compare with one point measure.ppt
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Measurement of Mandibular Cortical Width on Dental Panoramic Radiograph
![Page 2: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Objective
To develop a computer aided system for measuring mandibular cortical width between the margins of cortical bone continuously on dental panoramic radiograph ,and clarify the diagnostic efficacy of the system
![Page 3: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Femoral neck
Lumbar spine
Normal
Porous
![Page 5: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Schematic Diagram of measuring cortical width
I.Region of Interest determination
a.Contrast Stretchingb.Determining mental foramenc. cropping area around mental foramen
II. Image Enhancement
a. Thresholding Algorithmb. High pass filtering
III. Cortical margin Identificationa. Distance Functionb.Thresholdingc.Closing and Openingd.Distance Functione. Inverting imagef. Dynamic Programmingg. Maskingh. Inserting DiscI. Finding upper and lower boundary
IV.Distance Measurement
a.Smoothingb. Polynomial Function
![Page 6: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
RightLeft
Contrasting ImageOriginal Image
![Page 7: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Right
Distance functionHigh pass Filter
Closing &opening
Thresholding
Thresholding Filtering
![Page 8: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Distance Function Inverting Image Dynamic Programming
Smooth & Tangentline Disc Fitting Masking
![Page 9: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Distance functionHigh pass Filter
Filtering
ThresholdingThresholding
Closing &opening Thresholding
Left
![Page 10: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Distance Function Masking
Disc FittingSmooth&Tangent
![Page 11: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
No. Image Right Left
1 1.tif 53.16 49.78
2 2.tif 37.28 26.12
3 3.tif 72.59 83.57
4 4.tif 39.87 38.56
5 5.tif 48.13 49.37
6 6.tif 57.49 56.28
7 7.tif 43.73 41.37
8 8.tif 30.01 30.61
9 9.tif 35.85 38.97
10 10.tif 39.70 39.27
11 11.tif 39.58 33.61
12 12.tif 32.09 40.97
13 14.tif 48.48 42.03
14 15.tif 47.34 39.92
No. Image Right Left
15 16.tif 35.59 36.22
16 17.tif 42.25 55.90
17 18.tif 28.12 30.18
18 19.tif 26.79 26.48
19 20.tif 49.20 51.54
20 21.tif 19.22 27.31
21 22.tif 27.93 34.43
22 35.tif 54.70 45.35
23 61.tif 22.05 25.31
24 62.tif 25.78 25.61
25 84.tif 27.23 30.13
Results- cortical width by pixels
![Page 12: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Image Cortical Erosion
Cortical Width
1.tif 1 4.26
2.tif 3 2.22
3.tif 1 4.27
4.tif 1 6.04
5.tif 2 3.84
6.tif 1 4.66
7.tif 1 4.12
8.tif 2 3.42
9.tif 1 3.88
10.tif 2 4.63
11.tif 1 3.95
12.tif 2 3.07
14.tif 2 3.47
15.tif 1 6.48
16.tif 1 4.33
17.tif 1 4.9
18.tif 2 2.81
Image Cortical Erosion
Cortical Width
19.tif 1 2.57
20.tif 1 3.14
21.tif 3 2.39
22.tif 2 4.25
35.tif 2 3.94
61.tif 2 3.05
62.tif 1 4.33
84.tif 2 4.29
Previous Results
![Page 13: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Computer-aided system
Right cortical width
Left cortical width
Threshold (pixels)
Sensitivity %
Specificity %
Threshold (pixels)
Sensitivity %
Specificity %
Lumbar spine 40 90 60 40 90 60
Femoral 37.5 80 73.3 41 90 53.3
![Page 15: Compare with one point measure.ppt](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032516/563dbb03550346aa9aa98aab/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Correlation of Computer-aided system with lumbar spine and femoral bone
Right cortical Left
Lumbar spine 0.47 0.65
Femoral 0.4 0.55
Right cortical Left
Lumbar spine 0.41 0.67
Femoral 0.44 0.58
Correlation of Manual measurement with lumbar spine and femoral bone