community and propinquity. an e-mail “dear kareem, thanks very much for letting me know about the...
TRANSCRIPT
An e-mail
“Dear Kareem,
Thanks very much for letting me know about the typographical error in my book. Its much appreciated.
best wishes
Gill Valentine”
Community and Neighbourhood
• Valentine Ch 3 esp. pp. 117-123
• Issue of “Propinquity”– Nearness– Particularly in the residential sense
• Does community have to be localised to a neighbourhood?
Chicago School
• Argued that “community” was closely connected to neighbourhood
• Residential “nearness” is required for community
• Community and neighbourhood virtually the same– both localised and territorial
Spatial Texture
• Neighbourhood, community may have a finer, more localised spatial texture in the inner city compared to the suburbs
Role of Institutions
• Neighbourhood & community are promoted by many institutions:– faith communities– schools, libraries– charities– community organizations
Melvin Webber (1963)
• “Americans are becoming more closely tied to various interest communities than to place communities”– social clubs and organizations– college and workplace friends
Melvin Webber (1963)
• Technology allows interest communities to be decentralised and scattered, – people don’t need to be close to each other any
more
• “Community without Propinquity”– “place-free” and “stretched-out” communities
Castells “Space of Flows”
• In past 2 decades: – Global and information economy emerges
• Two types of space emerge:– Space of Spaces (people still bound to place)– Space of Flows (networked subculture of
managerial elite)– Space of Flows comes to dominate Space of
Spaces
Chinese Diaspora
• Phone calls cheaper in Canada than in China
• Chinese in Canada phone their families (including those in China) more often than when they lived in China
• “Community” closer without propinquity
Community without Propinquity
• Community can flourish without residential “nearness”
• People live in a scattered fashion, but participate in a community
Examples
• International lawyers working on the Pacific Rim– constitute a scattered professional “community”
Examples
• Church attendance in Toronto– most Catholics still attend locally– Protestants frequently have long-distance
commutes to church– church-going people move house but often
don’t change churches
Community without Propinquity
• Often requires a meeting place or gathering point– permanent– occasional– virtual
Krispy Kreme
• Marketing strategy includes:– promoting itself as a
destination for community groups, clubs
– including car clubs• communities without
propinquity
Electronic Gathering Places
• TV described as an electronic gathering place
• Similar concept with the Internet
• Does communication equal community?
IT and Community
• Information technology might– connect us via virtual communities– disconnect us from real community– re-connect us to community both real and
virtual
Disconnection
• Survey of 2035 WebTV users:– the more time on-line the less time on social
activities
Reconnection: Netville
• “Netville” a 1990s wired subdivision in USA– Residents of Netville used wired and
conventional means to interact with their neighbours
Netville
• Netville residents more socially interactive with neighbours than similar unwired families– neighbour recognition up 300%– neighbour visiting and conversation up 200%– neighbour phoning up 500%
Community
• Depends on opportunities for social interaction– Cyberspace facilitates this– Common spaces (front porches etc.,)– Common institutions
Knowledge Gaps
• Some communities better able to access knowledge than others– better able to use it
• Some communities find cyberspace easier to use
Chipping Sodbury UK
• Commuter village near Bristol UK
• Childhood home of J K Rowling
• Known as bland and boring– Sodding Chipbury
Henry Miller
“America is full of places. Empty places. And all these empty places are crowded. Just jammed with empty souls. All at loose ends, all seeking diversion. As though their chief object of existence was to forget.” - Henry Miller (1945) The Air-Conditioned Nightmare
Community through Propinquity
• High-tech clusters– these technology-based activities should be able
to decentralise– but they tend to cluster
Do suburbs have “community”?
• Nuclear families trying to get ahead
• Privacy more important than community?
Muller’s Typology (for USA)
• Exclusive, upper-income suburbs– little contact between neighbours– communality via golf & country club, churches
etc.,
Muller’s Typology (for USA)
• Middle-class family suburbs
• Nuclear families trying to earn money, accumulate possessions
• Limited neighbour-to-neighbour contact
• Most communality revolves around children: Schools, Scouts etc.,
Muller’s Typology (for USA)
• Working-class suburbs
• Intensive use of outdoor communal space, lots of social interaction
• Permanent ties to place and neighbourhood