comenius project 2011-13.. a proposal of project achievement indicators? ies barrio de bilbao madrid
TRANSCRIPT
Comenius Project 2011-13..
A proposal of project achievement indicators?
IES Barrio de Bilbao Madrid
Project Achievement Qualitative Indicators
STUDENTS (I)• Project Goals– Have they increased the knowledge of the participating
countries?– Have they increased the feelling to be part of Europe? – Have the activities promotioned the respect, admiration and
tolerance of the european cultural diversity in the students?– Students have shown a reasonable interest for the project
subject?
Project Achievement Qualitative Indicators
STUDENTS (II)•Work performed– Have the presented material allowed to know how
the european young people use the free time?– Have the presented material been varied and original? – Have the different produced material disseminated
along the different educational communities?
Project Achievement Qualitative Indicators
STUDENTS (III)• Families– Have been they adequatelly involved in the project
organisation?– Have been they adequatelly illusioned by the project?– Have they adequatelly participated in the involved
activities?– Have they overriden the communication difficulties?
Project Achievement Qualitative Indicators
STUDENTS (IV)• Communication and Relations– Have they increased its capacity to communicate
in foreign languages, in particular in english?– Have been established solid and strenght
friendship relations?
Project Achievement Qualitative Indicators
TEACHERS (I)• Implication– Has been the educational community adequatelly
involved during the project development?– Has been the hosting educational community adequatelly
involved during the week meeting in its own high school? – Has been the headmaster team adequatelly involved and
has supported the project development?
Project Achievement Qualitative Indicators
TEACHERS (II)• Comunication– Have existed adecuated change of didactic
experiences and ideas between the different teacher groups
Project Achievement Qualitative Indicators
LOCAL AUTHORITIES• Have been the cityhall authorities
adequatelly involved?• Have been the local educational
authorities adequatelly involved?
Project Achievement Quantitative Indicators
STUDENTS (I)– Level of hopeful anticipation to travel– Number of established contacts with persons of other groups
after the performed travels– Level of solidarity developed inside the group– Level of tolerance and respect to the cultural diversity and
differences– Number of proposals performed for the works to be prepared– Level of dissemination in the different educational communities
of prepared works
Project Achievement Quantitative Indicators
STUDENTS (II)– Level of hosting families participation along the project, and
in particular during the own high school meeting– Level of admiration of involved students and families to the
diverse and diferent cultures– Level of interest presented by the students non participating
directly in the project, in particular the youngers one.– Number of other student requests to participate in more
Comenius projects
Project Achievement Quantitative Indicators
STUDENTS (III)– Level of appreciation of involved students and
families to the European Comission by the provided project opportunity
Project Achievement Quantitative Indicators
TEACHERS (I)– Number of request to participate in the project by the high school
teachers– Implication level of involved teachers for the project goal achievement– Number of requests to participate in similar projects in the near future
by high school teachers– Level of contacts maintained between teachers of the different project
groups– Level of experience and information interchange between teachers of
different groups
Project Achievement Quantitative Indicators
TEACHERS (II)– Level of appreciation of involved teachers to the
European Comission by the provided project opportunity
Project Achievement Quantitative Indicators
THE PROJECT IN FIGURES– Number of free time aspect considered– Number of interviews performed– Number of social games presented– Level of information contained in the project web page– Number of place visits performed– What about the delivery files?– Level of european profitability of the used european fundings