comparative analysis of indigenous peoples’ rights in central africa d’afrique centrale
DESCRIPTION
Cléto Ndikumagenge and Phil René Oyono Presentation for the conference on Taking stock of smallholders and community forestryMontpellier FranceMarch 24-26, 2010TRANSCRIPT
1
Comparative Analysis of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Central Africa d’Afrique Centrale By Cléto Ndikumagenge and Phil René Oyono
(Cameroun et Grands Lacs)
©intu
2
Presentation Outline
• Why a comparative study of Indigenous Peoples’ rights in the Trinational de la Sangha (TNS) and the Great Lakes?
• Indigenous People confronting the challenge of biodiversity conservation
• Indigenous Peoples’ rights: Major inadequacies• Main lessons learned • Conclusions
3
Why a comparative study of Indigenous Peoples’ rights (1)?
4
Why a comparative study of Indigenous Peoples’ rights (1)?
• Universal Declaration of Human Rights• International and national meanings of human rights • IUCN’s Livelihoods and Landscapes Initiative• Main lessons learned
5
Indigenous Peoples (1): Reduced to poverty
Indigenous Peoples face the challenge of biodiversity conservation (1): Ecoregion Profiles
The concept of landscape and its complexity
• Geographic spaces that are sites of human activity;
• Encompasses – Physical– and biological characteristics – Institutions– People – Cultural and spiritual values;
• Scope and limits – Defined in terms of management
objectives as envisioned in the lanscape approach intervention;
• Adoption of this approach in the convergence plan
GAMBA CONKOUATI
TRIDOM
TNS
8
What is an Indigenous People?
9
Complexity of Rights
• Traditional human rights• Rights extended to negative things• Rights to positive services • Rights extended to positive processes• Ownership rights
10
Rights and Poverty Reduction
• Rights to basic services• Access rights to resources• Rights to rural economic
activities • Rights to benefits from
resources
11
Rights and Landscape Sustainability
• Forest ownership rights • Resource control and
exploitation rights • Right to practice traditional
management and conservation forms
©intu
12
Rights to Benfits from Resources
©intu
13
Changes in Household Patterns
©intu
14
Changes in Diet
©intu
15
• Rights to public and political participation
• Rights to justice and peace• Rights to post-conflict
services• Rights to cultural
identityidentité culturelle
Citizenship Rights
16
Lessons learned (2)
• Positive influence of organizations involved with indigenous peoples
• Link between economic and legal development • Cameroon’s paradox of abundance• Weakness of rights echo a greater
socioeconimic vulnerability• Sustainable landscapes depend on indigenous
practices
17
MERCI BEAUCOUP/ MANY THANKS
18
CONCLUSIONS
• Programs for sedentarization and improvement in the social status of Indigenous Peoples
• Isolationist approach has had little impact• Dispossession of ancestral rights • Inadequate recognition of rights-related
questions in strategic documents (MDGs, PRSP..)
• Need to encourage integrated and non-isolationist approaches to strengthen rights