collaborative platforms, why we should interconnect them ?
TRANSCRIPT
December 14th, 2016 Paris, France
Collaborative platforms, why you should
interconnect them?
Presented by
Eric BallotProfessor
MINES ParisTech
Yacine BoualloucheInnovation Project Manager
GS1 France
Disruption in the Supply Chain
From Supply Chain…
&
ONE to ONE ONE to MANY
Interactions
Disruption in the Supply Chain
After the optimization of eachorganization, each supply chain… Finding synergies beetween severalsupply chains is the way to optimize the overall performance
The main goal of this digital transformation is to developcollaborative logistics
MANY to MANY
From Supply Chain to Supply Network
The consequences of this digital transformation
A more complexdigital ecosystem
Changes in IT infrastructures
Drastic changes in the value chains
Speed-up of timeA word without
standard of interconnection
Reasons for co-building the platformization
Fragmentation
“Silo effect”
Interconnection
“Interoperability& trust”
Dominant position
“The winner takes all”
GS1: a ColLABorative platform
GS1 France API LAB for collaborative business
Transport resourcestracking
Asset management / circulatingpackaging
Goodstracking
Organization of transport operations
Document management
API
Transport operations : appointment scheduling
The receptionschedule is
less disrupted
The logisticiancan smooththe workloadand gains in productivity
The trucks waiting time
and theirvariabilitydecrease
Less delays and less doubts is the possibility for the
transporter to deliver several
places
The transporter choosing its time slot dealing withits obligation has
better timing statistics
This collaborative process emergesin the BtoB logistic
To have an appointment means for a transporter to fix a delivery/ picking slot with a logistician
This engages a virtuous circle
Transport operations : appointment scheduling
Most of the time the appointment is made without specific tool
Transporter
Logisticians : delivery/picking
locations
Transport operations : appointment scheduling
Transporter
Logisticians –delivery/picking
locations
Software publisher –Appointment scheduling
platform
It is more practicalto use a tool but this
practice is still a minority
Transport operations : appointment scheduling
Transporter
Logisticians –delivery/picking
locations
Software publishers –Appointment scheduling
platforms
The transporter has to juggle between
each platformchosen by logisticians
Interconnection of collaborative appointment scheduling platforms
Transporter
Logisticians –delivery/picking
locations
Software publishers –Appointment scheduling
platforms
Software publisher –Appointment scheduling
platform
Connector
By dismissed silos, itwill allow algorithms
to optimizetransport, improve
the double appointments, ease
the pooling, etc.
Interconnection of collaborative appointment scheduling platforms
Transporters
Logisticians –delivery/picking
locations
Connector
Software publisher –Appointment scheduling
platform
Software publisher –Appointment scheduling
platform
The interconnexion of this platforms will
allow a fasterdevelopment of the
market
Physical Internet
Already some examples of logistics services interconnection
Schéma de flux CRC Services
CO2 -22%
A bigger picture at french level
Actual networks
Physical InternetNetworks
Interconnection of transport services potential is:
• -15% in distance, +35% in transport mean fill rate, up to -60% CO2 (modal-shift)
• 2 Billion €/year for +1% transport mean fill rate at European level
The definition
The Physical Internet is an interconnected global logistics system enabling
seamless asset sharing and flow consolidation.
The Physical Internet is founded on universal physical, digital, operational, business and legal interconnectivity
achieved through standard open protocols, “encapsulation”, certification,
performance assessment and monitoring.
B. Montreuil, R. D. Meller & E. Ballot, 2011
It is Physical and there is work to do…
A huge need of API in new logistics networks
A shift from:
• Almost no visibilityand connection
• An interconnected logistics world
Linked with:
• Industry 4.0
• Internet of things
Current solutions Target
13
¡ Logistics information structure and communication could be more independent of operators
Information aspect
• Enterprise Resources Planning
• Capture
• Objects
• Software As A Service
• IoT
• Smart objects
E. Ballot Düsseldorf – 16 September 2016
The European Technology platform: ALICE
More than 100 European companies and universities involved
A research roadmap
Dissemination actions
Based on:collaborative development of the vision of the future and competition in the search for solution
http://www.etp-logistics.eu/
