comparison of the reliability of three methods for the ...llrs.org/llrs 2016 pdfs/comparison of the...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ComparisonoftheReliabilityofThreeMethodsfortheAssessmentoftheLowerLimbLength:
EOSwithNewMicro–DoseProtocolvs.Long–StandingRadiographvs.CTScanogram
BurakAbay,MehmetFa1hErol,Me1nKucukkayaIstanbulBilimUniversity
Dept.ofOrtopedicsandTraumatology,Istanbul,TURKEY
25thAnnualScien1ficMee1ngofLimbLengtheningandReconstruc1onSociety–Charleston,SC
22July2016
![Page 2: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Disclosure• Nofinancialrela1onshipsintereststodisclose.
![Page 3: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction• Newinternalfixa1ondevices
(IMLengtheningnails,anatomicplates)• Acutecorrec1on&precisepreopera1veplanning• Needforaccurateradiologicalimagingmethods
![Page 4: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ProblemsinacutecorrectionandinternalGixation
1)Preopera1veplanningismadebylongstandingroentgenogram• Correc1onisperformed
• Undergeneralanesthesia• Innon-weightbearingsupineposi1on• WiththeFluoroscopyimages
2)Decisiontoendthedistrac1onperiodofthelengtheningnails
![Page 5: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Methodsusedformeasuringlowerlimblength
Clinicaltechniques
• TapeMeasure• Standingonblocks
ImagingMethods
• LongStandingroentgenogram
• Slitscanography• Orthoroentgenogram• Scanogram• ComputerizedTomography(CT)scanogram
• Ultrasound• MRIScanogram• Biplanardigitalroentgenogram
• EOS
![Page 6: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Imagingmethodsfordeformityandlimblengtheningsurgery
• Longstandingroentgenogram• ComputerizedTomography(CT)scanogram• EOS• Slitscanography(supineposi1on)• Orthoroentgenogram• Scanogram• MRIScanogram
![Page 7: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Studymethod
1. Inter-raterreliability:agreementbetween
thereaders
2. Intra-raterreliability:agreementinthe
reader.(test–retestorreproducibility)
3. MeanAbsoluteDifferences(MAD):
betweenthethreeimagingmodali1es
![Page 8: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Materials
• 14lowerlimbsof7pa1ents(7men;meanage,31years;range,25-46years)• Threemethodsofradiologicalimagingmodali1es• EOS(micro-doseprotocol)• CTscanogram• Longstandingroentgenogram
![Page 9: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Assessment• Lengthsofbones(lowerlimb,femur,1bia)
• Radiologictechnician• Orthopedicsurgeon• Seniorresident(2seperateoccasionsataminimumof4weeksapart)
• Sta1s1cs• Meanabsolutedifference(ANOVA)• Bland-Altmananalyses
(Agreementbetweenreadersandmodali1es)
![Page 10: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
EOStechnique
• Biplanarradiography• Scannerpladorm• Wholelowerlimb• Feetsamecoronalplane• Micro-doseprotocol
![Page 11: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
EOSwithmicrodoseprotocol
![Page 12: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
LongStandingroentgenogramtechnique
• Single-exposure• Standingfull-lengthteleroentgenogram• Patellasfacingforward• Beamtothekneejoint• Fullextension• 300cmdistancefromtube• 20mmradioopaquesphere
![Page 13: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
LongStandingroentgenogramtechnique
• Single-exposure• Standingfull-lengthteleroentgenogram• Patellasfacingforward• Beamtothekneejoint• Fullextension• 300cmdistancefromtube• 20mmradioopaquesphere
![Page 14: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
LongStandingroentgenogram
![Page 15: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
CTscanogramtechnique
• feetenteringthegantryfirst• patellasorientedanteriorly• asingleposteroanteriorscoutimage• Non-weightbearingposi1on
![Page 16: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
LengthmeasurementsandanalysisLongstandingroentgenogram CTScanogram EOS
PACS®CORELDRAWX7®
PACS®
DrorPaley,PrinciplesofDeformityCorrecRon
![Page 17: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Results
• ThemeanabsolutedifferencesforthestandingroentgenogramandCTscanogramwereallsignificantlydifferentfromthatofEOS(p<0.05).
• 6,3mm/863,7mm(wholelowerlimb)=0,7%differencebetweenEOSandLongstandingroentgenogram
• Meanabsolutedifferencesamongthreemodali1es
![Page 18: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ResultsInter-raterreliability
• Inter-raterreliability,quan1fiedwithIntraclassCorrela1onCoefficients,showedexcellent(>0.90)agreementforstandingroentgenogram,CTscanogramandEOSwithmicrodoseprotocol.
• LSR=EOS=CT
![Page 19: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
ResultsIntra-raterreliability
• Intra-raterreliability,quan1fiedwithIntraclassCorrela1onCoefficients,showedexcellent(>0.90)agreementforstandingroentgenogram,CTscanogramandEOSwithmicrodoseprotocol.
• LSR=EOS=CT
![Page 20: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
LongStandingroentgenogram
• Magnifica1onerrordependson
- Lengthofthelowerlimb- Thedistancetothetube- Divergenceofthebeam
300cm
Sabharwaletal,2008
![Page 22: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• ComparisonofEOSwithCTscanogram• InterraterandintraraterreliabilitywereexcellentforbothtotallengthandintrabeaddistanceonbothEOSandCTscanogram
• (r>0.99andP<0.001)
![Page 23: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
• UsingPhantomlimb(withsawbones)• EOSwasthemostaccuratemodality• ThemeandifferencesonbothEOSsenngs
weresignificantlydifferentfromthoseonCTscanograms,notclinicallyimportant.
• Nocalibra1onmethodwasused.
![Page 24: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
EOSwithmicrodoseprotocol
Ar#factinslowmode
EOS–Slow EOS-microdose
16y,FSamepa1ent
![Page 25: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
![Page 26: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
23y,F
EOS=Biplanarradiography
LSR EOS
![Page 27: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Idealmethod1. Accurate2. Excellentreliabilityandexcellentreproducibility3. Readilyavailableinthephysician’soffice4. Technicallyeasy5. Itscostandradia1ondosageshouldbelow
![Page 28: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Conclusion• ThereliabilityoftheLSRissimilartoothertwomethodsifappropriatecalibra1onisdone.
• WiththecalibraRon1mm≈1mm• EOSmightbehelpfulduringtheendofthedistrac1onperiod• Single–exposureLSRwiththecalibra1onmightbegoodchoicefortheassessmentandpreopera1veplanningofthelowerlimbdeformi1es.
![Page 29: Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the ...llrs.org/LLRS 2016 PDFS/Comparison of the Reliability of Three Methods for the...1) Preoperave planning is made by long standing](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050517/5fa15d7b799def27576774c5/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Thankyou