common core new hampshire department of education november 18, 2011
TRANSCRIPT
Source: Carnevale, Anthony P. et al. (June 2010). Help Wanted: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2018. Georgetown Center on Education and the Workforce.
ww9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/FullReport.pdf
Jobs in Today’s (and Tomorrow’s) Workforce Require More Education and Training
8
Sources: Carnevale, Anthony P. and Donna Desrochers (2003). Standards for What? The Economic Roots of K-12 Reform. Education Testing Services. http://www.learndoearn.org/For-Educators/Standards-for-What.pdf ; Skills to Compete. http://www.skills2compete.org National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, analysis of
2009 American Community Survey. http://www.higheredinfo.org
In 1950, 60% of jobs were classified as unskilled, attainable by young people with high school diplomas or less. Today, less than 20% of jobs are considered to be unskilled.
9
Sources: Carnevale, Anthony P. and Donna Desrochers (2003). Standards for What? The Economic Roots of K-12 Reform.
83% of New Hampshire’s jobs are middle- or high-skill (jobs that require some postsecondary education or training).
Between 2008 and 2018, new jobs in New Hampshire requiring
postsecondary education and training will grow by 53,000 while jobs for high school graduates and dropouts will grow by 22,000.
10Sources: Carnevale, Anthony P. and Donna Desrochers (2003).
Between 2008 and 2018, New Hampshire will create 223,000 job vacancies both from new jobs and from job openings due to retirement.
141,000 of these job vacancies will be for those with
postsecondary credentials, 67,000 for high school graduates and 15,000 for high school dropouts.
11Sources: Carnevale, Anthony P. and Donna Desrochers (2003).
New Hampshire ranks 7th in terms of the proportion of its 2018 jobs that will require a Bachelor’s degree, and is 45th in jobs for high school dropouts.
64% of all jobs in New Hampshire (486,000 jobs) will require some postsecondary training beyond high school in 2018.
% of Citizens with Postsecondary Degrees Among OECD Countries, by Age Group (2006)
55-64 45-54 35-44 25-34 ALL (25-64)
1 U.S. (40%) Canada (44%) Canada (54%) Korea (58%) Canada (49%)
2 Canada (40%) Japan (43%) Japan (48%) Canada (56%) Japan (43%)
3 N.Z. (34%) U.S. (40%) Finland (44%) Japan (55%) U.S. (41%)
4 Finland (29%) N.Z. (38%) U.S. (43%) N.Z. (48%) N.Z. (40%)
5 Australia (28%) Finland (37%) Korea (43%) Norway (46%) Finland (37%)
6 Norway (28%) Australia (33%) N.Z. (40%) Ireland (45%) Korea (37%)
7 Switz. (27%) Denmark (32%) Norway (38%) Denmark (43%) Norway (36%)
8 U.K. (27%) Norway (32%) Australia (38%) Belgium (42%) Australia (36%)
9 Sweden (26%) Switz. (31%) Denmark (37%) Australia (42%) Denmark (34%)
10 Neth. (26%) Neth. (31%) Ireland (37%) U.S. (42%) Ireland (34%)
11 Denmark (26%) Iceland (30%) Switz. (36%) Sweden (41%) Switz. (34%)
12 Japan (26%) U.K. (30%) Iceland (36%) France (41%) U.K. (33%)
13 Germany (24%) Belgium (29%) Belgium (35%) Neth. (40%) Belgium (32%)
14 Iceland (24%) Sweden (28%) U.K. (33%) Spain (39%) Neth. (32%)
15 Belgium (22%) Ireland (27%) Sweden (33%) Luxembourg (39%) Sweden (32%)
America’s International Edge is Slipping in Postsecondary Degree Attainment
Source: OECD. Education at a Glance 2010. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2010_eag-2010-en ; National Center for Higher Education Management Systems analysis of 2009 American
Community Survey. http://www.higheredinfo.org
Over 40% of employers rate new entrants out of high school as
“deficient” (based on an assessment of 21st century skills: work ethic,
communication, collaboration, and critical thinking) in their for the entry-
level jobs they typically fill.
Source: Are they ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century U.S. workforce.
Half of the students taking the ACT meet
benchmark for reading
Source: Reading Between the Lines: What the ACT Reveals About College Readiness in Reading (http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/reading_summary.pdf)
Point #1: Common Core State Standards Solve
Three Specific Problems•Increased competition•Students not prepared•Need for consistency
Criteria for New Standards• Fewer, clearer, and higher (Consistent, rigorous, and
shared aligned with college and work expectations)
• Aligned with college and work expectations
• Include rigorous content and application of knowledge through high-order skills
• Build upon strengths and lessons of current state standards (think DNA of education)
• Internationally benchmarked, so that all students are prepared to succeed in our global economy and society
• Based on evidence and research
English Language Arts and Literacy
• Focus and coherence– Coherent progressions develop literacy skills across grade
levels• Focus on text complexity
– Students required to read texts of increasing complexity• College and career readiness in writing
– Students required to write using evidence from informational reading.
• Literacy as a shared responsibility– Literacy skills in reading and writing included in
history/social studies, science, and technical areas
Mathematics• Focus and coherence
– Focus on key topics t each grade level.– Coherent progressions across grade levels.
• Balance of concepts and skills– Content standards require both conceptual
understanding and procedural fluency.• Mathematic practices
– Foster reasoning and sense making in mathematics.• College and career readiness
– Level is ambitious but achievable.
Let’s Address the Claims for New Hampshire: Fewer, Clearer, Higher
English Language Arts Mathematics
Fordham K. Hess Fordham Petit
Fewer -- No -- Yes
Clearer Yes Varies Yes Yes
Higher Yes Varies Yes Yes
Point #3: Common Core State Standards Are Fewer, Clearer, and
Higher.•Text increases in complexity.
•Math standards are more coherent (fewer topics)
Current U.S. Performance
College and Career Readiness Standards
331360365368371371377381386387388
403405414419419421427427428431442445447453460466468477482483483487487
489490492493
495
496497497498501503507
513514515519525526
534536541543546555562
600
529527
494
512
530
496
487
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
KyrgyzstanPanama
PeruQatar
IndonesiaTunisiaAlbania
ColombiaBrazil
JordanArgentina
MontenegroKazakhstan
Trinidad andMexico
ThailandChile
UruguayRomaniaBulgaria
AzerbaijanSerbiaTurkey
IsraelDubai (UAE)
CroatiaGreece
RussianLithuania
LatviaItaly
SpainPortugal
Ireland
LuxembourgHungary
United KingdomCzech Republic
SwedenPoland
OECD averageAustria
Slovak RepublicFranceNorway
SloveniaDenmark
IcelandEstonia
GermanyAustraliaBelgium
New ZealandMacao-ChinaNetherlands
CanadaJapan
SwitzerlandLiechtenstein
FinlandChinese Taipei
KoreaHong Kong-China
SingaporeShanghai-China
Average PISA 2009 Mathematics Score
Not significantly different from the OECD average
Significantly above or below the OECD average
US College & Career Readiness Benchmark
Significantly above theCollege & Career Readiness
Benchmark
Significantly below theCollege & Career Readiness
Benchmark
United States
College and Career Readiness in Mathematics
Increased readiness of students meeting College and Career Benchmark
Internationally Competitive
7th
Estimated U.S. rank on PISA if students all students were college and career ready
Source: ACT, Affirming the Goal
Support Suggestions• Guidance on what to expect (e.g. timelines and
transition)– “Give clear direction of the NECAP testing or National
testing timeline.” • Crosswalk between NECAP and CCSS
– “Is there a side by side for the CCSS and NHDOE framework yet?”
• Professional Development– “Continue to offer professional development
opportunities for implementation of CCSS in all areas.”
• Policy Support
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
NH Standards for ELA and Math
Teach NH Curriculum Frameworks for ELA and Math
Begin to seriously map the grade level differences between NH and CCSS to plan for SY13-14
First full year for new standards to be used in classrooms
Common Core fully implemented
Common Core for ELA and Math
Continue Review, using NH Toolkit – Begin implementation of K-2 standards.
Begin to seriously map the grade level differences between NH and CCSS to plan for SY13-14 .
NECAP in Reading, Math, and Writing
NECAP (fall) NECAP (fall) NECAP (fall) Smarter Balanced Assessment (spring)
NECAP in Science NECAP (fall) NECAP (fall) NECAP (fall) NECAP (fall)
Point #6: The target date for full implementation is
Fall 2013*.•Current KG and 9th graders will take
SBA.•Changes in Fall 2013
To Learn MoreNational Website:www.corestandards.orgNH DOE Website:www.education.nh.gov/spotlight/ccss/index.htmQuestions: Joe Miller - [email protected] or 271-3594