common user interface programme - wordpress.com · –cda + templates –commissioning data sets...
TRANSCRIPT
Common User Interface
ProgrammeTim Chearman – CUI lead
Lindsey Butler – Clinical Safety Advisor
Agenda today
• Context of Data Standards and Products department
• CUI current state
• CUI proof of concept implementations
• SNOMED Implementation review and subset
demonstrator
DS&P and where CUI CAPS fits
CUI CAPS
Data Standards & Products
Technology Office
Department of Health Informatics Directorate
Department of Health
DS&P Focus
Standards, Standards everywhere
but which ones should we choose
Standardisation is
important, not standards
A bogie exchange station exists at the Chinese border to Mongolia. Both the Moscow-Beijing passenger
train (Trans-Siberian) and freight trains get their bogies exchanged. Mongolia has Russian gauge 1,520
mm (4 ft 11 5⁄6 in), China has 1,435 mm (4 ft 8 1⁄2 in). © Shultz CC- BY-SA
International
UK
England
Local
• ISO, CEN
• HL7, SNOMED
• NHS Number System
• ISB approved
• Spine connections
• Bespoke
• Shared - ITK
Just some of our standards
• Messaging– HL7 V3 for Spine
– HL7 V2 for local
integration
– CDA + Templates
– Commissioning Data Sets
– Other data sets
• Content Modelling– Clinical Archetypes
(CEN13606)
– Content models for
suppliers
• Logical Record
Architecture
• Terminologies– Read
– CTV3
– SNOMED CT
– dm+d
– Cross maps
• Classifications– OPCS
– ICD10
– Cross maps
• Data Dictionary
• Common User
Interface
Read
The Standards Solar System
V3
openEHR
ICD10
IHE
UML
ISO Data
Types
EHR
WHO
ISO
SOA
SAIF
ISO13606
HL7
V2
Intellect
What does good
science need?
• Good data from good sample sizes of well chosen
individuals
• Controlled trials
• Long term view on outcomes
Resources
• Clinical Safety Management System
– Raising profile of safety issues
– Influencing national solutions, design through to deployment
– Accredited clinician training – increasing a safety culture within NHS CFH, wider NHS and Suppliers
http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/engagement/clinical/clinicaldivision/safety
• DSCN’s 14/2009 & 18/2009
– 14/2009 Patient Safety Risk Management System – Manufacture of Health Software
– 18/2009 Patient Safety Risk Management System – Deployment and Use of Health Software
– Further information via http://www.isb.nhs.uk/
• Safer Implementation – Key Clinical Safety Activities, A
Guide to Implementation
http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/engagement/clinical/
clinicaldivision/safety
• Clinical Deployment Guide
Deployment Guide for Clinicians (PDF 960Kb)
• Help clinicians who have been asked to get involved in
IT projects understand how they can contribute
effectively and what roles and responsibilities they may
be asked to undertake.
CUI CAPS
What is the CUI CAPS
Project?
An NHS CFH project for the NHS
Started in 2005 and is focused on helping the NHS:
increase patient safety
increase clinician effectiveness
make IT systems easier to use
enable improved personal and team efficiency and
productivity
Our Aim
“To provide a highly mobile workforce with a
degree of familiarity between different systems
sufficient for the safe and effective delivery of
care without extensive re-training”
How?
The scope of the CUI CAPS project is focused on patient
safety critical aspects of clinical systems such as
medications management and patient identification in
order to increase consistency and improve safety
integrity
Who are we, what do we do
and why?
• Clinicians, developers, safety experts, usability experts
The Team
• User centred design – user interface
• influence clinical applications to make them safer, more consistent and easier to use
• Develop guidance, software(prototypes) and standards to support the design of safe and effective clinical computer systems
What and why
Our Vision
Current clinical IT systems
Common User
Interface (CUI)
Standards can help enable safe and
effective delivery of care without
extensive re-training
Many different application user
interfaces mean that retraining is
necessary.
Development process
Design
PrototypingUser
Research
PSAs
Requirements
ISB
Requirements
Standard
ISB
Draft
Standard
Guidance &
Technology
Pilot &
Feedback
ISB
Full
Standard
Updates
User
TestingUser
Testing
Updates
Patient Safety Risk Mitigation
Healthcare Professionals, NHS CFH, ISVs, ISB
PSAs
PSAs
Development process
Design
PrototypingUser
Research
PSAs
Requirements
ISB
Requirements
Standard
ISB
Draft
Standard
Guidance &
Technology
Pilot &
Feedback
ISB
Full
Standard
Updates
User
TestingUser
Testing
Updates
Patient Safety Risk Mitigation
PSAs
PSAs
PlanningHazard
identification
& analysis
Risk
management
Risk level
review
Safety
case
& closure
User interface
guidance
Guidance Catalogue
• Key Information• Telephone Number Display and
Input
• Patient ID Display and Input
• Sex / Gender Display and Input
• Address Display and Input
• Date Display and Input
• Time Display and Input
• Patient Name Display and Input
• Email Display and Input
• Accessibility• Accessibility Principles
• Accessibility Checklists
• Terminology (SNOMED CT)• Terminology Matching
• Terminology Elaboration
• Terminology Display
• Allergy/ADR display and entry
• SNOMED CT entry
• Admissions clerking
• Truncation of Clinical Terms
• Display of Clinical Statements
• Patient Administration• Patient Banner
• Find a Patient
• Patient List View
• Medications Management• Medications Views
• Drug Administration
• Search and Prescribe
• Medication Lines
• Abbreviations• Abbreviations in Free Text
• Abbreviations in Fixed Text
• Consistent Navigation• Alert Symbols
• Icons and Symbology
• Sorting filtering and grouping
• Decision Support• Decision Support Notification
• Decision Support Alerts
• Clinical Noting• Noting Using Templates
• Noting with Graphics
www.cui.nhs.uk
POC
POC
POC
Context
Mandated standards
Background
• The CUI project aims to reduce the risk of
misinterpretation of information and documentation input
options by users of different clinical systems. See
www.cui.nhs.uk
The common user interface programme has
produced a set of standards that address this
problem
Context
Clinical safety themes
Clinical safety hazard themes
Incorrect identification of the patient
Wrong record, wrong patient
Delayed, missed or inappropriate healthcare
•As the CUI CAPS project discovered during
the research phase, there are many causes of
safety hazards in relation the user interface
display.
•There are a limited set of safety themes that
this set of information standards seek to
address:
Context
The Information Standards Board
The ISB is the Board responsible for setting information
standards for the NHS and adult social care in England.
Please see the ISB website for more detailed information
www.isb.nhs.uk
Context
The information standards board has
mandated CUI demographics standards
has Data Set Change Notices (DSCN’s)
Standards and DSCN’s
IT systems must conform to the following standards by 1 December 2015
Address Input and Display
Date and Time Input
Date Display
NHS Number Input and Display
Patient Banner
Patient Name Input and Display
Sex and Current Gender Input and Display
Telephone Number Input and Display
Time Display
Further detail for each standard can be accessed at
www.isb.nhs.uk/use/baselines/cui . We are currently reviewing
the compliance process.
Context
Documents
Guidance examples
diltiazem – RETALZEM –
modified-release tablet –
DOSE 60 mg – oral – three times a day
Diltiazem – retalzem –
modified-release tablet –
DOSE 60 mg – oral – three times a day
paracetamol – 120 mg in 5 mL – suspension –
DOSE 80 mg – oral – every 4 hours
cefotaxime – powder for solution for
injection – intravenous – DOSE 400 mg –
every 8 hours
• All UI guidance is platform
agnostic and available free of
charge
• Rationale and evidence provided
within each guidance document
Patient banner
Medication line
Patient
name
Date
display
Address display
Patient banner
Leeds Teaching Hospitals
NHS Trust – Secondary
Care
Patient banner
Medication
line
Date
bluewire Technologies –
Secondary Care
Recording adverse
drug reaction
Date
CUI Standards Compliance
The Trust Clinical Safety
Officer and Compliance
CSO
External supplier
compliance
NHS CFH CSG
In-house and legacy
systems
SHA CSO
Request evidence of compliance
Prioritise and
assess
Key
Relationships Activities
Compliance overview
The Aims
• To enable healthcare IT suppliers to demonstrate they are
meeting the requirements of the CUI CAPS patient safety
standards (the DSCN’s)
• To inform NHS Trusts about the CUI CAPS patient safety
standards and empower NHS Trust representatives to request
this information from healthcare IT suppliers
• Give accreditation to suppliers for CUI CAPS compliance
What we want you to do
Work with suppliers to
• Undertake the compliance checks as per
defined process
• Evaluate the compliance process and
provide feedback on the process and tools
• Provide feedback on CUI design guidance if
identified
Supplier / developer
process
Have you
considered CUI
in your system
design
Plan/estimate
compliance
check
Assess effort and
plan into product
roadmap
Perform
Compliance
check
Inform CUI team
of compliance
results/queries
Feedback to CUI
team on planned
implementation
or issues
CUI
accreditation(plan)/
resolution of
feedback
Yes No
Feedback to cuistakeholder:
Evaluating your systems
We realise that from a trusts perspective there will be a
need to prioritise systems to identify which ones should
be implementing the patient safety standards. Working
with Trusts we have found that it is best to consider:
– Type of system – assess the clinical risk and
potential clinical safety benefits
– System owners – you might have a strong influence
internally or be dependant on a supplier
– Roadmap/development opportunities e.g. There
may be opportunities to insert CUI CAPS
requirements in new procurements, upgrade requests
etc.
System review activities
• For systems that you prioritise the following activities
should be considered:
• Contact suppliers/internal teams to inform about CUI
CAPS DSCN’s and understand current status
• Assess the software for compliance
• Evaluate the effort of any updates
• Request activities to attain CUI CAPS compliance in
roadmap/plans
•Give feedback to the CUI CAPS Team on the
design guidance and compliance process
Compliance exampleGuidance
document
Compliance
checklist
Tools
Full CUI design guidance – includes supporting
information on the project, safety issues, references see our guidance catalogue www.cui.nhs.uk
QIG – Quick Implementation Guidance documents. See our guidance catalogue www.cui.nhs.uk
Check lists – The guidance check lists in Microsoft Excel will help you to assess the healthcare IT system and document the level of compliance the system demonstrates. See our compliance section www.cui.nhs.uk
What you will need
• Access to www.cui.nhs.uk
• Familiarity with the Full CUI design guidance, access to
the QIG’s
• The check list – downloaded from www.cui.nhs.uk
• The application/s you are assessing for compliance level
• Commitment from the suppliers/time to do the
assessment and time to complete the evaluation
questionnaire
Feedback
We welcome feedback on any aspect of this pack.
Please direct your feedback to the CUI team via
General enquiries or feedback on a specific design
guidance area should be sent to
In order to ensure this process is useful, realistic and
achievable the CUI Team request your feedback
An online questionnaire will be available to give you theopportunity to give detailed feedback on the process.Link to be inserted
Other CUI project areas
CUI Proof of concept
implementation
• CURIO was developed as a collaborative research
project by the Centre for Health Informatics and Multi
professional Education (CHIME) team from UCL and the
Common User Interface (CUI) team
• http://forge.tactix4.net/gf/project/curio/
The aims of the CURIO project are:
• To develop a technical environment and framework to
explore implementation of Common User Interface
components and SNOMED CT
• To make learnings shareable and leveraged by others to
implement UKTC standards and CUI specifications.
Other Projects –
SNOMED CT
Goal – how best to implement SNOMED CT in the
User Interface of an Electronic Patient Record
Draft
implementation
recommendations
Various
exploratory
prototypesSubset analysis
SNOMED CT in the UI SNOMED CT Demonstrator
SNOMED CT
Demonstrator
• Identify appropriate
user interface
elements
• Design various
exploratory
prototypes of a
Discharge Summary
• But...there is a
dependency on
subset size
SNOMED CT
Demonstrator
• Different User Interface
elements work well for
different subset sizes
• To get feel for number of
results returned we
investigated: No.
Characters typed-in
wanted result (in a small
list of results)
• Re-worked prototype as
testing-rig
SNOMED CT
Demonstrator
Demo of prototypehttp://snomeddatahandling.appspot.com/
SNOMED CT
Demonstrator
Number of search characters typed in
% T
erm
s in
sm
all lis
t
Single search token e.g. “pneum”, “diab”, “ecze”
SNOMED CT
Demonstrator
Number of search characters typed in
% T
erm
s in
sm
all lis
t
Double search token e.g. “ches cold”, “child ecze”
SNOMED CT
Demonstrator
% Terms in small list 50,000
terms
3000
terms
3 chars (“pne”) 3% 38%
6 chars (“actino”) 16% 71%
2 chars per token (“co pn”) 16% 94%
3 chars per token (“com acq”) 56% 99%
Thank you…..
Any questions?
www.cui.nhs.uk