combination lm-llo immunotherapy plus radiation delays
TRANSCRIPT
Combination Lm-LLO Immunotherapy plus Radiation Delays Tumor Progression
and Prolongs Survival in Osteosarcoma
Nicola Mason, B.Vet.Med, PhD (Immunology), DACVIM (Internal Medicine)
Associate Professor, Departments of Pathobiology and Clinical Studies,
School of Veterinary Medicine,
University of Pennsylvania
215.898.3996
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA’S SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE
DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL STUDIES AND PATHOBIOLOGY
Nicola Mason
I have the following disclosures* related to my presentation:
Employee: University of Pennsylvania
Grants/Research contracts: Advaxis Inc., Aratana Therapeutics, Abramson Cancer Foundation, Morris Animal Foundation, Canine Health Foundation
Consulting: Advaxis Inc.
Aratana Therapeutics
Investments: Advaxis Inc
I will discuss results of clinical trial for the following agents that are currently NOT approved for use in animals.
*Disclosures include spouse and immediate family where relevant.
Osteosarcoma is an “immune responsive” tumor
HER2/neu is a molecular target in OSA
4
! " #$$ ! #%&' ( ) *$$
+, , $- . /) 0. 12304 1$
! "#$! "#$
! " #$$ ! #%&' ( ) *$$
+, , $- . /) 0. 12304 1$
! "#$! "#$
Ca
Ma
c#
2
MC
F-7
Myo
cca
rdiu
m
P1
96
0t
p1
Bud
dy
Jso
ie
Ga
il
Abb
y
Bru
tus
B-actin
Her2/neu
Ca
Ma
c#
2
MC
F-7
Myo
cca
rdiu
m
P1
96
0t
p1
Bud
dy
Jso
ie
Ga
il
Abb
y
Bru
tus
B-actin
Her2/neu
Ca
Ma
c#
2
MC
F-7
Myocca
rdiu
m
P1
960
t p
1
Bu
dd
y
Jso
ie
Ga
il
Abb
y
Bru
tus
B-actin
Her2/neu
Ca
Ma
c#
2
MC
F-7
Myo
cca
rdiu
m
P1
96
0t p
1
Bu
ddy
Jsoie
Ga
il
Ab
by
Bru
tus
B-actin
Her2/neu
! "#$"%&'( )*$'+*%', - . /01 "2''
• HER2/neu is expressed in 40-60% of
pediatric and canine primary OSA and in
pulmonary metastatic disease
• Supporting evidence for HER2/neu
expression in tumor initiating cells
• Expression is associated with aggressive
disease, increased risk of metastasis and
decreased OS
• Not associated with gene amplification
• IHC indicates staining is predominantly
cytoplasmic
• Trastuzumab showed minimal efficacy in a
phase I clinical trial in children
• Represents a therapeutic target for T cell
mediated therapies
Flint AF, et al. Vet Pathol. 2004 May;41(3):291-6.
• Gram positive intracellular bacteria • Preferentially infects APCs
• Induces potent innate (IL-12) and adaptive (CD4 & CD8 T cell) immune responses
• Readily genetically modified to deliver TAA into MHC I and II pathways
• Influences the tumor microenvironment• Increases TIL and reduces % of Tregs and MDSC within tumors
• In mouse models: • Induces HER2 specific CD8+ cytotoxic T cell responses
• Eliminates established HER2+ mammary tumors
• Prevents HER2+ metastatic disease
Sequence identity with canine HER2
EC1 89%
EC2 93%
IC1 98%
Listeria monocytogenes
ADXS31-164 administered in the setting of minimal residual disease prevents metastatic disease and prolongs overall survival
MOA to prevent metastatic disease
Overall survival
n=18
Disease Free Interval
Dis
ea
se f
ree
su
rviv
al
n=18
MST 956 days
DFI 615 days
ADXS31-64 plus RT will synergize to promote anti-tumor immune responses that
retard primary tumor progression and delay/prevent metastatic disease in dogs with
non-resectable appendicular OSA
Proposed synergy between ADXS31-164 and palliative radiation
Characteristic Radiographic Progression of OSA
following Radiation Therapy Alone
02.22.2012 05.09.201202.01.2012
2 x 8Gy
0 100 200 300 4000
20
40
60
80
100
Days
Pe
rce
nt s
urv
iva
l
Pe
rce
nt su
rviv
al
Time (days) Time (days)
n=10
2 x 8Gy + ADXS31-164
Pe
rce
nt
su
rviv
al
n=57
Survival of Data 2:Survival proportions
0 100 200 300 4000
20
40
60
80
100Legend
TTP (days)
Pro
gre
ssio
n fre
e s
urv
iva
l
2 x 8Gy + ADXS31-164
n=10
Pro
gre
ssio
n fre
e s
urv
iva
l
Time (days)
Knapp-Hoch et al. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb;45(1):24-32.
Inclusion/Exclusion criteria
• Confirmed diagnosis of OSA by bone biopsy and histopathology
• No evidence of metastatic disease
• Systemically healthy with no evidence of cardiac disease
• Treatment naïve (other than pain medications)
Overview of Pilot Study Timeline
Days 0 4 5 7 28 49 70 91 112 133 154
RT1 RT2
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
EKG/Echo/cTnI
Bone biopsy/histopth
CT – limb and thorax
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
EKG/Echo/cTnI
Bone aspirate/cytology
CT – limb and thorax
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
EKG/Echo/cTnI
Bone aspirate/cytology
CT – limb and thorax
V#1 V#2 V#3 V#4 V#5 V#6 V#7 V#8
Lameness score; Pain questionnaire
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
EUTHANASIA
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
cTnI
Necropsy
Thoracic radiographs
Limb radiographs
Thoracic radiographs
Limb radiographs
Days 0 4 5 7 28 49 70 91 112 133 154
RT1 RT2
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
EKG/Echo/cTnI
Bone biopsy/histopth
CT – limb and thorax
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
EKG/Echo/cTnI
Bone aspirate/cytology
CT – limb and thorax
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
EKG/Echo/cTnI
Bone aspirate/cytology
CT – limb and thorax
V#1 V#2 V#3 V#4 V#5 V#6 V#7 V#8
Lameness score; Pain questionnaire
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
EUTHANASIA
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
cTnI
Necropsy
Thoracic radiographs Limb radiographs
Thoracic radiographs Limb radiographs
Days 0 4 5 7 28 49 70 91 112 133 154
RT1 RT2
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
EKG/Echo/cTnI
Bone biopsy/histopth
CT – limb and thorax
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
EKG/Echo/cTnI
Bone aspirate/cytology
CT – limb and thorax
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
EKG/Echo/cTnI
Bone aspirate/cytology
CT – limb and thorax
V#1 V#2 V#3 V#4 V#5 V#6 V#7 V#8
Lameness score; Pain questionnaire
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
EUTHANASIA
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
cTnI
Necropsy
Thoracic radiographs Limb radiographs
Thoracic radiographs Limb radiographs
Days 0 4 5 7 28 49 70 91 112 133 154
RT1 RT2
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
EKG/Echo/cTnI
Bone biopsy/histopth
CT – limb and thorax
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
EKG/Echo/cTnI
Bone aspirate/cytology
CT – limb and thorax
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
EKG/Echo/cTnI
Bone aspirate/cytology
CT – limb and thorax
V#1 V#2 V#3 V#4 V#5 V#6 V#7 V#8
Lameness score; Pain questionnaire
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
Immune
analysis
EUTHANASIA
CBC,CS,UA
Immune analysis
cTnI
Necropsy
Thoracic radiographs Limb radiographs
Thoracic radiographs Limb radiographs
Median Duration of Pain Relief with RT alone = 70 daysMedian Survival Time with RT alone = 136 daysRef: Knapp-Hoch et al. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb;45(1):24-32.
Patient Signalment and Tumor Characteristics
T TramadolG GabapentinNSAID Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug
B Bone MetastasesL Lung MetastasesPF Pathologic Fracture
+ Alive* Euthanasia due to pathologic fracture
AGE BREED SEX TUMORLOCATION SUBTYPE
HER2/Neuexpression
Numberofvaccines
administeredtodate
Concurrenttreatments
Timetoprogression
(days)
Overallsurvival(days)
Vaccinegroup
9 ItalianSpinone MC Proximalhumerus Osteoblastic Pending 8 T,G,NSAIDs 238B 2856 GreatPyrenees FS Proximalhumerus Osteoblastic 1 8(+2) T,G,Pamidronate 479+9 IrishSetter FS Distalradius Osteoblastic 6 2 T,G 62L 628 GoldenRetriever MC Distaltibia Osteoblastic Pending 8(+2) None 243L 378+7 GSD MC Distalfemur Osteoblastic 2 8(+1) None 354+7 GreatDane MC Distalradius Osteoblastic 6 5 T,G,A,NSAIDs 113(PF) 187*7 Greyhound MC Proximalhumerus Fibroblastic 3 1 None 57(PF) 57*9 Mixbreed FS Proximalhumerus Osteoblastic Pending 7 None 204(PF) 322+9 Mixbreed MC Distaltibia Osteoblastic Pending 8(+2) T,G 269+6 GreatPyrenees FS Distalradius Osteoblastic Pending 2 None 90(PF) 115*7 Greyhound FS Proximalhumerus Osteoblastic Pending 3 None 116+9 Saluki M Distalradius Osteoblastic Pending 2 None 66+
Mild, transient increases in temperature and systolic blood pressure following ADXS31-164
100
101
102
103
104
105p<0.005
0 2 4 6
Hours post infusion
Tem
pera
ture
(oF
)
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220p<0.005
0 2 4 6
Hours post infusion
Systo
lic b
p(m
mH
g)
! "
#"
$"
%"
&"
' "
( "
) "
*"
+"
#! "
, -. " / $" / %" / &" / ' " / ( " / ) " / *"
01#"
! "
! #$"
%"
%#$"
&"
&#$"
' () " *&" *+" *, " *$" *- " *. " */" &0 1%"
2) (3) 4+"
! "
! #$"
%"
%#$"
&"
&#$"
' "
' #$"
( )*" +&" +' " +, " +$" +- " +. " +/" &0 1%"
2*)3*4' "
! "
#"
$"
%"
&"
' "
( "
) *+" , $" , %" , &" , ' " , ( " , - " , . " $/ 0#""
1+*2+3%"
! "
#"
$"
%"
&"
' ! "
' #"
' $"
( )*" +#" +, " +$" +- " +%"
. *)/*0, "
! "
#"
$"
%"
&"
' "
( "
) "
*"
+"
, -. " / $" / %" / &" / ' " / ( " / ) " , 012"/ ) "
3. -4. 1%"
! "
! #$"
%"
%#$"
&"
&#$"
' "
' #$"
( "
( #$"
) *+" , &" , ' " , ( " , $" , - " , . " , / "
01%"
! "
! #$"
%"
%#$"
&"
&#$"
' "
' #$"
( )*" +&" +' " +, " +$" +- " +. " +/" &0 1%"
2*)3*4%"
! "
! #$"
! #%"
! #&"
! #' "
( "
( #$"
( #%"
( #&"
) *+" , $" , - " , %" , . " , &" , / " , ' " $0 1( "
2+*3+4( "
! "
! #$"
%"
%#$"
&"
&#$"
' "
' #$"
( "
( #$"
) *+" , &" , ' " , ( " , $" , - " , . " , / " &0 1%""
2+*3+4%"
! "
! #$"
%"
%#$"
&"
&#$"
' "
' #$"
( )*" +&" +' " +, " +$" +- "
. *)/*0%"
! "
#"
$"
%"
&"
' "
( "
) *+" , $" , %" , &" , ' " , ( " , - " ) . /0", - "
1+*2+/#"
! "
#"
$"
%"
&"
' "
( "
) "
*"
+"
#! "
, -. " / $" / %" / &" / ' " / ( " / ) " / *"
01$"
! "
#"
$"
%"
&"
' "
( "
) *+" , $" , %" , &" , ' " , ( " , - " , . " $/ 0#"
1+*2+3$"
! "
#"
$"
%"
&"
' ! "
' #"
' $"
' %"
( )*" +#" +, " +$" +- " +%" +. " +&" #/ 0' "
1*)2*3#"
! "
! #$"
%"
%#$"
&"
&#$"
' "
' #$"
( )*" +&" +' " +, " +$" +- " +. " +/" &0 1%""
2*)3*4&"
! "
! #$"
%"
%#$"
&"
&#$"
' "
( )*" +&" +' " +, " +$" +- "
. *)/*0&"
! "
#"
$"
%"
&"
' "
( "
) "
*+, " - $" - %" - &" - ' " - ( " - ) " *. /0"- ) "
1, +2, /$"
Vaccine number
Fo
ld i
ncr
ease
in
sp
ots
ADXS31-164 breaks tolerance to HER2/neu and induces antigen-specific IFN-γ production
IC1
EC1
EC2
Dog OO2 Dog OO3 Dog OO5 Dog OO7 Dog OO8 Dog O10
No evidence of cardiotoxicity with repeat doses of ADXS31-164
Card
iac
Tro
pon
in I
(n
g/m
l)
V#1
V#2
V#3
V#4
V#5
V#6
V#7
V#8
Boost
er
V#1
! "
! #$"
! #%"
! #&"
! #' "
! #( "! ! %"
! ! &"
! ! ' "
! ! ( "
! ! ) "
! ! *"
! ! +"
! $! "
! $$"
! $' "Norm
lized
LV
ID (
d)
(cm
)! "#$
! "%$
&$
&"' $
&"( $
&"#$
&"%$
' $ ! ! ' $
! ! ) $
! ! ( $
! ! *$
! ! +$
! ! %$
! ! , $
! &! $
! &&$
! &( $
V#1
V#2
V#3
V#4
V#5
V#6
V#7
V#8
Boost
er
V#1
RT+ ADXS31-164 delays the radiographic progression of primary OSA
1.27.2014 1.20.2015
Dog 003
2 2 1 2
LAMENESS SCORE:0=clinically sound, 1=barely detectable lameness, 2=mild lameness, 3=moderate lameness, 4=severe lameness, 5=non weight bearing
Dog 007
2.9.20157.11.2014 9.23.2014 12.15.2014
2 2 1 1
LAMENESS SCORE:0=clinically sound, 1=barely detectable lameness, 2=mild lameness, 3=moderate lameness, 4=severe lameness, 5=non weight bearing
RT+ ADXS31-164 delays the radiographic progression of primary OSA
Dog 007
2 2 1 1
LAMENESS SCORE:0=clinically sound, 1=barely detectable lameness, 2=mild lameness, 3=moderate lameness, 4=severe lameness, 5=non weight bearing
! "#"! $%&'("%%"! $%)' #"! *"! $%)' %! "%&"! $%)' ! "#"! $%&'("%%"! $%)' #"! *"! $%)' %! "%&"! $%)' 6.2.2015
RT+ ADXS31-164 delays the radiographic progression of primary OSA
Dog 005
! "#! "$%#&' ("#$"$%#&' 2.9.20157.11.2014 8.12.2014! "#! "$%#&' ("#$"$%#&'6.16.2014 11.04.2014 3.02.2015
1 1 1 2
LAMENESS SCORE:0=clinically sound, 1=barely detectable lameness, 2=mild lameness, 3=moderate lameness, 4=severe lameness, 5=non weight bearing
RT+ ADXS31-164 delays the radiographic progression of primary OSA
Radiographic evidence of bone remodeling and “healing” of primary OSA lesion following RT+ ADXS31-164
Dog 011
• Increase boney deposition and apparent cortical bone replacement• Decrease in lysis of distal tibia• Smoothening of periosteal reaction on cranial aspect of tibia
2 1 1
2.24.20159.3.2014 11.25.2014 5.19.2015
2.26.2014 11.03.2014
386-003
Stable clinical disease following RT+ADXS31-164
6.12.2014 5.12.2015386-005
Stable clinical disease following RT+ADXS31-164
386-011
9.03.2014 05.19.20156.02.20157.11.2014
386-007
Lameness scores
0
1
2
3
4
5
Denali
Sheba
Scarlet
Harley
Luke
Bogie
Oscar
Chloe
Bailey
Keeva
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
Series5
Series6
Series7
Series8
Series9
Series10
Series11
Pre-RT
V1
V2
V3
V4
V5
V6
V7
V8
Re-ck 1
Re-ck 2
La
me
ne
ss s
co
re
0=clinically sound, 1=barely detectable lameness, 2=mild lameness, 3=moderate lameness, 4=severe lameness, 5=non weight bearing
002 003 004 005 007 008 009 010 011 014
Inflammatory infiltrates versus progressive pulmonary
metastatic disease following ADXS31-164 immune therapy?
6.12.2014 8.12.2014 11.4.2014
1.05.2015 3.02.2015 5.12.2015
0 100 2 00 3 00 400 5 00
0
2 0
40
6 0
80
100
T TP (days )
Progression free survival
K-M curves and autopsy findings of euthanized dogs
0 100 2 00 3 00 400 5 00
0
2 0
40
6 0
80
100
D ays
Percent survival
Overall survival
Time to Progression
n=12
n=12
238 days
HER2/neuH&E
Pulmonary noduleMetastatic HER2+ OSA
Lymphocytic recruitment
CD3+ lymphocytes specifically associated with nodule
Perivascular cuffing CD3+ lymphocytes adjacent to nodule
CD3 IHC CD3 IHC
CD3 IHC CD3 IHC
H&EH&E
Lymphocytic recruitment to metastatic lung lesions
! "#$ %%&' #( ) ' *#+, -. ) ( /, 01#
2# 3#
4# 5#
6# 7#
8# 9#
:# ;#
! #
! #
<# =#
! "#$ %%&' #( ) ' *#+, -. ) ( /, *012
! " #$ ! " #$
! " #$ ! " #$
%&' () *&) $%&' () *&) $
+ , - $
+ , - $
+ , - $
32
H&E H&E
! "#$ %%&' #( ) ' *#+, -. ) ( /, 01#
2# 3#
4# 5#
6# 7#
8# 9#
:# ;#
! #
! #
<# =#
! "#$ %%&' #( ) ' *#+, -. ) ( /, *012
! " #$ ! " #$
! " #$ ! " #$
%&' () *&) $%&' () *&) $
+ , - $
+ , - $
+ , - $
32
H&E H&E
T cell
activation
IFN-γ production
ξ
ξ
ξ
ξUp-regulation of PD-L1
T cell inhibition
Up-regulation of
PD-1 and CTLA4
ξ ξ
Up-
regulation of
PD-L1
DC
T cell
Tumor
T cell
activation
IFN-γ production
ξ
ξ
ξ
ξ
Prevention of T cell
inhibition
Inhibitors of
PD-1, PD-L1 and
CTLA4
ξ ξ
Y
Y
Y
Y
DC
T cell
Tumor
Physical and Functional T cell Inhibition Reduces Efficacy in Metastatic Disease
• Physical barriers• Fibrous capsule• High intra-tumoral pressure
• Functional barriers• Immune Checkpoints• Immune suppressive mileu
• Tregs &MDSC• Cytokines• IDO, Arginase I
Summary, Conclusions and Future Directions
• ADXS31-164 administration in dogs
• Repeat administrations of up to 3.3 x 109 CFU are well tolerated
• Breaks peripheral tolerance to HER2/neu and perhaps primes an effective memory response
• Delay or prevents metastatic disease when administered in MRD
o Innate versus Adaptive Immune response
• Delays clinical and radiographic progression of OSA when used following palliative RT
• Disease Progression is not associated with loss of HER2/neu• Sequencing required to determine presence of HER2 mutations
• Effective control or elimination of pre-existing metastatic disease will likely
require combination therapies that address the tumor microenvironment• Combination therapy with checkpoint inhibitors
• Combination therapy with FAP targeting CAR T cells
• Future Directionso Understanding the mechanism of action of ADXS31-164 – is HER2 a relevant target?
• Evaluation of CTCs for HER2 expression
o Understanding differences between primary and metastatic tumor microenvironments
o Evaluation of ADXS31-164 as neo-adjuvant therapy
Acknowledgements
Yvonne Paterson
Matt Seavey
Reshma Singh
George Gunn
Mason Lab
Josephine Gnanandarajah
Kazim Panjwani
Georges Habineza-Ndikuyeze
Anita Gaurnier-Hausser
Aliza Schmidt
Radiology/Radiation Oncology
Jenn Reetz, Ana Caceres, Wil Mai, Lili Duda, StephCorsi, Susan Mendez
Cardiology
Maggie Machen, Dani Laughlin, Mel Hezzell,
Chloe Thorn
Surgical team
Cara Blake, Kim Agnello, Jeff Runge, Christa Cioffi, Jacob Rubin
Microbiology
Shelley Rankin, Donna Maloney
Pathology
Julie Engiles, Falon Gray, Amy Durham
Juli Burns & Jackie Ferracone
Nurses and Staff
Sam Kean, Victoria Enders, Jen Prendergast, Ali McKenna, Chantal Reme, Ashley Deese, Amanda Ashley, Lila Sierra
Anu Wallecha
Robert Petit
Chris French
Referring Oncologists
Kate Vickery, MJ Hamilton, Kevin Choy, McFadden, Conor McNeil, Carrie Hume, Marlene Hauck, Emma Warry, Bridget Urie, Jennifer Locke, Kathy Kazmierski, Pascale Salah, Paula Levine, Lisa Van der Gagg, Christine Mullen, and many more…
Funding sources
Advaxis Inc
Abramson Cancer Center
Aratana Therapeutics
Morris Animal Foundation
Skippy Frank Translational Medicine Fund
Richard Lichter Canine Foundation