comparison of transportation
TRANSCRIPT
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 1/26
HABITATINTL.
Vol.
12, No. 3, pp. 65-90.1988
Printed in Great Britain.
0197-3975188 3.00 + 0.00
Pergamon Press plc
Urban Transport and Manpower
Development and Training Needs of
Four Asian Cities: A Case Study of
Bandung, Medan, Semarang ahd
Surabaya, Indonesia*
HARRY T. DIMITRIOUt
Centre for Urban Studies and Urban Planning University of Hong Kong
and Principal Consultant to Training and Development Consultants TDC S.A.
Lausanne Switzerland
SUMMARY
Mounting international evidence suggests that an important determinant of the
success of large scale urban development projects is the effectiveness of the
institutional framework and capacity of government (and its agencies at all
levels) to implement project proposals. In this regard, the limited professional
and management expertise in transport identified by the Manpower Develop-
ment and Training Study of the First Regional Cities Urban Transport Project in
Indonesia proved critical. The identified staff shortages (particularly among the
city authorities) were so acute, as to be in the author’s view almost as important
as the Project’s engineering and financial findings.
INTRODUCTION
Urbanisation trends
Indonesia is the fifth most populous nation in the world, with a current
population in the region of 165 million. Estimates indicate that approximately 33
million, or approximately 22% of the country’s total population live in urban
areas. By the year 2000 the urban population will rise to 72 million or 34% of the
national projected population of 214 million.
Almost half (48%) of the urban population resides in the 9 urban areas with
near/over 500,000 persons in size (see Table 1). These cities are growing at a
somewhat faster rate (4.1% annually 1971-1981) than the remaining smaller
settlements (3.5% annually) which are anticipated to absorb the majority of the
urban population growth over the next two decades.
*While the proposals outlined here are not those ultimately adopted in the implementation of the Project.
they constitute the basis upon which implementation has gone ahead. The author wishes to acknowledge the
permission given by the Directorate General of Highways (Bina Marga). Ministry of Public Works.
Government of Indonesia for the use of material quoted in this paper.
tThis study was undertaken when the author was a consultant on sub-contract to INDEC Associates of
Indonesia and Rennie Park and Associates GmbH, Switzerland.
*Address for correspondence: Centre of Urban Studies and Urban Planning, University of Hong Kong.
Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong.
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 2/26
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 3/26
Urban Tr ansport and M anpower Development
67
construction and maintenance of the national road network, as well as setting
national guidelines for urban infrastructure needs; while the Ministry of
Communications is responsible for planning all other transport modes and for
the regulation and control of all land-based transport, including public transport.
Responding to growing problems of urban movement, both the Directorate of
Highways in the Ministry of Public Works and the Directorate of Land Transport
of the Ministry of Communications, have set up urban directorates.
Other national agencies significantly involved in urban transport are the
National Police Force of the Ministry of Defence (for traffic enforcement), the
Ministry of Finance and Home Affairs (for the administration of grants and
other funding assistance to local governments) and the National Planning
Agency - BAPPENAS (for planning and programming aspects of national
agency investments in urban transport).
At the local level (see Fig. l), whilst there are minor variations in the
institutional framework for urban transport, the Municipal Public Works
Department [DPU(K)] is the city agency responsible for the design, construction
and maintenance of secondary and local urban road networks. The local Traffic
Police branch of the national police force is responsible for on-road traffic
control and regulation, while the provincial arm of the Ministry of Com-
munications Directorate of Land Transport (LLAJR) is responsible for the
operation and maintenance of traffic signals, public transport operations and off
road vehicle inspection. The Municipal City Planning Department (DTK) is
responsible for urban road planning, and the Municipal Development Planning
Agency (BAPPEDA II) is responsible for sectoral city investment programmes.
In some cities, a City Parking Unit exists in the form of a corporation, handling
all parking operations.
BACKGROUND TO PROJECT STUDY
Project history
The First Regional Cities Urban Transport Project in Indonesia developed
from
discussions held with government agencies as part of World Bank Mission
visits
- 1nstruct10n
-
Momtor and co-ordmatlon
.......... Guldance/adwce
--- - Report /liaison
KAPOLDA KANWIdDLLAJR KANWILI DPUP
Mayor
I I
L____,.. -_-__
Fig. 1. Provi ncial and cit y agency parti cipati on in Regional Cit ies Urban Transport Project.
(Source: I ND EC Associat es-Renni e Park GmbH . 1986a.J
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 4/26
68
Harry T Dimitriou
during 1981-1983. These missions assisted in identifying and preparing a
proposed urban transport project for Jakarta but were later expanded into
examining ways and means by which the fundamental urban transport
infrastructure problems of other major cities could be resolved. The discussions
initially centred around major urban road investments but were later broadened
to include a wider range of institutional and training considerations.
The Regional Cities Urban Transport Project in the first instance, was limited
to the four largest cities in the nation outside Jakarta - i.e. Bandung, Medan,
Semarang, and Surabaya, with subsequent studies to follow. The project cities
have an aggregate population of over 6 million, which is about 20% of the total
urban population of the nation.
Three of the cities are located in Java (the most densely populated of the
Indonesia islands) and the fourth, Medan in Sumatra (see Fig. 2). Bandung (1.5
million) is the capital of West Java and a major centre for higher education and
industry. Medan (1.4 million) is the capital of North Sumatra and an important
port and centre for oil and gas exploration. Semarang (1.03 million) is the capital
of Central Java and an important harbour. Surabaya (2.1 million) is the capital of
East Java and is a major national port.
Project objectives and components
The principal stated objectives of the First Regional Cities Urban Transport
Project include (IBRD, 1986):
(a) the implementation of a high priority programme of measures aimed at
improving traffic and transport infrastructure conditions in the project cities;
(b) the development of city professional and technical capabilities in the
planning, design, implementation, and maintenance of transport facilities
and services;
(c) the development of central government agency skills in: (i) providing tech-
nical assistance to cities in planning, designing, implementing, and operating
and maintaining their urban transport facilities and services, (ii) developing
national policy guidelines and technical standards for urban transport, and
(iii) preparing and appraising future urban transport projects; and
(d) the establishment of a process of co-ordinating the planning and program-
ming of central and local government agency investments in urban transport
infrastructure and services, so as to develop rolling multi-year compre-
hensive urban transport investment programmes in the nation’s principal
cities.
To date, urban transport problems in Indonesia have been addressed principally
by direct central government planning and investments with minimal city
involvement. The cities have not up until now, been encouraged to assume more
responsibility in the planning, financing and implementation of their own urban
transport facilities and services, on account of their known limited manpower
and financial resources.
The First Regional Cities Project, which is the first World Bank financed
urban transport project in Indonesia, seeks to alter the current situation by
substantially enhancing city capabilities and responsibilities; an approach which
is consistent with central government’s current objective of devolving more
development responsibilities to local governmental entities.
The Project scale (dramatically reduced from its initially discussed size of
US 220 million, to in the region of US SO million) is to address affordable
priority areas of the current backlog of road infrastructure, traffic engineering,
road maintenance needs, as well as related institutional strengthening require-
ments of urban transport. The Project is to be implemented over a 6 year
duration, with the training programme proposed for an initial period of 2 years.
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 5/26
Urban Transport and M anpower Development
69
6
I
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 6/26
70
physical components;
Harry T. Dimi t r iou
MANPOWER DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STUDY FINDINGS
Study method of approach
Given the broad scope of the Project and its complex institutional and technical
composition, the first task of the Manpower Development and Training Study
Team was to comprehend the Project and differentiate amongst its various parts
so as to ensure that the training proposals recommended were reflective of the
Project’s component activities.
In so doing, six major areas of manpower development and training concern
were noted (see Fig. 3):
(a) specific Project-related training for the implementation of the Project’s
FinoncvA management and control servicing
urban tronrport sub-sector
Urban tronsport sub-sector
Sub-sector institutional support
J
L
r
:
f I 1 Specific project related tmining for the implementation
of the project’s physical components
(2 ) Specrfrc project-related training fcr the rmplementation
of the project’sncn-physical compcnents
( 3 1 Specific project-related trolnlng n financial management
ond control servicmg he urbon transport sub-sector
( 4 ) General project-related tmining asprepomtion for
subsequent phases of the project and similar projects
-
(
5
)
General project-related training, providing urban
transport sub-sector institutional supportor the
project
-
(
6
)
Geneml institution-burlding training for the urban
transport sub-sector as a whole
Note : Shaded areas represent project-related manpower development and training areas
Fig. 3. Scope of study method of approach. Source: I ND EC Associat es - Rennie Park GmbH ,
1986a.
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 7/26
Urban Transport and M anpower Development
7
(b) specific Project-related training for the implementation of the Project’s non-
physical components;
(c) specific Project-related training in financial management and control
servicing the urban transport sub-sector;
(d) general Project-related training as preparation for subsequent phases of the
Project and similar projects;
(e) general Project-related training providing the urban transport sub-sector
with institutional support for the Project, and
(f) general institution-building training for the urban transport sub-sector as a
whole.
The overall method of approach employed (see Fig. 4) examined three aspects,
namely:
(a) the current need for city agency manpower development and training in
urban transport, and a projection of these requirements as perceived by the
agencies involved;
(b) the identification, design and formulation of Project-related manpower
development and training programme needs; and
(c) the shortfall between the training required by the Project and those training
opportunities available at existing public sector training centres in
Indonesia.
Owing to the substantial backlog of identified sub-sector training requirements
and the limited resources at hand with which to respond - the study ultimately
addressed the needs of (a) and (b) above, alone.
Cit y agency manpow er resource analysi s
An important finding of this part of the investigation was that the quantitative
and qualitative levels of agency staff shortages in transport of the cities under
study were in many instances found to be so great as to be believed to pose
considerable adverse impacts on the implementation of the RCUT Project if left
unattended.
The above conclusion was derived from an analysis (see Figs 5-7) of:
(a) measurable city development characteristics against current city agency
manpower inventories (see Table 2);
(b) existing city agency personnel grade/rank, formal education, age and
working experience details,
against current Government of Indonesia
employment conditions and agency formation regulations;
(c) both (a) and (b) above, to arrive at a final assessment of present city agency
manpower requirements for both specific personnel categories and totals,
and
(d) current individual city agency division responsibilities and manpower
resources in the field of urban transport, with an assessment of training
received by agency personnel over the last 5 years.
The findings of the above (see Table 3) indicated that:
(a) to enable BAPPEDA II senior and middle management levels in the four
cities to more effectively participate in the Project, selected personnel
required technical reorientation training in the field of urban transport;
(b) the DPU(K) gencies in the cities under study have substantial and critical
shortages of technician staff at a scale .that warrants an immediate tailor-
made training response;
(c) DT(K) agencies in these same settlements have a similar shortage of
technician staff and would therefore benefit from being included in the
DPU(K) technician training programme;
(d) selected, senior and middle management DT(K) staff would also greatly
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 8/26
r
e
o
c
e
u
b
m
I
m
d
I I
I
n
I
&
e
w
a
a
y
s
o
c
e
I
1
i
n
u
o
a
m
w
k
o
u
b
I
t
a
p
a
n
m
m
I
t
I
@
F
e
W
v
y
a
t
i
d
c
a
a
a
y
s
o
I
m
d
m
l
*
@
R
e
w
o
c
e
t
a
n
n
I
p
o
e
e
w
m
w
p
w
a
a
e
a
c
e
a
a
n
n
n
l
‘
d
w
m
m
n
n
n
f
o
u
b
a
m
o
m
n
w
y
I
‘
I
i
d
e
n
I
_
-_
_
_
I
@
g
O
p
p
o
s
e
e
1
w
a
a
s
c
m
n
b
f
I I
m
w
p
m
m
I
1
j
/
@
z
“
d
p
s
; I
I
_
_
I
F
g
O
a
m
h
o
I
O
m
w
d
o
m
a
a
n
n
u
c
I
N
a
e
R
e
k
G
H
1
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 9/26
~
_
_
_
_
_
-
I
’
1
1
F
g
M
e
h
o
e
o
y
m
w
r
e
c
o
y
s
2
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 10/26
T
e
C
m
a
v
a
y
m
w
a
y
o
m
c
a
e
s
c
1
1
2
3
4
5
C
e
P
a
o
C
y
a
A
(
K
a
m
(
n
m
o
(
k
m
K
m
o
o
N
o
v
c
e
m
w
L
R
(
C
a
m
B
(
1
(
8
(
4
(
3
15
8
9
4
8
8
1
M
(
1
(
7
(
4
(
3
14
2
1
6
2
2
4
S
m
(
1
(
9
(
4
(
3
10
3
8
4
4
1
5
S
(
1
(
6
(
4
(
1
21
2
7
5
7
0
M
15
2
6
5
1
5
7
B
I
A
m
n
s
a
o
a
c
n
a
u
u
e
D
v
s
o
B
M S
m
S
M
D
K
B
M S
m
(
1
15
(
1
14
(
1
10
(
1
21 15
(
1
15
(
1
14
(
1
10
’
8
8
9
(
4
(
3
4
8
8
1
(
7
(
4
(
3
2
1
6
2
2
4
(
9
3
8
(
4
4
4
(
3
1
5
(
6
2
7
(
1
7
0
2
6
(
4
5 5
1
5
7
2
(
8
8
9
(
4
(
3
4
8
8
1
(
7
(
4
(
3
2
1
6
2
2
4
(
9
(
4
(
1
3
8
4
4
1
5
6
7
O
c
a
p
a
o
O
c
a
a
h
(
k
m
8
O
c
a
k
m
o
o
2
9
O
c
a
n
o
v
c
e
1
1
7
5
1
0
4
1
23
1
4
1
2
1
5
6
1
1
0
1
26
1
1
0
7
1
1
0
l
5
7
1
73
1
7
7
1
1
2
0
I
S
1
1
79
1
9
9
1
1
3
1
7
1
50
1
4
4
2
1
7
0
1
4
5
1
4
4
3
1
3
8
1
7
1
1
1
3
1
2
R
2
l
7
O
1
1
4
1
6
0
l
(
2
1
2
9
1
1
2
(
1
1
2
2
(
2
1
2
3
1
6
1
7
0
(
1
1
1
9
(
2
1
2
6
1
2
5
9
1
1
5
1
0
0
1
0
4
1
8
1
1
7
9
I
?
6
1
1
4
4
1
4
1
1
5
I
8
1
11
1
4
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 11/26
S
a
(
1
(
6
2
1
2
7
M
15
2
6
C
y
P
a
n
D
m
D
K
B
(
1
(
8
15
8
9
M
S
m
a
S
a
M
P
k
n
B
M S
m
a
S
a
M
(
1
14
(
1
10
(
1
21 15
(
1
15
(
1
14
(
1
10 21
(
1s
o
(
7
2
1
(
9
3
8
(
6
2
7
2
6
(
8
8
9
(
7
2
1
3
Z
(
6
2
7
2
6
(
4
5 5
(
4
4
8
(
4
6
2
(
4
4
4
(
4
5 5
1
(
4
4
8
(
4
6
2
(
4
4
4
(
4
5 5
(
1
7
0
9
5
7
6
(
3
8
X
1
7
(
3
2
4
5
(
3
1
5
3
(
1
7
0
1
5
7
I
5
(
3
8
1
4
(
3
2
4
6
(
3
1
5
3
(
1
7
0
1
1
5
7
6
1
2
1
I
3
5
1
0
3
1
0
6
1
06
1
1
4
I
7
I
x
1
2
1
I
1
1
64
l
1
6
I
%
7
I
4
4
1
1
8
1
4
4
1
3
2
1
1
1
I
4
1
1
1
0
1
1
6
1
4
1
2
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
5
5
1
5
2
i
3
7
1
0
2
1
11
1
2
0
1
2
O
1
0
3
I
O
Y
I
3
I
_
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
8
1
0
2
I
7
1
2
6
1
0
4
1
0
5
l
O
I
9
R
1
R
o
C
e
U
b
T
a
p
T
O
A
m
f
a
2
O
o
1
(
2
N
U
N
o
U
b
D
o
m
S
u
N
U
S
u
C
p
a
K
y
1
(
3
P
o
e
d
c
o
S
u
e
(
4
W
P
N
6
o
P
e
a
o
f
o
h
R
o
C
e
U
b
T
a
p
a
o
J
u
1
(
5
D
a
P
o
W
P
N
6
o
P
e
a
o
f
o
R
o
C
e
U
b
T
a
p
a
o
M
1
(
6
S
a
U
b
D
o
m
P
a
n
S
u
J
C
M
c
1
(
7
M
R
S
u
D
e
C
p
a
K
y
O
o
1
(
8
R
n
B
d
K
p
a
K
y
K
a
B
D
e
C
p
a
K
y
M
1
(
9
S
m
a
M
e
P
a
D
e
C
p
a
K
y
1
K
a
c
g
e
n
c
e
n
m
c
s
a
s
h
a
b
o
w
h
a
a
o
h
o
c
e
s
u
e
S
c
N
&
A
o
a
e
R
e
P
k
G
H
1
9
%
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 12/26
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 13/26
Urban Transport and M anpower Development
77
_
+
I
L
”
-
0
-
0
.-
P
“.
I
T
I
T
2
-
0
2
.
-
2
w
-
0
z
‘:
-
.
s
n
:
c
E
3
a.
P
RAE 12:3-P
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 14/26
78
Harry T Dimitriou
benefit from technical re-orientation training in the urban transport field (of
the kind recommended for BAPPEDA II personnel); and
(e) Parking Unit operational staff of the cities under study are in particular need
of a supervised programme of “on-the-job” training.
Public training centre resource analysis
A review of selected public sector training centre resources in Java and Sumatra
revealed that:
(a) experience in aspects of urban transport training is very limited, with the
exception of long courses conducted by the Institute Technology Bandung
and the Institute Technology Surabaya, as well as the Ministry of
Communications Road Traffic and Transportation College;
(b) classroom and residential accommodation of most training centres is
adequate, particularly in the case of those operated by the Ministry of Public
Works, if one takes into account the extensive building programmes
currently underway in some such centres;
(c) full-time trainer resources to be non-existent in all but a few training centres
(excluding the universities), with part-time trainers specialised in aspects of
urban transport being scarce;
(d) more use needs to be made of experienced academic and government staff
on a part-time basis for Project-related training;
(e) a “training the trainers programme” for urban transport is urgently required;
(f) the type of laboratory and workshop training facilities required in urban
transport is in short supply;
(g) there is a widespread need for computerised hardware and software for the
management, operations and control of public-sector training, and
(h) Bandung is the only city of the four under study that has a Municipal
Training Centre.
PROPOSED PROJECT RELATED TRAINING PROGRAMME
Objectives
of
proposed t raining
The objectives of the training which emerged from the analysis of city agency
manpower resources and Project training needs included:
(a) to familiarise senior and middle management personnel with the concepts,
terminologies, techniques and issues of the Project;
(b) to provide an inter-agency and multi-disciplinary appreciation of the
management and technical tasks of the Project;
(c) to help further enhance and strengthen the city authorities’ financial-
management and technical capabilities, to evaluate and undertake the
various activities involved in the Project; and
(d) to furnish involved agencies and personnel with full supporting docu-
mentation of the training provided, so that it may be of value to subsequent
training efforts during operational aspects of Project implementation.
Phasi ng of proposed t rai ni ng
To achieve the above objectives (and simultaneously remain compatible with the
objectives of the Project) the training is proposed in two phases (see Fig. 6):
(a) Phase one: Project Launch Training - offered during Project Preparation;
and
(b) Phase two: Project Implementation Training - to be conducted during the
execution of the Project.
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 15/26
Urban Tr ansport and M anpower Development
79
t
Phase I Project launch tralnlng
:: Phase 2. Project Imp@mentatlon m1nn-q
-+
V
V
-
9 months 3 months
5 years
Project launch workshops ~
- ond courses and tralmng
Preparottc8-7 Project Implementation
V -- for project -)- tralntng
*
W
materlal preporotlon
Implement&on
tralnlng
I
I
I
I
Fig. 6. Schedul e of proj ect-r elat ed tr ain ing input s: proj ect l aunch tr ain ing and proj ect
impl ementat io n tr ain ing. Source: IN DEC Associat es - Rennie Park GmbH , 1986a.
Table 4. Characteristics of project launch t raini ng
Agencies to be
trained
Location of proposed aaency/trainme
Jakarta Bandung Medan Se g
Number of
Surabaya
Yoyakarta Overseas Jakarta Bandung
Technical committee J -
to PMU
Local steering
committees (LSC)
J V’
City project
co-ordinating offices
(CPCO)
J J
City agencies
- BAPPEDA
- LLAJR (C)
- DPU (K)
- DTK
- Parking unit
- Keuangan
- Traffic police
City agencies
(Financial mgt
course)
- BAPPEDA II
- DPU (K)
- Keuangan
City agencies
(Project mgt
course II)
- BAPPEDA II
- DPU (K)
-
J i
J
J - -
\I
Phase 1
14 -
“,’
-
11
J
“’
-
7
J - --
7
- -
- -
7
-
- - -
7
Technical committee
to PMU
Local steering
committees (LSC)
City project
co-ordinating offices
(CPCO)
City agencies
(Agency - specific
training)
City agencies
(Inter-agency
training)
Project staff
J
-
J J
J J
J J J
J J J
-
Phase 2
14
J
J
-
-
11
J
J ---
1
-
J
J - See Appendix
- -
J -
See Appendix
-
-
J
NA
NA
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 16/26
8
Harry T Dimitriou
Each phase is intended to address different priority audiences and emphasise
various aspects of the Project (see Table 4). The two phases require different
levels of teaching resources and equipment, and employ different time-scales to
achieve their objectives.
Project Launch Training is intended to lay the foundations for the much longer
and more comprehensive second phase training. It is also the period during
which the basis for a Management Information System (MIS) is to be set up, with
a view to later monitoring and evaluating the performance of training efforts.
ourse design principles
The principles employed in the identification and design of the proposed training
included:
Training areas
Concepts
Agency personnel
Level of traming
and
Medan Semarang Surahaya Senior mgt Mlddle mgt
Junior mgt Techmcian terminology Issues Techniques
-
” v’
10
13
11
-
I
:
I
7 7
“I J
7 7 7
u
r’
7 7 I
-
\J
-
J
7
7 7
i’ J
-
-
b
-
J J
10 13 14
\’ “’
-
” J
7 I
I
” \’
;
5’
\’
J
J
14-20
”
“’ ”
v’
J
J
14-20
\’ \’
,,’
L’ J J
NA NA
NA
\’
-
J
J
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 17/26
(4
(b)
Urban Transport and l~anpo~,er Development 81
that the most effective Project-related manpower development and training
programme is one which shares the same objectives as the Project it is
intended to serve, and reflects its constituent component parts;
that to ensure the training offered by a Project-related training programme
is most relevant, selected key Project staff should participate in the related
training programme curriculum development, as well as in the monitoring
and evaluation of Project-related training efforts.
Taking into account the above principles, the recommended training is to
employ frameworks which reflect the main areas and activities of the Project.
These are designed in a manner whereby, they accommodate both tailor-made
and standard teaching vehicles to meet different agency training needs. The
frameworks are based on variations of a common matrix for different agency
mixes - with details of the Project audiences and technical areas of training
concern on the vertical axis, and the proposed training vehicles on the horizontal
axis (see Fig. 7).
Training vehicles and techniques
It is anticipated that numerous teaching vehicles will be employed, all of which
may be categorised under one of two types, namely:
(4
04
“off-the-job” training -
i.e.
efforts conducted away from an on-going work
situation, usually requiring specialist training staff offering instruction in
classroom/conference room situations; and
“on-the-job” training - i.e. efforts undertaken in a work situation and
environment whilst executing a job, with the instruction commonly provided
by more senior personnel or expatriate specialist staff, who have longer
experience of particular tasks.
The first of the above may in turn be sub-divided among those which are
conducted:
(a) by the proposed Project Management Unit (PMU) Training Advisory
Team, with contributions from technical assistance personnel;
(b) jointly by the proposed PMU Training Advisory Team, in association with
resources from an Indonesian public sector training institute or agency;
212. Fm-lcdlc/~lar /
I
I I I
22 Tmhing cu aes
I
.-.. ___
I
22.1. -lod~c
/
I I
I
222 Rriodivhquw
I
..__-
j
/
222.~ [
I
I
I I I
I i
I /
I .
Fig. 7. UTP proj ect-r elat ed t rai ni ng framew ork . Source: INDEC Associat es - Renni e Park
GmbH, I986a.
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 18/26
82
Harry T. Dimi t r iou
(c) by an Indonesian public sector training institute or agency alone, and
(d) by an overseas training institute or agency.
“Off-the-job” training vehicles proposed for the Project include:
(a) Dissemination Workshops - such activities are intended to disseminate
critical concepts, terms, issues and techniques employed by the Project to
key participants involved in its development and work. These events need to
be highly structured and to take place over a period of one to three days,
either as one-off events or as part of a regular programme of Workshops.
(b) Training Courses - these are formal efforts at technology-transfer for staff
engaged in the Project and are of three kinds, namely:
- periodic/ad
hoc
training courses,
- periodic/regular training courses, and
-
continuous/regular training courses.
Such activities rely upon a pre-designed curriculum for a given instruction
period, focusing upon specific activities.
The “on-the-job” training vehicles proposed require the participation of the
Project Management Unit and City Project Office Staff (based upon an input of
15% of the overall Project technical consultancy assistance in man-months).
“On-the-job” training vehicles proposed include:
(a) On-Site Training - this entails the technology-transfer (usually of tech-
niques) of how to implement job tasks while they are being performed. Such
instruction is commonly (although not exclusively), provided on the site of a
construction project. The venue for this kind of training is dependent upon
where project implementation takes place, or where similar projects which
can provide relevant training experiences are located. On-site training may
be offered on a periodic
ad-hoc
basis or as a regular activity, and is best
provided to small groups; and
(b) Off-Site Training - this involves similar principles and trainer/trainee ratios
of instruction as in the case of on-site training. However, rather than be
located on a construction site or in the field, it takes place in a project office.
Off-site training can be of an
ad-hoc
periodic kind, or be offered on a
regular, periodic basis.
Organisati on and assi gnment of t rai ni ng
During the identification of the proposed areas for training, it was felt important
to differentiate between sector institution-building requirements (largely be-
lieved to be beyond the resources available for the Project), and the specific
training needs of the Project itself.
The assignment of the proposed Project-related training to various agencies
was based upon a thorough examination of various institutional agency
responsibilities. The proposals which emerged are categorised in accordance
with the audiences they are designed to serve, namely:
(a) Special Agency Training -
i .e.
for agencies specifically set up for the
Project.
(b) Inter-Agency Training -
i .e.
for agencies of central, regional, and
municipal governments involved in the Project or concerned with the urban
transport sub-sector of the cities under study; and
(c) City-Agency Training -
i .e.
for all municipal agencies involved in the
Project in the cities under study.
Phase 1 of Project-related training is to be primarily directed to the first of these
audiences, on the presumption that once the senior and middle personnel
involved in the pioneering work of the Project come to share a common
understanding of the Project’s concepts, terms and techniques, they are better
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 19/26
Urban Transport and M anpower Development 83
placed to provide the direction to the remaining Project Staff. Phase 2 of the
training is aimed at a larger training audience involved in the Project.
The following time budgets were recommended for the various training
activities:
(a) l-3 days for workshops;
(b) 2 weeks per short course module
(c) maximum of 3 modules per short course (i.e. a maximum short course
duration of 6 weeks)
(d) between 2 and 9 months for short courses in Indonesian Public Sector
Training Centres, and
(e) between 9 and 24 months for long term education/training courses, both in
Indonesia and overseas.
Ar eas of proposed t rai ni ng
The technical areas of concern of the proposed Project-related training,
(orientated toward two levels of public officials - senior and middle manage-
ment staff, and junior management and/or technician staff), cover:
(a) Comprehensive Urban Transport Planning, Management and Design which
includes: urban transport policy and planning, highway infrastructure policy
and planning, urban transport programming and management, parking
policy and management, highway programming and management, highway
and traffic engineering design, and use of computers in above;
(b) Urban Transport Pre-Project Implementation, which includes: urban
transport project appraisal, highway infrastructure appraisal, urban traffic
management and control, land acquisition, equipment procurement, and use
of computers in above;
(c) Urban Transport Project Implementation, which includes: highway infra-
structure periodic and routine maintenance, highway construction super-
vision, highway infrastructure construction and supervision, highway infra-
structure project management operations and control, traffic enforcement
and control, project financial management and control, and use of
computers in above.
The features of the above training are summarised in Tables 5-10.
INSTITUTIONAL AND MANAGEMENT CONTEXT OF PROPOSED TRAINING
The responsibilities of the proposed Training Advisory Team within the Project
Management Unit are to include: (a) the preparation of training curriculum and
materials; (b) conducting training programmes; (c) overseeing of training
activities; and (d) monitoring of training efforts; of those Project-realted training
activities for which the Unit will be either soley responsible or jointly responsible
with public sector training centres.
The latter activities are to be executed with a view to building up (and then
leaving behind) a capacity to run numerous later courses in urban transport. It is
envisaged that the Training Advisory Team will report (through the Project
Management Unit and the Project Training Committee) to the Ministry of
Finance’s Institute for Urban Policy Analysis (IUPA) Working Group on
Training. In so doing, it is hoped to initiate steps towards the integration (where
possible) of Project training efforts with others in the urban sector.
The focus of much of the local Regional Cities Urban Transport Project
training is proposed ultimately to be channelled through newly established
Municipal Training Centres, commencing with the appointment of City Training
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 20/26
T
e
5
P
o
o
e
a
a
n
n
s
o
m
d
e
m
m
s
A
A
o
n
n
D
o
o
e
N
o
t
n
n
t
n
n
a
v
y
a
v
e
(
d
1
T
c
c
m
e
t
o
P
o
e
P
M
d
m
n
o
1
3
2
L
s
e
n
c
m
e
P
o
e
a
C
d
m
n
o
4
3
C
T
c
s
a
a
c
y
a
s
a
P
o
e
d
m
n
o
c
m
a
t
e
q
4
4
C
y
a
D
U
K
P
o
e
m
m
1
3
1
3
N
o
o
c
y
t
n
n
l
o
o
T
a
t
m
b
f
o
P
o
l
o
o
o
t
n
n
N
o
T
n
n
t
n
n
(
d
t
n
r
o
H
e
(
a
3
1
1
O
R
V
(
B
(
M
(
S
m
(
S
1
1
1
O
R
V
(
B
(
M
(
S
m
(
S
4
6
1
1
1
1
R
V
(
a
3
2
1
1
1
1
5
F
n
a
e
P
o
e
d
m
n
o
a
f
n
a
m
m
a
c
o
N
1
1
1
J
a
1
2
1
1
1
1
T
a
1
7
9
2
^
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 21/26
T
e
P
M
U
a
n
n
s
y
a
v
e
e
b
e
s
o
m
d
e
m
m
s
a
A
A
e
o
a
n
n
c
1
P
M
e
c
c
m
e
(
a
P
o
e
w
k
h
c
s
e
m
a
c
m
s
C
2
a
C
3
L
s
e
n
c
m
e
a
C
O
s
a
a
P
o
e
w
k
h
c
s
e
m
a
c
m
s
c
4
P
o
e
e
c
s
a
c
5
R
o
C
e
P
o
e
N
I
p
o
e
a
w
k
h
T
a
c
4
1
P
g
a
e
a
n
n
i
n
a
p
e
m
c
C
4
2
P
g
a
e
a
n
n
i
n
a
c
a
a
p
p
a
n
c
4
3
P
g
a
e
a
n
n
i
n
h
g
w
a
a
c
e
n
n
c
4
4
P
g
a
e
a
n
n
i
n
m
m
e
o
a
a
n
n
S
R
o
C
e
T
m
D
a
o
o
e
N
o
t
a
n
n
t
a
n
n
a
v
y
a
v
e
(
d
1
3
d
8
3
d
1
1
y
N
o
c
y
t
a
n
n
l
o
o
T
a
t
m
b
P
o
o
o
o
f
o
N
o
T
a
n
a
n
t
a
n
n
t
a
n
n
ta
n
r
a
o
H
e
1
(
a
3
d
1
1
O
R
V
(
B
(
M
(
S
m
a
1
(
S
a
2
d
7
1
1
1
1
N
1
(
O
N
1
1
y
1
(
O
N
1
1
y
1
(
O
1
1
y
1
2
3
1
d
N
1
(
O
1
y
1
N
1
y
1
N
1
y
1
N
1
y
1
N
S
o
P
U
u
P
5
M
a
a
P
e
m
1
d
8
1
1
1
1
1
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 22/26
T
7
A
o
n
P
M
a
u
u
p
c
t
n
n
c
n
a
v
n
o
a
m
d
m
m
n
s
i
n
n
t
n
n
A
c
1
D
U
K
a
B
R
C
A
e
o
a
n
n
~
~
.
_
T
a
c
m
m
-
T
a
D
a
o
t
m
o
e
N
o
b
N
o
t
a
n
n
c
y
f
o
t
a
n
n
a
v
y
t
a
n
n
P
o
o
o
o
t
a
n
n
N
o
T
a
n
a
n
a
v
e
(
d
l
o
o
t
a
n
n
(
d
ta
n
r
a
o
-
~
_
_
-
-
~
-
_
R
3
1
1
(
B
4
3
1
1
1
1
C
1
T
a
c
a
a
u
R
D
K
a
B
D
p
a
n
2
1
1
(
B
2
3
1
1
1
1
c
1
K
D
U
K
a
B
D
F
n
a
m
m
a
c
o
c
1
T
a
c
a
L
A
R
C
T
a
c
e
o
c
m
a
c
m
c
o
C
6
D
U
K
a
B
D
I
U
o
m
c
o
c
m
e
1
1
1
P
M
T
(
M
T
a
c
p
c
a
n
n
c
e
a
P
v
e
c
m
(
a
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
T
a
9
1
4
1
1
l
U
1
1
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 23/26
T
e
o
n
M
U
s
y
c
a
n
e
v
e
u
o
m
m
a
e
c
a
a
i
n
e
a
a
n
n
A
A
e
o
a
n
n
D
a
o
o
e
N
o
N
o
t
a
n
n
c
y
t
a
n
n
a
v
y
t
a
n
n
a
v
e
(
d
l
o
o
T
a
t
m
b
f
o
P
o
o
o
o
t
a
n
n
N
o
T
a
n
a
n
t
a
n
n
(
d
ta
n
r
a
o
C
1
L
A
R
a
c
p
c
C
1
B
D
a
D
K
T
a
c
e
o
c
m
a
T
a
c
p
c
a
n
n
c
m
c
o
2
1
1
c
e
a
c
1
D
U
K
a
p
k
n
u
T
a
p
p
a
n
a
p
o
a
m
n
(
e
c
a
2
1
1
T
a
c
m
m
2
1
I
c
2
F
n
a
m
m
2
3
1
1
P
M
T
B
2
1
1
1
R
B
2
6
1
1
K
D
U
K
a
a
c
o
P
M
B
D
(
e
c
a
2
1
1
T
M
2
2
1
1
C
2
U
o
m
c
o
c
m
e
P
v
e
c
m
D
U
K
a
B
D
1
7
1
(
a
7
1
1
1
I T
a
9
4
1
1
1
1
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 24/26
T
e
Y
A
j
o
n
P
M
t
w
n
n
a
s
y
u
u
p
c
t
a
n
n
c
e
a
v
e
(
s
o
a
m
d
e
m
m
s
a
-
a
s
c
t
a
n
n
A
c
7
B
1
C
8
D
U
K
C
9
D
U
K
c
1
D
U
K
C
1
5
P
k
n
U
T
a
o
o
t
n
n
A
o
n
n
a
v
e
_
_
.
_
T
p
a
n
a
p
o
m
n
1
R
n
p
o
c
m
n
e
3
H
g
w
i
n
u
u
p
a
a
d
g
3
P
o
e
m
m
3
P
k
n
p
c
a
m
n
1
1
D
o
o
e
t
n
n
a
v
v
_
d
1
1
R
(
B
1
1
R
(
a
1
1
R
V
(
S
1 1 1
N
o
c
y
t
n
n
P
o
l
o
o
o
l
o
o
t
n
n
-
~
-
_
1
R
(
M
P
m
1
I
T
S
5
T
a
t
m
b
f
o
t
n
n
N
o
T
n
n
(
d
t
n
r
o
-
_
.
_
~
_
1
2
1
1
1
1
4
4
l
O
1
4
2
1
1
1
1
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
8
1
1
1
1
I
5
I
2
1
1
1
1
T
e
1
A
jo
n
P
M
t
a
n
n
u
o
y
u
a
p
c
t
a
n
n
c
e
a
v
e
(
u
o
m
m
a
t
e
c
a
s
a
-
a
s
c
A
C
1
D
U
K
C
2
D
U
K
C
2
D
U
K
T
a
o
t
n
n
A
o
n
n
a
v
e
R
n
p
o
c
m
n
e
2
H
g
w
i
n
u
u
p
a
a
d
g
2
E
p
m
h
n
2
6
D
o
o
e
t
n
n
a
v
y
(
d
N
o
c
y
t
n
n
l
o
o
1
1
R
(
a
2
4
1
1
1
1
R
V
(
S
2
2
1
1
1
I
R
(
M
2
3
I
1
1
3
8
9
1
1
T
a
t
m
b
f
o
P
o
l
o
o
o
t
n
n
N
o
T
n
n
t
n
n
(
d
t
n
r
o
-
_
-
_
-
_
*
c
s
d
i
n
p
e
m
u
t
n
n
S
I
N
&
A
a
e
-
R
c
P
k
G
H
1
”
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 25/26
8/10/2019 Comparison of Transportation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-transportation 26/26
90
Harry T Dimitriou
Liaison Officers who are expected to operate within a wider framework of
integrated urban infrastructure development training (IUIDP),2 (see Fig. 8).
Finally, the establishment of a management information system (MIS) is
advocated, with the purpose of monitoring the performance of the overall
Project Manpower Development and Training Programme, and its individual
activities. It is recommended that data banks should be particularly set up to
provide better access to information concerning: (a) manpower resource details
of city agencies in the urban transport sub-sector; (b) public centre resources for
training in urban transport, and (c) training materials and curricula in aspects (a)
of urban transport concern.
REFERENCES
IBRD, Regional Cities Urban Transport Project, “Aide Memoire”,
Findings of World Bank Mission,
Washington DC, 1986.
INDEC & Associates-Rennie Park GmbH, “Recommended Programme for Project-Related Manpower
Development and Training”, Final Report of Preparation Study for the Regional Cities Urban Transportation
Project, Jakarta, 1986a.
INDEC & Associates-Rennie Park GmbH, “Institutional Diagnostic Analysis”, Final Report of Preparation
Study for the Regional Cities Urban Transport Project, Jakarta, 1986b.
Training and Development Consultants (TDC) S.A. and INDEC & Associates, “Pilot Study of Policy and
Design Guidelines for Urban Road Transport in IUIDP”, Working Paper No. 2, Phase One Report, Annex 1,
Directorate Generals of Cipta Karya and Bina Marga, Ministry of Public Works, Government of Indonesia and
UNDPIUNCHS.
‘The Integrated Urban Infrastructure Development Programme (IUIDP) represents an approach to urban
development chosen by the Government of Indonesia which seeks to respond to the critical problems of urban
expansion in a context of limited public sector resources by: making optimum use of existing resources; co-
ordinating and integrating potential development resources; achieving affective integration of urban
development programmes; and taking measures to increase locally generated revenues to recover costs (TDC