comprehensive analysis

37
COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS Women’s European Championship Sweden 04-18. December 2016

Upload: others

Post on 26-Feb-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS Women’s European Championship

Sweden 04-18. December 2016

Page 2: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Ranking 2014 and 2016 WECH

• 2014 2016

• 1. NOR NOR

• 2.ESP NED

• 3.SWE FRA

• 4.MNE DEN

• 5.FRA ROU

• 6.HUN GER

• 7.NED RUS

• 8.DEN SWE

Page 3: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

• 9.ROU SRB

• 10.GER CZE

• 11.POL ESP

• 12.SVK HUN

• 13.CRO MNE

• 14.RUS SLO

• 15.SRB POL

• 16.UKR CRO

Page 4: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Age and number of the international games of the teams • / / data from 2014 WECH HUN/CRO

• Country U23 23-30 Over 30 Int. Matches /average/

• 1.SWE 3 /4/ 13 /10/ - /2/ 56

• 2.SRB 3 /2/ 12 /9/ 1 /5/ 50

• 3.ESP 3 /1/ 6 /9/ 7 /6/ 102

• 4.SLO 2 /-/ 9 /-/ 5 /-/ 49

• 5.NED 1 /4/ 13 /12/ 2 /0/ 96

• 6.FRA 2 /5/ 10 /9/ 4 /2/ 92

• 7.GER 1 /2/ 8 /9/ 7 /5/ 63

• 8.POL 4 /1/ 9 /9/ 3 /6/ 45

Page 5: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

• U23 23-30 Over 30 Int. matches

• 9.MNE 9 /6/ 6 /9/ - /1/ 43

• 10.HUN 4 /5/ 10 /8/ 2 /3/ 44

• 11.DEN 5 /3/ 10 /9/ 1 /4/ 49

• 12.CZE 4 /-/ 12 /-/ - /-/ 48

• 13.NOR 5 /3/ 9 /10/ 2 /3/ 76

• 14.RUS 6 /2/ 9 /10/ 1 /4/ 54

• 15.ROU 3 /2/ 9 /9/ 4 /5/ 55

• 16.CRO 6 /1/ 8 /10/ 2 /5/ 31

Page 6: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

The teams and theyr average age and international played matches of the players:

2016 WECH

16 players: U23 : 4

23-30 : 9

Over 30 : 3

Int.maches : 60

2014 WECH:U23:3

23-30:9

Over 30:4

Page 7: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

The youngest teams: MNE,RUS,CRO

The following teams have the most players over 30 years: ESP,GER

The most experienced teams: ESP, NED, FRA

MNE: participated with 9 players who are younger than 23 years.

MNE, SWE,CZE: no player over 30 years.

RUS,DEN, SRB: just one player over 30 years.

Page 8: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Forign Coaches

• 4 from 16 National Teams use forign coaches

• -NED: Helle Thomsen /SWE/

• -HUN: Kim Rasmussen /DEN/

• -ROU: Ambros Martin /ESP/

• -NOR: Thorir Heirgeisson /ISL/

• 2014,WECH: POL,GER,NOR with forign coach

Page 9: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

• 8 teams from 16 participated at the Olympics Games 2016 in Rio

• RUS /1.place/, FRA /2/, NOR 6 /3/, NED /4/, ESP /6/, SWE /7/, ROU /9/, MNE /11/.

• SLO and CZE participate instead of SVK and UKR at the WECH in 2016.

• Correlate to WECH 2014 from14 teams 10 arrived with new coach!!

• MECH 2016: 9 coach from 16 teams are new since the last MECH /2014/

Page 10: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Players Are Playing Abroad

WECH 2016

16 teams,256 players:149 play at home and 107 abroad

• Average: 7 players from each team play not in theyr country!

• 2016 MECH:

• 16 teams,256 players: 113 play at home and 143 abroad

• Average: 9 players from each team play not in own country!

Page 11: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

SWE: 6, SRB: 15!, ESP: 10, SLO: 9,

NED: 16!, FRA: 9, GER: 1, POL: 2,

MNE: 7, HUN: 1, DEN: 2, CZE: 10,

NOR: 8, RUS: 0!, ROU: 4, CRO: 7,

Most:NED 16, SRB 15,

Less: RUS 0,HUN,GER 1-1, POL ,DEN 2-2

Page 12: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Analysis after 42 matches

• Number of scored goals and shots

• WECH 2014/MP 47/: 2374/4360 G/S: 50/93/game

• Average:25/46/team/game

• Shot effeciency AV:54%

• WECH 2016/ MP 42/

• Average: 25/44

• Shot effeciency: 55%

• The less goals in one game: NED-FRA 18:17 /35/, MNE-HUN 14-21 /35/

• The most goals/ in one game: SRB-SLO 36-34 /70/, DEN-CZE 33-29 /61/

Page 13: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Ranking after the main rounds /42 matches/

• AV results of the teams and effeciency /MP 7/ • 1-4.: NOR: 27:21,60% NED: 29:25, 60% • DEN: 24:23, 57% FRA: 24:20, 55% • 5-6.: GER:25:22, 55% ROU: 25:23, 60% /MP 7/ • MP 6: • 7.:RUS: 25:27, 52% 12.:HUN:22:24, 50% • 8.:SWE:25:26,53% 13.:MNE:21:23,53% • 9.:SRB:26:29, 59% 14.:SLO: 26:30, 56% 10.:CZE: 27:29,52% 15.:POL:22:28,47% 11.:ESP:23:23, 56% 16.:CRO:23:32,52%

Page 14: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

• Few conceeded goals and few scored goals together:not good ranking

• Between 7-16 ranking teams have negative goal difference,exept ESP

• The best teams have more than average effenciency /56%/

Page 15: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Goal differences by goals after 47 match played

• O: 4

• 1: 8

• 2: 9

• 3: 2

• 4-5: 10

• 6:8: 9

• 8-10: 3

• More than 10: 2

• 23 games finished no more than 3 goals different,from other hand the team’s performances were close to each other.

• Expect POL and CRO each team won minimum one game.

Page 16: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Scored goals /AV/ and effeciency

• Scored: Effeciency:

• Most: NED:29,CZE,NOR: 27-27, Most:NOR:61%,NED:60%,ROU,SRB

• 59-59%

• Less: HUN: 22,ESP:23, FRA: 24 Less: POL:47%,HUN 50%,CZE:51%

Page 17: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

9m shots /average/

• 2014:6/16 G/S ,Eff:36% 2016: 6.5/17, 39%

most: CZE :8.5/21, NOR: 8/17, GER: 8/18

ROU: 7.5/17

less: ESP: 5/13, RUS: 5/17, FRA: 5/14

Page 18: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Shots from wing

• 2014: 4.5/8 G/S , Eff: 51% 2016: 5.5/10, 56%

Most: SRB: 7/11, HUN:7/12,CZE:7/13

Less: GER: 3.5/6.5, FRA: 4/6, RUS:4/9

Page 19: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

6m centre shots /pivot position/

• 2014: 5/8 G/S, Eff:61% 2016: 4/6, 66%

Most: DEN:6/9, ROU: 5/7, NOR: 5/6.5

Less: FRA: 2/3, GER: 2/3, NED: 2.5/4

Page 20: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Fast breaks:

• 2014:3.5/4.5, Eff: 74% 2016: 3/4, 75%

• Most: NED,RFA: 6-6, RUS: 4

• Less: CZE, DEN, SWE: 2.5-2.5

• Fast throw off :30 scored goals on 42 games,12 goals by NED.

Page 21: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Breakthroughs

• 2014:3/4.5, Eff:70% 2016: 2.5/3.5, 71%

• Most: 4.5, FRA,GER: 3.5-3.5

• Less: CZE: 1,DEN, HUN 1.5-1.5

Page 22: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Penalty shots /7m/

• 2014:3.5/4.5, Eff: 80% 2016: 3/4, 71%

• Most: ROU, SWE: 4-4, RUS: 3

• Less:NOR: 2, HUN,FRA: 2.5-2.5

Page 23: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Turn overs and technical faults

• 2016 MECH: 11/team/match 2010 WECH: 18 • 2012 WECH: 15 • 2014 WECH: 13

• 2016 WECH: 13.5 • Most: ESP,SRB :16-16, GER: 15

• Less: CZE: 10, DEN: 11, SWE: 12 •

Page 24: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Goal distribution by position

WECH 2014 2016 difference

-9 m shots: 23% 26% +3

-6 m centre: 19% 16% -3

-wing shots: 17% 22% +5!

-breakthroughs: 12,5% 10% -2.5

-fast breaks: 13% 12% -1

-7 m shots: 14% 12% -2

The number of the goals from the wing increased with 5% ,from 9m with 3%,and from the line player position decreased with 3%.

Page 25: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Effeciency by positions

• 2016 2014

• 6m: 66% 61%

• Wing: 55% 51%

• 9m: 36% 39%

• 7m: 72% 80%

• Fast break: 75% 74%

• Breakthrough: 71% 70%

Page 26: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Position, majority and minority attacks /AV/

Position majority minority

NOR:

NED:

DEN:

FRA:

ROU: 23/47%/ 4/60%/ 2.5/49%/

Page 27: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Conceeded goals

• Conceeded goals AV:

• 2014: 25 2016: 25

• Less: FRA: 20,NOR 21,GER 22,

• DEN,ROU: 23-23

• Most: SRB,CZE: 29-29, RUS: 27

• The best 6 teams conceeded the fewest goals.

Page 28: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Blocked shots and steals

• 2014: blocked:2.5 AV 2016: 2

• steals: 4 AV 3

• No relevant difference between the teams by blocked shots and steals.

Page 29: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Goal keeper’s performance

• 2014 AV: 33%/team 2016: 32%

• Most: NOR: 40%,FRA:39%, ESP:37%

• GER:35%,ROU:34%,NED:32%

• Less: SRB: 29%,CZE: 30%, SWE: 31%

• The best 6 team’s goal keeper performance over the average /exept NED/.

Page 30: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

2 min. suspension

• 2014 AV: 3.5 /team 2016: 3.5

• Most: DEN: 5,ROU,ESP: 4-4

• Less: RUS,FRA,CZE: 3-3

• No relevant difference between the teams.

Page 31: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

12 important elements of handball

• 1.-4. ranked team:NOR,NED,FRA,DEN

• 1.The four best teams by:

• 2.Scored goals:NED,NOR

• 3.9M: DEN

• 4.Wing: -

• 5.6.6m centre: DEN,NOR

• 7.Fast break: NED,FRA

• 8.Breakthrough: FRA

Page 32: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

• 9.7m: -

• 10.Turn over: DEN

• 11.Conceeded goals:FRA,NOR,DEN

• 12.Goal keeper’s performance:NOR,FRA

1-4. ranked teams are in the best three teams in each elements:

FRA: 5, NOR,DEN: 4, NED:2

Page 33: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Offence

Simly actions:

• -CB crosses LP

• -transition of the wing players without ball and with ball,cross for the opposite side

• -”YUG” cross

• -CB cross winger,BP cross opposite side for BP or for winger

• -

Page 34: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

• Numerical inferiority:player substitut for goal keeper

• Just few goals in the empty goals

• -Sometimes,closed to the end of the game some teams try to play 7:6

• The meaning of the winger’s performance is important

• Using the fast thow off:NED scored 12 goals

• -Numerical superiority:the teams used mostly short transition from LB,RB position

• „BL1,BL2”

Page 35: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Defence

• Generaly the teams used 6:0 system,but the changed it for 5:1 and 5+1 particularly in numerical superioriti

• MNE played 5:1

• SWE and DEN changed 6:0,5:1,3:2:1 system during the game ,sometimes during one attack,if it was nessesery

• The teams used „ball traps”in the defence

• The teams changed 1-2 players from offence to defence

Page 36: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Refereeing: the mostly discussed points:

• Punishment,duble punishment

• Red cards

• Video referee

• Violations related the line players

• Entering in the goal area

• Passive play

Page 37: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Players,who realized their talent since 2014 WECH CRO/HUN ESP: E.Chaves RUS: A.Sen, D. Dimitrieva POL: A.Zych, J. Dabrik NOR: N. Mörk,S.Ofendal SWE: N.Hagman,L.Blohm,J.Bundsen GER: K.Nadzinavicius MNE: S,Lazovic FRA: E Nze Minko,G.Zaadi,L.Glasuser HUN:r. Meszaros From 26 selected young players from 2014,17 played important role of their national teams.