaser
456 986 240 494 158
Counter
υ
Generic Atomic Clock
Atoms
Atomic Beam Clock
Ramsey Method
Cs
Signal
# of Atoms
dB/dxdB/dx
Local Oscillator
L
l
∆ν ≈ v / l ∆ν ≈ v / 2L
NIST F1, Cs atomic fountain clockPrimary frequency Standard of U.S.
S. Jefferts, L. Donley, T. Heavner
CSAC Design: All optical excitation of atomic microwave clock transition (Coherent Population Trapping)
1.5 mm
3.2 mm
1.5 mm
Laser
Optics
Cell
Photodiode
1 mmVolume: 7.2 mm3
Cell interior volume: 0.6 mm3
John Kitching, Svenja Knappe …
Current Microwave-Based Standards and Distribution
Approaching the limit for standards and distribution systems.
NISTMeasurementSystemHydrogen
Masersand
CesiumClocks
HydrogenMasers
andCesiumClocks
NIST-F1NIST-F1
GPS
Communications satellites
Radiobroadcasts
∆f/f ~ 1x10-15
for standards and distribution
Rb and/or Cs
Attributes of Clocks / Frequency Standards
Accuracy: Same average frequency fclock = fatom
Reproducibility: Different clocks give same frequency.
Stability: Frequency does not change with time.
fatom
Time
Freq. Quartz
Hydrogen maser 1
Hydrogen maser 2
Cs
o
rms
ff )(τ∆
Advantages of Optical Clocks
0
1 1ff Nτ
∆⋅ ⋅Frequency uncertainty ~
τ = observation time
N = number of atoms
510
15
0
0 101010
≈≈microwave
opticalf
f
Laser-cooled Trapped Ions Laser-cooled Neutral atoms
• Narrow linewidth• Long observation times• Possibility of entanglement
• Large number of atoms 106 or more
• High signal/noise• Possibility of lattices
Hg+, Al+, B+, Yb+ , Sr+ , In+ … Ca, Sr, Yb, Mg, H …
∆f
fo
Atomic Resonance
One atomic clock is always “perfect”Two similar clocks -- hard to detect systematic errors Different types of clocks can determine most accurate and stable
10-17
10-16
10-15
10-14
10-13
Alla
n D
evia
tion
-- In
stab
ility
10-2 100 102 104 106
Averaging Time (s)
H-maser
Cs
Hg+
Ca
1 day 1 monthCa
Oscillator Stabilityσ(
τ)
GPS
Quantum Limited Instability1 ( ) ~
o
ff N
σ ττ
∆
Alkaline-earth atoms make good optical atomic clocks, Ca example
(1) Singlet-triplet structure leads to narrow transitions in the optical domain
(2) Strong 1S0 → 1P1 transitions good for laser cooling
m = 01S0 (4s2)
1P1 (4s4p)
657 nm clock∆ν = 400 Hz
3P1 (4s4p)m = 0
Ca magneto-optic trap features
Slowing Beam∆ = - 260 MHz
~107 atoms
846 nm ECDL+ MOPA
KNbO3 40 mW
Trapping Beams∆ = - 35 MHz
Probe Beams∆ = - 10 MHz
T = 2 mK
AOM
AOM
AOM
dB/dz = 60 G/cm
13 cmCa Oven
Vacuum System
657 nm clock
1S0
3P1
423 nmcooling
400 Hz wide Ramsey fringes
Diode Laser
EOMServo
Isolator
AOM synthesizer
Atom error signal
1P1The Ca Optical StandardThe Ca Optical Standard
C. Oates G. Wilpers
C. Oates, et al. Opt. Lett. 25, 1603 (2000)
Residual Doppler effect
Trebst et al: IEEE Trans. IM-50 (2001) 535
R1
Freely expanding atoms
αg
R2
Atomic velocityAtomic velocity
WavefrontWavefront curvaturecurvature
GravitationGravitation
Beam directionBeam direction
Rtrktgtvrktr i
iii 2)()
21())((
22
00⊥+⋅+⋅+⋅=Φ
θ
Neutral Atom Lattice Clock Example
1S0
3P0
Optical Clock Transition
Advantages: No motion → Lamb Dicke limit, Long observation time, Collisions minimized
Candidates:87Sr, 171Yb, 43Ca
657 nm clock
1S0
3P1
423 nmcooling
Lattice field
∆ν
Ca
Detector
Local Oscillator
High-Q resonatorQuartz
Fabry Perot cavity
Feedback SystemLocks LO to
atomic resonance
Microwave SynthesizerLaser
456 986 240 494 158
Counter
υ
Generic Atomic Clock
Atoms
Vastly Simplified and Improved Synthesis Chain
NBS Laser Frequency Synthesis Chain(1979)
K. M. EvensonD. A. Jennings J. S. WellsC. R. PollockF. R. PetersenR. E. DrullingerE. C. BeatyJ. L. HallH. P. LayerB. L. DanielsonG. W. DayR. L. Barger
Required many labs filled with lasers, microwave synthesizers, and electronics.
Cs FREQSTANDARD
COUNTERν0 = 0.010 600 363 69KLYSTRON
ν1 = 0.074 232 545 83KLYSTRON
ν2 = 0.890 760 550HCN (337 µm)
ν3 = 10.718 068 6H2O (28 µm)
ν4 = 32.134 266 891
ν R(10) (9.3 µm)
ν5 = 29.442 483 315
CO2 ν R(30) (10.2 µm)
ν6 = 88.376 181 627He-Ne CH4P(7) (3.39 µm)
ν7 = 147.915 857Xe (2.03 µm)
ν8 = 196.780 372He-Ne (1.52 µm)
ν9 = 260.103 264Ne (20Ne)
He-Ne ν102 1.15 µm
X2XTAL
ν10(127I2)
ν10 = 520.206 837
13C16O2 9 µm R(20)
C16O2 9 µm R(22)XTALXTAL
CO (6.1 µm)ν = 48.862 075
CO2 9 µm P(36)
CO2 10 µm P(8)
SA
SA
SA
SA K
KSA
KSA
SA K
SA
SA
SA
K KLYSTRON
SPECTRUM ANALYZER
DIODE
CHARTREUSE
ν1 =7 ν0 + ν1Β
ν2 =12 ν1 + ν2Β
ν3 =12 ν2 + 0.029 + ν3Β
ν3 =3 ν3 − 0.020 + ν4Β
ν5 = ν4 − 3 ν2 − 0.020 + ν5Β
ν6 = 3 ν5 − 0.049 + ν6Β
ν7 = ν6 + ν’CO + ν’’CO + ν7Β2 2
ν9 = ν8 + ν’CO + ν’’CO + ν9Β2 2
ν8 = ν7 + νCO + ν8Β
ν10 = 2ν9 + ν10Β
all frequencies in THz
Ti:SapphireGain
532 nmPump
Femtosecond-Laser-Based Synthesizers/Dividers
Albrecht Bartels, Scott Diddams, Tanya Ramond
10 fs
Ultrashort optical pulse, plus nonlinear fiber → Broad SpectumRepetitive pulse train → Frequency Comb → “ruler for frequency/time”
Relationship Between Pulse Duration and Spectral Bandwidth
time
Wavelength
Power
•Initial efforts/ideas: J. Eckstein, A. Ferguson & T. Hänsch (1978), V. P. Chebotayev (1988)**
The frequency of a mode is simply FN = N * frep – f0Where N is and integer ~ 10
6
Frequencyfr=1/ τr.t.
f0
frep ~ 1000 MHz
0
0
I(f)
f
fo
0fn = n frep + fo
frep
x2 f2n = 2nfrep + fo
fo
Self-Referenced Optical Frequency Sythesizer
• fo is generated from a heterodyne beat between the second harmonic of the nth mode and the 2nth mode.
• Once frep and fo are referenced to a Cs clock, all the frequency modes of the fs comb are known absolutely
Jones, et al. Science 288, 635 (2000)
Cs ~9 GHz
Hg+, Ca~500 THzFemtosecond Laser Comb
50,000:1 Reduction Gear(not to scale!)
RF to Optical Clockwork with a Femtosecond Laser Comb
Electric Field from a Femtosecond Mode-locked Laser
0 fn = nfr + fo= fr (n + ∆φ/2π)
I(f)
f
fo fr
Frequency domain
2∆φ
τr.t = 1/fr
t
E(t)
Time domain∆φ
Carrier-envelopephase slip from pulseto pulse because:
vg ≠ vp
Modes are offset from harmonics of fr by:
fo = fr ∆φ/2π
Original ideas: Hänsch, Wineland, Udem
Testing the Femtosecond Synthesizer
Diode Laser456 THz
fs Comb #1
fs Comb #2
fr1 fo1
fr2 fo2
PMT
X-Correlation(tests optical envelope)Jitter: 400 as (1-100 Hz)Stability: <2×10-15 τ-1
Reproducibility : < 1 × 10-18
Optical output is very stable,but photodetection electronics adds Noise!
A. Bartels, T. Ramond, L.-S. Ma, L. Robertsson, M. Zucco, S. Diddams
Optical Heterodyne(tests comb teeth)
Stability: <2 × 10-16 τ-1
Reproducibility: <1 × 10-19
S. Diddams, et al. Opt. Lett 27, 58 (2002)
RF Mixing(tests microwave output)
Stability: ~2×10-15 τ-1
Reproducibility: <1 × 10-16
Ultra-low phase noise microwavesDivided down 500 THz optical frequency reference to 10 GHz
-200
-180
-160
-140
-120
-100
-80
L(f)
[dB
c/H
z]
100 101 102 103 104 105 106
Frequency (Hz)
sapphireresonator
Hg+ optical cavity
Ca standard optical(projected)
Femtosecond-laser-basedsynthesizer
Microwave synthesizer
Broadband Femtosecond Laser with <10 Hz Linewidthat optical frequency, ~500 THz
Diode Laser456 THz
fs Comb #1
fs Comb #2
Optical Heterodyne
-120
-110
-100
-90
-80
Pow
er (d
Bm)
-10,000 -5,000 0 5,000 10,000Frequency Offset (Hz)
10 Hz RBW, 20 averages82% of power in central peak
-110
-100
-90
-80
-70
Pow
er (d
Bm
)
-200 0 200Frequency Offset (Hz)
Measurementlimited linwidth
of 10 Hz
Applications of Optical Frequency Standards ?
•Advanced communication systems (security, autonomous synchronization)
•Advanced Navigation (position determination and control)
•Precise timing (moving into the fs range)
•Tests of fundamental physics (special and general relativity, time variation of fundamental constants)
•Sensors (strain, gravity, length metrology ……)
•Ultrahigh speed data, multi-channel parallel broadcast, or receivers, coherent communications
A Cosmological Test of the Stability of α
1-1510
5
yr 10yr 10
101 −−
≈×
=∆
∆
tα
α
An accessible level foratomic clocks!
Ca and Hg+ optical frequencies compared to Cs (difference from respective mean values vs. date)
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Freq
uenc
y O
ffset
(Hz)
1/1/1996 1/1/1998 1/1/2000 1/1/2002 1/1/2004Measurement Date
Frequency references, precise timing and Clocks of 21st Century are OPTICAL
• 2000 begins Optical/Laser era in atomic clocks and precision timing • Already providing lowest phase-noise and timing jitter
– (fs jitter will soon be common place)• Very Cold (cm/s) atoms/ions provide the best stability and will provide
the best accuracy– Requires super quality cw lasers and optical cavities– Fs laser based optical frequency combs enabling and nearly pefect
• Not clear which atoms will give best performance and depends on use• Some applications are beginning to appear:
– New tool for science, precise timing, length metrology, communications, navigation, optical radar, chemistry, biology, fundamental physics …