colorectal cancer · prostate cancer follow-up of results by one-stop prostate clinic same-day...

5
Constipation Diarrhoea Rectal bleeding Loss of weight Abdominal pain Abdominal tenderness Abnormal rectal exam Haemoglobin 10–13 g/dL Haemoglobin <10 g/dL PPV= Positive predictive value (%) or probability of cancer 0.42 0.94 2.4 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.5 0.97 2.3 PPV as a single clinical feature 0.81* 1.1 2.4 3.0 1.5 1.7 2.6 1.2 2.6 Constipation 1.5* 3.4 3.1 1.9 2.4 11 2.2 2.9 Diarrhoea 6.8* 4.7 3.1 4.5 8.5 3.6 3.2 Rectal bleeding 1.4* 3.4 6.4 7.4 1.3 4.7 Loss of weight 3.0* 1.4 3.3 2.2 6.9 Abdominal pain 1.7* 5.8 2.7 >10 Abdominal tenderness Find Cancer Early: A Guide for General Practitioners Find Cancer Early: A Guide for General Practitioners is a tool designed to assist Western Australian (WA) General Practitioners (GPs) in the early diagnosis of patients with colorectal, lung, prostate and breast cancers. The resource reflects the most current clinical guidelines and uses the positive predictive value (PPV) tables, which are based on evidence for clinical features (including signs, symptoms and common investigations) that best predict cancer. View referral contact details for metropolitan and regional WA Colorectal Cancer Implications for practice Findings of a physical examination including rectal examination can significantly alter the probability of colorectal cancer. Conduct a full blood count in people with possible symptoms of colorectal cancer. Low haemoglobin in the presence of symptoms significantly raises the probability of colorectal cancer. Positive FOBT can provide justification for an urgent referral for colonoscopy. Negative FOBT does not exclude cancer in people with symptoms. Recent onset of symptoms in patients >40 years should be viewed with a higher degree of suspicion. Figure 1 shows the probability of colorectal cancer for individual and pairs of clinical features, including second* presentation. For example, the probability of colorectal cancer for rectal bleeding alone is 2.4%, but rectal bleeding combined with an abnormal rectal exam increases the probability to 8.5%. Two separate episodes of rectal bleeding have a probability of 6.8%. >5% probability of cancer 2-5% probability of cancer 1-2% probability of cancer <1% probability of cancer * Second presentation Figure 1: Probability of cancer if clinical features present 1 Risk factors Increasing age Previous history of colorectal cancer, adenomas or Lynch syndrome-related cancers 2 Inflammatory bowel disease Family history of colorectal cancer (suspected Lynch syndrome); other Lynch syndrome-related cancers; or adenoma (suspected familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) (see RACGP Red Book 2 for risk criteria) Alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, unhealthy diet, obesity, smoking 3 . Refer all suspected colorectal cancer for colonoscopy or appropriate specialist review. Probabilities highlighted in red are >5%, and urgent referral should be considered. Symptoms that best predict colorectal cancer 1 Rectal bleeding Symptoms of anaemia (tiredness or fatigue) Weight loss Abdominal pain or tenderness Change in bowel habit (diarrhoea or constipation). Government of Western Australia Department of Health Partner:

Upload: others

Post on 05-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Colorectal Cancer · Prostate Cancer Follow-up of results by One-Stop Prostate Clinic Same-day assessment and TRUS biopsy at Fiona Stanley Hospital Fax referral to One-Stop Prostate

Con

stip

atio

n

Dia

rrho

ea

Rec

tal b

leed

ing

Loss

of w

eigh

t

Abd

omin

al p

ain

Abd

omin

al

tend

erne

ss

Abn

orm

al

rect

al e

xam

Hae

mog

lobi

n 10

ndash13

gdL

Hae

mog

lobi

n lt1

0 g

dL PPV= Positive predictive value () or probability of cancer

042 094 24 12 11 11 15 097 23 PPV as a single clinical feature

081 11 24 30 15 17 26 12 26 Constipation

15 34 31 19 24 11 22 29 Diarrhoea

68 47 31 45 85 36 32 Rectal bleeding

14 34 64 74 13 47 Loss of weight

30 14 33 22 69 Abdominal pain

17 58 27 gt10 Abdominal tenderness

Find Cancer Early A Guide for General PractitionersFind Cancer Early A Guide for General Practitioners is a tool designed to assist Western Australian (WA) General Practitioners (GPs) in the early diagnosis of patients with colorectal lung prostate and breast cancers The resource reflects the most current clinical guidelines and uses the positive predictive value (PPV) tables which are based on evidence for clinical features (including signs symptoms and common investigations) that best predict cancer

View referral contact details for metropolitan and regional WA

Colorectal Cancer

Implications for practicebull Findings of a physical examination including rectal examination

can significantly alter the probability of colorectal cancer

bull Conduct a full blood count in people with possible symptoms of colorectal cancer

bull Low haemoglobin in the presence of symptoms significantly raises the probability of colorectal cancer

bull Positive FOBT can provide justification for an urgent referral for colonoscopy

bull Negative FOBT does not exclude cancer in people with symptoms

bull Recent onset of symptoms in patients gt40 years should be viewed with a higher degree of suspicion

Figure 1 shows the probability of colorectal cancer for individual and pairs of clinical features including second presentation

For example the probability of colorectal cancer for rectal bleeding alone is 24 but rectal bleeding combined with an abnormal rectal exam increases the probability to 85 Two separate episodes of rectal bleeding have a probability of 68

gt5 probability of cancer

2-5 probability of cancer

1-2 probability of cancer

lt1 probability of cancer

Second presentation

Figure 1 Probability of cancer if clinical features present1

Risk factorsbull Increasing age

bull Previous history of colorectal cancer adenomas or Lynch syndrome-related cancers2

bull Inflammatory bowel disease

bull Family history of colorectal cancer (suspected Lynch syndrome) other Lynch syndrome-related cancers or adenoma (suspected familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) (see RACGP Red Book2 for risk criteria)

bull Alcohol consumption physical inactivity unhealthy diet obesity smoking3

Refer all suspected colorectal cancer for colonoscopy or appropriate specialist review

Probabilities highlighted in red are gt5 and urgent referral should be considered

Symptoms that best predict colorectal cancer1

bull Rectal bleeding

bull Symptoms of anaemia (tiredness or fatigue)

bull Weight loss

bull Abdominal pain or tenderness

bull Change in bowel habit(diarrhoea or constipation)

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner

Lung Cancer

Lung cancer clinical features NON-smokers (including ex-smokers)

Cou

gh

Fatig

ue

Dys

pnoe

a

Che

st p

ain

Loss

of w

eigh

t

Loss

of a

ppet

ite

Thro

mbo

- cy

tosi

s

Abn

orm

al

spiro

met

ry

Hae

mop

tysi

s

PPV= Positive predictive value () or probability of cancer

040 043 066 082 11 087 16 16 24 PPV as a single clinical feature

058 063 079 076 18 16 20 12 20 Cough

057 089 084 10 12 18 40 33 Fatigue

088 12 20 20 20 23 49 Dyspnoea

095 18 18 20 14 50 Chest pain

12 23 61 15 92 Loss of weight

17 09 27 gt10 Loss of appetite

36 gt10 Thrombocytosis

gt10 Abnormal spirometry

17 Haemoptysis

Symptoms that best predict lung cancer 4

bull Haemoptysis

bull Thrombocytosis

bull Weight loss or fatigue particularly in smoker or ex-smoker

bull Loss of appetite

bull Unexplained bone or chest painshoulder pain

bull Dyspnoea

bull Cough gt3 weeks or change in nature of cough

bull Persistent hoarseness

bull Non-resolving pneumonia

bull Significant neurological signs eg ataxia weakness

gt5 probability of cancer

2-5 probability of cancer

1-2 probability of cancer

lt1 probability of cancer

Second presentation

denotes data unknown

Figure 3 Probability of cancer if smokers in clinical features present 4

Figures 2 and 3 show the probability of lung cancer for individual and pairs of clinical features including second presentation in non-smokers (including ex-smokers) and smokers respectively

For example the probability of lung cancer for haemoptysis alone in non-smokers is 24 but haemoptysis combined with weight loss increases the probability to 92

The probability of lung cancer for haemoptysis alone in smokers is 45 but haemoptysis combined with dyspnoea increases the probability to 69 Two separate episodes of haemoptysis in non-smokers and smokers have a probability of 17 and 12 respectively

Figure 2 Probability of cancer in NON-smokers if clinical features present4

Lung cancer clinical features for smokers

Cou

gh

Fatig

ue

Dys

pnoe

a

Che

st p

ain

Loss

of w

eigh

t

Loss

of a

ppet

ite

Thro

mbo

- cy

tosi

s

Abn

orm

al

spiro

met

ry

Hae

mop

tysi

s

PPV= Positive predictive value () or probability of cancer

09 08 12 13 21 18 42 40 45 PPV as a single clinical feature

13 10 14 09 23 28 65 36 39 Cough

12 14 13 20 23 24 gt10 61 Fatigue

15 22 31 55 24 gt10 69 Dyspnoea

14 44 76 gt10 gt10 41 Chest pain

17 50 gt10 gt10 Loss of weight

27 Loss of appetite

12 Haemoptysis

Risk factors5

bull Smoker or ex-smoker

bull Increasing age

bull Passive smoking

bull Asbestos exposure

bull Occupational exposures6

bull Previous lung diseases

bull Family history of lung cancer

Implications for practicebull Perform early CXR in those with relevant

symptoms

bull Conduct a full blood count in people with possible symptoms of lung cancer

Diagnostic pathways Refer to Cancer Australiarsquos lsquoInvestigating symptoms of lung cancer a guide for GPsrsquo7 for investigation pathways

Refer all suspected lung cancer to a respiratory physician affiliated with a lung cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT)

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner

Probabilities highlighted in red are gt5 and urgent referral should be considered

View referral contact details for metropolitan and regional WA

Hae

mat

uria

Wei

ght l

oss

Noc

turia

Hes

itanc

y

Ben

ign

rect

al

exam

Mal

igna

nt re

ctal

ex

am

Freq

uenc

y

urge

ncy PPV= Positive

predictive value () or probability of cancer

10 075 22 30 28 12 22 PPV as a single clinical feature

16 19 33 39 18 Haematuria

21 12 94 18 Loss of weight

33 28 39 15 32 Nocturia

20 33 10 47 Hesitancy

31 Frequency urgency

40 Benign rectal exam

13 Rectal exam malignant

Figure 4 shows the probability of prostate cancer for individual and pairs of clinical features including second presentation

For example the probability of prostate cancer for nocturia alone is 22 but nocturia combined with weight loss increases the probability to 12 Two separate presentations of nocturia have a probability of 33

gt5 probability of cancer

2-5 probability of cancer

1-2 probability of cancer

lt1 probability of cancer

Second presentation

denotes data unknown

Figure 4 Probability of cancer if clinical features present1

Probabilities highlighted in red are gt5 and urgent referral should be considered

Prostate Cancer

Follow-up of results by One-Stop Prostate Clinic

Same-day assessment and TRUS biopsy at

Fiona Stanley Hospital

Fax referral to One-Stop Prostate Clinic at

Fiona Stanley Hospital f (08) 6152 8069

Risk factorsbull Increasing age8

bull Family history of prostate breast or ovarian cancer (see RACGP Red Book2 for risk criteria)

Implications for practicebull Severity of symptoms does not predict prostate cancer

bull Men age gt40 years with lower urinary tract symptoms should have a Digital Rectal Exam (DRE) and PSA blood test

Diagnostic option to One-Stop Prostate ClinicCriteria for referral

bull Hard irregular prostate on DRE regardless of PSA result

bull Risingraised age-specific PSA with symptoms

Note PSA should be taken at least 2 weeks after treatment for UTI Two PSA measures should accompany referral

For further information contact One-Stop Prostate Clinic

p (08) 6152 6916

Symptoms that best predict prostate cancer1

bull Hesitancy bull Nocturia bull Frequencyurgency bull Haematuria bull Weight loss

Refer all suspected prostate cancer to a Urologist affiliated with a MDT

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner

View referral contact details for metropolitan and regional WA

Figure 5 shows the probability of breast cancer for clinical features paired with age groups

For example the probability of breast cancer for a breast lump at age 40-49 years is 48 This increases to 48 for a woman aged 70 years or over The breast lumppain column is the PPV when a woman has reported both a breast lump and breast pain at least once each during the year before the index date

PPV= Positive predictive value () or probability of cancer

Age

(yea

rs)

Bre

ast p

ain

Nip

ple

disc

harg

e

Nip

ple

retra

ctio

n

Bre

ast l

ump

Bre

ast l

ump

pain

40-49 017 12 48 49

50-59 080 21 26 85 57

60-69 12 23 34 25 65

gt70 28 23 12 48 gt5

gt5 probability of cancer

2-5 probability of cancer

1-2 probability of cancer

lt1 probability of cancer

denotes data unknown

Figure 5 Probability of cancer if clinical features present9

Symptoms that best predict breast cancer9

bull Lump or lumpiness in breast or axilla especially if itrsquos only in one breast

bull Breast lump and pain

bull Changes in nipple appearance eg retraction scaliness inversion redness

bull Discharge from the nipple

bull Breast pain particularly localised with or without cyclic variation

bull Change in shape or appearance of breast eg dimpling redness

Probabilities highlighted in red are gt5 and urgent referral should be considered

Breast Cancer

Risk factorsbull Family history of breast or ovarian cancer

(see RACGP Red Book2 for risk criteria)bull Increasing age (uncommon lt40 years)bull Previous diagnosis of breast cancer

or DCISbull Breast density10

bull Hormonal factors10w Longer menstrual history (age at

menarche lt12 years age at menopause gt55 years)

w Use of hormonal treatments (combined hormone replacement therapy oral contraceptive pill)

w Conception history (age at first birth gt29 years nulliparity)

bull Alcohol consumption overweight amp obesity (particularly in postmenopausal women) physical inactivity10

Implications for practicebull The triple-test is the recommended approach

in the investigation of breast changesbull The triple-test includes

1 Clinical examination 2 Imaging (mammography andor ultrasound) 3 Non-excision biopsy (FNA andor core biopsy)

bull If any of the triple test results are abnormal or if all three do not fit with a benign diagnosis refer urgently to a Breast Assessment Clinic

bull Nipple retraction in women over 50 years should be investigated

bull Any new breast symptom or sign should be investigated as clinically indicated

Refer all suspected breast cancer to a Breast Assessment Clinic affiliated with a MDT

Diagnostic pathwaysRefer to Cancer Australiarsquos lsquoThe investigation of a new breast symptom a guide for GPsrsquo11 for investigation pathways

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner

View referral contact details for metropolitan and regional WA

1 Hamilton W The CAPER studies five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients British Journal of Cancer 2009101(Suppl 2) S80-S86

2 The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice 9th edition East Melbourne VIC RACGP 2016 Available from httpwwwracgporgauyour-practiceguidelinesredbook

3 International Agency for Research on Cancer World Cancer Report 2008 Lyon France IARC 2008 Available from httpwwwiarcfrenpublicationspdfs-onlinewcr2008

4 Hamilton W Peters TJ Round A Sharp D What are the clinical features of lung cancer before the diagnosis is made A population based case-control study Thorax 200560(12)1059-65

5 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Lung cancer in Australia an overview Cancer series no 643 Cat no CAN 58 Canberra ACT AIHW 2011 Available from httpwwwaihwgovaupublication-detailid=10737420419

6 Safe Work Australia Deemed Diseases in Australia Canberra ACT SWA 2015 Available from to httpswwwsafeworkaustraliagovausystemfilesdocuments1702deemed-diseasespdf

7 Cancer Australia Investigating symptoms of lung cancer a guide for GPs Cancer Australia 2012 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsinvestigating-symptoms-lung-cancer-guide-gps

8 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Australian Cancer Incidence and Mortality (ACIM) books prostate cancer Canberra ACT AIHW 2016 Available from httpwwwaihwgovauacim-books

9 Walker S Hyde C Hamilton W Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care a case-control study using electronic records British Journal of General Practice 201464(629) e788-93

10 National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre Breast cancer risk factors a review of the evidence July 2009 Surry Hills NSW NBOCC 2009 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsbreast-cancer-risk-factors-review-evidence

11 Cancer Australia The investigation of a new breast symptom a guide for General Practitioners Cancer Australia 2006 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsinvestigation-new-breast-symptom-guide-general-practitioners

This resource was initially developed as part of the Improving Rural Cancer Outcomes Project by The University of Western

Australia Cancer Council WA and Department of Health WArsquos Rural Cancer Initiative project team which investigated ways

to improve cancer outcomes for people in rural WA The resource was last updated by Cancer Council WA in July 2018

References

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner

Page 2: Colorectal Cancer · Prostate Cancer Follow-up of results by One-Stop Prostate Clinic Same-day assessment and TRUS biopsy at Fiona Stanley Hospital Fax referral to One-Stop Prostate

Lung Cancer

Lung cancer clinical features NON-smokers (including ex-smokers)

Cou

gh

Fatig

ue

Dys

pnoe

a

Che

st p

ain

Loss

of w

eigh

t

Loss

of a

ppet

ite

Thro

mbo

- cy

tosi

s

Abn

orm

al

spiro

met

ry

Hae

mop

tysi

s

PPV= Positive predictive value () or probability of cancer

040 043 066 082 11 087 16 16 24 PPV as a single clinical feature

058 063 079 076 18 16 20 12 20 Cough

057 089 084 10 12 18 40 33 Fatigue

088 12 20 20 20 23 49 Dyspnoea

095 18 18 20 14 50 Chest pain

12 23 61 15 92 Loss of weight

17 09 27 gt10 Loss of appetite

36 gt10 Thrombocytosis

gt10 Abnormal spirometry

17 Haemoptysis

Symptoms that best predict lung cancer 4

bull Haemoptysis

bull Thrombocytosis

bull Weight loss or fatigue particularly in smoker or ex-smoker

bull Loss of appetite

bull Unexplained bone or chest painshoulder pain

bull Dyspnoea

bull Cough gt3 weeks or change in nature of cough

bull Persistent hoarseness

bull Non-resolving pneumonia

bull Significant neurological signs eg ataxia weakness

gt5 probability of cancer

2-5 probability of cancer

1-2 probability of cancer

lt1 probability of cancer

Second presentation

denotes data unknown

Figure 3 Probability of cancer if smokers in clinical features present 4

Figures 2 and 3 show the probability of lung cancer for individual and pairs of clinical features including second presentation in non-smokers (including ex-smokers) and smokers respectively

For example the probability of lung cancer for haemoptysis alone in non-smokers is 24 but haemoptysis combined with weight loss increases the probability to 92

The probability of lung cancer for haemoptysis alone in smokers is 45 but haemoptysis combined with dyspnoea increases the probability to 69 Two separate episodes of haemoptysis in non-smokers and smokers have a probability of 17 and 12 respectively

Figure 2 Probability of cancer in NON-smokers if clinical features present4

Lung cancer clinical features for smokers

Cou

gh

Fatig

ue

Dys

pnoe

a

Che

st p

ain

Loss

of w

eigh

t

Loss

of a

ppet

ite

Thro

mbo

- cy

tosi

s

Abn

orm

al

spiro

met

ry

Hae

mop

tysi

s

PPV= Positive predictive value () or probability of cancer

09 08 12 13 21 18 42 40 45 PPV as a single clinical feature

13 10 14 09 23 28 65 36 39 Cough

12 14 13 20 23 24 gt10 61 Fatigue

15 22 31 55 24 gt10 69 Dyspnoea

14 44 76 gt10 gt10 41 Chest pain

17 50 gt10 gt10 Loss of weight

27 Loss of appetite

12 Haemoptysis

Risk factors5

bull Smoker or ex-smoker

bull Increasing age

bull Passive smoking

bull Asbestos exposure

bull Occupational exposures6

bull Previous lung diseases

bull Family history of lung cancer

Implications for practicebull Perform early CXR in those with relevant

symptoms

bull Conduct a full blood count in people with possible symptoms of lung cancer

Diagnostic pathways Refer to Cancer Australiarsquos lsquoInvestigating symptoms of lung cancer a guide for GPsrsquo7 for investigation pathways

Refer all suspected lung cancer to a respiratory physician affiliated with a lung cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT)

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner

Probabilities highlighted in red are gt5 and urgent referral should be considered

View referral contact details for metropolitan and regional WA

Hae

mat

uria

Wei

ght l

oss

Noc

turia

Hes

itanc

y

Ben

ign

rect

al

exam

Mal

igna

nt re

ctal

ex

am

Freq

uenc

y

urge

ncy PPV= Positive

predictive value () or probability of cancer

10 075 22 30 28 12 22 PPV as a single clinical feature

16 19 33 39 18 Haematuria

21 12 94 18 Loss of weight

33 28 39 15 32 Nocturia

20 33 10 47 Hesitancy

31 Frequency urgency

40 Benign rectal exam

13 Rectal exam malignant

Figure 4 shows the probability of prostate cancer for individual and pairs of clinical features including second presentation

For example the probability of prostate cancer for nocturia alone is 22 but nocturia combined with weight loss increases the probability to 12 Two separate presentations of nocturia have a probability of 33

gt5 probability of cancer

2-5 probability of cancer

1-2 probability of cancer

lt1 probability of cancer

Second presentation

denotes data unknown

Figure 4 Probability of cancer if clinical features present1

Probabilities highlighted in red are gt5 and urgent referral should be considered

Prostate Cancer

Follow-up of results by One-Stop Prostate Clinic

Same-day assessment and TRUS biopsy at

Fiona Stanley Hospital

Fax referral to One-Stop Prostate Clinic at

Fiona Stanley Hospital f (08) 6152 8069

Risk factorsbull Increasing age8

bull Family history of prostate breast or ovarian cancer (see RACGP Red Book2 for risk criteria)

Implications for practicebull Severity of symptoms does not predict prostate cancer

bull Men age gt40 years with lower urinary tract symptoms should have a Digital Rectal Exam (DRE) and PSA blood test

Diagnostic option to One-Stop Prostate ClinicCriteria for referral

bull Hard irregular prostate on DRE regardless of PSA result

bull Risingraised age-specific PSA with symptoms

Note PSA should be taken at least 2 weeks after treatment for UTI Two PSA measures should accompany referral

For further information contact One-Stop Prostate Clinic

p (08) 6152 6916

Symptoms that best predict prostate cancer1

bull Hesitancy bull Nocturia bull Frequencyurgency bull Haematuria bull Weight loss

Refer all suspected prostate cancer to a Urologist affiliated with a MDT

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner

View referral contact details for metropolitan and regional WA

Figure 5 shows the probability of breast cancer for clinical features paired with age groups

For example the probability of breast cancer for a breast lump at age 40-49 years is 48 This increases to 48 for a woman aged 70 years or over The breast lumppain column is the PPV when a woman has reported both a breast lump and breast pain at least once each during the year before the index date

PPV= Positive predictive value () or probability of cancer

Age

(yea

rs)

Bre

ast p

ain

Nip

ple

disc

harg

e

Nip

ple

retra

ctio

n

Bre

ast l

ump

Bre

ast l

ump

pain

40-49 017 12 48 49

50-59 080 21 26 85 57

60-69 12 23 34 25 65

gt70 28 23 12 48 gt5

gt5 probability of cancer

2-5 probability of cancer

1-2 probability of cancer

lt1 probability of cancer

denotes data unknown

Figure 5 Probability of cancer if clinical features present9

Symptoms that best predict breast cancer9

bull Lump or lumpiness in breast or axilla especially if itrsquos only in one breast

bull Breast lump and pain

bull Changes in nipple appearance eg retraction scaliness inversion redness

bull Discharge from the nipple

bull Breast pain particularly localised with or without cyclic variation

bull Change in shape or appearance of breast eg dimpling redness

Probabilities highlighted in red are gt5 and urgent referral should be considered

Breast Cancer

Risk factorsbull Family history of breast or ovarian cancer

(see RACGP Red Book2 for risk criteria)bull Increasing age (uncommon lt40 years)bull Previous diagnosis of breast cancer

or DCISbull Breast density10

bull Hormonal factors10w Longer menstrual history (age at

menarche lt12 years age at menopause gt55 years)

w Use of hormonal treatments (combined hormone replacement therapy oral contraceptive pill)

w Conception history (age at first birth gt29 years nulliparity)

bull Alcohol consumption overweight amp obesity (particularly in postmenopausal women) physical inactivity10

Implications for practicebull The triple-test is the recommended approach

in the investigation of breast changesbull The triple-test includes

1 Clinical examination 2 Imaging (mammography andor ultrasound) 3 Non-excision biopsy (FNA andor core biopsy)

bull If any of the triple test results are abnormal or if all three do not fit with a benign diagnosis refer urgently to a Breast Assessment Clinic

bull Nipple retraction in women over 50 years should be investigated

bull Any new breast symptom or sign should be investigated as clinically indicated

Refer all suspected breast cancer to a Breast Assessment Clinic affiliated with a MDT

Diagnostic pathwaysRefer to Cancer Australiarsquos lsquoThe investigation of a new breast symptom a guide for GPsrsquo11 for investigation pathways

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner

View referral contact details for metropolitan and regional WA

1 Hamilton W The CAPER studies five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients British Journal of Cancer 2009101(Suppl 2) S80-S86

2 The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice 9th edition East Melbourne VIC RACGP 2016 Available from httpwwwracgporgauyour-practiceguidelinesredbook

3 International Agency for Research on Cancer World Cancer Report 2008 Lyon France IARC 2008 Available from httpwwwiarcfrenpublicationspdfs-onlinewcr2008

4 Hamilton W Peters TJ Round A Sharp D What are the clinical features of lung cancer before the diagnosis is made A population based case-control study Thorax 200560(12)1059-65

5 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Lung cancer in Australia an overview Cancer series no 643 Cat no CAN 58 Canberra ACT AIHW 2011 Available from httpwwwaihwgovaupublication-detailid=10737420419

6 Safe Work Australia Deemed Diseases in Australia Canberra ACT SWA 2015 Available from to httpswwwsafeworkaustraliagovausystemfilesdocuments1702deemed-diseasespdf

7 Cancer Australia Investigating symptoms of lung cancer a guide for GPs Cancer Australia 2012 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsinvestigating-symptoms-lung-cancer-guide-gps

8 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Australian Cancer Incidence and Mortality (ACIM) books prostate cancer Canberra ACT AIHW 2016 Available from httpwwwaihwgovauacim-books

9 Walker S Hyde C Hamilton W Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care a case-control study using electronic records British Journal of General Practice 201464(629) e788-93

10 National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre Breast cancer risk factors a review of the evidence July 2009 Surry Hills NSW NBOCC 2009 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsbreast-cancer-risk-factors-review-evidence

11 Cancer Australia The investigation of a new breast symptom a guide for General Practitioners Cancer Australia 2006 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsinvestigation-new-breast-symptom-guide-general-practitioners

This resource was initially developed as part of the Improving Rural Cancer Outcomes Project by The University of Western

Australia Cancer Council WA and Department of Health WArsquos Rural Cancer Initiative project team which investigated ways

to improve cancer outcomes for people in rural WA The resource was last updated by Cancer Council WA in July 2018

References

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner

Page 3: Colorectal Cancer · Prostate Cancer Follow-up of results by One-Stop Prostate Clinic Same-day assessment and TRUS biopsy at Fiona Stanley Hospital Fax referral to One-Stop Prostate

Hae

mat

uria

Wei

ght l

oss

Noc

turia

Hes

itanc

y

Ben

ign

rect

al

exam

Mal

igna

nt re

ctal

ex

am

Freq

uenc

y

urge

ncy PPV= Positive

predictive value () or probability of cancer

10 075 22 30 28 12 22 PPV as a single clinical feature

16 19 33 39 18 Haematuria

21 12 94 18 Loss of weight

33 28 39 15 32 Nocturia

20 33 10 47 Hesitancy

31 Frequency urgency

40 Benign rectal exam

13 Rectal exam malignant

Figure 4 shows the probability of prostate cancer for individual and pairs of clinical features including second presentation

For example the probability of prostate cancer for nocturia alone is 22 but nocturia combined with weight loss increases the probability to 12 Two separate presentations of nocturia have a probability of 33

gt5 probability of cancer

2-5 probability of cancer

1-2 probability of cancer

lt1 probability of cancer

Second presentation

denotes data unknown

Figure 4 Probability of cancer if clinical features present1

Probabilities highlighted in red are gt5 and urgent referral should be considered

Prostate Cancer

Follow-up of results by One-Stop Prostate Clinic

Same-day assessment and TRUS biopsy at

Fiona Stanley Hospital

Fax referral to One-Stop Prostate Clinic at

Fiona Stanley Hospital f (08) 6152 8069

Risk factorsbull Increasing age8

bull Family history of prostate breast or ovarian cancer (see RACGP Red Book2 for risk criteria)

Implications for practicebull Severity of symptoms does not predict prostate cancer

bull Men age gt40 years with lower urinary tract symptoms should have a Digital Rectal Exam (DRE) and PSA blood test

Diagnostic option to One-Stop Prostate ClinicCriteria for referral

bull Hard irregular prostate on DRE regardless of PSA result

bull Risingraised age-specific PSA with symptoms

Note PSA should be taken at least 2 weeks after treatment for UTI Two PSA measures should accompany referral

For further information contact One-Stop Prostate Clinic

p (08) 6152 6916

Symptoms that best predict prostate cancer1

bull Hesitancy bull Nocturia bull Frequencyurgency bull Haematuria bull Weight loss

Refer all suspected prostate cancer to a Urologist affiliated with a MDT

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner

View referral contact details for metropolitan and regional WA

Figure 5 shows the probability of breast cancer for clinical features paired with age groups

For example the probability of breast cancer for a breast lump at age 40-49 years is 48 This increases to 48 for a woman aged 70 years or over The breast lumppain column is the PPV when a woman has reported both a breast lump and breast pain at least once each during the year before the index date

PPV= Positive predictive value () or probability of cancer

Age

(yea

rs)

Bre

ast p

ain

Nip

ple

disc

harg

e

Nip

ple

retra

ctio

n

Bre

ast l

ump

Bre

ast l

ump

pain

40-49 017 12 48 49

50-59 080 21 26 85 57

60-69 12 23 34 25 65

gt70 28 23 12 48 gt5

gt5 probability of cancer

2-5 probability of cancer

1-2 probability of cancer

lt1 probability of cancer

denotes data unknown

Figure 5 Probability of cancer if clinical features present9

Symptoms that best predict breast cancer9

bull Lump or lumpiness in breast or axilla especially if itrsquos only in one breast

bull Breast lump and pain

bull Changes in nipple appearance eg retraction scaliness inversion redness

bull Discharge from the nipple

bull Breast pain particularly localised with or without cyclic variation

bull Change in shape or appearance of breast eg dimpling redness

Probabilities highlighted in red are gt5 and urgent referral should be considered

Breast Cancer

Risk factorsbull Family history of breast or ovarian cancer

(see RACGP Red Book2 for risk criteria)bull Increasing age (uncommon lt40 years)bull Previous diagnosis of breast cancer

or DCISbull Breast density10

bull Hormonal factors10w Longer menstrual history (age at

menarche lt12 years age at menopause gt55 years)

w Use of hormonal treatments (combined hormone replacement therapy oral contraceptive pill)

w Conception history (age at first birth gt29 years nulliparity)

bull Alcohol consumption overweight amp obesity (particularly in postmenopausal women) physical inactivity10

Implications for practicebull The triple-test is the recommended approach

in the investigation of breast changesbull The triple-test includes

1 Clinical examination 2 Imaging (mammography andor ultrasound) 3 Non-excision biopsy (FNA andor core biopsy)

bull If any of the triple test results are abnormal or if all three do not fit with a benign diagnosis refer urgently to a Breast Assessment Clinic

bull Nipple retraction in women over 50 years should be investigated

bull Any new breast symptom or sign should be investigated as clinically indicated

Refer all suspected breast cancer to a Breast Assessment Clinic affiliated with a MDT

Diagnostic pathwaysRefer to Cancer Australiarsquos lsquoThe investigation of a new breast symptom a guide for GPsrsquo11 for investigation pathways

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner

View referral contact details for metropolitan and regional WA

1 Hamilton W The CAPER studies five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients British Journal of Cancer 2009101(Suppl 2) S80-S86

2 The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice 9th edition East Melbourne VIC RACGP 2016 Available from httpwwwracgporgauyour-practiceguidelinesredbook

3 International Agency for Research on Cancer World Cancer Report 2008 Lyon France IARC 2008 Available from httpwwwiarcfrenpublicationspdfs-onlinewcr2008

4 Hamilton W Peters TJ Round A Sharp D What are the clinical features of lung cancer before the diagnosis is made A population based case-control study Thorax 200560(12)1059-65

5 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Lung cancer in Australia an overview Cancer series no 643 Cat no CAN 58 Canberra ACT AIHW 2011 Available from httpwwwaihwgovaupublication-detailid=10737420419

6 Safe Work Australia Deemed Diseases in Australia Canberra ACT SWA 2015 Available from to httpswwwsafeworkaustraliagovausystemfilesdocuments1702deemed-diseasespdf

7 Cancer Australia Investigating symptoms of lung cancer a guide for GPs Cancer Australia 2012 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsinvestigating-symptoms-lung-cancer-guide-gps

8 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Australian Cancer Incidence and Mortality (ACIM) books prostate cancer Canberra ACT AIHW 2016 Available from httpwwwaihwgovauacim-books

9 Walker S Hyde C Hamilton W Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care a case-control study using electronic records British Journal of General Practice 201464(629) e788-93

10 National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre Breast cancer risk factors a review of the evidence July 2009 Surry Hills NSW NBOCC 2009 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsbreast-cancer-risk-factors-review-evidence

11 Cancer Australia The investigation of a new breast symptom a guide for General Practitioners Cancer Australia 2006 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsinvestigation-new-breast-symptom-guide-general-practitioners

This resource was initially developed as part of the Improving Rural Cancer Outcomes Project by The University of Western

Australia Cancer Council WA and Department of Health WArsquos Rural Cancer Initiative project team which investigated ways

to improve cancer outcomes for people in rural WA The resource was last updated by Cancer Council WA in July 2018

References

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner

Page 4: Colorectal Cancer · Prostate Cancer Follow-up of results by One-Stop Prostate Clinic Same-day assessment and TRUS biopsy at Fiona Stanley Hospital Fax referral to One-Stop Prostate

Figure 5 shows the probability of breast cancer for clinical features paired with age groups

For example the probability of breast cancer for a breast lump at age 40-49 years is 48 This increases to 48 for a woman aged 70 years or over The breast lumppain column is the PPV when a woman has reported both a breast lump and breast pain at least once each during the year before the index date

PPV= Positive predictive value () or probability of cancer

Age

(yea

rs)

Bre

ast p

ain

Nip

ple

disc

harg

e

Nip

ple

retra

ctio

n

Bre

ast l

ump

Bre

ast l

ump

pain

40-49 017 12 48 49

50-59 080 21 26 85 57

60-69 12 23 34 25 65

gt70 28 23 12 48 gt5

gt5 probability of cancer

2-5 probability of cancer

1-2 probability of cancer

lt1 probability of cancer

denotes data unknown

Figure 5 Probability of cancer if clinical features present9

Symptoms that best predict breast cancer9

bull Lump or lumpiness in breast or axilla especially if itrsquos only in one breast

bull Breast lump and pain

bull Changes in nipple appearance eg retraction scaliness inversion redness

bull Discharge from the nipple

bull Breast pain particularly localised with or without cyclic variation

bull Change in shape or appearance of breast eg dimpling redness

Probabilities highlighted in red are gt5 and urgent referral should be considered

Breast Cancer

Risk factorsbull Family history of breast or ovarian cancer

(see RACGP Red Book2 for risk criteria)bull Increasing age (uncommon lt40 years)bull Previous diagnosis of breast cancer

or DCISbull Breast density10

bull Hormonal factors10w Longer menstrual history (age at

menarche lt12 years age at menopause gt55 years)

w Use of hormonal treatments (combined hormone replacement therapy oral contraceptive pill)

w Conception history (age at first birth gt29 years nulliparity)

bull Alcohol consumption overweight amp obesity (particularly in postmenopausal women) physical inactivity10

Implications for practicebull The triple-test is the recommended approach

in the investigation of breast changesbull The triple-test includes

1 Clinical examination 2 Imaging (mammography andor ultrasound) 3 Non-excision biopsy (FNA andor core biopsy)

bull If any of the triple test results are abnormal or if all three do not fit with a benign diagnosis refer urgently to a Breast Assessment Clinic

bull Nipple retraction in women over 50 years should be investigated

bull Any new breast symptom or sign should be investigated as clinically indicated

Refer all suspected breast cancer to a Breast Assessment Clinic affiliated with a MDT

Diagnostic pathwaysRefer to Cancer Australiarsquos lsquoThe investigation of a new breast symptom a guide for GPsrsquo11 for investigation pathways

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner

View referral contact details for metropolitan and regional WA

1 Hamilton W The CAPER studies five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients British Journal of Cancer 2009101(Suppl 2) S80-S86

2 The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice 9th edition East Melbourne VIC RACGP 2016 Available from httpwwwracgporgauyour-practiceguidelinesredbook

3 International Agency for Research on Cancer World Cancer Report 2008 Lyon France IARC 2008 Available from httpwwwiarcfrenpublicationspdfs-onlinewcr2008

4 Hamilton W Peters TJ Round A Sharp D What are the clinical features of lung cancer before the diagnosis is made A population based case-control study Thorax 200560(12)1059-65

5 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Lung cancer in Australia an overview Cancer series no 643 Cat no CAN 58 Canberra ACT AIHW 2011 Available from httpwwwaihwgovaupublication-detailid=10737420419

6 Safe Work Australia Deemed Diseases in Australia Canberra ACT SWA 2015 Available from to httpswwwsafeworkaustraliagovausystemfilesdocuments1702deemed-diseasespdf

7 Cancer Australia Investigating symptoms of lung cancer a guide for GPs Cancer Australia 2012 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsinvestigating-symptoms-lung-cancer-guide-gps

8 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Australian Cancer Incidence and Mortality (ACIM) books prostate cancer Canberra ACT AIHW 2016 Available from httpwwwaihwgovauacim-books

9 Walker S Hyde C Hamilton W Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care a case-control study using electronic records British Journal of General Practice 201464(629) e788-93

10 National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre Breast cancer risk factors a review of the evidence July 2009 Surry Hills NSW NBOCC 2009 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsbreast-cancer-risk-factors-review-evidence

11 Cancer Australia The investigation of a new breast symptom a guide for General Practitioners Cancer Australia 2006 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsinvestigation-new-breast-symptom-guide-general-practitioners

This resource was initially developed as part of the Improving Rural Cancer Outcomes Project by The University of Western

Australia Cancer Council WA and Department of Health WArsquos Rural Cancer Initiative project team which investigated ways

to improve cancer outcomes for people in rural WA The resource was last updated by Cancer Council WA in July 2018

References

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner

Page 5: Colorectal Cancer · Prostate Cancer Follow-up of results by One-Stop Prostate Clinic Same-day assessment and TRUS biopsy at Fiona Stanley Hospital Fax referral to One-Stop Prostate

1 Hamilton W The CAPER studies five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients British Journal of Cancer 2009101(Suppl 2) S80-S86

2 The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice 9th edition East Melbourne VIC RACGP 2016 Available from httpwwwracgporgauyour-practiceguidelinesredbook

3 International Agency for Research on Cancer World Cancer Report 2008 Lyon France IARC 2008 Available from httpwwwiarcfrenpublicationspdfs-onlinewcr2008

4 Hamilton W Peters TJ Round A Sharp D What are the clinical features of lung cancer before the diagnosis is made A population based case-control study Thorax 200560(12)1059-65

5 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Lung cancer in Australia an overview Cancer series no 643 Cat no CAN 58 Canberra ACT AIHW 2011 Available from httpwwwaihwgovaupublication-detailid=10737420419

6 Safe Work Australia Deemed Diseases in Australia Canberra ACT SWA 2015 Available from to httpswwwsafeworkaustraliagovausystemfilesdocuments1702deemed-diseasespdf

7 Cancer Australia Investigating symptoms of lung cancer a guide for GPs Cancer Australia 2012 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsinvestigating-symptoms-lung-cancer-guide-gps

8 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Australian Cancer Incidence and Mortality (ACIM) books prostate cancer Canberra ACT AIHW 2016 Available from httpwwwaihwgovauacim-books

9 Walker S Hyde C Hamilton W Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care a case-control study using electronic records British Journal of General Practice 201464(629) e788-93

10 National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre Breast cancer risk factors a review of the evidence July 2009 Surry Hills NSW NBOCC 2009 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsbreast-cancer-risk-factors-review-evidence

11 Cancer Australia The investigation of a new breast symptom a guide for General Practitioners Cancer Australia 2006 Available from httpscanceraustraliagovaupublications-and-resourcescancer-australia-publicationsinvestigation-new-breast-symptom-guide-general-practitioners

This resource was initially developed as part of the Improving Rural Cancer Outcomes Project by The University of Western

Australia Cancer Council WA and Department of Health WArsquos Rural Cancer Initiative project team which investigated ways

to improve cancer outcomes for people in rural WA The resource was last updated by Cancer Council WA in July 2018

References

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Health

Partner