committee of vice rectors of polish universities, lodz - june 2012 commercial opportunities from...

36
Committee of Vice Rectors of Polish Universities, Lodz - June 2012 Commercial Opportunities from University Research Experience from Oxford Tim Cook University of Oxford Director - Isis Innovation, (Managing Director 1997 – 2007) Associate Fellow - Saïd Business School, (Visiting Professor of Science Entrepreneurship 2006 -2009)

Upload: elizabeth-dymond

Post on 15-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Committee of Vice Rectors of Polish Universities, Lodz - June 2012

Commercial Opportunities from University Research

Experience from Oxford

Tim CookUniversity of Oxford

Director - Isis Innovation, (Managing Director 1997 – 2007)Associate Fellow - Saïd Business School, (Visiting Professor of Science Entrepreneurship 2006 -2009)

Summary

Knowledge Transfer (KT) is important • for Universities, business and society

It’s all about people• Vision and interpersonal skills are crucial

Modest investment in KT can give large returns• Because universities have a lot of unexploited potential

Some supporting evidence• From fifteen years in an ancient university

What are the opportunities?

“University” covers a wide range of institutions• They all teach• Some train• Most research

Opportunities from a particular institution depend on:• Resources available

Financial, personal and intellectual• Abilities & attitudes of staff

both academic and administrative

How big is the opportunity?

If we add together the amount of money spent on research in Universities we will get a huge sum• You will know better than I do what it is in Poland• In the UK it is £1.5bn (zl 8bn) of taxpayers’ money

What can the taxpayer expect for this?• Educated students • and perhaps some economic impact

I am not disregarding the economic impact of education• but teaching is funded from a different budget• This talk is about the commercial impact from the Research Budget

What is the function of university research?

The creation, recording and dissemination of new knowledge

Is it irresponsible to divert clever people from this to create commercial opportunities?

Of course it would be irresponsible but• It is possible to manage commercialisation• Without disrupting academic activity

IT SHOULD BE EASY

Potential recipient of the idea

Originator of the idea

Potential recipient of

the idea

Potential recipient of

the idea

Transferring ideas

Intermediary

Boss(es)

Resources

Originator of the idea

Originator of the idea

So why is it difficult?

Transferring an idea (invention, procedure, service) from one environment to another is a cross-cultural activity

KT is not the main priority of academics or industrialists

Academics are fully employed doing what they do • In the case of a researcher – research• In the case of a teacher – teaching

Potential recipients are busy doing what they do• Running the company, dealing with their bosses / shareholders etc. • And probably don’t see a need for outside ideas anyway

Why is it difficult 2?

Not only are the sources & recipients busy

There is a shortage of cross-cultural intermediaries

The intermediaries are under-resourced

Those allocating resources aren’t sure they want to do it anyway!

Barriers to commercialisation

Everybody is busy • And feels under-resourced

Single track careers• Few move back and forth between industry or academia

Different value systems• Between industry and academia

Different value systems

Commercial World

Corporate activities must be integrated

Much commercial confidentiality

Investors expect financial returns

Academia

Actions are necessarily independent

Quality & quantity of Publications

Funders fund activity not returns

Action plan

Plan A (not successful!) Tell universities to be more “business-like”

• “Any competent industrial manager could soon sort them out”

Tell industrial companies to support universities• “Why don’t companies just give us more funding?”

Plan B Understand the value and values of both cultures

Support interfaces that use their unique strengths

Develop the interface

To set up a collaboration between a non-German speaking Frenchman and a non-French speaking German needs more than just a translator

We need someone who can explain French attitudes to life in German to the German and vice versa

My first choice would be someone who had • lived for some years in each country and • understood how their different societies work

Isis Project managers have PhDs & commercial experience

It is not all new

There have always been commercially adept academics• 1959 Martin Wood spun Oxford Instruments out of Oxford University • 53 years later: Market capital £600m (zl3bn), 1,500 employees

There are many other examples from different universities but

Considering the research spend there are not many

A more effective support system can achieve a better return on this investment

WHAT CAN WE DO?

Where do you put the support?

University Knowledge Transfer Office• Some universities have an internal office funded by the university• essentially a “service department”

Knowledge Transfer Company, Wholly owned by a University• E.g. Oxford, Cambridge and many others

Knowledge Transfer Company, Partially owned by a University• E.g. Imperial College, London• Raising external investment gives more resource• External investors will expect to have an input (may be positive or negative)

Privately owned Knowledge Transfer Company• By developing close relationships with one or more universities

Entrepreneurial individuals can create value for universities & themselves

Public Sector Organisation• Can provide creative investment of public resources

Advice to KTOs

Always operate in the environment as it is• I don’t understand your individual environments

But I know they are complex• In 1997 I didn’t understand Oxford University

But I knew it was complex

Remember that there are only three participants• The originator of the idea or service• The potential recipient of the idea or service• The intermediary (and those assigning resources)

Our challenge, as promoters of KT, is to help all of the above want to do it enough to change their behaviour

Convincing researchers - so they are prepared to get involved

They need to believe it is worth their time• Internal (and external) marketing

They need to believe you will help them• Demonstration of success

They need to believe the KTO is competent• Employ competent staff!• Demonstrations of previous success (but in their values)

They are trusting you with something they care about• Their ideas and their time

Convincing recipients - so they talk to you

They need to know & remember you exist• External marketing of the institution and the KT portal

They need to trust you• Demonstration of success

They need to believe you are competent• Employ staff who can relate to industrialists• Demonstrations of your success (but in their values)

They are trusting you with something they care about• Their time

Convincing our own University - so it allocates some resources

• This is the hardest one!

Identify potential contribution to the institution’s success• Universities all need to demonstrate “impact”, so focus on it• Regular report to Rector (good news on the front page!)

Recruit influencers in University• Seek their advice • Help them identify with what you are trying to do

Work hard on detractors• If your activity is well run you will eventually convince (most) of them

Raising resources

Sell the vision

Raise resources

Use new resources wisely & so expand expectations

Raise expectations

Raise more resources

IT REALLY CAN WORKOBSERVATIONS FROM OXFORD 1997-2012

Isis Innovation 2000 - 2012

Year Ending March: 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

University Investment £m

1 1 1 1 1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5

Staff 17 21 23 34 36 36 36 37 44 54 62 68 80

Open Projects 319 415 476 629 725 764 784 841 978 1112 1182 1321 1450

Patents filed (pa) 55 63 82 65 52 55 57 49 68 64 73 65 100

Licence Deals (pa) 21 36 42 37 31 38 45 50 74 69 93 107 113

Consultancies (pa) 34 50 48 59 89 102 151 157 185 243

Spin-outs (pa) 6 8 8 7 3 4 6 7 4 4 3 4 5

Annual T/ O £m 0.9 1.2 1.7 2 2.3 2.7 2.9 3.6 4.8 5.6 7.5 8.3 10.1

Isis Innovation 1997 - 2012

0

50

100

150

200

250

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Year to March 31st

Isis Staff

Isis Innovation 1997 - 2012

0

50

100

150

200

250

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Year to March 31st

Isis Staff

Spinouts started in year

Isis Innovation 1997 - 2012

0

50

100

150

200

250

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Year to March 31st

Isis Staff

Spinouts started in year

Licences signed in year

Isis Innovation 1997 - 2012

0

50

100

150

200

250

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Year to March 31st

Isis Staff

Spinouts started in year

Licences signed in year

Consultancies signed in year

Isis Innovation 1997 - 2012

0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

0

50

100

150

200

250

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

£000

Year to March 31st

Isis Staff

Spinouts started in year

Licences signed in year

Consultancies signed in year

Isis Enterprise Sales £000

How it looks from the University

CULTURE CHANGE

Culture Change

All three must proceed together but the University must lead the change because..

1. The ideas are in the University• If the University provides KT resource, change will happen faster

Oxford pre-Isis 1 spin-out every 4 years, post-Isis 4 per year

2. If the University doesn’t lead, the University may not receive its share of the benefits

Entrepreneurial culture of

researchers

University knowledge transfer

resource

Local professional environment

Executive(policies)

Other academics

Gene pool Commercially

active academics

The University

KnowledgeTransfer

Office

StudentsBrokers

Itinerant Managers Consultants

A “sub-culture” in a “barter economy”

Investors Lawyers

Headhunters

PR agent

Realestate

LeasingBanks

Accountants

Specialist suppliers

Otherstart-ups

Who benefits from Knowledge Transfer?

University• Reputation, interactions for students, royalties, spinout shares

Researchers• Technology, royalties from licences/consultancy and spinout shares

Research Funding Sponsorship• From spinouts and licensees

Industry • New technology

Economy• New industries and new technology to existing ones

Investors who engage with Universities• High returns on world class science

Conclusions

Opportunities exist in Universities for:• Economic development• Wealth creation both for the institution and for individuals

To realise these benefits needs competent intermediaries and facilities

The allocation of appropriate expertise & resources is essential for success

And will produce a substantial return for Universities, Researchers and the Economy

Thank you

[email protected]

www.isis-innovation.comwww.isis-enterprise.com