community governance in rural australia kevin o’toole deakin university crrf conference tweed...

29
Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

Upload: deborah-dean

Post on 24-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

Community Governance in Rural Australia

Kevin O’Toole

Deakin University

CRRF Conference

Tweed Ontario

October 2004

Page 2: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

2

Introduction

Background – Australian local govt Governance as a concept Types of Governance at local level Community governance and practice in

Victoria

Page 3: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

3

Australian Local Government

66

14274

157

175

79

29

NSW 6,691.8

Vic 4,929.8

Qld 3,774.3

WA 1,951.3

SA 1,528.2

Tas 476.2

NT 197.1

Populations‘000

Page 4: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

4

Distribution of urban, regional and rural local governing bodies

(no. and %) by State, 2002-03

   NSW Vic Qld WA SA Tas NT1 Total

Urban 44 33 14 29 19 2 2 143

% 25% 42% 9% 20% 26% 7% 3% 20%

Region & Rural 131 46 143 113 55 27 64 579

% 75% 58% 91% 80% 74% 93% 97% 80%

Total 175 79 157 142 74 29 66 722

1 Includes Northern Territory Trust Account.

Source: Department of Transport and Regional Services.

Page 5: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

5

Scale of local government, by state 2002

State

Number of

councils

Pop per

council

Number of

councillors

Pop percouncill

or

% of councils

with wards

NSW 175 37,887 1771 3680 45

Vic 79 60,962 593 8122 81

Qld 157 28,898 1037 3483 53

WA 142 13,409 757 2515 70

SA 74 22,079 694 2163 85

Tas 29 16,216 280 1680 0

Page 6: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

6

Governance

Origins in the Greek word for the ‘steering’ of boats - mainly been limited to the ‘affairs of state’

governance = the types and processes of governing

government refers to the institutions that are required to carry out the governing functions.

Page 7: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

7

Governance as Structure

The organizational and institutional arrangements of state and non-state actors

The formal partnership arrangements between the public and private sectors

Encompasses both the state and civil society where government involves only the state

Has shifted from a hierarchical model to a more flexible approach and a greater sharing of power between the state and the market

Page 8: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

8

Governance as Process

Where the ‘government’ acted in a commanding, controlling and directing manner ‘governance’ involves the processes of leading, facilitating, collaborating and bargaining

Page 9: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

9

Local Governance

Local government has shifted from a relatively basic system of administration to new styles of public management

Some services may no longer be in public hands but they are still part of local governance Eg under contract to private or voluntary

groups

Page 10: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

10

Governance Forms at Local Level in Victoria

1. Corporate Governance

2. Participatory Governance

3. Community Governance

Page 11: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

11

Local Governance 1Corporate governance

State government

Local Council Board of Directors

Local services

Clients Share holders

VotingDecision MakingAccountability

Page 12: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

12

‘Corporate’ Representation

Representatives are ‘acting for’ the electorate as a whole

‘Acting for’ = the placement of ‘experts’ in the political process to ‘do the job for us’

Involves a notion of ‘trusteeship’

Page 13: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

13

Putting the systems together Corporate governance

State government

Local Council Board of Directors

Local services

Clients Share holders

VotingDecision MakingAccountability

Corporate Represent

Voting Proportional

Quota

Unsubdivided

Reduces Property

Franchise Vote

Page 14: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

14

Local Governance 2Participatory governance

State government

Local council

Local services

Clients Citizens Special Interests

VotingDecision MakingAccountabilityInfluence

Page 15: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

15

‘Interest’ Representation

Elected representatives Personal advocates Sectional interests

Accountable at electionsAs individualsAs members of group

Central notion ‘Accountability’

Page 16: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

16

Putting the systems togetherParticipatory governance

State government

Local council

Local services

Clients Citizens Special Interests

VotingDecision MakingAccountabilityInfluence

Interest Represent

Subdivided

Voting Majority

Preference

Increases Property

Franchise Vote

Page 17: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

17

Community Governance The state has shifted various forms of

responsibility onto the private and voluntary sectors

Self-organising networks develop their own policies and help to shape their own environments.

‘an arena of participation …[embracing] all activity which involves either the provision of public services within the community, or the representation of community interests to external agencies’ (Woods, Edwards, Anderson, & Fahmy, 2001).

Page 18: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

18

Local Governance 3Community governance

State government

Local council

Local services

Clients Citizens Special Interests

VotingDecision MakingAccountabilityInfluence

Communities

Page 19: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

19

‘Mirror’ Representation

Depends upon the representatives’ characteristics as a reflection of those groups in the community

A ‘politics of presence’ that includes representatives of minority characteristics such as gender or ethnicity

Page 20: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

20

Putting the systems together Community governance

State government

Local council

Local services

Clients Citizens Special Interests

VotingDecision MakingAccountabilityInfluence

Communities

Unsubdivided

Mirror Represent

Voting Proportion

Quota

Page 21: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

21

Integrated Community Governance

Focuses on the way local groups are integrated into the structure of local government itself consultative mechanisms where there are various

public meetings public hearings discussion groups

partnership arrangements where local government establishes community forums local committees local advisory boards

Page 22: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

22

Examples of integration

1. Local government advisory committees

2. Consult with small rural towns four times a year

3.Assist in kind and sometimes with finance

Page 23: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

23

Independent Community Governance

claim to represent the interests of local people and independent of local government

may develop specific partnerships with local government but control over many local decision-making mechanisms of their local communities

not simply working at community level but also negotiating relationships with other levels of governance

varies according to social, demographic, historical, economic and biographical factors

Page 24: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

24

Examples of Independence

1. Create own shop front

2.Buy their own community assets

3.Create their own local festivals

Page 25: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

25

Organizational Role

Act as local ‘representatives’Some seen as ‘mini’ councils

‘Umbrella’ organisation for the town Information channels

Local newsletters

Various forms of membership Who turns up through to small payment

Some independent finance

Page 26: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

26

Community Processes

Advocacy and fund raising Submission Skills Fitting the funding templates

State and Federal funding prerequisites – community groups apply though local government

Reconstructing local needs to fit funding criteria

PartnershipsLocal government

Community asset building for local and tourist consumption

Page 27: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

27

Processes at Other Levels

More ‘efficient’ outcomes by using the volunteer capacities of local community organizations

Promoting sustainability as the responsibility of the local townspeople, eg

Regional Solutions at federal levelBuilding Great Communities at state level Community Building consultants at local government

Outcome: community associations become the avenues for local governance activities

Page 28: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

28

Conclusions

Local community groups have replaced some of the governance functions of local

government authorities now lead, facilitate, collaborate and bargain as

A consultative mechanism for local decision-making Partners with a range of outside agencies Advocates for local needs

This may be called a new community governance that is both

an outcome of the ‘minimal state’ approach of the higher levels of government in Australia

the desire of local development groups to ensure a sustainable level of services for their communities.

Page 29: Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

29

Further References O’Toole, K & Burdess, N. 2004 New community

governance in small rural towns: the Australian experience. Journal of Rural Studies Vol 20, No 4, 433-443 .

Burdess, N. & O’Toole K, 2004 Elections and representation in local government: a Victorian case study, Australian Journal of Public Administration Vol 63, No 2, 66-78

O’Toole, K. & Burdess, N. 2003 Municipal Wards in Victoria, 1982-1999, The Electronic Journal of Australian and New Zealand History, http://www.jcu.edu.au/aff/history/articles/articles.htm, pp1-12

O’Toole K. & Macgarvey A. 2003, Rural women and local economic development in south-west Victoria, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol 19, No 2, pp 173-186