compartive article

Upload: david-hui

Post on 07-Jul-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/18/2019 Compartive Article

    1/8

    Lynn Torrence

    EDUC 533

    June 2010

    Comparing Instructional Design Models and Strategies

    Instructional Design Model vs. Instructional Strategy

    Quality instruction can be ensured through instructional design. nstructional design is

    the de!elo"#ent o$ s"eci$ications using learning and theory% through analy&ing needs% setting

    goals and $inding a #ethod $or deli!ering in$or#ation '(erger and )a#% 1**+,. E$$ecti!e

    instructional design relies on instructional #odels and strategies to #eet such s"eci$ic needs.

    -$ten con$used as synony#ous because both #odels and strategies $ocus on i#"ro!ed

    student learning through #eaning$ul e"ectations and instruction% #odels and strategies are not

    identical. /ccording to Instructional Design% an instructional #odel hel"s deter#ine the

    current state and needs o$ students% set goals and create acti!ities to #eet stated goals. The #ain

    di$$erence beteen instructional #odels and instructional strategies is the s"eci$ic e"erience and

    acti!ities $or understanding that instructional strategies "ro!ides students% hel"ing the# acuire

    noledge% intellectual sills andor ne attitudes. 4trategies are o$ten deter#ined a$ter analyses

    o$ current "ractice and established "er$or#ance obecti!es. n essence% a #ethod is the action

     "lan66 a guideline to organi&e and structure the "rocess% hile a strategy is the deli!ery "lan66

    s"eci$ic e"eriences hich "ro!ide students ith learning and understanding. /gain% both

    instructional #odels and strategies are ey co#"onents o$ uality teaching.

    Instructional Design Models

    -ne o$ the $irst instructional design #odels ca#e in the $or# o$ the /DDE #odel. The

    /DDE #odel is a syste#atic design to guide educators through $i!e "hases7 '1, /nalysis% '2,

    Design% '3, De!elo"#ent% '8, #"le#entation% and '5, E!aluation. 9e!ised and #odi$ied

    nu#erous ti#es% /DDE has #utated into #any di$$erent #odels% ith the #aority still $ocusing

  • 8/18/2019 Compartive Article

    2/8

    Lynn Torrence

    EDUC 533

    June 2010

    on the $i!e "hases. To #odels% /44U9E and Understanding by Design 'UbD,% are #odi$ied

    $ro# the /DDE #odel and ill be co#"ared against the original.

    /44U9E is also a seuential #odel% each ste" laying the $oundation $or "roceeding to the

    net. /44U9E still $ocuses on understanding current student abilities% obecti!es% content and

    e!aluation. The /44U9E di$$erences include reuired student in!ol!e#ent and necessary

    etended re$lection.

    UbD% de!elo"ed by :iggins and ;cTighe% is a three stage% bacard design #odel%

    hich $ocus is still !ery si#ilar to /DDE. UbD

  • 8/18/2019 Compartive Article

    3/8

    Lynn Torrence

    EDUC 533

    June 2010

     Table 1: Instructional Design Models

    ADDIE ASSUE Understanding byDesign

    AnalysisLearning >roble#?oals-becti!es

    /udience @eeds

    Eisting )noledge

    Analy!e "earners/udience @eedsAde#ogra"hics% co#"etencies%

    learning styles

    Stage 1# DesiredesultsEstablish ?oalsEssential Questions

    DesignLearning -becti!es

    -!erall @ature 'loo% $eel% etc.,

    State $b%ectives

    Select instructionalmet&ods' media'materials

    Stage 1# DesiredesultsEssential Questions

    Stage (# "earning )lan

    Lesson e"ectations>rior noledge

    Development

    Creating content

    ImplementationTrainingLearning /cti!ities

    ;aterials Used

    Utili!e media andmaterials=e*uire learnerparticipationacti!e "artici"ation to ensureengage#ent in acti!ities 'not

    a necessary co#"onent o$

    /DDE,

    Stage (# "earning )lanEui" students

    E"erienceE"lore

  • 8/18/2019 Compartive Article

    4/8

    Lynn Torrence

    EDUC 533

    June 2010

     Table 1: Instructional Design Models

    ADDIE ASSUE Understanding byDesign

    Evaluation1. Bor#ati!e2. 4u##ati!e

    3. 9e!ision 'i$ needed,

    Evaluate and +evise9e$lect u"on lesson%obecti!es% strategies%

    #aterials% and assess#ent'neglected stage in /DDE,.

    Stage ,# AssessmentEvidence=>er$or#ance Tass

    '#aority,

    Bor#ati!e4u##ati!eStage (# "earning )lan=9ethin9e!ise'studentteacher,

    =4tudent E!aluation

    Tailor "lan to needs

    = re"resents di$$erence $ro# /DDE #odel

    Instructional Strategies

    /$ter deciding on an instructional #odel $or de!elo"ing a lesson% an instructional strategy

    is intended to hel" guide the deli!ery "rocess o$ the lesson. Through the years% educators ha!e

    had a ide s"ectru# o$ instructional strategy o"tions7 ranging $ro# beha!ioris# to

    constructi!is# theories. Co#"ared belo are to instructional strategies% direct instruction 'D,

    and "roect6based learning.

    Direct instruction is a $a#iliar and co##on #odel in traditional schooling. (eing

    co#"letely teacher6centered% D $ocuses on e"licit% seuential instruction co#bined ith guided

    and inde"endent "ractice. D #ethods are o$ten scri"ted and easy $or a teacher to $ollo.

    4tudent achie!e#ent is de#onstrated through "ro!ing #astery o$ obecti!es.

    -n the other hand% "roect6based learning has a constructi!ist $eel% being a ty"e o$ inuiry

    and disco!ery ty"e learning. The $ocus is taen $ro# the teacher and #utated into student6

  • 8/18/2019 Compartive Article

    5/8

    Lynn Torrence

    EDUC 533

    June 2010

    centered education. 4tudent achie!e#ent results $ro# collaboration% creati!e thining% and

    decision6#aing sills a""lied in real6orld situations.

    The table belo details the di$$erent #ethodology o$ each instructional strategy%

    co#"aring the $olloing7 co#"onents"rocess% relati!e student6centeredness% assess#ent% 21st

    century in$luences% and ease o$ use 'including ad!antagesdisad!antages,.

     Table ,: Instructional Strategies

    )ro%ect -ased "earning Direct Instruction

    Co#"onents>rocess 1. Creating ?rou"s

    2. 4earching

    3. 4ol!ing8. Creating

    5. 4haring

    1. >rogra# Design

    2. -rgani&ation o$

    nstruction← ntroduction

    ← De!elo"#ent

    ← ?uided >ractice

    ← Closure

    ← nde"endent >ractice

    ← E!aluation3. Teacher4tudent

    nteractions

    9elati!e 4tudent6

    Centeredness

    •4tudent res"onsibility and

    engage#ent inA "roect creation

     "roble# sol!ing

     "rocess"rocedureco##unication

    Teacher dri!en

    'not student centered,

  • 8/18/2019 Compartive Article

    6/8

    Lynn Torrence

    EDUC 533

    June 2010

     Table ,: Instructional Strategies

    )ro%ect -ased "earning Direct Instruction

    /ssess#ent @on6Traditional /ssess#entA

    •Bocus on "er$or#ance o$content and sills

    •Uses criteria related to thereal6orld

    •?oal setting through

    $eedbac 

    Bor#ati!e4u##ati!e

    /ssess#entA•Bocus on #eeting obecti!es

    •/d#inistered a$ter e!erylesson

    21st Century n$luences Constructi!ist Theory

    Collaboration6(ased

    •4hi$ts aay $ro# tradition%$ocusing onA

    interdisci"linary acti!itiesstudent6centered acti!ities

    •9euired sills $ro# studentA "roble#6sol!ing

    design

    decision6#aing

    •E#"hasis onA

    coo"erati!e learning

    Traditional Theory

    •E"licit nstruction

    •4euenced nstruction

    •;odeling

    ?uided >ractice•nde"endent "ractice

    Ease o$ Use /D/@T/?E4A

    •4tudent6dri!en "lanning

    >rocess -riented% ith clearobecti!es

    •;eets !aried student needs

    •Bleible

    D4/D/@T/?E4A

    •Ti#e consu#ing "re"aration

    •Di$$erent a""roach '"ossiblyun$a#iliar $or #any students,

    /D/@T/?E4A

    •Teacher6dri!en "lanning 'less

    ti#e consu#ing than student6dri!en,

    •4cri"ted lessons 'easy to

    $ollo,

    •E$$ecti!e ith strugglingstudents

    D4/D/@T/?E4A

    •;eets li#ited student needs%

    unless ability grou"ed

    • @o roo# $or student

    e"loration% creati!ity orcuriosity

    •4cri"ted lessons 'in$leible,

  • 8/18/2019 Compartive Article

    7/8

    Lynn Torrence

    EDUC 533

    June 2010

    /lthough both are considered e$$ecti!e in their res"ectable situations% "roect6based

    learning and direct instruction are to signi$icantly di$$erent strategies because their theory and

    i#"le#entation #ethods deri!e $ro# o""osing educational "hiloso"hies.

    Conclusion

    Teachers ha!e a broad list o$ instructional design #odels and strategies to choose $ro#%

     based on the needs and abilities o$ students. t see#s as though #ost #odels and strategies

    deri!e $ro# a s"eci$ic educational "hiloso"hy or theory co#"letely based on belie$s. (eing

    $a#iliar ith a !ariety o$ a""roaches builds a re"ertoire o$ teaching trics hich can be adusted

    and used to i#"ro!e student learning de"ending on indi!idual teacher and student ideals.

    9EBE9E@CE4

  • 8/18/2019 Compartive Article

    8/8

    Lynn Torrence

    EDUC 533

    June 2010

    (erger% C.% F )a#% 9. '1**+,. Denitions o/ Instructional Design. Uni!ersity o$;ichigan. 9etrie!ed $ro# htt"A.u#ich.eduGed+2+de$ine.ht#l.

    Heinich, Molenda, Russell, & Smaldino. (1999). The ASSURE Model. UNC Asheville: North

    Carolina’s Public Liberal Arts University. Instructional Media and Technologies for

    Learning. Retrieved from http://www2.unca.edu/education/edtech/techcourse/   assure.htm.

    nstructional Design ;odels 'n.d,. Instructional Design. 9etrie!ed $ro# htt"A  .instructionaldesign.org#odelsinde.ht#l.

    Learning Theories Knowledgebase. (2010). ADDIE Model at Learning-Theories.com. Retrieved

    from http://www.learning-theories.com/addie-model.html

    Marchand-Martella, N., R. Martella, & K. Ausdemore. (2005) An Overview of Direct

     Instruction. New Horizons for Learning. Retrieved from http://www.newhorizons.org/

    spneeds/inclusion/teaching/marchand martellaausdemore.htm.

    Project Based Learning. (n.d). Redirection to Equivalent @ Cengage. Houghton Mifflin

    Company. Retrieved from http://college.cengage.com/education/resources/res_project/

    students/c2007/background.html#Four

    Wiggins, G.P. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (2nd ed). Alexandria, VA:

    Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    http://www.umich.edu/~ed626/define.htmlhttp://www2.unca.edu/education/edtech/techcourse/assure.htmhttp://www2.unca.edu/education/edtech/techcourse/assure.htmhttp://www.instructionaldesign.org/models/index.htmlhttp://www.instructionaldesign.org/models/index.htmlhttp://www.instructionaldesign.org/models/index.htmlhttp://www.learning-theories.com/addie-model.htmlhttp://livepage.apple.com/http://livepage.apple.com/http://livepage.apple.com/http://college.cengage.com/education/resources/res_project/students/c2007/background.html#Fourhttp://college.cengage.com/education/resources/res_project/students/c2007/background.html#Fourhttp://www2.unca.edu/education/edtech/techcourse/assure.htmhttp://www2.unca.edu/education/edtech/techcourse/assure.htmhttp://www.instructionaldesign.org/models/index.htmlhttp://www.instructionaldesign.org/models/index.htmlhttp://www.learning-theories.com/addie-model.htmlhttp://livepage.apple.com/http://livepage.apple.com/http://college.cengage.com/education/resources/res_project/students/c2007/background.html#Fourhttp://college.cengage.com/education/resources/res_project/students/c2007/background.html#Fourhttp://www.umich.edu/~ed626/define.html