comparative analysis multiple submissions vs. loops agec 641 lab, fall 2010 mario andres fernandez
DESCRIPTION
Comparative Analysis Multiple Submissions vs. Loops AGEC 641 Lab, Fall 2010 Mario Andres Fernandez. Based on material written by Gillig and McCarl ; Improved upon by many previous lab instructors. Special thanks to Yuquan “Wolfgang” Zhang. Comparative Analysis. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Comparative Analysis Multiple Submissions vs. LoopsAGEC 641 Lab, Fall 2010Mario Andres Fernandez
Based on material written by Gillig and McCarl; Improved upon by many previous lab instructors.Special thanks to Yuquan “Wolfgang” Zhang
Comparative AnalysisAs is often (always) the case, one is interested to see outcomes
under different scenarios.
Two ways to conduct comparative analysis
Use multiple GAMS submissions or multiple solves generating
report writing output and then manually comparing the
analysis results
Use the GAMS LOOP procedure and set up a comparative
scenario analysis system that creates cross scenario
comparison tables
Example
ScenariosWhat if one has a RAP (risk aversion parameter) of “1.5” or “5.0”?
Multiple GAMS SubmissionsReport writing commands use values from the most recent solution.
Multiple GAMS Submissions
Multiple GAMS Submissions
Multiple GAMS Submissions: Percentage Change
Scenario Comparative Report
Loop
Loop
Loop: Structural Modification
Increasing run efficiency using the Save and Restart procedure. We can associate a set of execution time parameters with a file
Save work files: s = .\t\a1Restart work files: r = .\t\a1
(1)
(2)