comparison of bayesian and classical meta-analysis-powerpoint

Upload: joe-king

Post on 04-Jun-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    1/23

    COMPARISON OFBAYESIAN AND CLASSICAL

    META-ANALYSISJoe P King

    Educational Psychology

    Measurement, Statistics, and Research Design

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    2/23

    Meta Analysis

    Overview of Meta-Analysis

    Traditional Meta Analysis

    Bayesian Meta Analysis

    Why are they different? Why is it important?

    Comparing methods using experimental data

    Implications

    Conclusions

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    3/23

    Introduction

    Meta analysis is used in every field of scientific research

    Meta analysis allows us to compile many studies to test a

    theory across many studies.

    The goal is to take the many studies which have looked atan outcome variable and try to inform on a theory.

    This satisfies one of the tenants of science that research

    must be reproducible and not one study can confirm or

    deny a theory

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    4/23

    Introduction

    Methods of Meta Analysis

    Problem formulation

    Data collection and selection of relevant studies

    Evaluation of data collected

    Interpretation and analysis

    Presentation of results

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    5/23

    Example

    Study by Rakes, Valentine, McGatha, and Ronau (2010)

    analyzed different methods of algebra instruction they

    found 82 relevant studies, 109 independent effect sizes,

    and a total sample size of 22424 students.

    Searched electronic journals for relevant articles,

    calculated effect sizes and in some cases weighted effect

    sizes due to different sampling techniques or small

    sample size

    In 5 strategies of teaching algebra they found statisticalsignificance for each in at least one model, which should

    inform on how math instructors teach algebra.

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    6/23

    Treatment

    Communities that Care

    Seeks to prevent anti-social behaviors among the youth

    in a community and strengthen pro-social behaviors.

    Provides community leaders with training, materials andtechnical assistance in the advancement of the program

    (Coie, Watt, & West, 1993; Mrazek, Haggerty, &

    Committee on Prevention of Mental Disorders, 1994).

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    7/23

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    8/23

    Outcomes

    Two Measures were Used for this analysis

    Delinquent behavior

    Fifth grade, delinquent behaviors were categorized as

    stealing, property damage, shoplifting, and attacking

    someone with intention of hurting them.

    Eighth grade, delinquent behaviors were carrying a gun to

    school, beating up someone, stealing a vehicle, selling

    drugs, and being arrested.

    Binge Drinking - 5 or more drinks at once occasion, andthe measurement was how many instances of binge

    drinking per month

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    9/23

    Traditional Meta Analysis

    Effect size was collected for each pair of cities

    Used multilevel modeling with two levels Level 1 was the pairs of cities and accounting for the

    within experiment variance.

    Level 2 sought to account for the between experiment

    variance.

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    10/23

    Why Bayes?

    Specify Priors (this analysis uses non-informative priors)

    Can see the effect of adding each experiment on effect

    size and precision associated with the estimate.

    Less Uncertainty in the experiment Easier to implement

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    11/23

    Bayesian Analysis

    Replication of Howard, Maxwell, & Fleming (2000)

    They used Bayesian Calculations to calculate a posterior

    distribution of 3 studies.

    Basics of Bayesian Approach Prior Distribution Initial estimate of effect size

    Likelihood Principle Effect size estimate of data

    Posterior Distribution Final Effect Size Combining

    Prior and Likelihood.

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    12/23

    Calculations

    What we know

    Effect size for each Comparison

    Uncertainty within Effect Size

    What we will calculate

    Precision

    Posterior Effect Size for Each City then All

    Cities

    Uncertainty Around the Effect Size

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    13/23

    Precision

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    14/23

    Effect Size

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    15/23

    Results Delinquent Behavior

    Effect Size SE

    Traditional Meta Analysis -0.31 0.1400

    Bayesian Meta Analysis -0.17 0.0025

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    16/23

    Results Binge Drinking

    Effect Size SE

    Bayesian Meta Analysis -0.43 0.0011

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    17/23

    Results for Each ComparisonPosterior Distributions for Deliquent Behavior

    Comparison Number

    EffectSize

    -1.0

    -0.8

    -0.6

    -0.4

    -0.2

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    18/23

    Cumulative Results After Each IterationPosterior Distributions for Deliquent Behavior

    Posterior Iteration

    EffectSize

    -0.3

    -0.2

    -0.1

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    19/23

    Results for Each ComparisonPosterior Distributions for Binge Drinking

    Comparison Number

    EffectSize

    -2.0

    -1.5

    -1.0

    -0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    20/23

    Cumulative Results After Each IterationPosterior Distributions for Binge Drinking

    Posterior Iteration

    EffectSize

    -0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    21/23

    Summary

    Meta Analysis is important to research

    Many methods exist yet pose limitations

    Bayesian approach is an additional method that shows

    promise.

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    22/23

    Thank you

    Dr. Charles Peck

    Dr. Robert Abbott

    Dr. Joe Lott

    Kelly Jewell Mom and Dad

  • 8/13/2019 Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Meta-Analysis-Powerpoint

    23/23

    References

    Coie, J., Watt, N., & West, S. (1993). The science of prevention: A conceptual

    framework and some directions for a national research program.American

    Psychologist, 48(10), 1013-1022.

    Hedges, L. V., & Hedberg, E. C. (2007). Intraclass Correlation Values for Planning

    Group-Randomized Trials in Education. Educational Evaluation and Policy

    Analysis, 29(1), 60-87.

    Howard, G. S., Maxwell, S. E., & Fleming, K. J. (2000). The proof of the pudding: an

    illustration of the relative strengths of null hypothesis, meta-analysis, and

    Bayesian analysis. Psychological Methods, 5(3), 315-332.

    Mrazek, P. J., Haggerty, R. J., & Committee on Prevention of Mental Disorders, I. on

    M. (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive

    intervention research. Washington, D.C. National Academy Press.Noble, J. H. (2006). Meta-analysis: Methods, strengths, weaknesses, and political

    uses. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 147(1), 7-20.

    R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical

    Computing. Vienna Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.