comments of the alliance of automobile manufacturers on the … · 2018-06-27 · way. these 15 new...

1

Comments of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers on the Section 232 National

Security Investigation of Imports of Automobiles, Including Cars, SUVs, Vans and Light

Trucks, and Automotive Parts

Introduction

On behalf of the 12 members of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (Alliance), we

appreciate the opportunity to provide comments in response to the Department of Commerce’s

request for public comments on the “Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of

Automobiles, Including Cars, SUVs, Vans and Light Trucks, and Automotive Parts,” pursuant to

83 FR 24735, docket number DOC-2018-0002 (May 30, 2018). The Alliance is the leading

advocacy group for the auto industry, representing over 70 percent of new car and light-duty

truck sales in the United States.

Economic Impact of U.S. Auto Industry

By creating jobs, fueling innovation, building exports, and advancing mobility, automakers are

driving the American economy forward. Historically, the auto industry has contributed between

3 - 3.5 percent to America’s total gross domestic product. Nationwide, more than seven million

workers and their families depend on the auto industry. Each year, the industry generates $500

billion in paychecks, and accounts for $205 billion in federal and state tax revenues across the

country. No other single industry is linked to so much of U.S. manufacturing or generates so

much retail business and employment.

Automakers have an established footprint throughout the country (see attached Investing in

America report). In total, 14 domestic and international automakers currently operate 45

assembly plants across 14 states, with a heavy presence in the South and the Midwest. In the

past 25 years, 15 new manufacturing plants have been launched in the U.S and more are on the

way. These 15 new manufacturing plants – and automakers’ ongoing substantial, multi-billion-

dollar reinvestment in existing plants – have resulted in the creation of an additional 50,000

direct and 350,000 indirect auto jobs throughout the United States.

2

Automakers support an expansive network of thousands of suppliers and dealers throughout the

country. These suppliers and dealers directly employ millions of Americans and play vital roles

in local communities throughout all 50 states. According to the Motor and Equipment

Manufacturers Association, in the supplier community alone, motor vehicle parts manufacturing

jobs have increased nearly 19 percent since 2012.1 And, according to the National Automobile

Dealers Association, there are roughly 17,000 auto dealerships nationwide generating $995

billion in annual sales –18 percent of total retail sales in the United States.2 More than 90 percent

of these domestic and international nameplate dealerships are privately-owned small businesses

and have a powerful impact on their local communities– serving not only as employers but

significant sources of charitable giving and tax revenue in the cities and towns where they are

located.3

The demonstrated path to increasing direct and indirect auto jobs is through a growing economy.

The example of the Great Recession is instructive. The economic collapse of 2007-2008 left a

deep imprint on the auto industry and our nation as a whole. Auto sales plummeted from 16.2

million units in 2007 to just 10.4 million units in 2009. As a result, production declined sharply

and job losses followed. Auto sector employment dropped 34 percent in just 18 months,

shedding more than 323,000 jobs. This period demonstrated the cascading effects that a

dramatic drop in auto sales can quickly have on the industry and the overall economy.

In its recent Global Economic Prospects report, the World Bank warned that tariffs would have

severe consequences for global trade and could result in an economic decline similar to that

experienced in the Great Recession, or worse if tariffs exceed the maximum level allowed by the

World Trade Organization. 4

1 “The Economic Impact of the Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing Industry on the United States.” IHS Markit for the Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association. August 2016. Accessed via: https://www.mema.org/sites/default/files/resource/2016%20MEMA%20Economic%20Impact%20Final%20Report.pdf 2 “NADA Data 2016: Annual Financial Profile of America’s Franchised New-Car Dealerships” Accessed via: https://www.nada.org/2016NADAdata/ 3 Id. 4 World Bank. 2018. Global Economic Prospects, June 2018: The Turning of the Tide? Washington, DC: World Bank. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1257-6. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO.

3

The rebound the auto sector has witnessed since the financial collapse has been the result of

steady economic growth and the innovation of manufacturers and their supplier partners. In

addition, with recent tax and regulatory changes advanced by the Trump Administration and

Congress, which are likely to stimulate further economic growth, it would be a mistake to

introduce new variables that might upset a trajectory set to benefit workers all over the country.

Economic Security is National Security

While it is obviously the case that a healthy and growing economy is necessary to sustain

national security commitments, it is no less the case that certain policy decisions made in the

name of national security may actually undermine the economic growth on which the nation’s

security depends. It may seem attractive in this instance to pursue economic goals under the

umbrella of national security considerations; however, doing so could very well set a dangerous

precedent that other nations could use to protect their local market from foreign competition.

Those countermeasures will result in both short- and long-term negative consequences for U.S.

exports, and the workers whose jobs depend upon them.

In other words, we believe the resulting impact of tariffs on imported vehicles and vehicle

components will ultimately harm U.S. economic security and weaken our national security. The

potential negative ramifications of such tariffs to the nation’s auto industry, consumers, and

overall U.S. economy are real.

Import Tariffs Will Have a Negative Impact on America’s Automobile Industry – One of

the Most Powerful Engines Driving the U.S. Economy

There is no question that tariffs will have an adverse impact on consumer prices. Some dismiss

these concerns in the name of protecting U.S. jobs. However, a distinction between these two

concerns is artificial. The calculus is simple – tariffs will lead to increased producer costs,

increased producer costs will lead to increased vehicle costs, increased vehicle costs will lead to

fewer sales and less tax receipts, fewer sales will lead to fewer jobs, and those fewer jobs will

significantly impact many communities and families across the country.

4

Vehicle tariffs will unnecessarily increase costs for consumers and undermine consumer

affordability. A recent Trade Partnership Worldwide analysis estimates tariffs will add roughly

$6,400 to the price of an imported $30,000 vehicle.5 This price hike will result in a decline in

auto production, jobs, fleet turnover, and vehicle exports.

An analysis of U.S. Department of Commerce data shows that consumers of imported vehicles

will be faced with an average price increase of $5,800 as a result of a 25 percent import tariff.6

Nationwide, if a 25 percent tariff was to be imposed based on 2017 sales, American consumers

would be hit with a tax of nearly $45 billion.

Individual state impact sheets accompany this submission and highlight the consumer impact to

be felt throughout all 50 states should a 25 percent tariff be imposed on all imported

automobiles. These calculations do not take into account the cost increase of vehicles produced

in the U.S. or the impact on used car vehicle prices.

Tariffs on imported vehicle components will increase production costs for both domestic and

international automakers here in the U.S. These costs will translate into increased vehicle prices

for consumers and a decrease in sales. In fact, LMC Automotive – a leading automotive research

5 Francois, J., Baughman, L., and Anthony, D. “An Accident Waiting to Happen: The Estimated Impact of Tariffs on Motor Vehicles and Parts.” Trade Partnership Worldwide, LLC. May 29, 2018. 6 United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Foreign Trade Division TPIS Database: USHS IMPORTS, Revised Statistics for 1989-2016. Accessed via: https://www.trade.gov/td/otm/autostats.asp 7 Figures compiled by Auto Alliance with data provided by IHS Markit and Ward’s Automotive represent new vehicle registrations between 1/1/17 – 12/31/17 and value of import vehicle calculated using Department of Commerce import data (accessed via: https://www.trade.gov/td/otm/autostats.asp ). 8 This does not take into account the 1,981,873 vehicles that were manufactured in the U.S. for export in 2017.

Sales in 2017 Of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. And Abroad (National)78 Sales Of

Vehicles

Assembled

In U.S.

Assembled

In U.S.

(%)

Sales Of

Vehicles

Assembled

Abroad

Assembled

Abroad

(%)

Total

Sales

Average

Tariff

Costs

Proposed

Tariff Costs

9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $5,800 $44,557,838,800

https://www.trade.gov/td/otm/autostats.asp


5

firm – projects a 25 percent tariff on imported vehicles will result in an annual sales impact of 1

to 2 million units, depending on how much of the cost of the tariffs is passed on to consumers.9

There is a direct correlation between vehicle sales and auto employment in the U.S. – a decline

in vehicle sales is bad for jobs. In particular, when new vehicle sales drop, automakers and

suppliers begin to scale back production, resulting in eliminated shifts and employee lay-offs. A

recent analysis conducted by the Peterson Institute for International Economics shows that a 25

percent tariff on imported vehicles and vehicle components would result in a 1.5 percent decline

in production and cause 195,000 U.S. workers to lose jobs over a 1- to 3-year period or possibly

longer.10 Further, the analysis estimates that if other countries retaliate with their own tariffs

then American job losses would likely increase to 624,000. It should be noted that the

employment impact of any tariffs (and retaliation) would be felt nationwide – in automakers’

plants, where vehicles are assembled; in the factories where the parts for those vehicles are

made; and in the local communities where the dealers who sell those vehicles are located.

Increased vehicle costs also impact vehicle fleet turnover, as the average age of a vehicle on the

road today is roughly 11.5 years old. If consumers cannot afford to purchase a new vehicle, then

they may decide to hold on to their current, less efficient vehicle longer. As a result, the cycle of

fleet turnover is worsened – resulting in disruption to the industry and national economy, and

impacting our collective safety and environmental goals by delaying the deployment of today’s

new safer and cleaner vehicle technologies.

By increasing vehicle costs to consumers and triggering retaliatory measures, tariffs would

restrict access to other international markets, depress vehicle and vehicle parts exports, and

threaten the industry’s competitiveness in today’s global market. Last year, exports of cars and

parts amounting to over $99 billion were shipped from U.S. ports. The economic activity that

our industry generates throughout our nation’s ports supports thousands of American jobs.

9 Copolla, G. “Trump Tariffs May Cost Carmakers 1 Million Auto Sales a Year.” Bloomberg Business. June12, 2018. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-12/trump-tariffs-may-cost-carmakers-at-least-1-million-annual-sales 10 Robinson, S., Thierfelder, K.,Schott, J., Jung, E., Lu, Z., and Kolb, M. “Trump's Proposed Auto Tariffs Would Throw US Automakers and Workers Under the Bus.” Peterson Institute for International Economics. May 31, 2018. https://piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policy-watch/trumps-proposed-auto-tariffs-would-throw-us-automakers-and#_ftn1

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-12/trump-tariffs-may-cost-carmakers-at-least-1-million-annual-sales

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-12/trump-tariffs-may-cost-carmakers-at-least-1-million-annual-sales

https://piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policy-watch/trumps-proposed-auto-tariffs-would-throw-us-automakers-and#_ftn1

https://piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policy-watch/trumps-proposed-auto-tariffs-would-throw-us-automakers-and#_ftn1

6

These jobs, as well as those jobs tied to the production for vehicle exports, would be put in

jeopardy should our exports decline as a result of retaliatory measures.

The prospects of these Section 232 tariffs and the likely retaliation by other countries could not

come at a worse time for the industry. After seven years of record growth (2010-2016),

automakers witnessed flat or declining sales in 2017, and 2018 sales are projected to be roughly

the same. In this softening economic environment, the industry cannot afford the added burden

of tariffs. As noted, their imposition will contribute to a decline in vehicle sales and the resulting

harm will further stall the industry’s growth, with severe consequences for the industry and the

overall U.S. economy. Moreover, while vehicle exports would normally represent Alliance

members’ best opportunity to make up for those lower domestic sales, the imposition of the

Section 232 tariffs, and the threat of retaliation, would make U.S. produced vehicles non-

competitive in foreign markets, increasing the likelihood that manufacturing shifts would have to

be eliminated and workers laid off.

Tariffs Would Undo the Benefits of Tax and Regulatory Reform Efforts & Chill Future

Economic Investment

Automakers are very appreciative of the Administration’s efforts to provide long overdue tax

reform and regulatory relief. These actions have made the U.S. a more attractive environment

for business investment, and are already having a positive economic impact. However, 25

percent tariffs on imported autos and auto parts have the potential to erode the benefits achieved

in these areas. In fact, they would more than wipe out the tax savings attributable to the recent

tax cuts. Indeed, a recent analysis by the Tax Foundation found that the tariffs would amount to

a $73 billion tax increase, assuming import levels remain the same.11 The analysis concludes by

stating, “If imposed, these automobile tariffs would fall more on middle- and lower-income

taxpayers, reducing the increase in income these households would see because of the Tax Cuts

and Jobs Act, and making the distribution of the tax burden less progressive.”12Additionally,

11 York, E. “Automobile Tariffs Would Offset Half the TCJA Gains for Low-income Households.” June 4, 2018. https://taxfoundation.org/automobile-tariffs-2018/?utm_source=Corporate&utm_campaign=599962eac5-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_06_04_07_52_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_94e6588ff2-599962eac5-429121933&mc_cid=599962eac5&mc_eid=6afd4735f6 12 Id.

https://taxfoundation.org/automobile-tariffs-2018/?utm_source=Corporate&utm_campaign=599962eac5-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_06_04_07_52_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_94e6588ff2-599962eac5-429121933&mc_cid=599962eac5&mc_eid=6afd4735f6



7

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell recently echoed concerns about the potential impact of

the Administration’s trade-related activities on the economy stating, “concerns seem to be rising,

for the first time we are hearing about decisions to postpone investment, postpone hiring.”13

The prospect of tariffs (and retaliation) will chill future auto investment in the U.S. and, if the

tariffs are implemented (and other nations retaliate), the very nature of the U.S. market would

likely change. Forced to source parts locally, U.S. automakers’ production costs would increase

while their margins decrease, along with the overall demand for new vehicles. Producing

vehicles in the U.S. and selling them globally would no longer be economically justifiable.

Under these circumstances, the attraction of making new manufacturing investments in the U.S.

market would likely diminish and capital would flow elsewhere.

It’s also worth highlighting the potential contradiction the Department of Commerce’s Section

232 investigation will likely have with another significant regulatory action that is currently

under review with the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Just last month,

the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

jointly submitted a draft proposal for OMB review as the Administration considers potential

changes to the fuel economy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions standards for Model Year

(MY) 2021-2026 light-duty vehicles. In its April 12, 2018 Final Determination, EPA noted that:

“Based on our review and analysis of the comments and information submitted, and

EPA’s own analysis, the Administrator believes that the current GHG emission standards

for MY 2022–2025 light-duty vehicles presents challenges for auto manufacturers due to

feasibility and practicability, raises potential concerns related to automobile safety, and

results in significant additional costs on consumers, especially low-income consumers.

On the whole, the Administrator believes the MY 2022–2025 GHG emission standards

are not appropriate and, therefore, should be revised as appropriate.”14

So, while on the one hand, motor vehicle safety and affordability has been a guiding principle

that the President, DOT and EPA have outlined to justify the need for possible changes to auto

13 https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/20/reuters-america-powell-says-u-s-trade-policy-could-impact-outlook.html 14 Federal Register. Vol. 83, No. 72. April 13, 2018. Pg. 16078.

8

fuel efficiency standards, a 25 percent tariff on imported autos and auto parts will jeopardize

consumer affordability by increasing the average price of an imported automobile by more than

five thousand dollars (not counting the potential retaliatory and jobs impact from such a

decision).

Automakers Pave the Way for Transformation in Mobility

The auto industry is witnessing a profound transformation in personal mobility and automakers

in the U.S. are leading the way on the research and development (R&D) of future innovative

vehicle technologies, including electrification and automation. In fact, automakers invest more

than $20 billion in U.S. R&D and operate 79 R&D facilities throughout the country. Silicon

Valley is rapidly transforming into the Motor City of the West with automakers, suppliers,

startups, and other tech companies taking root to help drive this rapidly advancing mobility shift.

Several automakers have partnered with tech companies like Waymo, Cruise Automation, and

Uber to accelerate the safe testing and deployment of highly-automated vehicles (HAVs).

HAVs have tremendous potential to save lives and reduce traffic congestion, fuel use, and carbon

emissions, while expanding personal mobility. Automakers are also investing heavily in the next

generation of fuel-efficient powertrains, including hybrids, plug-in hybrids, battery-electric, and

fuel-cell electric vehicles. The increased electrification of our transportation fleet will play an

important role in achieving future energy and environment gains.

Alliance members are concerned that the imposition of tariffs on imported vehicles and vehicle

components will mean less capital for automakers to invest in these technologies, and thereby

disrupt U.S. leadership in the development of these future, innovative technologies. We are

already in the midst of an intense global race to lead on electrification and automation. The

increased costs associated with the proposed tariffs may result in diminishing the U.S.’

competitiveness in developing these advanced technologies and related safety and mobility

benefits.

9

Recommendations to Enhance the Economic Security of the U.S. Auto Industry and Nation

We understand the Administration’s desire for a “level playing field” when it comes to

international trade. However, imposing 25 percent tariffs on imported autos and auto parts will

actually hurt consumers and our member companies’ ability to invest in the U.S. and compete in

the global market. Rather than proceed with these tariffs, to level the playing field, the Alliance

recommends that the Administration pursue the following initiatives:

• Modernize NAFTA: The Alliance supports the Administration’s efforts to modernize the

North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to make it relevant in a 21st century world.

America’s automotive industry has a significant economic stake in the outcome of the

renegotiations of NAFTA, perhaps more than any U.S. industrial sector.

Last year, the U.S. shipped $87 billion in autos and auto parts to Canada and Mexico. The

auto industry in the U.S. relies heavily on the interconnected regional supply chain that

NAFTA has created throughout North America. Auto manufacturing throughout the NAFTA

region has helped anchor automaker and supplier engineering and R&D operations largely

within the U.S. In doing so, it creates and supports thousands of high-wage auto sector

jobs.15

The Alliance remains concerned that the ongoing re-negotiations of NAFTA have reached a

stalemate and encourages the three partners to stay at the negotiating table in efforts to seek a

workable solution. We are hopeful that an agreement can be reached on a NAFTA “2.0” that

builds on the agreement’s existing benefits to further enhance our nation’s global

competitiveness and grow U.S. manufacturing and jobs.

• Conclude a U.S. – E.U. Trade Pact: Additionally, the Alliance recommends the U.S.

restart bilateral negotiations with the European Union (E.U.). The E.U. has recently

expressed a willingness to engage in bilateral discussions on a limited trade agreement

covering industrial goods. Automakers would support such efforts as they would provide a

good opportunity to pick-up on the progress achieved during the previous negotiations on the

Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Within the context of those

15 Center for Automotive Research, NAFTA Briefing: Trade benefits to the automotive industry and the potential consequences of withdrawal from the agreement. January 2017

10

negotiations, auto manufacturers and suppliers on both sides of the Atlantic worked together

to improve market access by removing regulatory barriers and addressing automotive tariffs.

Reinvigorating those discussions would help achieve the Administration’s goal of seeking

free and fair trade opportunities and help expand export opportunities for automakers in the

U.S.

• Address Regulatory Barriers to Foreign Markets: Automakers also encourage the

Administration to pursue opportunities to remove regulatory barriers abroad to further grow

U.S. auto exports. For example, the E.U. has been successful in persuading other markets to

accept vehicles certified to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN ECE)

safety standards, and the United States should also advocate for the official acceptance of

vehicles certified to U.S. motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS). The Alliance would

welcome opportunities to work with the Administration to encourage markets to accept

vehicles certified to U.S. FMVSS standards, in addition to those certified to meet UN ECE

standards. We believe such efforts would help improve market access opportunities abroad.

Conclusion

The Alliance respectfully suggests that there is no basis to claim that auto-related imports are a

threat to national security. In 1941, there were 31 manufacturing facilities in the U.S producing

fewer than four million vehicles.16 Today’s 45 assembly plants (operated by both domestic and

international automakers) produced nearly 12 million vehicles last year – more than three times

the production volume pre-WWII – and are currently operating at more than 80 percent capacity.

If those 31 facilities operating in 1941 were able to shift to the production of war-related material

necessary to support our nation during WWII, then we are confident that today’s U.S. production

capabilities are more than sufficient to satisfy our country’s future security needs.

Additionally, 98 percent of the vehicles imported into the U.S. last year came from our national

security allies, and trading partners, including Canada, the European Union, Japan, South Korea,

and Mexico. Given the production capacity here in the U.S. and the source of our automobile

imports, automakers are confident that imported vehicles and vehicle components do not pose a

16 Wards Intelligence, U.S. Vehicle Production 1900-2017.

11

risk to our national security. In fact, we are concerned that the imposition of 25 percent tariffs on

imported automobiles and automotive parts may have the opposite of its intended effect. Such

action could impose economic harm on consumers, our companies and closest foreign trading

partners – thereby ultimately undermining our national security, not to mention inviting

retaliatory measures that will negatively impact American workers and families outside of the

auto sector.

We therefore urge the Administration to refrain from imposing tariffs on imported automobiles

and automotive parts. These imports do not pose a threat to U.S. national security or our

economic security.

U.S. automakers are all global companies that operate and sell in markets throughout the world.

Free and fair trade has allowed them to remain competitive in today’s global marketplace.

Erecting trade barriers – like import tariffs – will invite retaliation from other nations and affect

our leadership and competitiveness overseas. More importantly, tariffs will be a tax on our

customers, increase our costs in the U.S., and impact our ability to invest in technology

development, manufacturing expansion and improvements, and job creation in the United States.

The Alliance appreciates the opportunity to provide comment on the ongoing Section 232

investigation of imported automobiles and automotive parts. Automakers support the

Administration’s goals of growing U.S. manufacturing and American jobs and we are committed

to working with the Administration to improve U.S. economic welfare and to advance

opportunities that remove barriers to free and fair trade.

12

ALABAMA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO

PURCHASE LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES

Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Alabama)17

2017 AL Sales

Potential Impact of Tariff

on AL Consumers

Average Value of Imported Vehicle

Average Tariff Costs

Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

84,297 $488,922,600 $23,200 $5,800 $46,257 13%

NATIONWIDE IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF

Figures above denote potential impact regarding the ongoing U.S. Department of Commerce

investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The investigation seeks to determine whether imports of automobiles, including SUV’s, vans, and light trucks, and automotive parts into the

United States threaten to impair the national security of the United States. Figures do not evaluate impact of tariff on the price of vehicles produced in the U.S. by both domestic

and international automakers or used car prices.

17 Estimated by Auto Alliance based on proposed 25% tariff and imported vehicle value calculated using Department of Commerce data: https://www.trade.gov/td/otm/autostats.asp 18 Figures compiled by Auto Alliance with data provided by IHS Markit and Ward’s Automotive represent new vehicle registrations between 1/1/17 – 12/31/17 19 Figures compiled by Auto Alliance with data provided by Ward’s Automotive represent new vehicle registrations between 1/1/17 – 12/31/17

2017 AL Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Alabama)18 Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled In U.S. Assembled In U.S. (%)

Sales Of Vehicles Assembled Abroad

Assembled Abroad (%)

Total Sales

125,417 59.80 84,297 40.20 209,714

2017 U.S. Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (National)19 Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled In U.S.

Assembled In U.S. (%)

Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of

Tariff on U.S. Consumers

9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


13

ALASKA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Alaska)20

2017 AK Sales


on AK Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

10,399 $60,314,200 $23,200 $5,800 $76,440 8%







2017 AK Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Alaska)21 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

15,748 60.23 10,399 39.77 26,147


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


14

ARIZONA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Arizona)23

2017 AZ Sales


on AZ Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

158,430 $918,894,000 $23,200 $5,800 $53,558 11%







2017 AZ Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Arizona)24 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

216,904 57.79 158,430 42.21 375,334


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


15

ARKANSAS POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Arkansas)26

2017 AR Sales


on AR Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

49,650 $287,970,000 $23,200 $5,800 $44,334 13%







2017 AR Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Arkansas)27 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

81,061 62.02 49,650 37.98 130,711


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


16

CALIFORNIA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (California)29

2017 CA Sales


on CA Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

994,196 $5,766,336,800 $23,200 $5,800 $67,739 9%







2017 CA Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (California)30 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

1,009,653 50.39 994,196 49.61 2,003,849


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


17

COLORADO POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Colorado)32

2017 CO Sales


on CO Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

127,802 $741,249,280 $23,200 $5,800 $65,685 8.83







2017 CO Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Colorado)33 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

159,637 55.54 127,802 44.46 287,439


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


18

CONNECTICUT POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Connecticut)35

2017 CT Sales


on CT Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

83,920 $486,736,000 $23,200 $5,800 $73,433 8%







2017 CT Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Connecticut)36 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

89,129 51.51 83,920 48.49 173,049


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


19

DELAWARE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Delaware)38

2017 DE Sales


on DE Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

21,229 $123,128,200 $23,200 $5,800 $61,757 9%







2017 DE Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Delaware)39 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

28,341 57.17 21,229 42.83 49,570


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


20

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (D.C.)41

2017 DC Sales


on DC Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

11,586 $67,198,800 $23,200 $5,800 $75,506 8%







2017 DC Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (D.C.)42 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

10,544 47.65 11,586 52.35 22,130


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


21

FLORIDA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Florida)44

2017 FL Sales


on FL Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

635,003 $3,683,017,400 $23,200 $5,800 $50,860 11%







2017 FL Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Florida)45 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

675,401 51.54 635,003 48.46 1,310,404


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


22

GEORGIA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Georgia)47

2017 GA Sales


on GA Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

203,584 $1,180,787,200 $23,200 $5,800 $53,559 11%







2017 GA Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Georgia)48 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

284,106 58.26 203,584 41.74 487,690


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


23

HAWAII POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Hawaii)50

2017 HI Sales


on HI Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

42,070 $244,006,000 $23,200 $5,800 $74,511 8%







2017 HI Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Hawaii)51 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

43,566 50.87 42,070 49.13 85,636


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


24

IDAHO POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Idaho)53

2017 ID Sales


on ID Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

26,524 $153,839,200 $23,200 $5,800 $51,807 11%







2017 ID Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Idaho)54 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

40,614 60.49 26,524 39.51 67,138


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


25

ILLINOIS POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Illinois)56

2017 IL Sales


on IL Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

292,662 $1,697,439,600 $23,200 $5,800 $60,960 10%







2017 IL Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Illinois)57 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

349,216 54.41 292,662 45.59 641,878


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


26

INDIANA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Indiana)59

2017 IN Sales


on IN Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

99,701 $578,265,800 $23,200 $5,800 $52,314 11%







2017 IN Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Indiana)60 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

143,274 58.97 99,701 41.03 242,975


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


27

IOWA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Iowa)62

2017 IA Sales


on IA Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

51,415 $298,207,000 $23,200 $5,800 $56,247 10%







2017 IA Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Iowa)63 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

82,166 61.51 51,415 38.49 133,581


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


28

KANSAS

POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO PURCHASE LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES

Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Kansas)65

2017 KS Sales


on KS Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

40,713 $236,135,400 $23,200 $5,800 $54,935 11%







2017 KS Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Kansas)66 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

61,273 60.08 40,713 39.92 101,986


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


29

KENTUCKY POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Kentucky)68

2017 KY Sales


on KY Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

59,844 $347,095,200 $23,200 $5,800 $46,659 12%







2017 KY Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Kentucky)69 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

85,951 58.95 59,844 41.05 145,795


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


30

LOUISIANA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Louisiana)71

2017 LA Sales


on LA Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

74,816 $433,932,800 $23,200 $5,800 $45,146 13%







2017 LA Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Louisiana)72 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

129,945 63.46 74,816 36.54 204,761


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


31

MAINE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Maine)74

2017 ME Sales


on ME Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

26,793 $155,399,400 $23,200 $5,800 $53,079 11%







2017 ME Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Maine)75 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

36,018 57.34 26,793 42.66 62,811


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


32

MARYLAND POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Maryland)77

2017 MD Sales


on MD Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

149,233 $865,551,400 $23,200 $5,800 $78,945 7%







2017 MD Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Maryland)78 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

180,907 54.80 149,233 45.20 330,140


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


33

MASSACHUSETTS POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Massachusetts)80

2017 MA Sales


on MA Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

167,302 $970,351,600 $23,200 $5,800 $75,297 8%







2017 MA Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Massachusetts)81 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

192,082 53.45 167,302 46.55 359,384


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


34

MICHIGAN POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Michigan)83

2017 MI Sales


on MI Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

284,998 $1,652,988,400 $23,200 $5,800 $52,492 11%







2017 MI Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Michigan)84 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

350,876 55.18 284,998 44.82 635,874


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


35

MINNESOTA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Minnesota)86

2017 MN Sales


on MN Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

103,907 $602,660,600 $23,200 $5,800 $65,599 9%







2017 MN Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Minnesota)87 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

143,428 57.99 103,907 42.01 247,335


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


36

MISSISSIPPI POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Mississippi)89

2017 MS Sales


on MS Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

42,823 $248,373,400 $23,200 $5,800 $41,754 14%







2017 MS Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Mississippi)90 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

79,364 64.95 42,823 35.05 122,187


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


37

MISSOURI POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Missouri)92

2017 MO Sales


on MO Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

122,448 $710,198,400 $23,200 $5,800 $51,746 11%







2017 MO Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Missouri)93 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

184,906 60.16 122,448 39.84 307,354


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


38

MONTANA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Montana)95

2017 MT Sales


on MT Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

21,859 $126,782,200 $23,200 $5,800 $50,027 12%







2017 MT Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Montana)96 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

37,410 63.12 21,859 36.88 59,269


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


39

NEBRASKA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Nebraska)98

2017 NE Sales


on NE Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

33,791 $195,987,800 $23,200 $5,800 $56,927 10%







2017 NE Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Nebraska)99 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

53,408 61.25 33,791 38.75 87,199


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


40

NEVADA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Nevada)101

2017 NV Sales


on NV Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

66,894 $387,985,200 $23,200 $5,800 $55,180 11%







2017 NV Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Nevada)102 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

75,899 53.15 66,894 46.85 142,793


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


41

NEW HAMPSHIRE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO

PURCHASE LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (New Hampshire)104

2017 NH Sales


on NH Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

42,847 $248,512,600 $23,200 $5,800 $70,936 8%







2017 NH Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (New Hampshire)105 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

52,794 55.20 42,847 44.80 95,641


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


42

NEW JERSEY POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO

PURCHASE LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (New Jersey)107

2017 NJ Sales


on NJ Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

270,820 $1,570,756,000 $23,200 $5,800 $76,126 8%







2017 NJ Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (New Jersey)108 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

303,079 52.81 270,820 47.19 573,899


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


43

NEW MEXICO POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (New Mexico)110

2017 NM Sales


on NM Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

35,436 $205,528,800 $23,200 $5,800 $46,748 12%







2017 NM Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (New Mexico)111 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

50,452 58.74 35,436 41.26 85,888


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


44

NEW YORK POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (New York)113

2017 NY Sales


on NY Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

483,209 $2,802,612,200 $23,200 $5,800 $62,909 9%







2017 NY Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (New York)114 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

535,777 52.58 483,209 47.42 1,018,986


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


45

NORTH CAROLINA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (North Carolina)116

2017 NC Sales


on NC Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

189,349 $1,098,224,200 $23,200 $5,800 $50,584 11%







2017 NC Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (North Carolina)117 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

257,788 57.65 189,349 42.35 447,137


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


46

NORTH DAKOTA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (North Dakota)119

2017 ND Sales


on ND Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

11,923 $69,153,400 $23,200 $5,800 $60,656 10%







2017 ND Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (North Dakota)120 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

25,484 68.13 11,923 31.87 37,407


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


47

OHIO POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Ohio)122

2017 OH Sales


on OH Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

266,136 $1,543,588,800 $23,200 $5,800 $52,334 11%







2017 OH Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Ohio)123 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

334,018 55.66 266,136 44.34 600,154


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


48

OKLAHOMA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Oklahoma)125

2017 OK Sales


on OK Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

337,159 $1,955,522,200 $23,200 $5,800 $49,176 12%







2017 OK Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Oklahoma)126 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

403,108 54.45 337,159 45.55 740,267


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


49

OREGON POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Oregon)128

2017 OR Sales


on OR Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

85,385 $495,233,000 $23,200 $5,800 $57,532 10%







2017 OR Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Oregon)129 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

99,685 53.86 85,385 46.14 185,070


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


50

PENNSYLVANIA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Pennsylvania)131

2017 PA Sales


on PA Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

294,934 $1,710,617,200 $23,200 $5,800 $56,907 10%







2017 PA Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Pennsylvania)132 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

361,249 55.05 294,934 44.95 656,183


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


51

RHODE ISLAND POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Rhode Island)134

2017 RI Sales


on RI Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

23,125 $134,125,000 $23,200 $5,800 $60,596 10%







2017 RI Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Rhode Island)135 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

25,716 52.65 23,125 47.35 48,841


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


52

SOUTH CAROLINA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (South Carolina)137

2017 SC Sales


on SC Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

94,025 $545,345,000 $23,200 $5,800 $49,501 12%







2017 SC Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (South Carolina)138 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

129,870 58.00 94,025 42.00 223,895


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


53

SOUTH DAKOTA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (South Dakota)140

2017 SD Sales


on SD Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

13,574 $78,729,200 $23,200 $5,800 $54,467 11%







2017 SD Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (South Dakota)141 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

26,622 66.23 13,574 33.77 40,196


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


54

TENNESSEE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Tennessee)143

2017 TN Sales


on TN Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

105,831 $613,819,800 $23,200 $5,800 $48,547 12%







2017 TN Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Tennessee)144 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

144,242 57.68 105,831 42.32 250,073


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


55

TEXAS POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Texas)146

2017 TX Sales


on TX Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

615,556 $3,570,224,800 $23,200 $5,800 $56,565 10%







2017 TX Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Texas)147 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

904,375 59.50 615,556 40.50 1,519,931


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


56

UTAH POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Utah)149

2017 UT Sales


on UT Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

58,093 $336,939,400 $23,200 $5,800 $65,977 9%







2017 UT Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Utah)150 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

86,347 59.78 58,093 40.22 144,440


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


57

VERMONT POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Vermont)152

2017 VT Sales


on VT Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

20,138 $116,800,400 $23,200 $5,800 $57,677 10%







2017 VT Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Vermont)153 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

23,871 54.24 20,138 45.76 44,009


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


58

VIRGINIA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Virginia)155

2017 VA Sales


on VA Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

169,627 $983,836,600 $23,200 $5,800 $68,114 9%







2017 VA Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Virginia)156 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

212,964 55.66 169,627 44.34 382,591


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


59

WASHINGTON POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Washington)158

2017 WA Sales


on WA Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

141,704 $821,883,200 $23,200 $5,800 $67,106 9%







2017 WA Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Washington)159 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

160,473 53.11 141,704 46.89 302,177


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


60

WEST VIRGINIA POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (West Virginia)161

2017 WV Sales


on WV Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

33,215 $192,647,000 $23,200 $5,800 $43,385 13%







2017 WV Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (West Virginia)162 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

47,262 58.73 33,215 41.27 80,477


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


61

WISCONSIN POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Wisconsin)164

2017 WI Sales


on WI Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

106,420 $617,236,000 $23,200 $5,800 $56,811 10%







2017 WI Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Wisconsin)165 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

147,342 58.06 106,420 41.94 253,762


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


62

WYOMING POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 25% TARIFF TO CONSUMERS WHO


Vehicles Assembled Abroad Subject To Possible Tariffs (Wyoming)167

2017 WY Sales


on WY Consumers



Median State

Annual Income

% of Annual

Income

8,639 $50,106,200 $23,200 $5,800 $59,882 10%







2017 WY Sales of Vehicles Assembled in U.S. and Abroad (Wyoming)168 Sales Of Vehicles




Total Sales

16,892 66.16 8,639 33.84 25,531


Assembled In U.S.


Sales Of Vehicles

Assembled Abroad


Total Sales

Potential Impact of


9,452,347 55.16 7,682,386 44.83 17,134,733 $44,557,838,800


comments of the alliance of automobile manufacturers on the … · 2018-06-27 · way. these 15 new...

Documents