collective dynamics at rhic
DESCRIPTION
Collective Dynamics at RHIC. Nu Xu LBNL, Berkeley, USA. 1) Introduction: QGP partonic collectivity 2) Some results from SPS and RHIC 3) Summary and outlook. J. Fu, H. Huang, M. Kaneta, F. Liu, H.G. Ritter, K. Schweda, R. Snellings, Z. Xu, E. Yamamoto …. 1) Initial Condition - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 11
Collective Dynamics at RHICCollective Dynamics at RHIC
J. Fu, H. Huang, M. Kaneta, F. Liu, H.G. Ritter, K. Schweda, R. Snellings, Z. Xu, E. Yamamoto…
Nu Xu LBNL, Berkeley, USA
1) Introduction: QGP partonic collectivity
2) Some results from SPS and RHIC
3) Summary and outlook
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 22
IntroductionIntroduction
1) Initial Condition - baryon transfer - ET production - parton dof
2) System Evolves - parton/hadron expansion
3) Bulk Freeze-out - hadron dof - interactions stop
??
?
?
?
?
J/D
K*
,
K
p
d, HBT
vv22 saturates saturates
TT saturates saturates
Q2
time
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 33
Pressure, Flow, …Pressure, Flow, …
pdVdUd Thermodynamic identity
– entropy p – pressureU – energy V – volume= kBT, thermal energy per dof
In nuclear collisions, interactions among constituents and density distribution lead to: pressure gradient collective flow
number of degrees of freedom (dof) Equation of State (EOS) time integral – partonic + hadronic effects
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 44
Transverse flow observablesTransverse flow observables
As a function of particle mass:• Directed flow (v1) – early• Elliptic flow (v2) – early• Radial flow – integrated over whole evolution
Note:1) Effect of collectivity is additive – final effect is the sum of all processes as long as interactions are there. 2) No thermalization is needed – pressure gradient only depends on the density gradient and interactions.
1i
Ritttt
))ψcos(i(2v1dydpp
dN
2π
1
dyddpp
dN
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 55
Results from RHICResults from RHIC
1) At RHIC ~ constant vs. centrality2) At AGS, ratios changes factor ~100 / SPS factor ~ 2 variation
re-scatterings at hadronic stage reduced at RHIC
STAR: Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4778(01), 87, 262301(01), 89, 092301(02)
pΛ
pΛp,p
STAR preliminary
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 66
Proton flow at RHICProton flow at RHIC
1) <pt> increases with
centrality flow
2) RQMD describes
transverse motion well
hadronic re-scattering
3) It underestimates pbar
yield due to large
annihilation x-section
re-scattering at
earlier stage?
197197Au + Au + 197197Au at 130 GeV Au at 130 GeV STAR Preliminary
Fiducial yields
Total yields Systematic errors
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 77
Transverse momentum distributionTransverse momentum distributionSPS: GeVsNN 3.17
)/exp(
22
Tmf
masspm
T
TT
NA44, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2080(97)
Dependence on the particle mass and the size of the colliding system collective flow !
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 88
T vs. mass plotT vs. mass plot (SPS)(SPS)
Interactions with hadronic gas:
Large x-section limit: pions, kaons, protons
Small x-section limit: , J/
sensitive to hadronization!
2 massTT thermalfo C
22ti
i
pm-exp
At SPS, the observed collective transverse flow, ~ 0.4c, develops mostly at the hadronic stage. and J/ do not flow!
H. van Hecke, H. Sorge, N. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5764(98).
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 99
Beam energy systematicsBeam energy systematics
1) Smaller baryon chemical potential B = 45 MeV with Tch = 170 MeV
Approaching net-baryon free ! 2) Stronger transverse flow, T= 0.55(c)
More explosive expansion !
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 1010
vv22 for K for K00 and and
1) Integrated v2 increases with particle mass ;2) Hydro model results are consistent with data. ‘QGP’ EoS used in calculations! Does v2 signal partonic flow?
STAR Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 182301(01) STAR, Phys. Rev. Lett. , accepted, (02)
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 1111
Transverse collective flowTransverse collective flow
Heavier mass particles show stronger collective flow effects !PHENIX: Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 242301(02) / STAR: Phys. Rev. C65, 041901(02) / STAR: Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 092301(02)
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 1212
Slope parameters vs. massSlope parameters vs. mass
gluon
tii
n
pm
00
22
-exp
At high energy, high gluon density and strong interactions partonic flow
, D, J/ sensitive to partonic collectivity ?
??
At RHIC, the observed collective transverse flow, ~ 0.55c, sum of partonic and hadronic interactions ! and J/ should flow!
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 1313
Partonic Flow at RHIC?Partonic Flow at RHIC?
??
We need: 1) Non-zero values of v2 for 2) Increase of T for , D, J/ …
YES
NO
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 1414
SummarySummary
1) SPS: most of the collective flow develops at later hadronic stage2) RHIC: Copious scattering needed,Copious scattering needed, Not at the later hadronic stage,Not at the later hadronic stage, Evidence of early patonic flow?! Evidence of early patonic flow?!
3) To ‘see’ the partonic flow directly, spectra and v2 for all hadrons, especially,
s s D J/ D J/ ... ...
ISMD XXXII, September 7–14, 2002 Nu XuNu Xu 1515
OutlookOutlook
Discover partonic collectivity – ‘QGP’ New Form of Matter !New Form of Matter !Diagnose bulk properties of ‘QGP’
Important: Scan collision geometry b Scan collision size A Scan collision energy E