collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – the...

26
Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective bargaining in the EMCEF sectors‘ Elewijt, 25-27 September 2009 Béla Galgóczi and Vera Glassner ETUI [email protected] & [email protected]

Upload: helena-atkinson

Post on 26-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF

CB Report 2009

Seminar ‚Coordination of collective bargaining in the EMCEF sectors‘

Elewijt, 25-27 September 2009

Béla Galgóczi and Vera Glassner

ETUI

[email protected] & [email protected]

Page 2: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

2

Structure of presentation

● The macroeconomic background with view to the crisis● Basic facts and prognoses on the downturn in Europe● Is the crisis over now?● The performance of the relevant manufacturing sub-

sectors (output, orders, employment, productivity)● Snapshot picture in crisis vs longer term trends● Some employment policy tools● EMCEF template results 2009● The controversity of the productivity based wage formula

at the time of the crisis● What does this mean for collective bargaining in the sector ● Conclusions

Page 3: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

3

The nature of the crisis

The financial crisis developed into a full scale global economic crisis and in a wider sense a `systemic crisis`

● as the financial sector had become disconnected from economic fundamentals and developed instruments through financial innovations that started to function in a virtual reality

● The current crisis manifests itself as a severe `demand shock`

● The fundamentals underlying the spread of the crisis, however, were chronic imbalances in the world economy, within the Euro area and within the national economies of many member states.

Page 4: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

4

Europe in full grip of the economic crisis

● The ‘hard landing’ that is visible in the next graph refers mostly to those economies with unsustainable past growth strategies, characterised as ‘bubble growth’ in the previous section.

● The most dramatic downturn is to be seen in Latvia, where above 10% GDP growth in 2007 is likely to turn into a decrease of 13 % by 2009. Previous high-growth economies, such as Estonia, Lithuania and Ireland, are also expected to be hit hard, with a projected drop in GDP of 9-11 % in 2009.

● Other major economies are expected to experience a downturn of around 4-5%, with the Euro area GDP set to fall by 4% and the EU27 by 4 % in 2009 (European Commission 2009). The 5.4% likely downturn in Germany is a huge drag on whole Europe.

Page 5: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

5

Gross domestic product in 2008 and prognosis for 2009 (annual growth)

Data Source: European Commission (2009).

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

LV EE IE DK IT LU SE

PT

HU FR U

K

EA FI

EU

27 BE

ES

DE

MT AT

NL

EL

LT CZ SI

CY

PL

BG

SK

RO

in % 2008

2009

Page 6: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

6

Facts on the downturn in I.Q. 2009 – an even bleaker picture

● The downturn in the first quarter of 2009 was 18.6 % in Latvia, Estonia suffered a 16% drop and Lithuania 11%.

● Only Poland has managed limited growth in the I.Q – showing also that the region is not equally effected

● Lithuania already published its II.Q. GDP figure: with a 22.4% drop (year-on-year) this is the largest GDP fall ever measured in peacetime Europe

● Indeed a dramatic picture for the whole of Europe● Employment shows a mixed picture across countries,

dramatic deterioration in Spain and the Baltic states, relative stability in DE, NL, AT…

Page 7: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

7

Gross domestic product in IV. Q 2008 and in I. Q. 2009 (year on year basis)

Data Source: European Commission (2009).

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

LV

EE

L

T

IE*

SI*

FI*

DE

RO

S

E

SK

IT

LU

* H

U

NL

EU

27

DK*

UK

PT

B

G

CZ

F

R

BE

E

S

AT

E

L

CY

P

L

MT

in % IV.quart.08

I.quart.09

Page 8: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

8

Unemployment rate

02468

101214161820

ES

L

V

EE

L

T

IE

S

K

HU

F

R

PT

S

E

EU27

E

L

BE

P

L

FI

DE

I

T

UK

M

T

BG

L

U

RO

C

Z

SI

DK

C

Y

AT

N

L

in % May 2008

May 2009

Page 9: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

9

Is the `crisis` over now?

Fragile and sporadic signs of an upturn in the Summer of 2009

● Not only in terms of business sentiment and consumer confidence indicators (as IFO index for DE, Philadelphia index for US)

● But in terms of new orders● and factual data GDP growth in Q2 on previous quarter in

DE (+0.3%), FR (+0.3%), still a -5.9% in DE year/on/year● DE industrial output Q2 2009 +2% on Q1, BUT still -23%

year/on/year● Definite signs of an upward turn as a snapshot picture, but

the trend is still downward and it is uncertain bottom has been reached – SUSTAINABLE?? or just effect of stimulus packages?

Page 10: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

10

Relative performance of the manufacturing sector to the whole economy under the current crisis

Manufacturing had been hit exceptionally hard, not just because it is cyclical but because of the nature of the current financial crisis

At the same time employees in manufacturing industry are better protected and have more tools than elsewhere in economy (e.g services)

The result: productivity drop much beyond that of the whole economy

Still the longer term trend of the higher performance of the manufacturing industry remains

Page 11: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

11

EU27 Industry new orders (compared to corresponding period of previous year)

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

in % chemical industry

total industry

Page 12: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

12

EU27 Industry new orders (compared to corresponding period of previous year)

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

Basic metals Motorvehicles

TOTALMANUFACT.

Chemicals &chem.

products

paper &paper

products

Basicpharmaceut.

products

in %

average growth 2008

Q1 2009

April 2009

Page 13: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

13

Output growth

-45-40-35-30-25-20-15-10-505

10

basicpharmaproducts

paper &paper

products

chemicals &chemicalproducts

rubber &plastics

TOTALMANUFACT.

motorvehicles

basic metals

in% Average 2008

Q1 2009

May 2009

Page 14: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

14

Employment growth in selected sectors

-9

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

Motorvehicles

Rubber &plastics

TOTALMANUFACT.

Basic metals Basicpharmaceut.

products

Chemicals &chem.

products

paper &paper

products

in % average growth 2008

March 2009

Page 15: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

15

Relative performance of the chemical sector to the whole industry under the current crisis

In general chemical industry is hit hard but to a somewhat lesser extent than manufacturing as a whole and substantially less that metal and automobile sectors

There is also a phase delay in the downturn compared to metal and automobile (question if chemical sub-sectors would still reach the depth the metal and automobile sectors saw in the first quarter

Employment effects seem to be also more moderate sofar, with the great exception of the pharmaceutical industry: even output growth, but huge employment loss (!)

Page 16: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

16

Output and employment: cushioning effect

While manufacturing output fell by 19% in the first Q of 2009, employment fell by 6%

In chemical industry output down by 20% in Q1, employment by 4.2%, in paper output down by 15%, employment by 3.9%

This is a positive sign for employment protection, shows the effect of short working time schemes and labour hoarding practices of enterprises

At the same time shows a dramatic decrease of productivity (with the exception of pharmaceuticals (!)

Important however, this is a short term trend (moment picture), longer term productivity trend still positive

Page 17: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

17

Longer term trend of productivity (before crisis)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

annual change (%)

LP Total Economy

LP Total Industry

LP Total Manufacturing

Page 18: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

18

Wage formula at the time of the crisis

● To make the picture complete, we show the elements of the wage formula (wages > inflation+productivity) below

● We should be aware that under these extraordinary times (especially in manufacturing), this has limited relevance

● After a long period of wage moderation during the boom, what we see now at the light of the current figures (2009) – is the opposite:

● Over 3% nominal wage inrease forecast in EA16 (Commission)

● 0.45% expected inflation● 0.75% fall of productivity for total economy (EA16)● This shows a substantial overperformance of the wage

formula in 2009...

Page 19: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

Source: AMECO 200919

Nominal labour costs 2005-2008, 2009 forecast

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

annual change (%)

EA16

EU27

Page 20: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

Source: AMECO20

Inflation (HCPI), 2005-2008, 2009 forecast

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

annual change (%)

EA16

EU27

Page 21: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

Source: AMECO21

Productivity growth, total economy

-1

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

annual change (%)

EA16

EU27

Page 22: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

22

What does this mean for collective bargaining

● We need to stress, thesee are short term trends and extraodinary times

● Still, this is the first year after a long period, when wages would grow more than inflation + productivity (with a substantial real wage increase)

● The productivity slump is the immediate consequence of the crisis and will remain temporary (hopefully not at the detriment of employment but through the fast recovery of output)

● Manufacturing (as shown before) has a larger drop in productivity then total economy – there the wage formula is even more `over-performed`

● We also showed the longer term trends (from 1999) and the higher productivity growth in manufacturing is still true for this time horizon

Page 23: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

23

EMCEF Eucob@n – up-dating the CB database

Collective agreements concluded between June 2008 and June 2009 have been considered in the survey!

New agreements have been reported in the following countries: Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Finland and Germany in the period under consideration.

Further considered: Agreements affecting wage formation in the period June 2008 – June 2009 in the following countries: Netherlands, Italy, Norway and Sweden;

Page 24: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

24

Country Coll. negotiated

wage increase (2008,

annualized)

inflation a

2008 (AMECO) productivity a

2008 (AMECO) Coll.

Negotiated wage increase

(2009, annualized)

inflation a 2009 (AMECO*)

productivity a 2009

(AMECO*)

AT 2,54 3,2 0,08

3,56

0,54 - 0,3

BE 2,50 4,5 - 0,06 0,26 0,33 - 0,5 CZ 5,00 6,3 2,45 1,88 1,08 - 0,77 FI 2,90 3,9 - 1,53 2,83 1,3 - 1,4 DE 3,37 2,75 - 0,01 2,91 0,33 - 1,95 IT 3,63 3,5 - 0,52 3,2 0,77 - 0,1 NL 1,83 2,2 0,42 1,54 1,4 - 2,13 NO 3,2 3,4 - 1,44 2,8 1,37 - SW 3,40 3,35 - 1,76 3,4 1,6 - 1,13 AVERAGE (over all 9 countries)

2,95 2,49

EA16 3,3 0,24 0,44 - 0,86 EU27 3,66 - 0,88 - Source: EMCEF CB Template, Survey July 2009 a annual %-change, AMECO Database July 2009

Page 25: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

25

Qualitative Issues:

● Working time: 8 agreements● Pensions: 8 agreements● Training: 5 agreements● Employability/workability: 4 agreements● Health and safety: 2 agreements● Equal opportunities/

gender policy: 2 agreements● Flexibilisation of labour markets & employment: –● Other issues: 1 agreement

Page 26: Collective bargaining in the chemical sector against the background of the economic crisis – The EMCEF CB Report 2009 Seminar ‚Coordination of collective

26

Conclusions on the bargaining climate● Even if the sporadic signs of an upturn get manifested in the

rest of the year, the whole year will still show a dramatic decrease of economic performance (GDP for the EA16 cca at -4%, in many countries however much deeper)

● Manufacturing is hit much more dramatically that the total economy The wage formula has lost its relevance in the short-term

● All these make the CB climate very unfavourable● Efferts should be concentrated on stabilising employment

and maintaining the purchasing power of workers● This is also a precondition for recovery and the interest of all

players as consumer demand is key in overcoming the crisis!● Crucial is the CB timetable and the duration of agreements

now!