complex cardiac presentations & ecg interpretation · 2019-07-04 · a 55 year old man with 4...
TRANSCRIPT
Complex Cardiac Presentations
& ECG Interpretation
Simon Kennon Barnet & Royal Free Hospitals
Barts Heart Centre
Complex Cardiac Presentations
• Chest Pain • Breathlessness • Palpitations • Dizzy spell, collapses
2
Chest Pain ‒ male 45 smoker
1. Lower central burning CP after eating, 6 weeks.
2. Dull upper chest pain on walking to work, 3 months.
3. Nocturnal chest tightness and SOB, 1 year.
4. Prolonged episodes of left sided chest pain, 18 months.
5. Central chest ache, 3 hours. 3
Chest Pain ‒ female 25 nonsmoker
1. Lower central burning CP after eating, 6 weeks.
2. Dull upper chest pain on walking to work, 3 months.
3. Nocturnal chest tightness and SOB, 1 year.
4. Prolonged episodes of left sided chest pain, 18 months.
5. Central chest ache, 3 hours. 4
Breathlessness
1. F70, NYHA 4, walked to GP surgery, smoker.
2. M50, NYHA 1-2, BMI 28, 18 months
3. F60, NYHA 2-3, 3-4 months.
4. F40, SOB at any time, when speaking, 9 months
5. M85, NYHA 2-3, and on bending over, BMI 30, 12 months. 5
Palpitations
1. M45, Momentary bumps and jumps, esp at night ‒ 3 months.
2. F45, Sudden onset, 10-60 minutes rapid and forceful, fade away ‒ 3 months.
3. M25, Sudden onset, 10-60 minutes rapid and forceful, sudden stop ‒ 3 months.
4. F55, Variable duration and characteristics ‒ 3 months.
6
Dizzy spells.
1. M80, Dizzy on standing, sometimes collapse, 1 year.
2. M65, Unheralded syncope with trauma.
3. F25, Dizzy and nausea with syncope, when standing, 10 years.
4. F25, Palpitations and dizziness, 10-60 minutes, 1 year
7
• ecgpedia.org • ecglibrary.com
8
ECG Interpretation
Electrocardiogram p p
QRS QRS
Electrocardiogram
P waves ‒ atrial depolarisation.
PR interval ‒ crossing AV node.
QRS ‒ ventricular depolarisation.
Electrocardiogram
Longer = slower - suggests ‘disease’ PR interval ‒ 1st HB QRS duration - BBB
ECG Rate ‒ beats per minute
Rhythm ‒ regular / irregular
P waves ‒ presence, PR interval, association with QRS
Rhythm - diagnosis
QRS duration
Axis
Other abnormalities ‒ Q waves, T wave inversion
Other abnormalities - ST segment elevation/depression
Heart Rate Heart rate in beats per minute = 300 / n (bpm) n = number of large squares between QRS complexes.
Tachycardia: >100bpm Bradycardia: <50bpm
13
Heart Rate
14
Heart Rate
15
Heart Rate
16
Heart Rate
17
Rhythm
Regular Irregular
18
P Waves
Sinus rhythm: - P wave before every QRS. - Unchanging PR interval. - PR interval 120-200ms (3-5 small squares).
19
P Waves
20
P Waves
21
P Waves
22
P Waves
23
P Waves
24
P Waves
25
P Waves
26
P Waves
27
09/03/2013 18:53Complete Heart Block
Page 1 of 1http://www.ecglibrary.com/chb4.html
A 70 year old man with exercise intolerance.
Complete Heart BlockP waves are not conducted to the ventricles because of block at the AV node. The P waves are indicated below andshow no relation to the QRS complexes. They 'probe' every part of the ventricular cycle but are never conducted.The ventricles are depolarised by a ventricular escape rhythm.
Go back to ECG homepage
P Waves
28
QRS duration
QRS duration: <120ms or <3 small squares
29
QRS duration
30
QRS duration
31
09/03/2013 18:53Left ventricular and left atrial hypertrophy
Page 1 of 2http://www.ecglibrary.com/lvhlah.html
An 83 year old man with aortic stenosis.
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)There are many different criteria for LVH.
Sokolow + Lyon (Am Heart J, 1949;37:161)S V1+ R V5 or V6 > 35 mm
Cornell criteria (Circulation, 1987;3: 565-72)SV3 + R avl > 28 mm in menSV3 + R avl > 20 mm in women
Framingham criteria (Circulation,1990; 81:815-820)R avl > 11mm, R V4-6 > 25mmS V1-3 > 25 mm, S V1 or V2 +R V5 or V6 > 35 mm, R I + S III > 25 mm
Romhilt + Estes (Am Heart J, 1986:75:752-58)Point score system
Left atrial abnormality (dilatation or hypertrophy)M shaped P wave in lead IIprominent terminal negative component to P wave in lead V1 (shown here)
See also - mitral stenosis.
QRS duration
32
09/03/2013 18:54'Trifascicular' block
Page 1 of 1http://www.ecglibrary.com/trifas.html
A 90 year old lady with syncope.
'Trifasicular' blockComplete Right Bundle Branch BlockLeft Anterior HemiblockLong PR interval
The combination of RBBB, LAFB and long PR interval has been called 'trifasicular' block and implies thatconduction is delayed in the third fascicle (in this case the left posterior fascicle) and a permanent pacemaker may beneeded. However there are other causes of a long PR interval such as delayed conduction in the AV node or atrium so'trifascicular block' is not a true ECG diagnosis.
Go back to ECG homepage
QRS duration
33
Bundle Branch Block
WILLIAM MORROW V1 and V6
LBBB ‒ WILLIAM RBBB ‒ MORROW
34
09/03/2013 18:54'Trifascicular' block
Page 1 of 1http://www.ecglibrary.com/trifas.html
A 90 year old lady with syncope.
'Trifasicular' blockComplete Right Bundle Branch BlockLeft Anterior HemiblockLong PR interval
The combination of RBBB, LAFB and long PR interval has been called 'trifasicular' block and implies thatconduction is delayed in the third fascicle (in this case the left posterior fascicle) and a permanent pacemaker may beneeded. However there are other causes of a long PR interval such as delayed conduction in the AV node or atrium so'trifascicular block' is not a true ECG diagnosis.
Go back to ECG homepage
QRS Axis
Normal: V1 & V2 more positive than negative Left axis deviation: V2 & V3 more negative than positive. Right axis deviation: V1&V2 more negative than positive.
35
QRS axis
36
QRS axis
37
09/03/2013 18:53Left ventricular and left atrial hypertrophy
Page 1 of 2http://www.ecglibrary.com/lvhlah.html
An 83 year old man with aortic stenosis.
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)There are many different criteria for LVH.
Sokolow + Lyon (Am Heart J, 1949;37:161)S V1+ R V5 or V6 > 35 mm
Cornell criteria (Circulation, 1987;3: 565-72)SV3 + R avl > 28 mm in menSV3 + R avl > 20 mm in women
Framingham criteria (Circulation,1990; 81:815-820)R avl > 11mm, R V4-6 > 25mmS V1-3 > 25 mm, S V1 or V2 +R V5 or V6 > 35 mm, R I + S III > 25 mm
Romhilt + Estes (Am Heart J, 1986:75:752-58)Point score system
Left atrial abnormality (dilatation or hypertrophy)M shaped P wave in lead IIprominent terminal negative component to P wave in lead V1 (shown here)
See also - mitral stenosis.
QRS axis
38
09/03/2013 18:54'Trifascicular' block
Page 1 of 1http://www.ecglibrary.com/trifas.html
A 90 year old lady with syncope.
'Trifasicular' blockComplete Right Bundle Branch BlockLeft Anterior HemiblockLong PR interval
The combination of RBBB, LAFB and long PR interval has been called 'trifasicular' block and implies thatconduction is delayed in the third fascicle (in this case the left posterior fascicle) and a permanent pacemaker may beneeded. However there are other causes of a long PR interval such as delayed conduction in the AV node or atrium so'trifascicular block' is not a true ECG diagnosis.
Go back to ECG homepage
QRS axis
39
QRS axis
40
ECG report
This ECG is unremarkable with
sinus rhythm at a rate of 60
beats per minute with a normal
axis and QRS duration.
ECG report Multiple ‘diagnoses’:
SR and otherwise unremarkable
Atrial fibrillation and otherwise unremarkable.
SR with LBBB.
Atrial fibrillation with RBBB and left axis deviation.
SR with 1st degree heart block, LVH and an old inferior MI.
ECG report
SR with a normal axis and QRSD with one PVE
ECG report
SR with ventricular bigeminy, a normal axis & QRSD
Ventricular Trigeminy
ECG Report
SR with a normal axis & QRSD, anterior Q waves with
TWI leads V1-5
ECG report
Ventricular Tachycardia
Torsade de Pointes
Atrial Fibrillation & LAD
Atrial Flutter 4:1 block
Wolf Parkinson White & LAD
SupraVentricular Tachycardia (SVT)
09/03/2013 18:53Left ventricular and left atrial hypertrophy
Page 1 of 2http://www.ecglibrary.com/lvhlah.html
An 83 year old man with aortic stenosis.
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)There are many different criteria for LVH.
Sokolow + Lyon (Am Heart J, 1949;37:161)S V1+ R V5 or V6 > 35 mm
Cornell criteria (Circulation, 1987;3: 565-72)SV3 + R avl > 28 mm in menSV3 + R avl > 20 mm in women
Framingham criteria (Circulation,1990; 81:815-820)R avl > 11mm, R V4-6 > 25mmS V1-3 > 25 mm, S V1 or V2 +R V5 or V6 > 35 mm, R I + S III > 25 mm
Romhilt + Estes (Am Heart J, 1986:75:752-58)Point score system
Left atrial abnormality (dilatation or hypertrophy)M shaped P wave in lead IIprominent terminal negative component to P wave in lead V1 (shown here)
See also - mitral stenosis.
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy 09/03/2013 18:53Left ventricular and left atrial hypertrophy
Page 1 of 2http://www.ecglibrary.com/lvhlah.html
An 83 year old man with aortic stenosis.
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)There are many different criteria for LVH.
Sokolow + Lyon (Am Heart J, 1949;37:161)S V1+ R V5 or V6 > 35 mm
Cornell criteria (Circulation, 1987;3: 565-72)SV3 + R avl > 28 mm in menSV3 + R avl > 20 mm in women
Framingham criteria (Circulation,1990; 81:815-820)R avl > 11mm, R V4-6 > 25mmS V1-3 > 25 mm, S V1 or V2 +R V5 or V6 > 35 mm, R I + S III > 25 mm
Romhilt + Estes (Am Heart J, 1986:75:752-58)Point score system
Left atrial abnormality (dilatation or hypertrophy)M shaped P wave in lead IIprominent terminal negative component to P wave in lead V1 (shown here)
See also - mitral stenosis.
09/03/2013 18:52Acute Inferior Myocardial Infarction
Page 1 of 1http://www.ecglibrary.com/infmi.html
A 55 year old man with 4 hours of "crushing" chest pain.
Acute inferior myocardial infarctionST elevation in the inferior leads II, III and aVFreciprocal ST depression in the anterior leads
See also acute anterior MI.
Right Bundle Branch Block and sinus bradycardia are also present.
Go back to ECG homepage
Inferior Myocardial Infarction 09/03/2013 18:52Acute Inferior Myocardial Infarction
Page 1 of 1http://www.ecglibrary.com/infmi.html
A 55 year old man with 4 hours of "crushing" chest pain.
Acute inferior myocardial infarctionST elevation in the inferior leads II, III and aVFreciprocal ST depression in the anterior leads
See also acute anterior MI.
Right Bundle Branch Block and sinus bradycardia are also present.
Go back to ECG homepage
09/03/2013 18:54'Trifascicular' block
Page 1 of 1http://www.ecglibrary.com/trifas.html
A 90 year old lady with syncope.
'Trifasicular' blockComplete Right Bundle Branch BlockLeft Anterior HemiblockLong PR interval
The combination of RBBB, LAFB and long PR interval has been called 'trifasicular' block and implies thatconduction is delayed in the third fascicle (in this case the left posterior fascicle) and a permanent pacemaker may beneeded. However there are other causes of a long PR interval such as delayed conduction in the AV node or atrium so'trifascicular block' is not a true ECG diagnosis.
Go back to ECG homepage
Bifascicular Block ‒ RBBB & LAD 09/03/2013 18:54'Trifascicular' block
Page 1 of 1http://www.ecglibrary.com/trifas.html
A 90 year old lady with syncope.
'Trifasicular' blockComplete Right Bundle Branch BlockLeft Anterior HemiblockLong PR interval
The combination of RBBB, LAFB and long PR interval has been called 'trifasicular' block and implies thatconduction is delayed in the third fascicle (in this case the left posterior fascicle) and a permanent pacemaker may beneeded. However there are other causes of a long PR interval such as delayed conduction in the AV node or atrium so'trifascicular block' is not a true ECG diagnosis.
Go back to ECG homepage
09/03/2013 18:53Complete Heart Block
Page 1 of 1http://www.ecglibrary.com/chb4.html
A 70 year old man with exercise intolerance.
Complete Heart BlockP waves are not conducted to the ventricles because of block at the AV node. The P waves are indicated below andshow no relation to the QRS complexes. They 'probe' every part of the ventricular cycle but are never conducted.The ventricles are depolarised by a ventricular escape rhythm.
Go back to ECG homepage
Complete Heart Block & LBBB 09/03/2013 18:53Complete Heart Block
Page 1 of 1http://www.ecglibrary.com/chb4.html
A 70 year old man with exercise intolerance.
Complete Heart BlockP waves are not conducted to the ventricles because of block at the AV node. The P waves are indicated below andshow no relation to the QRS complexes. They 'probe' every part of the ventricular cycle but are never conducted.The ventricles are depolarised by a ventricular escape rhythm.
Go back to ECG homepage
Complete Heart Block
Normal ECG
Probable Old Inferior MI
Normal ECG ‒ non-pathological Q waves
Old Anterior MI
LVH with a ‘strain pattern’
Atrial Fibrillation
Pacemaker in situ
Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB)
Trifascicular Block ‒ RBBB & LAD & 1st HB
2nd Degree Heart Block
Complete (3rd degree) Heart Block
1st degree Heart Block & LAD & LVH
Left Axis Deviation
?Pericarditis
24 hour tape
Difficult!
Limited value - AF rate control, daily palpitations
Variable quality
Specific indication
Reports usually good
101
Name: SNELLING, Brian Date of birth: 22/06/1948 Date: 03/04/2017
ID number: 198140 Gender: M Channel: 3+1 Page: 1/11
Version 2.2.1.8 | 2.2.1.8 CardioDay® for Windows®, getemed AG, Teltow
_______________________________________________________________________
Referred by: 20173 BMI The Kings Oak Hospital Dr KennonIndication: Medication: Comments: Start of recording: 03/04/2017 09:21(1), Duration: 47:59 h , Recorder SN/ID: 340 07 4660 211
S U M M A R Y
Day 1 and 2 of 3 day Holter recording.
QRS Complexes: 158856 Artifacts: 43
VENTRICULAR EVENTS SUPRAVENTRICULAR EVENTSVentricular escapes: 0 SVE (Prematurity < 80 %): 1541 PVC (Prematurity < 90 %): 206 SVT Tachycardia (>120 1/min): 8Bigeminy: 9 -longest: 6.3 s at 18:16(2)Couplets: 1 -fastest: 144 bpm at 14:36(1)Triplets: 0VE Runs: 0 ARRHYTHMIA-fastest: Arrhythmias (Delay > 140 %): 0VE Tachycardias (>4): 0 -longest: -longest: Bradycardias (< 50 1/min): 964-fastest: -slowest: 43/min at 23:49(2) Pauses (>2000 ms): 0VE/QRS Ratio: 0.15 % -longest:
HEART RATE Minimum: 43/min at 09:15(1)Mean: 56/minMaximum: 96/min at 14:35(1)___________________________________________________________________________
D I A G N O S I S
07/04/2017
Sinus rhythm seen throughout recording. Infrequent ventricular activity included a couplet, bigeminy and isolated extrasystoles. Infrequent supraventricular activity included non-sustained atrial tachycardias, non-sustained atrial runs, atrial triplets and atrial couplets. Nocturnal bradycardia was also seen.
TECHNICAL: Medium quality recording.
ANALYST: Mary Cox___________________
102
Name: SNELLING, Brian Date of birth: 22/06/1948 Date: 03/04/2017
ID number: 198140 Gender: M Channel: 3+1 Page: 2/11
Version 2.2.1.8 | 2.2.1.8 CardioDay® for Windows®, getemed AG, Teltow
114:35:00
3
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
N62197
N62596
N61797
N62596
N62197
N63395
N62596
N504119
N75080
N62995
N543111
1
2
3
Event: 1 03/04/2017 14:35:34 (1) Maximum Heart Rate 25 mm/s10 mm/mV98/min
109:15:16
3
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
N142242
N140243
N136344
N139543
1
2
3
Event: 2 04/04/2017 09:15:50 (1) Minimum Heart Rate 25 mm/s10 mm/mV43/min
110:59:27
3
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
N N120750
N120750
N116452
N119950
N116851
1
2
3
Event: 3 04/04/2017 11:00:01 (2) Diary Time 25 mm/s10 mm/mV50/min
103
Name: GRUNDY, RUSSELL Date of birth: 11/06/1971 Date: 04/04/2017
ID number: 1051775 Gender: M Channel: 3+1 Page: 6/7
Version 2.2.1.8 | 2.2.1.8 CardioDay® for Windows®, getemed AG, Teltow
Heart rate140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1/min
09:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 19:00 21:00 23:00 01:00 03:00 05:00 07:00 [h]
Event histograms
09:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 19:00 21:00 23:00 01:00 03:00 05:00 07:00 [h]
2
1
4
15
1
R on T0
VE tachyc.0
VE run0
Triplet0
Couplet0
Bigeminy0
PVC86
R-R pause3
Bradycardia517
N-N delay0
SVE tachyc.0
SVE303
Vent. esc.0
Noise1
Patient1
1
Echocardiogram
MRI gold standard for structure and function
Diastolic dysfunction and mild valvular
regurgitation rarely important.
Impairment of LV function / LV dilation important
Variable quality images and reports
Clinical correlation important
Specific indication
105
106
107
Echocardiogram
MRI gold standard for structure and function
Diastolic dysfunction and mild valvular
regurgitation rarely important.
Impairment of LV function / LV dilation important
Variable quality images and reports
Clinical correlation important
Specific indication
2 year outcome TAVI (n=1011)
AVR (n=1021)
p
Mortality or CVA %
19.3 21.1 0.33
Mortality % 16.7 18.0 0.45
CVA% 9.5 8.9 0.67 PVL % 8.0 0.6 <0.001 AF % 11.3 27.3 <0.001 PPM % 11.8 10.3 0.29
Leon et al NEJM 2016 Randomised trial. TAVI vs AVR 2032 patients Intermediate risk as per ‘the Heart team’. - TF 76.3% Average STS = 5.8% Average age 82
Intermediate Risk Patients The PARTNER 2a Trial
n engl j med nejm.org 6
T h e n e w e ngl a nd j o u r na l o f m e dic i n e
with TAVR plus PCI (19.3% and 20.5%, respective-ly; P = 0.84) and surgery alone with surgery plus CABG (20.9% and 21.5%, respectively; P = 0.90).
Multivariate predictors of death from any cause in the overall trial as well as in each of the trial groups are presented in Table S7 in the Supplementary Appendix. Treatment assignment to TAVR or surgery was not a significant predic-tor of mortality. The time-dependent effects of disabling stroke, life-threatening bleeding, acute
kidney injury, and major vascular complication were all significantly associated with a higher risk of death over the period of 2 years in both the TAVR group and the surgery group (P<0.001 for all comparisons).
Other Clinical End PointsAt 30 days, major vascular complications were more frequent in the TAVR group than in the surgery group (7.9% vs. 5.0%, P = 0.008) (Ta-
Figure 1. Time-to-Event Curves for the Primary Composite End Point.
The insets show the same data on an enlarged y axis. TAVR denotes transcatheter aortic-valve replacement.
Dea
th fr
om A
ny C
ause
or D
isab
ling
Stro
ke (%
)100
80
60
20
40
00 3 6 15 18 21 24
Months since Procedure
A Intention-to-Treat Population
No. at RiskTAVRSurgery
10111021
918838
901812
825747
12
842770
9
870783
811735
801717
774695
C Transfemoral-Access Cohort, Intention-to-Treat Analysis
Dea
th fr
om A
ny C
ause
or D
isab
ling
Stro
ke (%
)
100
80
60
20
40
00 3 6 15 18 21 24
Months since Procedure
No. at RiskTAVRSurgery
775775
718643
709628
652577
12
663595
9
685604
644569
634557
612538
D Transfemoral-Access Cohort, As-Treated Analysis
Dea
th fr
om A
ny C
ause
or D
isab
ling
Stro
ke (%
)100
80
60
20
40
00 3 6 15 18 21 24
Months since Procedure
No. at RiskTAVRSurgery
762722
717636
708624
652573
12
663591
9
685600
644565
634555
612537
B As-Treated Population
Dea
th fr
om A
ny C
ause
or D
isab
ling
Stro
ke (%
)
100
80
60
20
40
0
90
70
30
50
10
90
70
30
50
10
90
70
30
50
10
90
70
30
50
10
0 3 6 15 18 21 24
Months since Procedure
No. at RiskTAVRSurgery
994944
917826
900807
825743
12
842766
9
20
40
0
30
50
10
0 3 6 15 18 21 24129
20
40
0
30
50
10
0 3 6 15 18 21 24129
20
40
0
30
50
10
0 3 6 15 18 21 24129
20
40
0
30
50
10
0 3 6 15 18 21 24129
870779
811731
801715
774694
Hazard ratio, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.73–1.09)P=0.25
TAVR
Surgery14.5
16.419.3
21.1
Hazard ratio, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.62–1.00)P=0.05
12.3
15.916.8
20.4
TAVR
Surgery
Hazard ratio, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.71–1.07)P=0.18
14.0
16.618.9
21.0
TAVR
Surgery
Hazard ratio, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.61–0.99)P=0.04
11.7
15.8
16.3
20.0
TAVR
Surgery
The New England Journal of Medicine Downloaded from nejm.org on April 2, 2016. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2016 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Mack et al NEJM 2019 Randomised trial. TAVI vs AVR 1000 patients Low risk: STS<4 Excluded: Bicuspid AV ‘Frailty’ as per heart team Elevated anatomical risk for TAVI or AVR
Low Risk Patients The PARTNER 3 Trial
TAVI (n=496)
AVR (n=454)
p
Primary outcome (12mo)
8.5 15.1 <0.001
Death/CVA 30 days 1.0 3.3 <0.001
CVA 30 days 0.6 2.4 0.02
AF 5.0 39.5 <0.001
LoS 3.0 7.0 <0.001
PPM 6.5 4.0 0.09
111 TAVI: 1hour procedure; 48hour LoS
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)