comment on “fullerene-based materials for solar cell

3
4216 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 4216--4218 This journal is © the Owner Societies 2016 Cite this: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 4216 Comment on ‘‘Fullerene-based materials for solar cell applications: design of novel acceptors for efficient polymer solar cells – a DFT study’’ by A. Mohajeri and A. Omidvar, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 22367Denis Sh. Sabirov,* a Anton O. Terentyev a and Igor S. Shepelevich b Though a linear correlation has been recently reported between mean polarizabilities of the fullerene derivatives and open-circuit voltages of organic solar cells based on them, we demonstrate that there is no general dependence between these two values and some related quantities (anisotropy of polarizability and LUMO levels). 1 Introduction A recent theoretical study 1 reports on the correlations between the open-circuit voltage (V OC ) of organic solar cells (OSCs) and physicochemical parameters of the fullerene derivatives used as electron acceptors in OSCs. Mohajeri and Omidvar 1 have performed accurate quantum-chemical calculations (using appropriate DFT methods) and compared their computational results with the experimental V OC values from the review. 2 It is important that all open-circuit voltages were measured under the same experimental conditions, so their joint use in the frame of one correlation is justified. One of the correlations reported in ref. 1 is a linear dependence of V OC on the mean polarizability of the corresponding fullerene derivative acceptors (R 2 = 0.914). The authors concluded that ‘‘the most efficient fullerene-based acceptors are characterized by... maximum dipole polarizability’’. We consider that the mentioned conclusion is overoptimistic and poorly justified. In the comment, we provide pro et contra arguments regarding the citation above. As is known, polarizability is a tensor quantity that describes molecule’s behavior in the external electric fields. It has wide applications in physical chemistry and chemical physics as it defines dispersion interactions, chemical properties, dielectric permittivity, refractivity, etc. As previously pointed in the reviews 3–5 and original studies, 6–19 polarizability has high importance for fullerene chemistry and materials science because fullerenes and their derivatives are highly polarizable species. We have illustrated how polarizability can be applied to such a current hot fullerene topic as organic solar cells. 4 Polarizability plays an important role in OSCs due to (1) its relation to dielectric permittivity (described by the Clausius–Mossoti formula; see also a very recent review 5 ), (2) extremely high polarizability of the charge- transfer complexes generated when OSCs act, and (3) influence of polarizability on wetting processes (the de Gennes equation), which define miscibility of polymer donors with fullerene acceptors and, therefore, the OSC output parameters. The aforementioned arguments are in favor of the importance of polarizability for OSCs. All of them are qualitative. In contrast, Mohajeri and Omidvar 1 propose a linear correlation between V OC and mean polarizability a. They operate in their work with 9 derivatives of the C 60 fullerene, viz. substituted cyclopropa- [60]fullerenes. Note that 6 of them were monoadducts whereas other 3 compounds were bis- and trisadducts. The latter, as known, have multiple regioisomers. This leads to the first mistake of ref. 1 using the experimental results for fullerene multiadducts corresponding to the mixtures of the isomers while the computational data correspond to one selected isomer. This mistake is not decisive for polarizability considerations because we have previously shown that regioisomeric fullerene multiadducts have almost the same mean polarizabilities (with very rare exceptions). 8,10,11,13–15,17 However, it may be more pronounced for hardness, LUMO levels and other parameters calculated by Mohajeri and Omidvar. The second weak spot is that ref. 1 covers only 9 fullerene derivatives to build up a correlation. We think it is not enough to substantiate a linear dependence. To demonstrate this, we have performed similar calculations with the extended set of a Institute of Petrochemistry and Catalysis, Russian Academy of Sciences, 450075 Ufa, Russia. E-mail: [email protected]; Fax: +7 347 2842750 b Bashkir State University, 450076 Ufa, Russia Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Numerical data associated with Fig. 1, the plot and structural formulas of 27 studied fullerene adducts. See DOI: 10.1039/c5cp05408g Received 10th September 2015, Accepted 4th January 2016 DOI: 10.1039/c5cp05408g www.rsc.org/pccp PCCP COMMENT Open Access Article. Published on 04 January 2016. Downloaded on 4/9/2022 11:30:14 AM. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. View Article Online View Journal | View Issue

Upload: others

Post on 09-Apr-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

4216 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 4216--4218 This journal is© the Owner Societies 2016

Cite this:Phys.Chem.Chem.Phys.,

2016, 18, 4216

Comment on ‘‘Fullerene-based materials for solarcell applications: design of novel acceptors forefficient polymer solar cells – a DFT study’’ byA. Mohajeri and A. Omidvar, Phys. Chem. Chem.Phys., 2015, 17, 22367†

Denis Sh. Sabirov,*a Anton O. Terentyeva and Igor S. Shepelevichb

Though a linear correlation has been recently reported between mean polarizabilities of the fullerene derivatives

and open-circuit voltages of organic solar cells based on them, we demonstrate that there is no general

dependence between these two values and some related quantities (anisotropy of polarizability and

LUMO levels).

1 Introduction

A recent theoretical study1 reports on the correlations betweenthe open-circuit voltage (VOC) of organic solar cells (OSCs) andphysicochemical parameters of the fullerene derivatives used aselectron acceptors in OSCs. Mohajeri and Omidvar1 haveperformed accurate quantum-chemical calculations (usingappropriate DFT methods) and compared their computationalresults with the experimental VOC values from the review.2 It isimportant that all open-circuit voltages were measured underthe same experimental conditions, so their joint use in theframe of one correlation is justified.

One of the correlations reported in ref. 1 is a linear dependenceof VOC on the mean polarizability of the corresponding fullerenederivative acceptors (R2 = 0.914). The authors concluded that ‘‘themost efficient fullerene-based acceptors are characterized by. . .

maximum dipole polarizability’’. We consider that the mentionedconclusion is overoptimistic and poorly justified. In the comment,we provide pro et contra arguments regarding the citation above.

As is known, polarizability is a tensor quantity that describesmolecule’s behavior in the external electric fields. It has wideapplications in physical chemistry and chemical physics as itdefines dispersion interactions, chemical properties, dielectricpermittivity, refractivity, etc. As previously pointed in the reviews3–5

and original studies,6–19 polarizability has high importance for

fullerene chemistry and materials science because fullerenesand their derivatives are highly polarizable species. We haveillustrated how polarizability can be applied to such a currenthot fullerene topic as organic solar cells.4 Polarizability plays animportant role in OSCs due to (1) its relation to dielectricpermittivity (described by the Clausius–Mossoti formula; see alsoa very recent review5), (2) extremely high polarizability of the charge-transfer complexes generated when OSCs act, and (3) influence ofpolarizability on wetting processes (the de Gennes equation), whichdefine miscibility of polymer donors with fullerene acceptorsand, therefore, the OSC output parameters. The aforementionedarguments are in favor of the importance of polarizability forOSCs. All of them are qualitative.

In contrast, Mohajeri and Omidvar1 propose a linear correlationbetween VOC and mean polarizability a. They operate in their workwith 9 derivatives of the C60 fullerene, viz. substituted cyclopropa-[60]fullerenes. Note that 6 of them were monoadducts whereasother 3 compounds were bis- and trisadducts. The latter, asknown, have multiple regioisomers. This leads to the firstmistake of ref. 1 using the experimental results for fullerenemultiadducts corresponding to the mixtures of the isomerswhile the computational data correspond to one selected isomer.This mistake is not decisive for polarizability considerationsbecause we have previously shown that regioisomeric fullerenemultiadducts have almost the same mean polarizabilities(with very rare exceptions).8,10,11,13–15,17 However, it may be morepronounced for hardness, LUMO levels and other parameterscalculated by Mohajeri and Omidvar.

The second weak spot is that ref. 1 covers only 9 fullerenederivatives to build up a correlation. We think it is not enoughto substantiate a linear dependence. To demonstrate this, wehave performed similar calculations with the extended set of

a Institute of Petrochemistry and Catalysis, Russian Academy of Sciences,

450075 Ufa, Russia. E-mail: [email protected]; Fax: +7 347 2842750b Bashkir State University, 450076 Ufa, Russia

† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Numerical data associatedwith Fig. 1, the plot and structural formulas of 27 studied fullerene adducts. See DOI:10.1039/c5cp05408g

Received 10th September 2015,Accepted 4th January 2016

DOI: 10.1039/c5cp05408g

www.rsc.org/pccp

PCCP

COMMENT

Ope

n A

cces

s A

rtic

le. P

ublis

hed

on 0

4 Ja

nuar

y 20

16. D

ownl

oade

d on

4/9

/202

2 11

:30:

14 A

M.

Thi

s ar

ticle

is li

cens

ed u

nder

a C

reat

ive

Com

mon

s A

ttrib

utio

n-N

onC

omm

erci

al 3

.0 U

npor

ted

Lic

ence

.

View Article OnlineView Journal | View Issue

This journal is© the Owner Societies 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 4216--4218 | 4217

fullerene derivatives. The experimental data (VOC and powerconversion efficiency Z) have been taken from the Troshin et al.work on OSCs with substituted cyclopropafullerenes20 (all ofthem are monoadducts; our set includes 6 compounds from theMohajeri and Omidvar calculations). We have calculated their meanpolarizabilities by the PBE/3z method in terms of the finite fieldapproach. This method was previously used for accurate calculationsof diverse fullerene derivatives.8,10,11,13–15,17 Unfortunately, we havefound no correlations between the calculated a values and measuredVOC and Z (Fig. 1).

Additional arguments against the reported correlation arisefrom comparative experimental studies21–24 applying the purifiedregioisomeric fullerene bisadducts to OSCs. As these studiesdiscovered, isomerism of fullerene derivatives affects the keyoutput parameters of OSCs. However, we have shown on a large

set of fullerene adducts that their positional isomers have almostequal mean polarizabilities (only some isomers of chlorofullerenes,10

C60 oligomers,13 and C70 dimers17 reveal a significant difference;these compounds are not present in our set). Hence, Mohajeriand Omidvar’s correlation contradicts the known experimentaland theoretical data.

It is not an easy task to find out correlations between thephysicochemical parameters and device performances. Indeed,we have previously obtained a correlation between the experimentalVOC and Z values and calculated anisotropy of polarizability a2 ofisomeric fullerene bisadducts.15 However, it works only if theisomeric compounds are considered. In this comment in the contextof Mohajeri and Omidvar’s paper, we report on no correlationbetween the VOC (Z) and a2 values (Fig. 1). Finally, ref. 1 provides acorrelation between VOC and LUMO levels of fullerene derivatives.Therefore, we have calculated LUMO energies of 27 compoundsfrom ref. 20 and plotted these against the experimental data (Fig. 1).No obvious correlation has been also found.

Thus, we explain the reported correlations1 by insufficiencyof the studied set of fullerene derivatives (9 compounds).Extending the set to 27 samples breaks the declared regularities.As a consequence, only polarizability or only LUMO energies areinsufficient to predict novel acceptor structures for OSCs. Thesituation may be corrected if a multi-parameter correlation willbe proposed like models in QSAR and QSPR studies (quantitativestructure–activity relationship and quantitative structure–propertyrelationship).

Acknowledgements

The work was financially supported by Russian Foundation forBasic Research (project 16-03-00822 A).

Notes and references

1 A. Mohajeri and A. Omidvar, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015,17, 22367.

2 Y. He and Y. Li, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13,1970.

3 M. Broyer, R. Antoine, E. Benichou, I. Compagnon, P. Dugourdand D. Rayane, C. R. Phys., 2002, 3, 301.

4 D. S. Sabirov, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 44996.5 S. Few, J. M. Frost and J. Nelson, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,

2015, 17, 2311.6 C. R. Zhang, H. S. Chen, Y. H. Chen, Z. Q. Wei and Z. S. Pu,

Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin., 2008, 24, 1353.7 K. Hornberger, S. Gerlich, H. Ulbricht, L. Hackermuller,

S. Nimmrichter, I. V. Goldt, O. Boltalina and M. Arndt, NewJ. Phys., 2009, 11, 043032.

8 D. S. Sabirov, R. G. Bulgakov, S. L. Khursan and U. M. Dzhemilev,Dokl. Phys. Chem., 2009, 425, 54.

9 R. Rivelino, T. Malaspina and E. E. Fileti, Phys. Rev. A: At.,Mol., Opt. Phys., 2009, 79, 013201.

10 D. S. Sabirov, R. R. Garipova and R. G. Bulgakov, Chem. Phys.Lett., 2012, 523, 92.

Fig. 1 Plots of open-circuit voltages against mean polarizability, anisotropyof polarizability, and LUMO energy of fullerene adducts.

Comment PCCP

Ope

n A

cces

s A

rtic

le. P

ublis

hed

on 0

4 Ja

nuar

y 20

16. D

ownl

oade

d on

4/9

/202

2 11

:30:

14 A

M.

Thi

s ar

ticle

is li

cens

ed u

nder

a C

reat

ive

Com

mon

s A

ttrib

utio

n-N

onC

omm

erci

al 3

.0 U

npor

ted

Lic

ence

.View Article Online

4218 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 4216--4218 This journal is© the Owner Societies 2016

11 D. S. Sabirov, A. A. Tukhbatullina and R. G. Bulgakov,Comput. Theor. Chem., 2012, 993, 113.

12 C.-R. Zhang, L.-H. Han, J.-W. Zhe, N.-Z. Jin, Y.-L. Shen, L.-H.Yuan, Y.-Z. Wu and Z.-J. Liu, J. Nanomater., 2013, 612153.

13 D. S. Sabirov, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 19430.14 D. S. Sabirov, R. R. Garipova and R. G. Bulgakov, J. Phys.

Chem. A, 2013, 117, 13176.15 D. S. Sabirov, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117, 9148.16 K. Akhtari, K. Hassanzadeh, B. Fakhraei, H. Hassanzadeh,

G. Akhtari and S. A. Zarei, Comput. Theor. Chem., 2014, 1038, 1.17 D. S. Sabirov, A. O. Terentyev and R. G. Bulgakov, Phys.

Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 14594.18 B. Bernardo, D. Cheyns, B. Verreet, R. D. Schaller, B. P. Rand

and N. C. Giebink, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 3245.

19 A.-R. Nekoei and S. Haghgoo, Comput. Theor. Chem., 2015,1067, 148.

20 P. A. Troshin, H. Hoppe, J. Renz, M. Egginger, J. Y. Mayorova,A. E. Goryachev, A. S. Peregudov, R. N. Lyubovskaya, G. Gobsch,N. S. Sariciftci and V. F. Razumov, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2009,19, 779.

21 S. Kitaura, K. Kurotobi, M. Sato, Y. Takano, T. Umeyamaand H. Imahori, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 8550.

22 R. Tao, T. Umeyama, K. Kurotobi and H. Imahori, ACS Appl.Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 17313.

23 T. Mikie, A. Saeki, N. Ikuma, K. Kokubo and S. Seki, ACSAppl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 12894.

24 F. Zhao, X. Meng, Y. Feng, Z. Jin, Q. Zhou, H. Li, L. Jiang,J. Wang, Y. Li and C. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 14991.

PCCP Comment

Ope

n A

cces

s A

rtic

le. P

ublis

hed

on 0

4 Ja

nuar

y 20

16. D

ownl

oade

d on

4/9

/202

2 11

:30:

14 A

M.

Thi

s ar

ticle

is li

cens

ed u

nder

a C

reat

ive

Com

mon

s A

ttrib

utio

n-N

onC

omm

erci

al 3

.0 U

npor

ted

Lic

ence

.View Article Online