commissioner’s dashboard september 2014...ooh behavioral health settings: children served dow:...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Commissioner’s Dashboard
September 2014
Allison Blake, Ph.D., L.S.W
Commissioner
October 20, 2014
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different
than the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF.
-
86,817 37,241
49,576 17,284
7,140 1,544
40,395 981
2,041 Remained in same Living situation 96%
Youth Open with CSOC2 37,241
9,859
FCP: Total Clients Served3 6,145 1,619
723 Placed out of State 2
27,616 8,162
24,783 DD Related Calls 1,896
2,833 489
15,190 2,515
31% 318
10% 2,085
11 1,227
96% 23%
93% 77%
428
92% 1,375
98% 795
89% 63%
15,713 83
3 FCP measures clients served in SBYSP and DV Services. Since Family Success Centers and Home Visitation programs report data in terms of families served, each family is assumed
to have at least one client.4 DoW measures clients served in SAARC and Displaced Homemakers. RPE measures doses or activities provided and does not allow for an unduplicated count of clients served.5 Families served by DCF includes CP&P families and FCP families. FCP families served data has a one month lag. 6
CSOC Children may receive multiple services and are counted multiple times.7 FCP quick facts are based on new clients/families. DoW quick facts are based on new and ongoing clients/families served.8
The cumulative number of human trafficking referrals between Nov and September 2014 was 111.
Response Timeliness Residential
2 The definition for "Youth Open with CSOC" reflects youth who are involved and eligible to receive services through CSOC.
Entries to Care
Caseload: Intake SAARC: Clients Served (April- June 2014)
Caseload: Permanency Displaced Homemaker: Clients Served (April- June 2014)
Caseload: Adoption New Clients
Subsidized Adoptions/KLG(Includes Subsidized Adoptions and subsidized KLGs)
RPE: Doses/Activities provided at Implementation Sites
(Nov-Jan)1 Some children may be served by both CP&P and CSOC, and are over-represented in the final count of children served in the month.
CWS Referrals SBYSP: Clients Served (August)
Number of Human Trafficking Referrals8 DV Services: Clients Served (August)
CP&P Quick Facts FCP & DoW Quick Facts7
Hotline Referrals FSCs: Families Served (August)
Monthly Staff Contacts/Children OOH Non-Residential
CPS Reports Home Visiting: Families Served (August)
DCF: Families Served in the Month5 PerformCare Calls
CP&P
FCP (Family Success Centers & Home Visiting) Sandy Related Calls
Care Management: Children Served
OOH Behavioral Health Settings: Children Served
DOW: Total Clients Served4 (Monthly Average)
On or About September 30, 2014
DCF At a Glance CSOC6 Quick Facts
DCF: Total Children Served in the Month1 Youth Open with CSOC (unduplicated count)
CP&P: Children/Youth Served DD Eligible Children (unduplicated count)
OOH Setting (< 18) MRSS: Dispatches in the month
In-Home Setting (< 18) MRSS: Interventions (includes prior dispatches)
Youth 18-21
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than the final reported figures.
The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 2
-
December
2013
September
2014
∆ from
Dec 2013
MSA
Target
Initial FTMs (August 2014) 69% 79% 10% 90%
Quarterly FTMs 54% 79% 25% 90%
Initial Case Plans (August 2014) 97% 93% -4% 95%
Ongoing Case Plans 98% 98% 0% 95%
CW visits Child Monthly (at placement site) 94% 93% -1% 98%
CW visits Child 2x/Mo 1st2Mo (July 2014) 89% 93% 4% 95%
CW visits Parent 2x/Mo 74% 74% 0% 95%
Parent visits Child 4x/Mo 56% 55% -1% 60%
Response Timeliness 97% 96% -1% 98%
Investigation Timeliness CP&P (July 2014) 63% 75% 12% 98%
Investigation Timeliness IAIU 85% 84% -1% 80%
Ind. Living Assessments 14-18 yrs 96% 85% -11% 95%
Caseloads: Intake 87% 92% 5% 95%
Caseloads: Permanency 95% 98% 3% 95%
Caseloads: Adoption 87% 89% 2% 95%
MSA Updates Comparing December 2013 to September 2014
This table compares performance in the most current month to the last month of the previously published monitoring report (December 2013)
The blue bar indicates DCF performance in the current month. The red bar indicates the difference between
the current performance and the MSA target. Measures with a 30 or 60 day lag are noted next to the description
of the measure.
Caseworker visits with Child in Placement (all locations) August: 98%
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than the final reported figures.
The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 3
-
SECTION I: CHILD PROTECTION & PERMANENCY 5
SECTION II: ADOLESCENT SERVICES 10
SECTION III: INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE INVESTIGATION UNIT 11
SECTION IV: CHILDREN'S SYSTEM OF CARE 12
SECTION V: FAMILY & COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS 15
SECTION VI: DIVISION ON WOMEN 16
SECTION VII: TRACKING DATA AFTER SUPERSTORM SANDY 18
SECTION VIII: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS BY CPP LOCAL OFFICE 21
Table of Contents
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 4
-
n for
9/2014
∆ from
9/2013
24,783 1%
49,576 1%
42,028 1%
(53%)
(39%)
(7%)
(1%)
1,162 15%
620 5%
1,999 -4%
13,714 1%
428 -12%
357 -23%
Entries to Care
Exits from Care
7,548 0%
Data in this chart includes children up to age 20.99
Families Under CP&P Supervision
Children Under CP&P Supervision
Children Receiving CP&P In-Home Services
Children in Subsidized Kinship Legal Guardianship
Children in Subsidized Adoptions
Resource Family (non-Kin)
Resource Family Kinship
CP&P Quick Facts
Section I: Child Protection & Permanency
Group and Residential
Children in CP&P Out-of-Home Placement
Independent Living
Children Legally Free for Adoption (Excludes TPR Appeals)
Finalized Adoptions to date (CY 2014)
10,390
9,465 8,846
7,900
7,171 7,018
7,361 7,330 7,493 7,637 7,671 7,735 7,775 7,660 7,640 7,552 7,548
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
11,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Jan'14
Feb'14
Mar'14
Apr'14
May'14
Jun'14
Jul'14
Aug'14
Sep'14
Children in Out-of-Home Placement: Annual Entries, Exits and Monthly Point in Time Populations
Children in Placement-Point in Time Entries Exits
Point In Time data is based on data as of the last day of each month.
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 5
-
59.5%
Section I: Child Protection & Permanency
State Central Registry StatisticsTotal SCR Intakes Recorded in NJ SPIRIT
CPS Reports
CWS Referrals
Non CPS/CWS Child Related Calls
9.8%
15,190
30.7%
94% 91% 93% 93%
94% 93% 95% 97% 97% 96% 95% 95% 96%
69% 66% 61% 63%
72% 77% 79% 76% 75% 76% 75%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Sep2013
Oct2013
Nov2013
Dec2013
Jan2014
Feb2014
Mar2014
Apr2014
May2014
Jun2014
Jul2014
Aug2014
Sep2014
Response and Investigation Timeliness (MSA Target= 98%)
CPS Response Timeliness CPS Investigation Timeliness
Axis begins at 30% to enhance separation.
Investigations have a 60 day lag in reporting.
July 2014: 7% of the Investigations received had a Substantiated finding & an additional 8% had an established finding.
The variation in performance on investigation timeliness in the Fall of 2013 is likely due to the high number of referrals re ceived in October 2013 (see above).
6,513
5,752
6,994
6,516
7,136
6,313
5,449
4,851
6,166
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
8,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Tota
l Nu
mb
er
of
Re
ferr
als
CPS & CWS Referrals Assigned to All CP&P Offices
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Axis begins at 4,000 to enhance separation of data.
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 6
-
Apr
2014
May
2014
June
2014
Jul
2014
Aug
2014
Sep
2014
∆ from
MSA
6 Months
Average
In Home 95% 95% 92% 91% 91% 92% N/A 93%
Out of Home 92% 92% 90% 90% 93% 93% -5% 92%
Section I: Child Protection & PermanencyMonthly Staff Contacts (MSA Target for Out of Home Children = 98%)
MSATarget
Apr2014
May2014
Jun2014
Jul2014
Aug2014
Sep2014
Contacts with Child - First TwoMonths In Placement¹
95% 93% 89% 90% 93%
Contacts with Parents - Reun. Goal(2x/month)²
95% 77% 77% 74% 72% 72% 74%
Parent/child Visits - ReunGoal.(4x/month)³
60% 59% 59% 56% 53% 54% 55%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Pe
rce
nt
Co
mp
lete
d
Statewide Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
[1] Contacts with Child - First Two Months In Placement: (n=618) There is a two month lag in this measure. [2] Contacts with Parents - Reun. Goal (2x/month): (n=3,697) Excludes children who entered/exited in the month (n=105). [3] Parent/child Visits - Reun Goal.(4x/month): (n=3,574) Excludes children who entered/exited in the month (n=226).
N/A N/A
88%
83%
86% 87%
82%
89% 86% 87%
81%
88%
93% 94% 92%
95% 95% 95% 95% 96% 96% 98%
96% 96% 96% 98% 98% 98%
87%
78%
88% 91%
88%
82% 81% 81%
82% 87%
90%
86% 89%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Sep2013
Oct2013
Nov2013
Dec2013
Jan2014
Feb2014
Mar2014
Apr2014
May2014
Jun2014
Jul2014
Aug2014
Sep2014
Caseload Compliance (Individual Worker Level) (MSA Target= 95%)
Intake Permanency AdoptionAxis begins at 70% to enhance separation of data.
Monthly Staff Contacts: In Home (n=21,486), Out-of-Home (n=6,959).
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 7
-
Initial FTMs: (n=316) Compliance excludes children who exited within 30 days of removal.
Initial Case Plans: (n=313) Compliance excludes children who exited. 6 months average for Initial Case Plans is 95%.
Ongoing Case Plans (n=1265) Compliance excludes children who exited in the last six months. 6 months average for Ongoing Case Plans is 97%.
Section I: Child Protection & Permanency
Quarterly FTMs: (n=1841) Compliance excludes children who exited.
44%
57% 64%
69% 68% 75% 77% 77%
80%
74%
81% 79%
46%
46% 52% 55%
60% 63%
69% 76%
80%
79%
73% 78%
79%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Sep2013
Oct2013
Nov2013
Dec2013
Jan2014
Feb2014
Mar2014
Apr2014
May2014
Jun2014
Jul2014
Aug2014
Sep2014
Initial & Quarterly Family Team Meetings
Initial FTM Quarterly FTM
Initial FTMs have a 30 day lag time for reporting
94% 96%
94%
97%
93% 95%
98% 98%
93% 93% 95%
93%
96% 96%
94%
99%
96% 98% 98% 98% 99% 98%
95%
97% 98%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
Sep2013
Oct2013
Nov2013
Dec2013
Jan2014
Feb2014
Mar2014
Apr2014
May2014
Jun2014
Jul2014
Aug2014
Sep2014
Initial & Ongoing Case Plans
Initial Case Plan Ongoing Case Plan
Axis begins at 70% to enhance separation of data.
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 8
-
Section I: Child Protection & Permanency
54% 51%
56% 57% 57% 59% 59% 59% 59% 58% 58% 57%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Monthly Cumulative Rate of Referral to Early Intervention Service for Eligible Children
FederalFiscalYear2013
Eligible Children: Pursuant to the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) 42 U.S.C.§5106a, a child under three years of age involved in a Substantiated or Established incident of child abuse or neglect, must be referred to the New Jersey Early Intervention System (NJEIS) in his or her county of residence. Rate of Referral: This graph represents the rate of referral by month for the cumulative number of eligible children as a result of investigations completed in the 2013 federal fiscal year (October 1, 2013 – September 30, 2014).
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 9
-
2,041
1,633
(54%)
(26%)
(19%)
578
Independent Living
Youth 18-21
Youth 18-21 years old served by CP&P⁴
[5] The terms “out-of-home” and “in-home” may not be appropriate for all 18-21 year olds. Youth identified as “in-home” can either be residing with a
parent/relative, or living independently. Any of these youth may be receiving services. These definitions are currently being reviewed to better understand
how we capture DCF’s work with this population. The goal of this ongoing work is to create three meaningful categories for 18-21 year olds 1) Youth in a
formal out-of-home placement setting, 2) Youth that achieved permanency, and 3) Youth that never achieved permanency.
408
Youth served “In Home” living with a parent/relative or living independently⁵
Youth Receiving Adoption or KLG Subsidy
Family Based Setting
Congregate Care Setting
[4] The data includes all 18-21 year olds who are active participants in an open CP&P case as of the end of the month.
Youth served "Out-of-Home"
Section II: Adolescent Services
OAS Quick Facts
93% 91%
90% 91% 89% 90% 89%
86% 85%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Completed Independent Living Assessments of Youth Ages 14-18 years (n= 994)
2013 2014
Axis begins at 70% to enhance separation of data.
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 10
-
Section III: Institutional Abuse Investigation Unit
251 214
317
262
323
262
208
159
224
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Nu
mb
er
of
Re
po
rts
Pe
r M
on
th
IAIU Child Protective Service Reports
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
88% 89% 90% 85% 82%
88% 89% 90% 90% 85% 88% 85% 84%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Sep2013
Oct2013
Nov2013
Dec2013
Jan2014
Feb2014
Mar2014
Apr2014
May2014
Jun2014
Jul2014
Aug2014
Sep2014
IAIU Investigation Timeliness (MSA Target= 80%)
IAIU Timeliness
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 11
-
x2
Section IV: Children’s System of Care
9,434 9,465 9,577
9,947 10,153
10,209 10,248 9,954 9,829 9,859
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
11,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Children in Care Management January 2010 - October 2014
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Axis begins at 6,000 to enhance separation of data.
The relative increase in children in care management is attributable in part to an expansion of populations served. This includes children with developmental
disabilities and children in need of substance abuse treatment.
674 613
881
570
1,194
734 583 563
746 579 519 537 580 523 563
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Children in Care Management by County as of 10/1/2014
(n= 9,859)
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 12
-
*n includes 2 children placed out-of-state.
Section IV: Children’s System of Care
Treatment Home
3%
Detention Alternative 1%
13%
Intensive Residential Treatment
Psychiatric Comm. Residence
Group Home 8%
Residential Treatment Center 29%
Children in Out-of-Home Treatment – September 2014
Out-of-Home Treatment Settings n= 1,619
Specialty Bed 21%
25%
1,735 1758 1759
1728 1715 1684 1673
1623 1619
1,500
1,600
1,700
1,800
1,900
2,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Children in Out of Home Treatment Settings - All Children January 2010 - September 2014
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Axis begins at 1,500 to enhance separation of data.
Data does not include DD only children.
1,443 1,296
1,760 1,610
1,693
1,356
831 841
1,544
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mobile Response Stabilization Services (MRSS) Dispatched January 2011 - September 2014
2011 2012 2013 2014
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 13
-
Section IV: Children’s System of Care
9,132 8,190
10,504 9,678 9,766 9,686
7,390
6,489
8,162
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Nu
mb
er o
f C
alls
PerformCare Total Calls January 2011 - September 2014
2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Calls is the unduplicated number of calls in the month.
1,650
1,339
1,866 1,949
2,069
2,910
2,060
1,626
1,896
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Nu
mb
er o
f C
alls
PerformCare Calls Related to Children with Developmental Disabilities January 2013 - September 2014
2013 2014
CSOC changed the methodology for collecting data on DD related calls thus resulting in a higher number of DD related calls. Calls are now counted as DD Related if the call has a “DD Call Reason or Resolution” or if the Child has an open DD tracking element. Calls may be classified as DD and/or Sandy as these numbers are duplicated.
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 14
-
Section V: Family & Community Partnerships
DCF's Strategic Priorities for 2014-2016 include developing a data system for Family & Community Partnership and the Division on Women to ensure the timeliness, consistency and quality of data collected from providers.
2,847
2,297
2,591 2,873
2,042 1,719
3,010 2,515
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Family Success Centers - Families Served
2012 2013 2014
Methodology for counting FSC clients changed beginning in July 2013 to only count registered participants.
12,794 12,892
14,752
13,565 13,062
9,613
3,892
2,085
0
3,000
6,000
9,000
12,000
15,000
18,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
School-Based Youth Services Programs - New and Ongoing Clients Served
2012 2013 2014
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 15
-
Apr-Jun
2013
Jul-Sep
2013
Oct-Dec
2013
Jan-Mar
2014
Apr-Jun
2014⁶
21 21 21 21 21
815 788 709 786 752
681 597 490 554 408
131 144 133 105 147
109 133 73 63 68
1736 1662 1405 1508 1375
3505 2940 3173 3386 3133
416 410 375 355 421
539 477 537 464 548
Nov-Jan
2013
Feb-April
2013
May-July
2013
Aug-Oct
2013
Nov-Jan
20148
107 128⁶ 165⁷ 72⁶ 83⁶
167 249⁶ 135⁷ 181⁶ 61⁶
Apr-Jun
2013
Jul-Sep
2014
Oct-Dec
2014
Jan-Mar
2014
Apr-Jun
2014
484 455 431 523 502
334 687 330 316 293
818 1142 761 839 795
Section VI: Division on Women
Number of New Clients Served
Ongoing Significant Others Served
New Victims Served
Ongoing Victims Served
New Significant Others Served
⁶ Missing information from 1 county.
⁷Missing information from 2 counties. In addition, there are some ongoing data quality issues. DoW Coordinators are providing TA to improve the data going forward.
⁸ RPE reporting requirements are under revision. Data for the Feb-Apr '14 & May-Jul '14 quarters will be available at a later date.
Volunteer Confidential Sexual Violence Advocates
Total SAARC Served
Hotline/Email Services Provided
Accompaniments
Total Number of SAARC Programs
Total Number of Clients Served
Number of Ongoing Clients Served
Displaced Homemaker Program
Number of Recruitment Presentations & One-Time
Education Sessions
Rape Prevention & Education Programs (RPE)
Number of Doses/Activities Provided at
Implementation Sites
946 932 842 891 899
790 730 563 617 476
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
Apr-Jun2013
Jul-Sep2013
Oct-Dec2013
Jan-Mar2014
Apr-Jun 2014⁶
Sexual Assault, Abuse and Rape Care Programs (SAARC)
New Clients Ongoing Clients
DCF's Strategic Priorities for 2014-2016 include developing a data system for Family & Community Partnership and the Division on Women to ensure the timeliness, consistency and quality of data collected from providers.
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 16
-
Section VI: Division on Women
1,215
1,102
1,333 1,344 1,291
1,443
1,243 1,227
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Domestic Violence Services - Adults and Children Admitted to Residential and Non-Residential Services
Total New Clients
2012 2013 2014
The Domestic Violence data is different from the August 2014 dashboard because of provider data entry changes.
to ensure the timeliness, consistency and quality of data collected from providers.
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 17
-
Section VII: Tracking Data after SuperStorm Sandy10 Most Impacted Counties
0
50
100
150
200
250
CP&P Local Offices with >10% Increase in Referrals Comparing September 2013 to September 2014
Sep 2013 Sep 2014
Red bars indicate a SuperStorm Sandy designated impacted county.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Calls to PerformCare from Sandy Affected Families September 2014
Red bars indicate a SuperStorm Sandy designated impacted county.
n=489; There were 2 calls that was not attached to any county.
Calls are counted as Sandy Related if the family has ever answered yes to the question “were you affected by Superstorm Sandy”.
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 18
-
Section VII: Tracking Data after SuperStorm Sandy10 Most Impacted Counties
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Atlantic Bergen Cumberland Hudson Middlesex Union
Q2 '13
Q3 '13
Q4 '13
Q1 '14
Q2 '14
Bergen county includes two agencies, but all waiting victims come from one. The waiting list for this agency is group counseling, and the victim is likely to have received crisis counseling. Cape May, Essex, Monmouth & Ocean are not included. They had 2 or fewer DV victims waiting for services during the entire time period.
Surveillance of Counties with Unmet Needs for Non-Residential DV Services Domestic Violence Victims Waiting for Non-Residential Services
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Bergen Essex Middlesex Monmouth Ocean Union
Q2 '13
Q3 '13
Q4 '13
Q1 '14
Q2 '14
Atlantic, Cape May, Cumberland & Hudson are not included. They had 10 or fewer clients not admitted during the entire time period. Non -admitted clients are offered referrals to other counties.
County-Level Surveillance of Residential DV Shelters Over Capacity Women and Children Not Admitted to Domestic Violence Shelters Due to Insufficient Space
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 19
-
Section VII: Tracking Data after SuperStorm Sandy10 Most Impacted Counties
735 708
878 909 841
978
755 730
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 2012 2013 2014
Domestic Violence Services: Adults and Children Admitted to Residential and Non Residential Services
In Counties Impacted by SuperStorm Sandy
The Domestic Violence data is different from the August 2014 dashboard because of provider data entry changes.
29
38
42
32
33
37
33 30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 2012 2013 2014
Residential Domestic Violence Programs: Victims' Average Length of Stay (days)
In Counties Impacted by SuperStorm Sandy
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different than
the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 20
-
Local Office M# 3b M# 4 M# 7a M# 7b M# 10 M# 11 M# 16 M# 17 M# 18 M# 20Intake
Caseload
Atlantic East 97% 61% 79% 82% 99% 98% 90% 91% 70% 52% 56%
Atlantic West 93% 59% 76% 68% 89% 97% 90% 92% 66% 51% 49%
Bergen Central 91% 70% 88% 94% 99% 100% 97% 94% 77% 69% 93%
Bergen South 90% 63% 89% 93% 98% 100% 95% 91% 78% 63% 97%
Burlington East 89% 68% 68% 74% 98% 98% 90% 89% 73% 66% 76%
Burlington West 97% 71% 75% 73% 95% 98% 90% 89% 80% 57% 86%
Camden Central 95% 63% 64% 55% 86% 95% 88% 93% 70% 38% 94%
Camden East 95% 71% 65% 64% 97% 98% 94% 97% 82% 54% 99%
Camden North 89% 61% 55% 43% 97% 98% 89% 91% 78% 57% 91%
Camden South 97% 78% 62% 52% 99% 99% 96% 97% 67% 52% 96%
Cape May 89% 82% 77% 77% 99% 95% 94% 91% 72% 49% 93%
Cumberland East 87% 79% 65% 50% 88% 99% 90% 95% 55% 43% 93%
Cumberland West 89% 50% 71% 79% 98% 99% 97% 94% 73% 48% 91%
Essex Central 99% 95% 45% 53% 95% 96% 89% 95% 67% 39% 99%
Essex North 97% 77% 53% 46% 81% 93% 86% 93% 68% 57% 97%
Essex South 96% 85% 33% 41% 90% 90% 94% 93% 64% 45% 99%
Gloucester East 94% 61% 81% 72% 92% 94% 88% 92% 72% 48% 83%
Gloucester West 95% 88% 68% 63% 88% 97% 90% 95% 74% 55% 89%
Hudson Central 87% 54% 74% 84% 97% 97% 94% 94% 79% 56% 69%
Hudson North 97% 81% 83% 85% 91% 99% 99% 96% 84% 74% 96%
Hudson South 88% 43% 62% 50% 97% 96% 90% 91% 72% 54% 56%
Hudson West 81% 58% 88% 83% 93% 96% 89% 83% 71% 51% 79%
Hunterdon 100% 91% 85% 90% 100% 96% 96% 88% 84% 53% 100%
Mercer North 96% 66% 89% 88% 92% 98% 93% 93% 78% 56% 91%
Mercer South 97% 62% 92% 89% 97% 98% 95% 94% 83% 64% 99%
Middlesex Central 94% 68% 50% 83% 100% 95% 93% 90% 73% 43% 83%
Middlesex Coastal 96% 91% 81% 86% 95% 98% 97% 93% 71% 58% 77%
Middlesex West 94% 67% 71% 73% 83% 95% 94% 93% 62% 51% 79%
Monmouth North 90% 71% 38% 41% 97% 97% 91% 92% 64% 48% 78%
Monmouth South 95% 74% 78% 56% 98% 97% 89% 93% 70% 45% 51%
Morris East 97% 86% 100% 89% 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 70% 97%
Morris West 98% 77% 76% 71% 80% 97% 97% 93% 76% 59% 95%
Newark Center City 97% 91% 51% 57% 95% 97% 89% 93% 71% 42% 97%
Newark Northeast 97% 89% 84% 66% 96% 95% 98% 92% 82% 58% 92%
Newark South 96% 89% 83% 72% 93% 99% 98% 91% 65% 55% 82%
Ocean North 96% 63% 73% 70% 97% 95% 93% 95% 71% 53% 96%
Ocean South 98% 77% 53% 53% 98% 99% 94% 92% 62% 44% 97%
Passaic Central 95% 66% 62% 64% 92% 97% 82% 86% 66% 43% 78%
Passaic North 97% 85% 87% 81% 97% 100% 92% 94% 75% 52% 88%
Salem 93% 50% 46% 53% 86% 95% 91% 96% 75% 60% 83%
Somerset 98% 81% 60% 66% 96% 99% 91% 89% 71% 46% 95%
Sussex 98% 62% 65% 54% 100% 96% 97% 98% 75% 59% 75%
Union Central 97% 85% 63% 66% 94% 98% 98% 94% 74% 48% 99%
Union East 94% 68% 89% 88% 98% 99% 96% 91% 79% 59% 100%
Union West 98% 74% 86% 77% 95% 99% 100% 88% 77% 60% 99%
Warren 92% 55% 63% 50% 88% 93% 81% 81% 60% 36% 99%
Statewide 94% 72% 70% 67% 95% 97% 92% 92% 72% 53% 87%
Measure # Final
Target
M# 3b 98%
M# 4 98%
M# 7a. 90%
M# 7b. 90%
M# 10 95%
M# 11 95%
M# 16 95%
M# 17 98%
M# 18 95%
M# 20 60%
Intake Caseload 95%Intake Worker Caseload Oct '13- Sep '14
Met Target Within 10% of Meeting Target < 50% of Final Target
Monthly Wkr-Child Visits at the Placement Site (Includes Out of State Children) Oct '13- Sep '14
Wkr-Parent Visits (Reunification goal; 2x monthly) Oct '13- Sep '14
Parent-Child Visits (weekly) Oct '13- Sep '14
Case Plans (initial) Sep '13 - Aug '14
Case Plans (ongoing) Oct '13- Sep '14
Wkr-Child Visits (first 2 months OOHP) Aug '13 - Jul '14
Timeliness of Completion (investigations in 60 days) Aug '13 - Jul '14
FTM (initial) Sep '13 - Aug '14
FTM (quarterly) Oct '13- Sep '14
Key Performance Indicators by CPP Local Office
October '13 - September '14(Unless otherwise indicated in the footnote table)
Description of the Measure12 Months
Totaled
Timeliness of Response (investigations commenced in required response time) Oct '13- Sep '14
The data contained in this dashboard is considered preliminary and as a result, these figures might be different
than the final reported figures. The data is produced for continuous quality improvement across DCF. 21