common(s) wisdom: ohio university’s faculty commons
Upload: library-leadership-management-association-llama-american-library-association-ala
Post on 13-Dec-2014
1.476 views
DESCRIPTION
Presentation by Jan Maxwell (Ohio University Library, Assistant Dean, Collections & Access) as part of a program called "Common(s) Wisdom: Designing Graduate and Faculty Spaces that Work". Program was hosted by LLAMA - BES at the ALA Annual 2010 conference. If you build it, will they come? Does the concept of a separate "Research" or "Scholarly" Commons meet identified needs? Is there a sure-fire mix of research and teaching support spaces guaranteed to meet the demands of this vital (and vocal) group? What are the challenges in designing and living in these facilities? Learn how two libraries are enhancing the scholar’s experience. Come away with proven ideas to use in your own library.TRANSCRIPT
Common(s) Wisdom: Ohio University’s Faculty Commons
Jan MaxwellAssistant Dean, Collections & Access
Ohio University
Ohio University
• Located in Athens, Ohio• Established 1804• 20,000+ students • 1000+ full-time faculty• 5 regional campuses• Carnegie classification: Research Universities
(high research activity)
Ohio University Libraries
• Vernon R. Alden Library – 7 floors• 2 branch libraries and remote storage• 89 full-time staff, 3M volumes• ARL member since 1996• Learning Commons opened 2004• Faculty Commons opened 2007
Faculty Commons Key Players
• University Libraries• Center for Academic Technology (CAT )
• Center Teaching and Learning (CTL)• Center for Writing Excellence (CWE)• DesignGroup of Columbus OH, architects for
master plan
Original Goal: Better space for CAT, CTL and CWE
Concept: Faculty Commons as analogous and complementary to Learning Commons
Faculty Commonsentry
entry Learning Commons
Customer Service
Stacks
Archives/ Special Collections
Third Floor
Expanded Goals
• Better space for CAT, CTL and CWE• One-stop shopping for faculty
Planned Faculty Commons Units
• University Libraries– AD, Collections & Access– Media Production
• Center for Academic Technology (CAT)• Center Teaching and Learning (CTL)• Center for Writing Excellence (CWE)
One-stop shopping? Other services we considered:
• Reserves• Assistance with Blackboard• Interlibrary Loan• Grant-writing assistance• Statistical assistance
Expanded goals
Display space for faculty research and creative activity
Expanded Goals
• Better space for CAT, CTL and CWE• One-stop shopping for faculty• Display space for faculty research and
creative activity • Faculty Club atmosphere
Learning Commons Faculty Commons
FRIENDS ROOM HERE
Goals and Outcomes
Pre-construction goals:• Relocate CAT, CTL, CWE to
high visibility venue• Provide one-stop shopping
for faculty services• Create ‘faculty club’ space• Showcase faculty research
Outcomes:• Primary venue for faculty
development programs• Faculty Club atmosphere:
somewhat• Faculty research showcase:
didn’t happen
Faculty Commons Units
Year One:
• University Libraries– AD, Collections & Access– Media Production
• Center for Academic Technology (CAT)
• Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL)
• Center for Writing Excellence (CWE)
• Campus-Community Engagement
Year Two:
• University Libraries– AD, Collections & Access– Media Production
• CAT (leadership change)• CTL (reduced staffing)• CWE• Campus-Community
Engagement (reduced staffing)
Faculty Commons UnitsYear Three:• University Libraries
– Assistant Deans for Collections & Access, Research & Education Services
• CAT (interim director)• CTL (reduced staffing and
operating budget)• CWE (reduced staffing) • Office of Nationally
Competitive Awards (ONCA) and Director of Fulbright Programs
Beginning Year Four:• University Libraries
– Assistant Deans for Collections & Access, Research & Education Services
• CAT (2nd interim director)• CTL (staffing and operating
budget reduced further)• CWE (reduced staffing)• ONCA and Director of
Fulbright Programs
Some surprises
• Differences in work cultures among the units were greater than anticipated
• Summer is the busiest season• The conference room specifically designed as
creative space is the least popular• Students do not wander in, even when there
is no seating available elsewhere in the building
Things to think about if you are planning a faculty commons
• Can you truly have one-stop shopping?• Leadership and reporting lines• Operating budget• What will success look like?• Design flexibility
QUESTIONS?EMAIL ADDRESSES
Jan Maxwell: [email protected]