composition and property changes of hnbr & fkm ... - artis · artis 2016 manchester polymer...
TRANSCRIPT
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 1
Composition and Property Changes of HNBR & FKM Elastomers after Sour Gas
Ageing
C. Norris, M. Bennett, M. Hale & J. Lynch
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 2
Overviewo Demanding Environment Facility
o Ageing Protocol
o Lifetime Predictions
o DMA Assessment
o Extract Analysis
o TGA
o Elemental Analysis
o Degradation Mechanisms
o Conclusions
o Further Work
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 3
Sour Gas Testing Capability OverviewEquipment: Six autoclaves (initially) capable of sour gas exposure testing following:
• NORSOK M-710 (ed. 3 Sep 2014)
• ISO 23936-2:2011
• NACE TM0187-2011
Temperature Range: Ambient to +250°C.
Pressure Range: Atmospheric to +110bar.
Gas Mixtures:
• 2% H2S/ 3% CO2/ 95% CH4
• 10% H2S/ 5% CO2/ 85% CH4
• 5% CO2/ 95% CH4
• Others upon request
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 4
Oil Price
Oil Price
@ sign-off
Oil Price @
commissioning
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 5
Ageing Protocol
10% Distilled Water
30% Gas Phase
60% Solvent Phase
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 6
Lifetime Prediction - Example
Example: Cured FKM polymer aged using aggressiveconditions.
50% change in M50% used as the failure criterion.
M50% modulus plotted as a function of time.
Extrapolation often used to estimate time to failure,especially at lower temperatures.
Arrhenius then used to predict lifetime at lowertemperatures.
In this case = 16 years @ 100°C
y = -0.0092x + 2.6551R² = 0.9359
y = -0.0234x + 2.6204R² = 0.9659
y = -0.034x + 2.633R² = 0.9729
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
M5
0%
(M
Pa)
Time (days)
166°C181°C195°C
y = -9461.3x + 16.676R² = 0.954
-5
-4.8
-4.6
-4.4
-4.2
-4
-3.8
-3.6
0.00212 0.00214 0.00216 0.00218 0.0022 0.00222 0.00224 0.00226 0.00228 0.0023
ln (
1/t
50)
1/TK
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 7
Additional Post-Exposure TestingShould we rely on basic physical testing to direct lifetime predictions and product
development?
What additional information can we gain from these testing regimes?The following analytical study was conducted on samples aged under the most
severe conditions.
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 8
DMA: Temperature Dependency• Samples tested in tension, 10Hz, 0.1% DSA & -80°C to +80°C.
• HNBR: Reduced tan δ peak height and higher stiffness indicative of higher crosslink density.
• FKM: Reduced stiffness and Tg suggesting molecular weight reductions had occurred; likely
associated with the loss of side-groups .
Opposing effects for the two polymer types
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
Tan
de
lta
Log
(E'/
Pa)
Temperature (°C)
HNBR Control
HNBR Aged
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
Tan
de
lta
Log
(E'/
Pa)
Temperature (°C)
FKM Control
FKM Aged
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 9
DMA: Strain Dependency• Samples tested in tension, 10Hz, +80°C & 0.06 to 6% DSA.
• HNBR: Significant increase in filler-filler interactions, as indicated by ∆E’ (↑ 79%).
• FKM: Reduced filler-filler interactions observed, possibly due to filler surface modification due to
contact with HF (∆E’ ↓ 7%) .
Opposing effects for the two polymer types
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00
E' (
MP
a)
DSA (%)
HNBR Control
HNBR Aged
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00
E' (
MP
a)
DSA (%)
FKM Control
FKM Aged
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 10
Extract Analysis GCMS and IR Spectroscopy: • FKM: Unsurprising, the FKM was found to contain very little in the way of soluble matter. No evidence of low
molecular weight polymer was detected but such species may have remained in the ageing vessel fluids.
• HNBR: Naugard 445 antioxidant (↓90%) and a trimellitate plasticiser were found to be deficient in the aged material, confirming migration of soluble matter to have occurred. The extract was noted as being gummy in nature – IR spectroscopy revealed the presence of acrylonitrile groups (-C≡N), almost certainly arising from low molecular weight polymer.
E59505_A.sp - 30/09/2014 - UNAGED HNBR EXTRACT, SP_ATR
E59505_B.sp - 30/09/2014 - AGED HNBR EXTRACT, SP_ATR
L59410_A.002 - 17/04/2014 - TOTM/TNTM BLEND, SP_ATR
4000.0 3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600.0
52.92
55.0
60.0
65.0
70.0
75.0
80.0
85.0
90.0
95.0
100.00
cm-1
%T
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 11
TGA: HNBR
• No significant impact on bulk composition (other than reduced extract content).
• The cumulative weight loss profile reveals some modification of the polymer decomposition behaviour, with more rapid weight loss being recorded for the aged sample over much of the temperature range – further confirmation of formation of lower molecular weight species.
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
dW
/dt
We
igh
t /(
%)
Time (mins)
HNBR Control
HNBR Aged
0.1
1
10
100
200 300 400 500 600
Cu
mu
lati
ve w
eig
ht
loss
(%
)
Temperature (°C)
HNBR Control
HNBR Aged
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 12
TGA: FKM
• No significant impact on bulk composition.
• Increase in carbonaceous residue formed during polymer volatilisation.
• Increased carbon black oxidation rate, typically associated with the attachment or formation of pro-oxidative species.
• More rapid polymer decomposition indicating some level of chain scission.
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
dW
/dt
We
igh
t (%
)
Time (mins)
FKM Control
FKM Aged
0.1
1
10
100
100 200 300 400 500 600
Cu
mu
lati
ve w
eig
ht
loss
(%
)
Temperature (°C)
FKM Control
FKM Aged
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 13
SEM EDX Analysis
Presence of localised surface degradation on both compounds.
↑O & S at surface. Low-level oxidative ageing.
↑O & F at surface. Possible bloom of low molecular weight fragments. Low-level oxidative ageing.
Sulphur content of sectioned samples show both to have ↑ sulphur content
FKMHNBR
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 14
Elemental Microanalyses Quantitative elemental microanalyses of extracted samples
(aged – unaged values in wt%)
C -1.36 -3.5
H 0.1 -0.29
N -0.12 Not tested
S 0.55 0.73
F Not tested -0.67
• Sulphur content increased for both HNBR and FKM = permanently bound.
• HNBR – Reduction in N content further confirmation of loss of low MW polymer.
• FKM – Reduction in H & F content confirms dehydrofluorination. Significant reduction in carbon content suggests loss of polymeric fragments.
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 15
Mechanisms Summary: HNBRData suggests that additional C-Sx-C is the dominant mechanism with regard to increased stiffness. No evidence of H reduction to support additional C-C linkages.
*arbitrary numbers
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 16
Mechanisms Summary: FKM
*arbitrary numbers
Data suggests molecular weight reductions and dehydrofluorination to be the dominant mechanisms:
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 17
Conclusionso The test fluids outlined in NORSOK M710 ed.3/ ISO 23936-2:2011 were found to impart
muliple modes of degradation to both HNBR and FKM compounds after relatively short exposure times.
o Stiffening of HNBR attributed to additional crosslinking, plasticiser extraction and increased filler-filler interactions.
o Softening of FKM attributed to dehydrofluorination and loss of polymer fragments.
o Crosslinking, chain scission, dehydrofluorination, oxidative ageing, filler surface modification and extraction all likely to be occurring at different rates.
o Understanding of the mechanisms involved can be used to develop more robust formulations for sour service conditions.
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 18
Further Work• Currently running a Box-Behnken experimental
design to further understand the effects of temperature, H2S concentration and time on the different modes of degradation.• HNBR material compounded at ARTIS –
therefore, composition fully understood.
• Can we use parameters other than standard physical properties to estimate lifetimes?
• Can we correlate the ageing mechanisms occurring during service with those of the accelerated ageing?
© ARTIS 2016 Manchester Polymer Group, 16th May 2016 19
Thank You!
Interested?
Please contact us:Tel: 01225 896500