community energy in bulgaria- public attitudes and

10
Community energy in Bulgaria- public attitudes and prospects for future development Ass.Prof. Mariya Trifonova Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” DECIDE WEBINAR 02.07.2021 02/07/2021 DECIDE WEBINAR 1

Upload: others

Post on 23-Jan-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Community energy in Bulgaria- public attitudes and prospects for future development

Ass.Prof. Mariya Trifonova Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”

DECIDE WEBINAR02.07.2021

02/07/2021 DECIDE WEBINAR 1

SELECTED RESULTS FROM NATIONAL REPRESENTATIVE STUDY

02/07/2021 DECIDE WEBINAR 2

The survey on the social acceptance of RES has been conducted among 1034 respondents in December 2020Survey’s field work: Market LinksProject financed by PURPOSE Climate Lab in cooperation with Sofia University

Citiation: Trifonova, Mariya (2021): Social acceptance of renewable energy sources and the technologies for their utilization. Available at https://www.uni-sofia.bg/index.php/bul/content/download/248293/1637967/version/1/file/Report_RES.pdf

02/07/2021 DECIDE WEBINAR 3

Low level of public awareness of renewable energy technologies

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

Solar energy/PV technologies

I haven't heard about them Very well informed I don't know much

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Wind energy technologiesInstalled capacity and number of installations

13 MW6 objects

1 MW2 objects

110 MW44 objects

108 MW556 objects

Installed capacity and number of installations

166 MW273

objects

100 MW235

objects

172 MW70 objects

39 MW15 objects

266.7MW744

objects

419.38 MW834 objects

2.76 MW56 objects

02/07/2021 DECIDE WEBINAR 4

Benefits associated with decentralized clean energy

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

New employment opportunities

Economic development/growth

Approaching a vision of modern EU country

Decreasing dependency on fossil fuels

Contribution to global effort for CO2reduction

Environmental protection

Agree Neutral Disagree

However, only 6 to 10% of the

respondents are planning to invest in

RES for various energy consumption

needs (electric power, heating, mobility)

02/07/2021 DECIDE WEBINAR 5

Statistically significant factors for higher public engagement with activities supporting RES

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Асоциирани с ВЕИ ползи: Опазване на околната среда 0.326 0.119 7.530 1 0.006 1.386

Асоциирани с ВЕИ ползи: Визия на модерна европ. държава 0.230 0.117 3.877 1 0.049 1.258

Асоциирани с ВЕИ ползи: Принос към забавяне на глобалните

климатични промени

0.269 0.127 4.493 1 0.034 1.309

Възприятие на климатичните промени 0.291 0.080 13.118 1 0.000 1.338

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ 0.225 0.058 15.203 1 0.000 1.252

ВЪЗРАСТ -0.233 0.050 21.692 1 0.000 0.792

Оценка на енергийния преход като ангажиращ и прозрачен 0.289 0.077 13.961 1 0.000 1.335

Доверие в институциите, взeмащи решение за ВЕИ 0.162 0.083 3.823 1 0.050 1.176

Constant -6.459 0.665 94.311 1 0.000 0.002

Benefits associated with RES: Environmental protection (A)

Benefits associated with RES: Vision of modern state (B)

Benefits associated with RES: Contribution to climate change mitigation (c)

Consciousness about the climate change (D)

Education (E)

Age (F)

View of the energy transitions as engaging and transparent (G)

Trust in the institutions (H)

Perceived benefits, trust in the institutions and sociodemographic factors, such as education and age, are found statistically significant , but not income

02/07/2021 DECIDE WEBINAR 6

Willingness to participate in a renewable energy community and reasons for (not)joining

02/07/2021 DECIDE WEBINAR 7

Perceived key actors/ initiators

02/07/2021 DECIDE WEBINAR 8

Opportunities for coping with energy poverty/ vulnerability

02/07/2021 DECIDE WEBINAR 9

Current challenges and opportunities for energy communities

Challenges Opportunities

• Lack of information and awareness

• Cultural factors (lack of trust and historically limited engagement of citizens/ entrepreneurs in the energy sector)

• Signals by policy-makers/ governance bodies

• Regulatory barriers

• Delayed transposition of RED II

• Access to financing

• Administrative capacity

• Taxation

• The experience gathered by the first wave of building renovation

• Second wave of building renovation currently designed

• Large stock of huge multiple-house buildings with flat roofs

• The experience of neighboring countries (Greece)

• Current EU mechanism for reforms and financing of new projects

THANK YOU!

Mariya TrifonovaAssistant Professor

Department of Industrial Economics and ManagementFaculty of Economics and Business AdministrationSofia University St. Kliment Ohridski

[email protected]