comparison of performance between zn microscopy and ... · detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis...
TRANSCRIPT
Albert Okumu
06th EDCTP Forum
09th - 13th Oct , 2011
Comparison of performance between ZN microscopy and GeneXpert in MTB detection in sputum specimens at KEMRI/CDC TB laboratory
Okumu A1, Orina F1, Musau S1, Cavanaugh S2, McCarthy K2, Heather A2, Modi S2 , Laserson K1, Cain K1
Affiliation:
1 – KEMRI/CDC Research and Public Health Collaboration
2 – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC-Atlanta
Tuberculosis is a major public health threat in Kenya, where 100,000 new cases are reported annually, and approximately 50-60% are HIV-infected.
Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) usually depends on Ziehl Neelsen (ZN) microscopy, but this has been shown to be insensitive, especially in persons with HIV.
Xpert MTB/RIF, an automated PCR-based assay, with high sensitivity and turn-around time of under 2 hours, has potential to revolutionize Mtb detection.
We studied the added value of this test compared to ZN microscopy in people with HIV enrolled in a study of TB screening and diagnosis in Nyanza province, Kenya.
Background
TB Burden in Kenya
• Kenya ranked 13th out of the 22 countries with the most TB, according to the WHO
• Nyanza Province has greatest TB burden in Kenya
– TB notification: 440/100,000
– 20% of all notified TB cases in Kenya
– Only 2.6% of notified TB cases were reported in children aged 0-14 years
• 75% of TB patients are HIV co-infected, while (52%) nationally.
• To compare yield of ZN smear microscopy
and Xpert MTB/RIF assay for Mtb in people
with HIV.
Purpose:
1. ZN smear with
positive TB bacilli
2. Xpert PCR result with
Rif resistance detected
• Sputum specimens from people with HIV
were subjected to both ZN microscopy and
Xpert MTB/RIF at KEMRI/CDC TB laboratory.
• We compared the diagnostic yield of these
tests.
Methodology:
1. Microscopy ( ZN) 2. Cepheid GeneXpert
MTB Rif machine
Procedure for GeneXpert processing
1. Starting up system 2. Identifying
corresponding cartridge
4. Loading cartridge 3. Scanning cartridge
onto the machine
Boehme C, Nabeta P, Hilleman D, et al., NEJM 2010; 363:1005-1015
• From October 2010 to December 2010, a
total of 262 specimens were tested with ZN
microscopy and Xpert MTB/RIF.
• Of those, 34 of 262 (13%) were positive by
Xpert MTB/RIF but only 8 of 262 (3%) were
also positive by ZN microscopy.
• 26/34(76%) TB diagnoses would have been
missed by ZN microscopy alone.
Results
Results of Specimen Testing
• More work to validate the Xpert assay(s), as
it seems appropriate for POC centres, since
it is user friendly, fast and efficient
• Since it shows MTBc id and Rif. resistance
results, its helpful in pt. management
Recommendations
• Xpert MTB/RIF more than quadrupled,
(76%) of TB diagnostic testing in specimens
from people with HIV. Given the high
mortality rate of undiagnosed TB in people
with HIV, this could save many lives.
Conclusions/summary:
• EDCTP
• Ministry of Health
• HIV patients(KDH-MoH)
• CDC-Atlanta team
• KEMRI-CDC, Kisian
• Kisian TB Lab staff
Acknowledgements
For more information please contact:
KEMRI/CDC
P.O. Box 1578
Kisumu, Kenya
E-mail: [email protected]
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official
position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Thank you