comparison of experimental and analytical substation … · who we are 3 • tony pribble •...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation Bus
Temperatures
Presented by: Joe Goldenburg, Tony Pribble
IEEE PES Scottsdale, AZ May, 2018
1
![Page 2: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Who we are• Joe Goldenburg• Leads GA Tech NEETRAC’s
Mechanical Section• BME GA Tech• MSOR GA Tech• Licensed Engineer, Georgia• 26 years experience• Chair ANSI C119.0 OH Connectors• Member ASTM B01 OH Conductors• Member Overhead Lines
Committee
2
![Page 3: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Who we are3
• Tony Pribble• Research Engineer –
NEETRAC Lab• BSME Iowa State
University• MSE‐MS Georgia Tech – In
progress• EIT
![Page 4: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
NEETRAC Overview
• Non-profit, 37 member industry consortium at Georgia Tech– 37 Members – Utilities and Manufacturers– Represent ~65% of US + Canadian electric customers
• Provide third‐party testing and application research services.
4
Electrical SectionMechanical Section
![Page 5: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
NEETRAC Overview5
![Page 6: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Agenda1. History of the project2. Heat transfer refresher
– Convection – Radiation
3. Three methods– 605– CFD– Experiments
6
![Page 7: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Agenda7
4. How 605 works5. How CFD works6. How the experiments work7. Results8. Discussion / question9. Lessons learned
![Page 8: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
History of the Project
• In 2012, NEETRAC members funded a project to develop a bus ampacity software package.– Automates IEEE 605 with some slight modifications.
• CFD simulations were run to determine the steady state bus temperature.– Predicted values from 605 were used to verify the results.
• CFD and 605 didn’t match in some cases.– 605 made several simplistic assumptions not made in CFD.
• A wind tunnel was built and experimental data collected.
8
![Page 9: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
History of the Project
• The temperature differences were confirmed in experiments.
• NEETRAC members requested we share the data with the 605 committee.
• This presentation is meant to inform the committee of available data and resources.
9
![Page 10: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Agenda
1. History of the project2. Heat transfer refresher
– Convection – Radiation
3. Three methods– 605– CFD– Experiments
10
4. How 605 works5. How CFD works6. How the experiments work7. Results8. Discussion / question9. Lessons learned
![Page 11: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Steady‐State Heat Transfer
Qresistance
Qsun
Qconvection
Qradiation
![Page 12: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Steady‐State Heat Transfer
Qresistance
Qsun
Qconvection
Qradiation
Ignore
Ignore
![Page 13: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Forced Convection13
Tw
Tair, Vair QcIf Tair < Tw
Convection Coefficient [w/m2K]
![Page 14: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Forced Convection14
Tw
Tair, VairQc1
h is different
Tw
Tair, Vair
Qc2
![Page 15: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Forced Convection
The convection coefficient, h, is affected by:• Geometry• Fluid properties• Fluid velocity
15
![Page 16: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Forced Convection
• How is h determined?• The Nusselt number is a dimensionless quantity used to find h.
16
Convection Coefficient
Characteristic Length
Thermal Conductivity of the Fluid
![Page 17: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Forced Convection
Experiments have shown a relationship between the Nusselt, Reynolds, and Prandtl numbers to find h.
17
Fluid Velocity Characteristic Length
Kinematic Viscosity
Prandtl –Typically taken as 0.7 for air
![Page 18: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Forced Convection18
Flat Plate Nusselt Correlation
Tw
Tair, Vair QcIf Tair < Tw
![Page 19: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Forced Convection19
Tw
Tair, Vair
Qc
Round Body Nusselt Correlation
![Page 20: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Steady‐State Heat Transfer
Qresistance
Qsun
Qconvection
Qradiation
Ignore
![Page 21: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Radiation21
T
Tsur Qr
Emissivity Stefan-Boltzmann Constant
Radiation is the emission of energy through EM waves; In substations, this happens at infrared wavelengths.
![Page 22: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Steady‐State Heat Transfer
Qresistance
Qconvection
Qradiation
![Page 23: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Agenda
1. History of the project2. Heat transfer refresher
– Convection – Radiation
3. Three methods– 605– CFD– Experiments
23
4. How 605 works5. How CFD works6. How the experiments work7. Results8. Discussion / question9. Lessons learned
![Page 24: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Heat Transfer Solution MethodsThree methods to solve the steady‐state heat transfer problem.
• IEEE 605• Experimental• CFD/FEA
24
CFD/FEA Experimental
IEEE 605
![Page 25: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
IEEE 605 Calculation
IEEE 605 uses the Nusselt correlation for a flat plate to find h.– All bus geometries (except round) are broken into a series of horizontal flat plates.
– Disregards orientation
25
Nusselt correlation for a flat plate
![Page 26: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
IEEE 605 Calculation
AB
CD
Flow Direction
Flow Direction
=++
A C
B
D
![Page 27: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
IEEE 605 Calculation
A
B
C
D
+
++A C
B
D=
Flow Direction
![Page 28: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
IEEE 605 Calculation28
AB
CD
A
B D
C
![Page 29: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
IEEE 605 Calculation29
Round Body Nusselt Correlation
![Page 30: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
IEEE 605 Calculation30
Flow Direction
++
++
![Page 31: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
IEEE 605 Calculation31
These regions are approximated by free (natural) convection
![Page 32: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
IEEE 605 Calculation32
++
Force Convection
+
+Natural Convection – Horizontal Surfaces
+ +Notice these are all downward facing surfaces.
![Page 33: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Agenda
1. History of the project2. Heat transfer refresher
– Convection – Radiation
3. Three methods– 605– CFD– Experiments
33
4. How 605 works5. How CFD works6. How the experiments work7. Results8. Discussion / question9. Lessons learned
![Page 34: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Δ(Qres ‐ Qconv)
Δ T4
Δ Qrad
Steady‐State Heat Transfer
Qresistance
Qconvection
Qradiation
I2RΔT
ΔR
ΔI2R
TΔT
Δ air prop.
Δh
T4
![Page 35: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
CFD Simulation35
Flow Direction
![Page 36: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
CFD Simulation36
Fluid Velocity
Bus Temperature
![Page 37: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
CFD Simulation37
Swirling & Recirculation
![Page 38: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
CFD Simulation38
Un-even heat flux
![Page 39: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Agenda
1. History of the project2. Heat transfer refresher
– Convection – Radiation
3. Three methods– 605– CFD– Experiments
39
4. How 605 works5. How CFD works6. How the experiments work7. Results8. Discussion / question9. Lessons learned
![Page 40: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Experimental40
![Page 41: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Wind Tunnel Anatomy
Flow Straightener
Compression Zone
Sample Chamber
Bus
Expansion Zone
![Page 42: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Wind Tunnel Anatomy
Expansion Zone
Sample Chamber
Fan
![Page 43: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Experimental
• We assume:– Heat conduction from the bus is negligible.– Surface‐to‐surface radiation model.– Input air flow is uniformly laminar.
• Wind tunnel data and CFD results are compared for agreement. – This helps us check our assumptions and verify the results.
43
![Page 44: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Experimental44
Geometry Wind Speed Targets
Temperature Targets
0.61 m/s
70 C110 C140 C190 C
1 m/s
70 C110 C140 C190 C
2 m/s
70 C110 C140 C190 C
Rectangular Horizontal
![Page 45: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Experimental45
Geometry Wind Speed Targets
Temperature Targets
0.61 m/s
70 C90 C120 C160 C
1 m/s
60 C90 C120 C140 C
2 m/s
50 C90 C110 C140 C
Rectangular Vertical
![Page 46: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Experimental46
Geometry Wind Speed Targets
Temperature Targets
0.61 m/s
80 C100 C120 C140 C
1 m/s
70 C90 C120 C140 C
2 m/s70 C120 C140 C
UAB Closed
![Page 47: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Experimental47
Geometry Wind Speed Targets
Temperature Targets
0.61 m/s90 C120 C140 C
1 m/s 90 C120 C140 C
2 m/s90 C120 C140 C
UAB Open
![Page 48: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Experimental48
Geometry Wind Speed Targets
Temperature Targets
0.61 m/s90 C120 C140 C
1 m/s 90 C120 C140 C
2 m/s90 C120 C140 C
IWBC
In Progress
![Page 49: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Agenda
1. History of the project2. Heat transfer refresher
– Convection – Radiation
3. Three methods– 605– CFD– Experiments
49
4. How 605 works5. How CFD works6. How the experiments work7. Results8. Discussion / question9. Lessons learned
![Page 50: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Results• On the proceeding slides, the steady state bus temperature is displayed by method (605, CFD, Experimental)
• Experiments were run first. From these runs, input current was recorded. This current was then used in CFD & 605 to determine the bus temperature.
• Nussult correlations were developed from this data.
50
![Page 51: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
1 21 086420
200
1 75
1 50
1 25
1 00
75
50
Case
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
CFDExperimentalIEEE 605
Method
Horizontal Rectangular Results51
0.6 m/s 1 m/s 2 m/s
*Each point represents the steady state temperature determined by the respective method
22 C difference between 605 & exp.
![Page 52: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
1 21 086420
1 75
1 50
1 25
1 00
75
50
Case
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
CFDExperimentalIEEE 605
Method
Vertical Rectangular Results52
0.6 m/s 1 m/s 2 m/s
17 C difference between 605 & exp.
![Page 53: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
1 21 086420
1 50
1 40
1 30
1 20
1 1 0
1 00
90
80
70
60
Case
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
CFDExperimentalIEEE 605
Method
UAB Closed Results53
0.6 m/s 1 m/s 2 m/s31 C difference between 605 & exp.
![Page 54: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
9876543210
1 50
1 40
1 30
1 20
1 1 0
1 00
90
80
70
60
Case
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
CFDExperimentalIEEE 605
Method
UAB Open Results54
0.6 m/s 1 m/s 2 m/s
33 C difference between 605 & exp.
![Page 55: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
IWBC Results
In progress
55
![Page 56: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Experimental Results
• For vertical rectangular, IEEE 605 is conservative.– Translates to lost ampacity
• For horizontal rectangular, closed UAB, open UAB, and IWBC IEEE 605 is aggressive.– Predicts lower steady‐state temperature than found in experiments
56
![Page 57: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Survey
• NEETRAC sent out a survey to determine the popularity of each style bus.
57
![Page 58: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Total Number of Substations
(3 Responses)
58
![Page 59: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Average Percentage of Bus Used
(3 Responses)
59
![Page 60: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Flat Plate Correlation
• Advantages of flat plate correlations:– Can be built up to approximate complex geometries
– Inexpensive – Computationally simplistic
• Disadvantages of flat plate correlations:– Inaccurate, upwards of 20% error
60
![Page 61: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Whole Body Correlation61
• Advantages of whole body correlations– More accurate– Computationally less complex (one formula)
• Disadvantages of whole body correlations– Only good for specific geometry, orientation, and Reynolds number range.
• Given the limited number of geometries, NEETRAC recommends using whole body correlations, as is currently done with round.
![Page 62: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
9.59.08.58.07.5
4.4
4.2
4.0
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.2
3.0
S 0.0572904R-Sq 97.7%R-Sq(adj) 97.6%
Ln(Re)
ln(N
u/Pr
^0.
33)
Regression95% CI
Rectangular - Horizontalln(Nu/Pr^0.33) = - 1 .834 + 0.6553 Ln(Re)
Correlations62
exp.
![Page 63: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
9.59.08.58.07.5
4.75
4.50
4.25
4.00
3.75
3.50
S 0.0982542R-Sq 90.8%R-Sq(adj) 90.4%
Ln(Re)
ln(N
u/Pr
^0.
33)
Regression95% CI
Rectangular - Verticalln(Nu/Pr^0.33) = - 0.5852 + 0.5504 Ln(Re)
Correlations63
![Page 64: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Correlations64
9.259.008.758.508.258.007.757.50
4.25
4.00
3.75
3.50
3.25
3.00
S 0.0641 092R-Sq 97.4%R-Sq(adj) 97.3%
Ln(Re)
ln(N
u/Pr
^0.
33)
Regression95% CI
UAB Closedln(Nu/Pr^0.33) = - 2.354 + 0.71 21 Ln(Re)
![Page 65: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
9.08.58.07.5
4.00
3.75
3.50
3.25
3.00
2.75
2.50
S 0.0729692R-Sq 96.9%R-Sq(adj) 96.7%
Ln(Re)
ln(N
u/Pr
^0.
33)
Regression95% CI
UAB - Openln(Nu/Pr^0.33) = - 2.523 + 0.71 54 Ln(Re)
Correlations65
![Page 66: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Correlations
In progress
66
![Page 67: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Agenda
1. History of the project2. Heat transfer refresher
– Convection – Radiation
3. Three methods– 605– CFD– Experiments
67
4. How 605 works5. How CFD works6. How the experiments work7. Results8. Discussion / question9. Lessons learned
![Page 68: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Recommendations
• IEEE 605 move to whole body correlations.• NEETRAC member have agreed to provide our data to the substation committee.
• NEETRAC members have funded our participation in the next revision of 605.
68
![Page 69: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Questions?
69
![Page 70: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Agenda
1. History of the project2. Heat transfer refresher
– Convection – Radiation
3. Three methods– 605– CFD– Experiments
70
4. How 605 works5. How CFD works6. How the experiments work7. Results8. Discussion / question9. Lessons learned
![Page 71: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Radiation
• The below equation assumes radiation from the body is lost to the surroundings.
• This is not always the case.
71
![Page 72: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Radiation72
How much radiation is “seen” by the other surface is determined by it’s view factor.
![Page 73: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Radiation
• The view‐factor is the percentage of energy emitted by one surface that irradiates another.
• This is known as a Surface‐to‐Surface model.• Modern day simulation software can calculate view factors for complex geometries.– Not available during the creation of 605
73
![Page 74: Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Substation … · Who we are 3 • Tony Pribble • Research Engineer – NEETRAC Lab • BSME Iowa State University • MSE‐MS Georgia](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011803/5b8b4d5609d3f229498b9cd6/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Radiation74
Changing ε from 0.3 to 0.5 results in about 10oC change (As determined in CFD simulations)