commissioning alignrt with minimal disruption

34
Another Device to Commission? Begin Commissioning AlignRT® with Minimal Disruption

Upload: vision-rt

Post on 23-Jan-2018

215 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

Another Device to Commission?

Begin

Commissioning AlignRT® with Minimal Disruption

Page 2: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

DISCLOSURES

2

I have nothing to disclose

Page 3: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

INTRODUCTION

3

• Technology and complexity in radiation oncology continues to grow at a fast pace

• The need for accurate implementation of SRS/SBRT QA programs is crucial

• Increased pressure to keep cost down and be more efficient

How can physicists provide increased value to clinics with increasing demands,

but maintain a high level of safety?

Page 4: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

INTRODUCTION

4

• Combine tests to accomplish multiple QA procedures at one time

• Focus first on mission critical processes (think TG-100 and FMEA analysis)

• Use AAPM Task Groups as guidance when developing your program

Now, what about a technology that I don’t know? Like surface imaging?

Page 5: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

COMMISSIONING SURFACE IMAGING

5

The approach is the same as every other modality in

radiation therapy

• Start out with the Task Group (AAPM TG-147)1 for

recommendations

• Discuss with your clinicians the goals of the system

(motion management for SRS, positioning for breast

patients, etc)

• Prioritize the QA in terms of the clinical need

– Do you need to perform all QA possible?

1 Willoughby, T., et al. “Quality assurance for nonradiographic radiotherapy localization and positioning systems: Report of Task Group 147.” 8 March 2012

Page 6: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

6

THE TECHNOLOGY

• Stereoscopic camera system that is used for positioning and tracking

• Isocenter is determined from a novel calibration procedure2

• Triangulation provides a 3D reference frame using a speckle pattern on the

patient’s surface

ALIGNRT® INTRODUCTION

2 http://www.visionrt.com/content/core-technology

Page 7: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

7

COMMON APPLICATION

• Intrafraction motion-management for SRS, SBRT, and respiratory cases

• Positioning for sites where the surface is a good surrogate for the target

– Breast, intracranial, extremities, etc

• General use for all patients

– Gross movements

• The beam can be held (automatically on most systems) when the registered

surfaces are out of the specified tolerance

ALIGNRT® INTRODUCTION

Page 8: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

8

Start with the clinical use cases to establish QA procedures in conjunction with the

AAPM TG-147

One size may not fit all, and a good QA program will reflect the clinical need

• What site will be treated most often?

• Will it be used for motion-management, positioning, or both?

• Will the beam be held during treatment delivery (dynamic gating)?

• What tolerances will be needed during position and treatment delivery?

CLINICAL USE CASES

Page 9: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

9

Start by mapping out the workflow and establish an End-to-end test, which

incorporates the complete clinical use case

COMMISSIONING TESTS

Page 10: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

10

Try to create a test that mimics the clinical use case (E2E)

END-TO-END (E2E) TEST

Page 11: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

11

EQUIPMENT NEEDED

• Phantom (preferably anthropomorphic) that has a neutral surface for imaging

– Shouldn’t be a ball or cylinder, due to tracking difficulties

– MAX-HD® (Integrated Medical Technologies) a good choice

– STEEV SRS Phantom (CIRS)

– SRS Head Phantom from IROC (clear, so may need taped to image well)

• Detectors such as Gafchromic® film, microchambers/diodes, OSL/TLD

• Electrometer

• 3DOF Head Adjuster (provided by VisionRT) or 6DOF couch for accurate

positioning

END-TO-END (E2E) TEST

Page 12: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

12

END-TO-END (E2E) TEST

SAMPLE PHANTOMS

MAX-HD STEEV SRS (IROC) SRS Phantom

IMT CIRS IROC CIRS

Page 13: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

13

SOME NOTES ABOUT EQUIPMENT

• Detectors should be small enough to avoid partial volume effects, especially for

SRS

• Film scanning should use the right calibration procedure

• Make sure film is cut in such a way to ensure reproducibility and localization

– Laser cut films for the phantom are available

• Epson Perfection XL11000 (or the older XL10000) are good choices for film

scanning

END-TO-END (E2E) TEST

Page 14: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

14

CT SCANNING

• Use the highest resolution protocol possible (small slice thickness ~1mm, high

mAs, etc)

• Try and use the same immobilization techniques that would be used during

treatment

• Set your DICOM origin (CT origin) at a reproducible localization to minimize setup

errors

• If the phantom supports it, try multiple CT scans with different inserts and cubes

– Again, it’s important to know the origin with certainty for film scanning

END-TO-END (E2E) TEST

Page 15: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

15

CONTOURING

• Many treatment planning systems automatically create the BODY contour, so

review for accuracy

• The Target Volume can be the sensitive volume of the detector or the center of

the film

END-TO-END (E2E) TEST

Page 16: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

16

TREATMENT PLANNING

• Use a beam configuration that will test the system

– Couch kicks

– VMAT, if applicable, to block cameras

– Dose levels that mimic treatment time (don’t scale MU)

– Use a real plan if available

• Save for a baseline for routine QA

END-TO-END (E2E) TEST

Page 17: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

17

LOCALIZATION

• Use the AlignRT system to be the primary localization method

• Verify the positioning with CBCT and lasers

– There may be a small deviation with the DICOM because of the BODY

contour

– If so, position initially with CBCT, capture the reference, then reposition

with the AlignRT system

• Use a 6DOF localization technique to position the phantom

END-TO-END (E2E) TEST

Page 18: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

18

DELIVERY

• Make note of gantry occlusion and deltas

– Some variation is acceptable during blockage, but extreme shifts may

indicate improper lighting, ROI, or calibration conditions

• Watch the deltas for drift over the course of the treatment at the couch base

• When rotating the couch, use the AlignRT readout, not the digital indicators, to

reposition

– Stereoscopic systems trump the internal readouts of the LINAC system,

hence the “STEREO” in stereotactic

– This is especially important in older systems, where couch tolerances are

looser

END-TO-END (E2E) TEST

Page 19: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

19

ANALYSIS

• Temperature/pressure correct the chamber reading, and use a cross calibration

factor to calculate the ratio of charge/dose (traced by to your ASCL calibrated

detector)

• FilmQA® from Ashland is a good choice for film scanning

– FilmQA analyzes in all 3 RGB channels

– ImageJ is also available for free, but takes some effort to write code

• Always scan the film in the same orientation, and if the calibration films are not

done on the same day, wait a while for the film to develop

END-TO-END (E2E) TEST

Page 20: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

20

WHAT AM I LOOKING FOR?

Depends on the clinical goals

• Breast patients could be passing 95% with a gamma index at 3%, 3mm with the

film analysis

• SRS programs treating trigeminal neuralgia cases may need 2%, 1mm

• Output measurements should be within 2% of the expected from the TPS, but

can be tough for small cones because of the output factors

If you pass the E2E, the commissioning process got a whole lot better. But…

END-TO-END (E2E) TEST

Page 21: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

21

WHAT IF IT FAILS?

Start looking at each component of the system closer. You will need it for the

overall QA program anyways. Keep in mind:

1. TG-147 is just part of this. Since an E2E test checks the whole system, it could

be anything outlined in TG-40, TG-142, TG-66, etc

2. Focus on the components that are specific to TG-147, as to not get

overwhelmed

END-TO-END (E2E) TEST

Page 22: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

22

• Do a “chart check” style review to make sure items transferred properly

– Patient ID

– Isocenter

– Contour (especially BODY)

– Scan orientation

• The coordinate system of the LINAC matches the TPS and DICOM transfer

– For example, the couch coordinates could be opposite if the coordinate

systems don’t match

COMMICATION BETWEEN SYSTEMS

Page 23: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

23

• Do a “chart check” style review to make sure items transferred properly

– Patient ID

– Isocenter

– Contour (especially BODY)

– Scan orientation

• The coordinate system of the LINAC matches the TPS and DICOM transfer

– For example, the couch coordinates could be opposite if the coordinate

systems don’t match

• If using an interface for shifts, ensure that is correct by using lasers or another

surrogate to confirm AlignRT shifts performed by the LINAC console

COMMICATION BETWEEN SYSTEMS

Page 24: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

24

• An accurate ROI gives stable real-time deltas for any phantom when there are no

occlusions. If the delta jump at couch base, and no blockage

– Ensure the ROI give a unique view

• I.e., not flat, symmetric, nor broken

– The underlying image is intact

• Check lighting condition or skin tone

• It is equally important to not make the ROI so big it doesn’t detect small

movements

– Like contouring the entire head for SRS – just use the small area in the

open mask

REGION OF INTEREST (ROI)

Page 25: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

25

• In order to make sure the calibration (both the calibration plate and fine

isocenter) is correct, perform a series of shifts to known positions, and record

the deltas

– Shift 2mm, 1cm, 2cm, 5cm, 10cm in S/I, L/R, and A/P directions

– Kick the couch in increments of 45 degree, for example

– Move the phantom arbitrarily, and see if the 6DOF positioning can get

back to a zero baseline

• If greater than 1mm (for SRS) disagreement is seen, perform isocenter and

monthly calibrations again, and repeat

• Refer to the acceptance testing procedures for vendor baselines as well

SHIFTS

Page 26: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

26

• With the camera system on for a significant period of time (like an hour or so),

turn the monitoring on and watch the deltas

• Record the values, and if large deviations are seen, repeat after a longer warm

up is achieved

• Compared to infrared based systems, the drift should be quite minimal

SHIFTS

Page 27: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

27

• With the camera system on for a significant period of time (like an hour or so),

turn the monitoring on and watch the deltas

• Record the values, and if large deviations are seen, repeat after a longer warm

up is achieved

• Compared to infrared based systems, the drift should be quite minimal

SHIFTS

Page 28: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

28

• With a simple motion phantom, try and move the phantom enough to hold the

beam

• Tighten tolerance to only beam on when the chamber is in position

• Use a simple test plan to isolate it just the motion of the phantom

• Measure with an ion chamber and record the results

– Should be very close to baseline, stationary reading, assuming the

phantom is not shifting during motion, and the gating is working

• This would also test spatial accuracy at the same time

DYNAMIC GATING

Page 29: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

29

• As with all medical devices, it is up to the medical physicists to stay current with

the latest customer service bulletins and release notes

• The tests outlined are from a clinical medical physicist’s perspective, but are by

no means meant to be prescriptive

• Training and continuing education are equally, and maybe more, important than

a one-time commissioning – as is the continual QA program

VENDOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Page 30: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

30

• VisionRT has already provided a nice workflow for QA

– DailyQA

• Uses the calibration plate, aligned by the therapists, and analyzes it

for constancy

– MonthlyQA

• Again, using the plate, but overrides the triangulated 3D position of

the system. To be done if the system appears to have changed

– Isocenter Calibration

• Using a phantom with fiducials that can be seen on CT/MV, with the

surface imaged, allows the isocenter of the imaging system to be

correlated to the MV isocenter

ESTABLISHING A QA PROGRAM

Page 31: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

31

• In addition to the vendor provided phantoms and software, use the results from

the commissioning tests to create baselines for routine QA

ESTABLISHING A QA PROGRAM

Page 32: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

32

"If it's not written down, it didn't happen“

• Ensure all the tests you do during commissioning, QA, or anything concerning

the system are well documented

• Not only is it good to establish baselines and trends, it is very useful in helping

other centers when they go live with AlignRT

DOCUMENTATION

Page 33: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

33

• Commissioning any system doesn’t have to be difficult, or even that time-

consuming, any long as the problem is well-defined

• By using clinical use cases as guidance, tests will solidify, and the project can be

focused

• By incorporated E2E tests, and grouping other QA procedures in an effective way,

commissioning and routine QA time can be reduced

CONCLUSIONS

Page 34: Commissioning AlignRT with Minimal Disruption

34

THANK YOU!

www.alyzenmed.com

1801 South 54th StreetParagould, AR 72450

870.926.0894

[email protected]

Jonathan Rogers, MS, DABR