comparison of bayesian and classical meta-analysis-powerpoint
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
1/23
COMPARISON OFBAYESIAN AND CLASSICAL
META-ANALYSISJoe P King
Educational Psychology
Measurement, Statistics, and Research Design
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
2/23
Meta Analysis
Overview of Meta-Analysis
Traditional Meta Analysis
Bayesian Meta Analysis
Why are they different? Why is it important?
Comparing methods using experimental data
Implications
Conclusions
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
3/23
Introduction
Meta analysis is used in every field of scientific research
Meta analysis allows us to compile many studies to test a
theory across many studies.
The goal is to take the many studies which have looked atan outcome variable and try to inform on a theory.
This satisfies one of the tenants of science that research
must be reproducible and not one study can confirm or
deny a theory
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
4/23
Introduction
Methods of Meta Analysis
Problem formulation
Data collection and selection of relevant studies
Evaluation of data collected
Interpretation and analysis
Presentation of results
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
5/23
Example
Study by Rakes, Valentine, McGatha, and Ronau (2010)
analyzed different methods of algebra instruction they
found 82 relevant studies, 109 independent effect sizes,
and a total sample size of 22424 students.
Searched electronic journals for relevant articles,
calculated effect sizes and in some cases weighted effect
sizes due to different sampling techniques or small
sample size
In 5 strategies of teaching algebra they found statisticalsignificance for each in at least one model, which should
inform on how math instructors teach algebra.
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
6/23
Treatment
Communities that Care
Seeks to prevent anti-social behaviors among the youth
in a community and strengthen pro-social behaviors.
Provides community leaders with training, materials andtechnical assistance in the advancement of the program
(Coie, Watt, & West, 1993; Mrazek, Haggerty, &
Committee on Prevention of Mental Disorders, 1994).
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
7/23
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
8/23
Outcomes
Two Measures were Used for this analysis
Delinquent behavior
Fifth grade, delinquent behaviors were categorized as
stealing, property damage, shoplifting, and attacking
someone with intention of hurting them.
Eighth grade, delinquent behaviors were carrying a gun to
school, beating up someone, stealing a vehicle, selling
drugs, and being arrested.
Binge Drinking - 5 or more drinks at once occasion, andthe measurement was how many instances of binge
drinking per month
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
9/23
Traditional Meta Analysis
Effect size was collected for each pair of cities
Used multilevel modeling with two levels Level 1 was the pairs of cities and accounting for the
within experiment variance.
Level 2 sought to account for the between experiment
variance.
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
10/23
Why Bayes?
Specify Priors (this analysis uses non-informative priors)
Can see the effect of adding each experiment on effect
size and precision associated with the estimate.
Less Uncertainty in the experiment Easier to implement
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
11/23
Bayesian Analysis
Replication of Howard, Maxwell, & Fleming (2000)
They used Bayesian Calculations to calculate a posterior
distribution of 3 studies.
Basics of Bayesian Approach Prior Distribution Initial estimate of effect size
Likelihood Principle Effect size estimate of data
Posterior Distribution Final Effect Size Combining
Prior and Likelihood.
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
12/23
Calculations
What we know
Effect size for each Comparison
Uncertainty within Effect Size
What we will calculate
Precision
Posterior Effect Size for Each City then All
Cities
Uncertainty Around the Effect Size
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
13/23
Precision
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
14/23
Effect Size
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
15/23
Results Delinquent Behavior
Effect Size SE
Traditional Meta Analysis -0.31 0.1400
Bayesian Meta Analysis -0.17 0.0025
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
16/23
Results Binge Drinking
Effect Size SE
Bayesian Meta Analysis -0.43 0.0011
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
17/23
Results for Each ComparisonPosterior Distributions for Deliquent Behavior
Comparison Number
EffectSize
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
18/23
Cumulative Results After Each IterationPosterior Distributions for Deliquent Behavior
Posterior Iteration
EffectSize
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
19/23
Results for Each ComparisonPosterior Distributions for Binge Drinking
Comparison Number
EffectSize
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
20/23
Cumulative Results After Each IterationPosterior Distributions for Binge Drinking
Posterior Iteration
EffectSize
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
21/23
Summary
Meta Analysis is important to research
Many methods exist yet pose limitations
Bayesian approach is an additional method that shows
promise.
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
22/23
Thank you
Dr. Charles Peck
Dr. Robert Abbott
Dr. Joe Lott
Kelly Jewell Mom and Dad
-
8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint
23/23
References
Coie, J., Watt, N., & West, S. (1993). The science of prevention: A conceptual
framework and some directions for a national research program.American
Psychologist, 48(10), 1013-1022.
Hedges, L. V., & Hedberg, E. C. (2007). Intraclass Correlation Values for Planning
Group-Randomized Trials in Education. Educational Evaluation and Policy
Analysis, 29(1), 60-87.
Howard, G. S., Maxwell, S. E., & Fleming, K. J. (2000). The proof of the pudding: an
illustration of the relative strengths of null hypothesis, meta-analysis, and
Bayesian analysis. Psychological Methods, 5(3), 315-332.
Mrazek, P. J., Haggerty, R. J., & Committee on Prevention of Mental Disorders, I. on
M. (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive
intervention research. Washington, D.C. National Academy Press.Noble, J. H. (2006). Meta-analysis: Methods, strengths, weaknesses, and political
uses. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 147(1), 7-20.
R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical
Computing. Vienna Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.