computer-aided design volume 26 issue 7 1994

Upload: gnanasekar

Post on 20-Feb-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/24/2019 Computer-Aided Design Volume 26 Issue 7 1994

    1/16

    Product design for

    manufacture and assembly

    G eoffrey Boothroyd

    Design i s the f i rs t s tep in manufa ctur ing , and i t is where m ost

    of the im porta n t decis ions are m ade that af fect the f inal cost

    of a p roduct . S ince 1980 , analysis techniques have been m ade

    avai lab le which can gu ide designers towards products which

    are easy to manu facture a nd assemble. The avai lab i l i ty of these

    techniques has created a revolu t ion in manufactur ing indust ry ,

    especial ly in the USA, lead ing to reduced product cost , bet ter

    qual i ty , shor ter t ime to ma rket , low er inventory , few suppliers ,

    an d m an y o th e r im p ro v em en t s .

    The paper f i rs t s t resses the importance of tak ing carefu l

    acco u n t o f m an u fac tu r i n g an d assem b ly p ro b l em s i n t h e ea r l y

    stages of pro du ct design. Then, using a case study, the

    p h i l o so p h y o f t h e Des ig n fo r Man u fac tu re an d Assem b ly

    (DFMA) methodology and i t s appl icat ion are explained . The

    his tor ical development of design-for-assembly and design-for-

    manufactur ing techniques in Japan , Europe and the USA is

    presente d. A review of publishe d case histories em phasiz es the

    enormous advantages to be gained by adopt ing th is relat ively

    n ew ap p ro ach as t h e m ajo r t o o l in co n cu r ren t an d s im u l t an eo u s

    engineering. Finally, a discussion of the various roa dblo cks

    affecting D FM A imp leme ntat ion i s fo l lowed by a d iscussion of

    curren t deve lopme nts , which include produ ct design for

    disassembly, service and recycling.

    Keyw ords : as sembly, m anufacture

    h a s t h e m o s t p r o d u c t i v e p l a n t s . H o w e v e r , i t w a s f o u n d

    t h a t a u t o m a t i o n c o u l d o n l y a c c o u n t f o r o n e - t h i r d o f t h e

    t o t a l d i ff e r e nc e i n p r o d u c t i v i t y b e t w e e n p l a n t s , a n d t h a t ,

    a t a n y l e ve l o f a u t o m a t i o n , t h e d i ff e re n c e b e t w e e n t h e

    m o s t a n d l e a s t e f fi ci e nt p l a n t s i s e n o r m o u s . F o r e x a m p l e ,

    t h e l e a s t - a u t o m a t e d J a p a n e s e d o m e s t i c p l a n t ( i n w h i c h

    3 4 % o f a ll s te p s a r e a c c o m p l i s h e d a u t o m a t i c a l l y ) , w h i c h

    i s a l s o t h e m o s t e f f i c ie n t p l a n t i n t h e w o r l d , n e e d s o n e - h a l f

    o f t h e h u m a n e f fo r t o f o n e c o m p a r a b l y a u t o m a t e d

    E u r o p e a n p l a n t , a n d o n e - t h i r d o f t h e e ff o r t o f a n o t h e r .

    T h e E u r o p e a n p l a n t t h a t i s t h e m o s t a u t o m a t e d i n t h e

    w o r l d ( in w h i c h 4 8 % o f a ll a s s e m b l y s t ep s a r e a u t o m a t e d )

    r e q u i re s 7 0 % m o r e e f f o r t t o p e r f o r m a s t a n d a r d s e t o f

    a s s e m b l y t a s k s o n a s t a n d a r d c a r t h a n d o e s t h e m o s t

    e f f i c i e n t p l a n t , w h i c h i s o n l y 3 4 % a u t o m a t e d .

    T h e q u e s t i o n i s th a t o f w h e t h e r m a n u f a c t u r a b i l i t y a n d

    e a s e o f a s s e m b l y a re m o r e i m p o r t a n t t h a n a u t o m a t i o n

    i n im p r o v i n g p r o d u c t i v i t y . T h e a u t h o r s o f t h e s t u d y

    c o n c l u d e t h a t n o i m p r o v e m e n t s in o p e r a t i o n c a n m a k e

    a p l a n t f u l ly c o m p e t i t i v e i f t h e p r o d u c t d e s i g n i s d e fe c t i v e.

    H o w e v e r , t h e y f ai l t o m a k e a d i r e c t c o n n e c t i o n b e t w e e n

    p r o d u c t d e s i g n a n d p r o d u c t i v i t y , a n d a n a t t e m p t i s m a d e

    i n t h is p a p e r t o s h o w t h a t t h e r e i s n o w o v e r w h e l m i n g

    e v i d e n c e t o s u p p o r t t h e v ie w t h a t p r o d u c t d e s i g n f o r

    m a n u f a c t u r e a n d a s s e m b l y c a n b e t h e k e y t o h i gh

    p r o d u c t i v i t y i n a l l m a n u f a c t u r i n g i n d u s t r i e s .

    I t h a s b e e n e s t i m a t e d t h a t , i n t h e U S A , m a n u f a c t u r i n g

    c o n t r i b u t e s a b o u t 2 3 % o f t h e g r o s s n a t i o n a l p r o d u c t ,

    a n d , m o r e i m p o r t a n t l y , a b o u t 7 0 % o f a l l w e a l t h -

    p r o d u c i n g a c t i v i t i e s . T h o s e w h o c o m p l a c e n t l y s a y t h a t

    t h e U S A i s c h a n g i n g t o a s e rv i c e e c o n o m y m a y e v e n t u a l l y

    f in d t h a t t h e y n o l o n g e r h a v e t h e m e a n s t o p u r c h a s e t h e s e

    s e r v i c e s . T h e U S A h a s b e e n l o s i n g $ 3 4 0 M p e r d a y t o i t s

    f o r e ig n c o m p e t i t o r s , a n d t h e n a t i o n a l d e b t i s n o w a r o u n d

    $ 4 0 0 0 O0 0 M

    C o m p e t i t i v e n e s s h a s b e e n l o s t i n m a n y a r e a s , m o s t

    n o t a b l y , a s c a n b e s e e n i n F ig u r e 1 , i n a u t o m o b i l e

    m a n u f a c t u r e . I n 1 9 9 0, th e r e s u l t s o f a $ 5 M w o r l d w i d e

    s t u d y o f t h is i n d u s t r y w a s p u b l i s h e d 1. T h e s t u d y

    a t t e m p t e d t o e x p l a i n t h e w i d e v a r i a t i o n s i n a u t o m o b i l e

    a s s e m b l y - p l a n t p r o d u c t i v i t y t h r o u g h o u t t h e w o r l d .

    F i g u r e 2

    ( w h i c h is ta k e n f r o m t h i s s t ud y ) s h o w s t h a t J a p a n

    University of Rho de Island, K ingston, RI 02881, USA

    Pape r received." 15 Sep temb er 1993

    (60)

    A i r c r a ft & O t h e r T r a n s p o rt E q u i p m e n t

    Pr o f . , Sc ien t i f i c & Con t r o l Instruments

    Syn the t i c Res ins , Ru bbe r & P las t i cs

    Medicinals Pharmaceuticals

    O r g a n i c C h e m i c a l s & Products

    (1.9)

    )3.6) m

    (41[]

    (s.9)

    (5.3)

    1

    (S.7)I

    (8.4}

    1

    (16.2) I

    ( 1 7 ) ~

    (50) (40) (30) (20) (10)

    ~ 1 0 . 8

    113

    2.4

    1.9

    1.4

    M e t a l w o r k i n g M a c h i n e ry

    Textiles, Yarns & Fibers

    Paper Paper Board

    Other Electrical Machinery & Par ts

    Nonferrous Metals

    Nonmetallic Mineral Manufacturers

    I r on & Stee l Mi l l Products

    Telecorn. & Sound Reproduction Equipment

    Apparel Accessories

    Motor Vehicles & Par ts

    r r r r

    10 20 30 40 50 60

    Figure i Breakdow n of US trade balance

    [Values in $ 1 0 9 . ]

    0 0 1 0 - 4 4 8 5 / 9 4 / 0 7 / 0 5 0 5 - 1 6 @ 1 9 9 4 B u t t e r w o r t h - H e i n e m a n n L t d

    C o m p u t e r - A i d e d D e s i g n V o l u m e 2 6 N u m b e r 7 J u l y 1 9 94

    5 0 5

  • 7/24/2019 Computer-Aided Design Volume 26 Issue 7 1994

    2/16

    P r o d u c t d e s i g n f o r m a n u f a c t u r e a n d a s s e m b l y : G B o o t h r o y c l

    Pr oduc t i v i t y ( h r s /veb ic le j

    100 [ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    ,30

    o

    J , ' , l (8}

    JINA (5) USINA (14) US&J/E (9) E/E (13) NIC (11)

    Pa r en t Loca t ion /P lan t Loca t ion { Sam p le S ize }

    F i g u r e

    2 W o r l d w i d e a u t o m o b i l e a s s e m b l y - p h m t p r .~ d u c ti v i b , (~,tdtma

    producers in 198~))

    [ A d a p t e d f r o m R e f e r e n c e I . l ' h e v o l u m e p r o d u c e r s i n c lu d e t h e L i b b l ~

    th ree ' , F ia t . PS A, Renau l t an d Volk s wag en in E urope . and a l l o f the

    J a p a n e s e c o m p a n i e s . J ,' J : J a p a n e s e - o w n e d p l a n t s i n J a p a n , J N A

    J a p a n e s e - o w n e d p l a n t s i n N o r t h A m e r i c a . i n c l u d i n g j o i n t - y e n ( m e

    p lan t s w i th Am er ican f i rm s , US / NA : l, J S -owned p la n t s in N or (h

    A m e r i c a , U S & J / E : U S - a n d J a p a n e s e - o w n e d p l a n t s in E u r o p e , 1 t :

    E u r o p e a n - o w n e d p l a n t s i n E u r o p e , N I C : p l a n t s m n e w l y i n du s t r ia l i z in F

    c o u n t r i e s : M e x i c o , B ra z i l, T a i w a n a n d K o r e a . S o u r c e : I n t e r n a t i o n a l

    M o t o r V e h i c l e P r o g r a m S t u d y . ]

    D E S IG N F O R M A N U F A C T U R E A N D

    A S S E M B L Y

    I n th e co n tex t o f th i s p ap er , d e s ig n i s th e f i r s t s t ep m

    m a n u f a c t u r e , a n d i t i s a n a c t i v i t y t h a t s t a r t s w i t h s k e t c h e s

    o f p a r t s a n d a s s e m b l i e s, a n d p r o g r e s s e s t o t h e d r a w i n g

    b o a r d o r CA r) w o r k s t a t i o n , w h e r e a s s e m b l y d r a w i n g s a n d

    d e t a i le d p a r t d r a w i n g s a r e p r o d u c e d . T h e s e d r a w i n g s a r c

    t h e n p a s s e d t o t h e m a n u f a c t u r i n g a n d a s s e m b l y e n g in e e r s.

    w h o s e f u n c t i o n i s t o o p t i m i z e t h e p r o c e s s e s u s e d t o ,

    p r o d u c e t h e f i n a l p r o d u c t . F r e q u e n t l y , i t i s a t t h i s

    s t a g e t h a t m a n u f a c t u r i n g a n d a s s e m b l y p r o b l e m s a r c

    e n c o u n t e r e d a n d r e q u e s t s a r e m a d e f o r d e s i g n c h a n g e s .

    S o m e t i m e s , t h e s e d e s i g n c h a n g e s r e s u l t i n c o n s i d e r a b l e

    d e l a y s i n t h e f i n a l p r o d u c t r e l e a s e . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e l a t e /

    i n t h e p r o d u c t d e s i g n a n d d e v e l o p m e n t c y c l e t h e c h a n g e s

    o c c u r , t h e m o r e e x p e n s i v e t h e y b e c o m e . T h e r e f o r e . n o t

    o n l y i s i t i m p o r t a n t t o t a k e m a n u f a c t u r e a n d a s s e m b l y

    i n t o a c c o u n t d u r i n g p r o d u c t d e s i g n , b u t a l s o t h e s e

    c o n s i d e r a t i o n s m u s t o c c u r a s e a r l y a s p o s s i b l e i n t h e

    d es ig n cy c le .

    Th is i s sh o w n q u a l i t a t iv e ly b y th e c h ar t in / - 7.qw ' c 3 .

    w h ich sh o w s th a t ex t r a t ime sp en t ea r ly in th e d es ig t~

    p r o c e s s i s m o r e t h a n c o m p e n s a t e d f o r b y s a v i n g s i n t i m e

    w h e n p r o t o t y p i n g t a k e s p l a c e . T h u s . i n a d d i t i o n l ~ ,

    r e d u c i n g p r o d u c t c o s t s , th e a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h e D e s i g n fo~

    M a n u f a c t u r e a n d A s s e m b ly ( D F M A ) m e t h o d o l o g y *

    s h o r t e n s t h e t i m e t a k e n t o b r i n g t h e p r o d u c t t o m a r k e t .

    A s a n e x a m p l e , t h e I n g e r s o l l R a n d C o m p a n y r e p o r t e d :

    t h a t t h e a p p l i c a t i o n o f D F M A r e d u c e d p r o d u c l

    d e v e l o p m e n t t i m e f r o m t w o y e a r s t o o n e . I n a d d i t i o n .

    t h e d e si g n t e a m r e d u c e d t h e n u m b e r o f p a r ts i n a p o r t a b l e

    c o m p r e s s o r r a d i a t o r a n d o i l - c o o l e r a s s e m b l y f ro m 8 0

    t o 2 9, d e c r e a s e d t h e n u m b e r o f f a s t e n e r s f r o m 3 8 t o 2 0 .

    t r i m m e d t h e n u m b e r o f a ss e m b l y o p e r a t i o n s f r o m 1 59 to

    4 0 , a n d r e d u c e d t h e a s s e m b l y t i m e f r o m 1 8 . 5 m i n t o 6 . 5

    m i n . D e v e l o p m e n t s t a r t e d i n J u n e 1 9 8 9 , a n d t h e n e w

    d e s i g n w e n t i n t o f u l l p r o d u c t i o n i n F e b r u a r y 1 9 9 0 .

    T r a d i t i o n a l l y , t h e a t t i t u d e o f d e si g n e r s h a s b e e n " w e

    d e s i g n i t , y o u b u i l d i t ' . T h i s h a s n o w b e e n t e r m e d t h e

    ' o v e r - t h e - w a l l a p p r o a c h ' , i n w h i c h t h e d e s i g n e r t h r o w s

    * ' D E M A ' i s a t r a d e m a r k o f B o o t h r o y d D e w h u r s t I n c ., U S A .

    c o n c e p t u a l

    des i gn

    w i t h ou t D F M A

    de ta i l

    d e s i g n

    p r o t o t y p i n g

    ~ nd des ign

    c h a n g e s

    c o n c e p t u a i

    d e s i g n

    w i t h D F M A

    _J

    t i m e

    F i g u r e

    3 Sh,.n-tct dcs ign-to -prod la: t i , ,~ , ' , n i t- . ihiougt~ t~ ,c v,] I ) I :NiA

    ear l> m des ign p roces s

    j " -

    jr - , .

    F i g u r e 4 ( ) \ c { t h e ~ w all '

    des tgr i

    fR ep ro du cc d b} courtes , , , of Mu tu o & ' , ,: ,sociatcs I t~ . . 5~ , ,c :.(i~J

    91l W Bi.~ Beaxc~ Roa d. " lro, . . MI 48084 S ' ~

    t h e d e s i g n s o v e r a w a l l t o t h e m a m t l a c t u r i n g e n g i n e e r >

    w h o t h e n h a v e t o d e a l w i t h t h e ' , a r i o u s m a n u f a c t u r i n g

    p r o b l e m s a r i s i n g b e c a u s e t h e y w e r e n o t i n v o l v e d i n t h e

    d es ig n e f f o r t ( s ee Fi.qurc 4). O n e m e a n s o f o v e rc o m i n g

    t h is p r o b l e m i s t o c o n s u l t t h e m a m , f a c t u r i n g e n g i n e e r s

    a t t h e d e s i g n s t a g e . T h e r e s u l t i n g t e a m w o r k a v o i d s

    m a n y o f th e p r o b l e m s t h a t a r is e . H o w e v e r . t h es e t e a m s .

    n o w c a l l e d s i m u l t a n e o u s - e n g i n e e r i n g o r c o n c u r r e n t -

    e n g i n e e r i n g t e a m s , r e q u i r e a n a l y s i s t o o l s t o h e l p t h e m

    s t u d y p r o p o s e d d e s i g n s a n d e v a l u a t e t h e m f r o m t h e p o i n t

    o f v i e w o f m a n u f a c t u r i n g a n d a s s e m b l y d i f f i c u lt y a n d c o s L

    H O W D F M A W O R K S

    B y w a y o f e x a m p l e ,

    k~.qurc

    .5 s h o w s t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f

    a m o t o r - d r i v e a s s e m b l y t h a t m u s t b e d e s i g n e d t o s e n s e

    5 0 6 C o m p u t e r - A i d e d D e s i g n V o l u m e 2 6 N u m b e r 7 J u l y 1 9 9 4

  • 7/24/2019 Computer-Aided Design Volume 26 Issue 7 1994

    3/16

    \ \ \

    F igure

    5

    3 . 2 5

    a t t ached to

    /

    screw drive

    ~

    guide rails

    \ .

    Configuration of required motor-drive assemb ly

    C O V E R S C R E W ( 4 ) E N D P L A T E

    0 . 1 2 d i a x 0 3 I c S l e e l . p a i n t e d

    / / 4 5 x 2 2 5 ~ 1 3

    B U S H ( 2 ) P L A S T I C B U S H

    i p e w e e m e a - - i

    ~ -. II ~ . e / / / ~ IY . I ~ M O T O R S C R E W { 2 ) ~

    ' 0 2 d [ a x 0 6

    / ~ I L . / / 2 / < / / ~ q - t ~ b . .

    M . . . .

    I

    . / < % - q C / a> ~ , ' y . / . ', - - ~ /

    S E T S C a E W

    E N D p L A T E S C R E W [ 2 1 ~ - ~ ' ~

    0 2 d J a x 0 5

    Figure 6 Init ial design of motor-drive assembly

    a n d c o n t r o l i t s p o s i t i o n o n t w o s t e e l g u i de r a il s . T h e m o t o r

    m u s t b e f u l ly e n c l o s e d f o r a e s t h e ti c r e a s o n s , a n d h a v e a

    r e m o v a b l e c o v e r f o r a c c e s s s o t h a t t h e p o s i t i o n s e n s o r

    c a n b e a d j u s t e d . T h e p r i n c i p a l r e q u i r e m e n t s a r e a r i g i d

    b a s e t h a t i s d e s i g n e d t o s l i d e u p a n d d o w n t h e g u i d e r a i l s ,

    a n d t h a t s u p p o r t s t h e m o t o r a n d s e n s or . T h e m o t o r a n d

    s e n s o r h a v e w i r e s t h a t c o n n e c t t h e m t o a p o w e r s u p p l y

    a n d a c o n t r o l u n i t , r e s p e c t i v e l y .

    A p r o p o s e d s o l u t i o n i s s h o w n i n

    Figure 6.

    T h e b a s e i s

    p r o v i d e d w i t h t w o b u s h e s t o p r o v i d e s u i t a b l e fr i c ti o n a n d

    w e a r c h a r a c t e r is t ic s . T h e m o t o r i s s e c u r e d t o t h e b a s e

    w i t h t w o m o t o r s c r e w s , a n d a h o l e i n t h e b a s e a c c e p t s

    t h e c y l i n d r i c a l s e n s o r , w h i c h i s h e l d i n p l a c e w i t h a s e t

    s c r e w . T o p r o v i d e t h e r e q u i r e d c o v e r s , a n e n d p l a t e i s

    s e c u r e d b y t w o e n d - p l a t e s c r e w s t o t w o s t a n d o ff s , w h ic h

    a r e , in t u r n , s c r e w e d i n t o t h e b a s e . T h i s e n d p l a t e i s f i t te d

    w i t h a p la s t i c b u s h t h r o u g h w h i c h t h e c o n n e c t i n g w i re s

    p a s s . F i n a l l y , a b o x - s h a p e d c o v e r s l i d e s o v e r t h e w h o l e

    a s s e m b l y f r o m b e l o w t h e b a s e , a n d is h e ld i n p l a c e b y

    f o u r c o v e r s c re w s , t w o p a s s i n g i n t o t h e b a s e , a n d t w o

    i n t o t h e e n d c o v e r .

    T w o s u b a s s e m b l i e s a r e r e q u ir e d , t h e m o t o r a n d t h e

    s e n s o r , a n d , i n t h i s i n i ti a l d e s i g n , th e r e a r e e i g h t a d d i t i o n a l

    m a i n p a r t s , a n d n i n e s c re w s , m a k i n g a t o t a l o f 1 9 i t e m s

    t o b e a s s e m b l e d .

    W h e n D F M A b e g a n t o b e t a k e n s e r i o u s ly i n t h e e a r l y

    1 9 8 0 s , a n d t h e c o n s e q u e n t b e n e f i t s w e r e a p p r e c i a t e d , i t

    b e c a m e a p p a r e n t t h a t t h e g r e a te s t i m p r o v e m e n t s a r o s e

    f r o m s i m p l i fi c a t io n o f t he p r o d u c t b y r e d u c t i o n o f t h e

    n u m b e r o f s e p a r a t e p a r t s . T o g i ve g u i d a n c e t o t h e

    d e s i g n e r in r e d u c i n g th e p a r t c o u r t , th e D F M A

    m e t h o d o l o g y 3 p r o v i d e s t h r e e c r i t e r i a a g a i n s t w h i c h e a c h

    P r o d u c t d e s i g n f o r m a n u f a c t u r e a n d a s s e m b l y : G B o o t h r o y d

    p a r t m u s t b e e x a m i n e d a s it i s a d d e d t o t he p r o d u c t

    d u r i n g a s s e m b l y :

    D u r i n g th e o p e r a t i o n o f t h e p r o d u c t , d o e s t h e p a r t

    m o v e r e l a t i v e t o a l l t h e o t h e r p a r t s a l r e a d y

    a s s e m b l e d ? O n l y g r o s s m o t i o n s h o u l d b e c o ns i d e r e d ;

    s m a l l m o t i o n s t h a t c a n b e a c c o m m o d a t e d b y i nt e g ra l

    e l a s t i c e l e m e n t s , f o r e x a m p l e , a r e n o t s u f f i c i e n t f o r

    a p o s i t i v e a n s w e r .

    M u s t t h e p a r t b e o f a m a t e r i a l t h a t is d i f f e r e n t

    f r o m t h o s e o f a ll t he o t h e r p a r t s a l r e a d y a s s e m b l e d ,

    o r m u s t i t b e i s o l a t e d f r o m t h e s e ? O n l y f u n d a m e n t a l

    r e a s o n s r e l a t i n g t o m a t e r i a l s p r o p e r t i e s a r e a c c e p t a b l e .

    M u s t th e p a r t b e s e p a r a t e f r o m a ll t h e o t h e r p a r t s

    a l r e a d y a s s e m b l e d b e c a u s e n e c e s s a r y a s s e m b l y o r

    d i s a s s e m b l y o f o t h e r s e p a r a t e p a r t s w o u l d o t h e r w i s e

    b e i m p o s s i b le ?

    T h e a p p l i c a t i o n o f t he s e c r i te r i a t o t h e p r o p o s e d d e s i g n

    (see Figure 6) d u r i n g a s s e m b l y p r o c e e d s a s f o l lo w s :

    T h e b a s e is a s s e m b l e d i n to a f i x tu r e , a n d , s in c e t h e r e

    a r e n o o t h e r p a r t s w i t h w h i c h t o c o m b i n e i t, it i s a

    t h e o r e t i c a l l y n e c e s s a r y p a r t .

    T h e t w o b u s h e s d o n o t s a t is f y t h e c r i t e r ia , a n d c a n

    t h e o r e t i c a l l y b e i n t e g r a l w i t h t h e b a s e .

    T h e m o t o r is a s t a n d a r d s u b a s s e m b l y o f p a r t s w h i c h

    i s a p u r c h a s e d i t e m . T h u s , t h e c r i t e r i a c a n n o t b e

    a p p l i e d u n l e s s t h e a s s e m b l y o f t h e m o t o r i t s e l f i s

    c o n s i d e r e d a s p a r t o f t h e a n a l y s i s . I n t h is e x a m p l e ,

    w e a s s u m e t h a t t h e m o t o r a n d s e n s o r a r e n o t t o b e

    a n a l y s e d .

    I n v a r i a b l y , s e p a r a t e f a s t e n e rs s u c h a s t h e t w o m o t o r

    s c r e w s d o n o t m e e t t h e c r i t e r i a , b e c a u s e a n i n t e g r a l

    f a s t e n i n g a r r a n g e m e n t i s a l w a y s t h e o r e t i c a l l y p o s s i b le .

    T h e s e n s o r i s a p u r c h a s e d it e m .

    T h e s e t s c r e w i s t h e o r e t i c a l l y n o t n e c e s s a r y .

    T h e t w o s t a n d o f f s d o n o t m e e t t h e c r i t e r ia ; t h e y c o u l d

    b e i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o t h e b a s e.

    T h e e n d p l a t e m u s t b e s e p a r a t e f or r e a s o n s o f

    a s s e m b l y .

    T h e t w o e n d - p l a t e sc r e w s a r e t h e o r e t ic a l l y n o t

    n e c e s s a r y .

    T h e p l a s ti c b u s h c a n b e o f t h e s a m e m a t e r i a l a s , a n d

    t h e r e f o r e c o m b i n e d w i t h , t h e e n d p l a t e .

    T h e c o v e r c a n a ls o b e c o m b i n e d w i t h t h e e n d pl a te .

    F i n a l l y , t h e f o u r c o v e r s c r e w s a r e t h e o r e t i c a l l y n o t

    n e c e s a r y .

    F r o m t h is a n a l y s is , it c a n b e s e e n t h a t , i f t h e m o t o r a n d

    s e n s o r s u b a s s e m b l i e s c a n b e a r r a n g e d t o s n a p o r s c r e w

    i n t o t h e b a s e , a n d a p l a s t i c c o v e r c a n b e d e s i g n e d t o s n a p

    o n , o n l y f o u r s e p a r a t e i t e m s w i l l b e n e e d e d , i n s t e a d o f

    1 9 . T h e s e f o u r i t e m s r e p r e s e n t t h e t h e o r e t i c a l m i n i m u m

    n u m b e r n e e d e d t o s a ti s fy th e c o n s t r a i n t s o f t h e p r o d u c t

    d e s i gn w i t h o u t c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f th e p r a c t i c a l l i m i t a ti o n s .

    I t is n o w n e c e s s a r y f o r t he d e s i g n e r o r d e s i g n t e a m t o

    j u s t i f y t h e e x i s t e n c e o f t h o s e p a r t s t h a t h a v e n o t s a t i s f i e d

    t h e c r i t e r i a . J u s t i f i c a t i o n m a y a r i s e f r o m p r a c t i c a l ,

    t e c h n ic a l o r e c o n o m i c c o n s i d e r a t i o n s . I n t h i s e x a m p l e , i t

    c a n b e a r g u e d t h a t t w o m o t o r s c r e w s a r e n e e d e d t o s e c u r e

    t h e m o t o r , a n d o n e s e t s c r e w i s n e e d e d t o h o l d t h e s e n s o r ,

    b e c a u s e a n y a l t e r n a t i v e s w o u l d b e i m p r a c t i c a l f o r a

    l o w - v o l u m e p r o d u c t s u c h a s t h is .

    I t c a n b e a r g u e d t h a t t h e t w o p o w d e r m e t a l b u s h e s

    a r e u n n e c e s s a r y , b e c a u s e t h e b a s e c o u l d b e m a c h i n e d

    C o m p u t e r - A i d e d D e s i g n V o l u m e 2 6 N u m b e r 7 J u l y 1 9 9 4 5 0 7

  • 7/24/2019 Computer-Aided Design Volume 26 Issue 7 1994

    4/16

    P r o d u c t d e s i g n f o r m a n u f a c t u r e a n d a s s e m b l y : G B o o t h r o y d

    f r o m a n a l t e r n a t i v e m a t e r i a l w i t h t h e n e c e s s a r y f r i c ti o n a l

    c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s .

    F i n a l l y , i t i s v e r y d i f f i c u l t t o j u s t i f y t h e s e p a r a t e

    s t a nd o f f s, e n d p l a t e , c o v er , p l a s t i c b u s h a n d a s s o c i a t e d

    s i x s c r ews .

    N o w , b e f o r e a n a l t e r n a t i v e d e s i g n c a n b e c o n s i d e r e d ,

    i t i s n e c e s s a r y t o h a v e e s t i m a t e s o f th e a s s e m b l y t i m e s

    a n d c o s t s , s o t h a t a n y p o s s i b l e s a v i n g s c a n b e t a k e n i n t o

    a c c o u n t w h e n c o n s i d e r i n g d e s i g n a l t e r n a t i v e s . U s i n g

    D F M A t im e s t a n d a r d s a n d k n o w l e d g e b a s e s, i t i s p o s s i b l e

    t o m a k e e s t i m a t e s o f a s s e m b l y c o s t s, a n d t h e n t o e s t i m a t e

    t h e co s t o f t h e p a r t s a n d a s s o c i a t e d t o o l i n g , w i t h o u t

    h a v i n g f i n a l d e t a i l d r a w i n g s o f th e p a r t s .

    F i r s t , Ta b le 1 s h o w s t h e r e s u lt s o f t h e D F A a n a l y s i s;

    t h e t o t a l a s s e m b l y t i m e i s e s t i m a t e d t o b e 1 6 0 s. I t is a l s o

    p o s s i b l e t o o b t a i n a n a b s o l u t e m e a s u r e o f t h e q u a l i t y o f

    t h e d e s ig n f o r e a s e o f a s s e m b l y . T h e t h e o r e t i c a l m i n i m u m

    n u m b e r o f p a r t s i s f o u r, a s e x p l a i n e d a b o v e , a n d , i f t h e s e

    p a r t s w e r e e a s y t o a s s e m b l e , t h e y w o u l d t a k e 3 s e a c h t o

    a s s e m b l e o n a v e r a g e . T h u s , t h e t h e o r e t i c a l m i n i m u m ( o r

    i d e a l ) a s s e m b l y t i m e i s 1 2 s , a f i g u r e w h i c h c a n b e

    c o m p a r e d w i t h t h e e s t i m a t e d t i m e o f 1 6 0 s , g i v i n g a n

    a s s e m b l y e f f ic i e n c y ( o r D F A i n d e x ) o f 1 2 /1 6 0 , o r 7 . 5 % .

    T h e e l i m i n a t i o n o f p a r t s n o t m e e t i n g t h e m i n i m u m

    p a r t - c o u n t c r i t e r ia , a n d w h i c h c a n n o t b e j u s t i f ie d o n

    p r a c t i c a l g r o u n d s , r e s u l ts in t h e d e s i g n c o n c e p t s h o w n i n

    Figure 7 . H e r e , t h e b u s h e s a r e c o m b i n e d w i t h t h e b a s e ,

    a n d t h e s t a n d o f f s , e n d p l a t e , c o v e r , p l a s t i c b u s h a n d s i x

    a s s o c i a t e d s c r e w s a r e r e p l a c e d b y o n e s n a p - o n p l a s t i c

    c o v e r . T h e e l i m i n a t e d i t e m s e n t a i l e d a n a s s e m b l y t i m e o f

    9 7 .4 s . T h e n e w c o v e r t a k e s o n l y 4 s t o a s s e m b l e , a n d i t

    a v o i d s t h e n e e d f o r a r e o r i e n t a t i o n . I n a d d i t i o n , s c r e w s

    w i t h p i l o t p o i n t s a r e u s e d a n d t h e b a s e i s r e d e s i g n e d s o

    t h a t t h e m o t o r i s s e l f - a l i g n i n g . Ta b le 2 p r e s e n t s t h e r e s u l t s

    o f a D F A a n a l y s i s o f t h e r e d e s i g n e d a s s e m b l y ; th e n e w

    a s s e m b l y t i m e i s o n l y 4 6 s , a n d t h e d e s i g n e f f i c i e n c y h a s

    i n c r e a s e d t o 2 6 % .

    F i n a l l y , Ta b le 3 c o m p a r e s t h e c o s t o f t h e p a r t s f o r t h e

    t w o d e s i g n s . I t c a n b e s e e n t h a t t h e r e i s a s a v i n g o f $ 1 3. 7 1

    i n p a r t s c o s t s . H o w e v e r . t h e t o o l i n g f o r t h e n e w c o v e r i s

    , e s ti m a t e d t o b e $ 5 0 00 - - a n i n v e s t m e n t t h a t w o u l d h a v e

    t o b e m a d e a t t h e o u ts e t . T h u s , t h e o u t c o m e o f t h i s s tu d y

    i s a s e c o n d d e s i g n c o n c e p t t h a t r e p r e s e n t s a t o t a l s a v i n g

    o f $1 4 .6 6 , o f w h i c h $ 0 .9 5 r e p r e s e n t s t h e s a v i n g s i n

    a s s e m b l y t i m e .

    F igure

    7 Redesign of mo tor-dr ive assembly following design-for-

    assembly analysis

    Table 1 Results of D FA analysis for initial design of mo tor-driv e assembly

    Item Num ber Theoretical Assembly Assembly

    par t count time, s cost, US cents

    Base 1 1 3.5 2.9

    Bu sh 2 0 12.3 10.2

    M oto r subassembly 1 1 9.5 7.9

    M oto r screw 2 0 21.0 17.5

    Sensor subassembly 1 1 8.5 7.1

    Set screw 0 10.6 8.8

    Stand off 2 0 16.0 13.3

    End plate 1 8.4 7.0

    End -plate screw 2 0 16.6 13.8

    Plastic bush I 0 3.5 2.9

    Threa d leads 5.0 4.2

    Reo rient 4.5 3.8

    Cov er 1 0 9.4 7.9

    Cov er screw 4 0 31.2 26.0

    To tals l 9 4 160.0 133.0

    [Design efficiency=4 x 3 /160=7.5%. ]

    Table 2 Results of DFA analysis for redesign of moto r-drive assembly

    Item Num ber Theoretical Assembly Assembly

    part coun t time, s cost, US cents

    Base 1 l 3.5 2.9

    Mo tor subassembly 1 l 4.5 3.8

    Mo tor screw 2 0 12.0 10.0

    Senso r subass emb ly 1 1 8.5 7.1

    Set screw 1 0 8.5 7.1

    Thr ead leads 5.0 4.2

    Plastic cover 1 1 4.0 3.3

    Tota ls 7 4 46.0 38.4

    [Design efficiency= 4 x 3/46.0 = 26%.]

    5 0 8 C o m p u t e r - A i d e d D e s i g n V o l u m e 2 6 N u m b e r 7 J u l y 1 9 9 4

  • 7/24/2019 Computer-Aided Design Volume 26 Issue 7 1994

    5/16

    Pr o d u c t d e s i g n f o r m a n u f a c t u r e a n d a s s e m b l y : G Bo o t h r o y d

    Ta b le 3 Com par i s o n o f pa r t cos t s fo r m oto r -d r ive as s em bly des ign and r edes ign

    Propos e d des ign Redes ign

    I tem Cos t , US cen t s I t em Cos t , US cen t s

    Base (alum inium ) 12.91

    Bu sh (2) 2.40*

    Mo tor screw (2) 0.20

    Set screw 0.10"

    Stan doff (2) 5 .19

    End plate 5.89

    End -pla te screw (2) 0.20*

    Plas t i c bus h 0 .10"

    Cover 8.05

    Cov er screw (4) 0.40*

    Total 35.44

    Base (nylon) 13.43

    Mo tor s c r ew (2 ) 0 .20*

    Set screw 0.10"

    P las t i c cover ( inc ludes too l ing ) 8 .00

    Total 21.73

    [*Pu rchas e d in quan t i ty . Pu rc has ed m ot o r an d s ens o r s ubas s em bl ies no t inc luded . Redes ign : too l ing cos t for p last i c cover = $5000. ]

    gn concep t I~

    design for assembly L

    DFA) |

    _I

    e~arlySelection f materials

    and processes and

    cos t

    estimates

    T

    ~ -suggest ions

    for

    ~simpl i f icat ion

    ~ of p roduc t s t ruc tu re

    ~ , suggestions fo r [

    more economic [

    materials and [

    processes

    [

    G

    @

    ~LbLbLb~stes ig n con cep t I a b

    design f o r m a n u f a c t u r e ~ d et ail d e si g n I

    (DFM) I V)fo r minimum ]

    , manufactur ing

    ,

    I p r o d u c t i o o

    Fi gu re

    8 T yp ica l s t eps t aken in s im ul tan eous eng ineer ing s tudy us ing

    D F M A

    I t c a n b e n o t e d t h a t t h e r e d e s i g n s u g g e s t i o n s a r o s e

    t h r o u g h t h e a p p l ic a t i o n o f t h e m i n i m u m p a r t - c o u n t

    c r i te r i a d u r i n g t h e d e s i g n - f o r - a s se m b l y a n a l y s i s ; th e f i n a l

    c o s t c o m p a r i s o n w a s m a d e a f t e r a s s e m b l y - c o s t a n d

    p a r t s - c o s t e s t i m a t e s w e r e c o n s i d e r e d .

    Figure 8 s u m m a r i z e s t h e s t e p s t a k e n w h e n u s i n g

    D F M A d u r i n g d e s ig n . T h e d e s i g n - fo r - a ss e m b l y ( D F A )

    ana lys i s i s conduc ted f i r s t , l eading to a s impl i f i ca t ion of

    t h e p r o d u c t s t r u c t u r e . T h e n , e a r l y c o s t e s ti m a t e s f o r t h e

    p a r t s a r e o b t a i n e d f o r b o t h t h e o r i g i n a l d e s i g n a n d t h e

    n e w d e s i g n in o r d e r t o m a k e t r a d e o f f d e c i si o n s . D u r i n g

    th i s proces s , t he bes t ma te r i a l s and proces ses to be used

    f o r th e v a r i o u s p a r t s a r e c o n s i d e r e d . F o r e x a m p l e , w o u l d

    i t b e b e t t e r t o m a n u f a c t u r e t h e c o v e r i n t h e n e w d e s i g n

    f r o m s h e e t m e t a l ? O n c e t h e m a t e r i a l s a n d p r o c e s s es h a v e

    b e e n f i n a l ly se l ec t ed , a m o r e t h o r o u g h a n a l y s i s f o r d e s i g n

    f o r m a n u f a c t u r e ( D F M ) c a n b e c a r r i e d o u t f o r t h e d e t a i l

    des ign of the pa r t s .

    D E V E L O P M E N T O F D F A A N D D F M

    M E T H O D S

    A s e a r l y a s t h e 1 9 6 0 s , c o m p a n i e s w e r e d e v e l o p i n g

    g u i d e l in e s fo r u s e d u r i n g p r o d u c t d e s i g n . P e r h a p s o n e o f

    F i g u r e 9 Mis lead ing p roduc ib i l i ty r ecom m enda t ion4 : (a ) s ing le p iece ,

    (b) mult iple pieces

    [T wo- fo r -one par t des ign : the s ubs t i tu t ion o f a s m al l num b er o f s im ple

    s hapes to p rov ide a func t ion r a ther than a s ing le com plex s hape . ]

    t h e b e s t k n o w n e x a m p l e s i s t h e Manufacturin9

    Producibility Handbook, w h i c h w a s p u b l i s h e d f o r i n t e r n a l

    u s e b y G e n e r a l E l e c t r i c i n t h e

    U S A 4 .

    In this ,

    m a n u f a c t u r i n g d a t a w a s a c c u m u l a t e d i n t o o n e l a r g e

    r e f er e n c e v o l u m e , w i t h t h e i d e a t h a t d e s i g n e r s w o u l d h a v e ,

    a t t h e i r f i n g e r t i p s , t h e m a n u f a c t u r i n g k n o w l e d g e

    necessa ry for e f f ic i en t des ign . How ever , t he em pha s i s was

    o n t h e d e s i g n o f i n d i v i d u a l p a r t s f o r ' p r o d u c i b i li t y ' , a n d

    l i t t l e a t t en t ion was g iven to the as sembly proces s . Thi s

    a p p r o a c h l ed , f o r ex a m p l e , to t h e c u r i o u s r e c o m m e n d a t i o n

    s h o w n i n

    Figure 9:

    ' s u b s t i t u t e a s m a l l n u m b e r o f s i m p l e

    s h a p e s t o p r o v i d e a f u n c t i o n r a t h e r t h a n a s i ng l e c o m p l e x

    s h a p e ' . I n f a c t , w h e n o n e c o n s i d e r s t h e m e a n s w h e r e b y

    the separa te s imple pa r t s in Figure 9 m i g h t b e s e c u r e d ,

    o n e c a n s ee t h a t t h e t o t a l c o s t o f th i s r e c o m m e n d e d d e s i g n

    w o u l d b e f a r g r e a t e r t h a n t h a t o f th e s i n g l e p a r t .

    I t h a s n o w b e c o m e c l e a r t h a t t h e o b j e c t i v e s h o u l d b e

    t o s i m p l i fy th e p r o d u c t s t r u c t u r e t o r e d u c e a s s e m b l y c o s t

    and reduce the to t a l pa r t s cos t . In fac t , des ign for a s sembly

    ( D F A ) s h o u l d a l w a y s b e t h e f i r s t c o n s i d e r a t i o n .

    D E S I G N F O R A S S E M B L Y

    S i g n i f i c a n t b e n e f i t s d e r i v e d f r o m t h e u s e o f D F A w e r e

    n o t r e a li z e d u n t i l s y s t e m a t i c - a n a l y s i s t o o l s b e c a m e

    a v a i l a b l e a r o u n d 1 9 8 0 . T h e r e a s o n w a s t h a t d e s i g n

    g u i d e li n e s , e v e n i f t h e y p r o v i d e s o u n d r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s ,

    d o n o t h e l p t h e d e s ig n e r a n y m o r e t h a n b y s a y i n g ' t r y t o

    C o m p u t e r -A i d e d De s i g n Vo l u m e 2 6 Nu m b e r 7 J u l y 1 9 94 5 0 9

  • 7/24/2019 Computer-Aided Design Volume 26 Issue 7 1994

    6/16

    P r o d u c t d e s i g n f o r m a n u f a c t u r e a n d a s s e m b l y : G B o o t h r o y d

    design so that the product is easy to assemble'. Examples

    of changes made to simplify assembly in other products

    never seem to apply to the product under consideration,

    and, in order to cover a reasonable proportion of possible

    design changes, the design-guideline handbook would be

    huge, leaving the designer to thumb through numerous

    examples with little chance of success in the end.

    Interestingly, most of the first efforts to develop

    systematic procedures for assembly analysis concentrated

    on product design for ease of

    automatic assembly.

    The

    Hitachi Assembly Evaluation Method (AEM) 5 described

    further below was directed at simplifying the automatic

    insertion of parts. The Boothroyd Dewhurst design-for-

    assembly (DFA) method 3 grew out of collaborative

    research on design for automatic feeding and automatic

    insertion carried out at the University of Massachusetts,

    USA, and the University of Salford Industrial Centre,

    UK. This emphasis arose from the fact that, when a

    company desired to automate the assembly of a product,

    it was forced to reconsider its design. There are many

    examples of products for which automatic assembly is

    simply not feasible without redesign, but none where

    manual assembly is not feasible. Also, when redesign for

    automatic assembly was undertaken, it was frequently

    found that the resulting product was so easy to assemble

    manually that automatic assembly could no longer be

    justified. The IBM Pro-Printer is an example of this

    experience 6.

    It is now the application of design for

    manual

    assembly

    that is resulting in staggering cost savings in many

    products, because of the resulting simplification of the

    product and the reductions in

    to tal

    manufacturing and

    assembly costs.

    As with the method just described, the idea behind

    most systematic DFA methods is to consider each part

    in turn as it is inserted into the product, gauge the

    difficulty of the assembly process, and then sum the results

    to obtain a numerical rating of assembly difficulty.

    Ideally, different individuals analysing the same product

    will obtain similar ratings, thus providing the means for

    independent evaluation of a design.

    HITACHI AEM METHOD

    In 1980, the Okochi Memorial Prize was awarded for the

    development of an automatic-assembly system for

    tape-recorder mechanisms 7. In the process of developing

    this system, the product design was considered carefully

    using the Assembly Evaluation Method developed at

    Hitachi. This method is based on the principle of 'one

    motion for one part'. For more complicated motions, a

    point-loss standard is used, and the assemblability of

    the whole product is evaluated by subtract ing points lost.

    The AEM method, described in 1986 by Miyakawa

    and Ohashi 5, uses two indices at the earliest possible

    stage of design, namely the assembly-evaluation score E,

    which is used to assess the design quality or the difficulty

    of assembly, and the assembly-cost ratio K, which is used

    to project assembly costs relative to current assembly

    costs. The method does not distinguish between manual,

    robot or automatic assembly, because, Myakawa and

    Ohashi believe, there is a strong correlation between the

    degrees of assembly difficulty using these three methods.

    In the AEM, approximately 20 symbols represent the

    various assembly operations. Each symbol has an index

    Elementaloperation AEM sym bo l Pen al t y core

    Fr---h

    4) /q

    Downward

    movement

    Soldering 20

    Figure 10 Examplesof AEM symbolsand penalty scores~

    Product s t ructure and assembly operat ions

    S e t c has s i s

    2 Br ing down block

    and hold i t to

    maintain its

    orientation

    t Set chass is

    2 Br ing Clown block

    (orientation is

    maintained by

    spot-facing )

    3 Fasten screw

    1 S e t c has s i s

    2 B r ing d ow n and

    pressf it block

    Part

    assemblabi l it y Assemb[abi~i ty Assem bly Part to be

    evaluat ion score evaEuat ion score cost rat io improved

    1 0 0

    50

    7 3 1 b l o c k

    6 5

    1 0 0

    1 0 0 8 8 A p p r o x s c r e w

    0 8

    65

    100

    80

    A p p r o x

    8 9 0 5 b l o c k

    Figure 11 Assemblability valuationand improvementexamples8

    to assess the assemblability of the part under

    consideration. Examples of the symbols and penalty

    scores 8 are given in

    Figure 10,

    and examples of their

    application are given in

    Figure 11.

    By 1986, more than 1500 engineers at Hitachi had been

    trained to use this method, and it was claimed that the

    method was saving tens of millions of dollars annually.

    B O O T H R O Y D D E W H U R S T D F A M E T H O D

    The development of the Boothroyd Dewhurst DFA 3

    method, which was described above, started in 1977 with

    funding from the US National Science Foundation, and

    it was first introduced in handbook form in 1980. Soon

    afterwards, the Salford University Industrial Centre

    produced a UK version of the handbook 9 which was

    authored by K G Swift. These handbooks included

    analysis methods and databases for both manual and

    high-speed automatic assembly. For each process, the

    handling of the parts and their insertion were considered

    separately. The original procedure for design for

    automatic assembly was the result of collaboration

    between the author of this paper and A H Redford and

    K G Swift in Salford.

    Later, in the USA, the author and his colleague

    P Dewhurst developed a personal computer program for

    DFA which was introduced in 1982. In 1983, a new

    handbook, based on the lessons learned in implement ing

    DFA in industry, was introduced, and, since then, design

    for robot assembly and PCB assembly have been added 3.

    5 10 C o m p u t e r - A i d e d D e s i g n V o l u m e 2 6 N u m b e r 7 J u l y 1 99 4

  • 7/24/2019 Computer-Aided Design Volume 26 Issue 7 1994

    7/16

    M O R E R E C E N T D F A A N A L Y S IS M E T H O D S

    S o m e t e n y e a r s a f t er t he i n t r o d u c t i o n o f th e H i t a c h i A E M

    a n d t h e B o o t h r o y d D e w h u r s t D F A m e t h o d s , v a r ia t i on s

    o n t h e s e s t a r t e d t o a p p e a r . O n e o f t h e f ir s t w a s t h a t o f

    W a r n e c k e a n d B a s s l e r a t t h e U n i v e r s i t y o f S t u t t g a r t ,

    G e r m a n y . I n t h e i r m e t h o d l , w h i c h t h e y n a m e d

    A s s e m b l y - O r i e n t e d P r o d u c t D e s i g n , t h e y a s s e s s e a c h

    p a r r s u s e f u ln e s s o r f u n c t i o n a l v a l u e . T h u s , b o t h a s s e m b l y

    d i f fi c u l ty a n d f u n c t i o n a l v a l u e a r e e v a l u a t e d , a n d a

    c o m b i n e d r a t i n g i s g i v e n . T h i s m e a n s t h a t p a r t s w h i c h

    h a v e l i t t l e f u n c t i o n a l v a l u e ( s u c h a s s e p a r a t e f a s t e n e r s )

    a n d t h a t a r e d i f fi c u l t t o a s s e m b l e a r e g i v e n t h e l o w e s t

    r a t in g s . T h e s e r a t i n g s a r e t h e n u s e d a s g u i d e s t o r e d e s i g n

    (see

    Figure 12).

    I n t h e i r p a p e r , B L M i l e s a n d K G S w i f t d e s c r i b e t h e

    a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h e L u c a s m e t h o d d e v e l o p e d a t t h e

    U n iv er s i ty o f H u l l , U K , d u r in g th e la te 1 9 80 s 1 1.

    I n t h e L u c a s m e t h o d , t h e t h r e e s t e p s a r e a s f o l l o w s :

    A f u n c t i o n a l a n a ly s i s i s c a r r i e d o u t i n w h i c h p a r t s

    a r e c a t e g o r i z e d i n t o A p a r t s ( d e m a n d e d b y t h e d e s i g n

    s p e c i fi c a t i on ) , a n d B p a r t s ( r e q u i r e d b y t h a t p a r t i c u l a r

    d es ig n so lu t io n ) . A ta r g e t i s s e t f o r d es ig n e f f ic ien cy ,

    w h ich i s

    A / ( A + B )

    an d i s ex p r essed as a p e r cen tag e .

    T h e o b j e c t i v e i s t o e x c e e d a n a r b i t r a r y 6 0 % t a r g e t

    v a l u e b y t h e e l i m i n a ti o n o f c a t e g o r y B p a r t s t h r o u g h

    r e d e s i g n . T h e a u t h o r s e m p h a s i z e a s s e m b l y - c o s t

    r e d u c t i o n a n d p a r t s - c o u n t r e d u c t i o n , a n d i n c l u d e t he

    u s e o f t h e B o o t h r o y d D e w h u r s t m i n i m u m - p a r t s

    c r i t e r i a i n a ' t r u t h ' t a b l e t o a s s i s t i n p a r t - c o u n t

    r e d u c t i o n .

    A h a n d l i n g a n d f e e d i n g a n a l y s i s i s c a r r i e d o u t i n

    w h i c h t h e p a r t s a r e s c o r e d o n t h e b a s is o f t h r e e a r e a s:

    th e s ize an d w e ig h t o f th e p a r t , h an d l in g d i f f icu l t i e s,

    a n d t h e o r i e n t a t i o n o f t h e p a rt . T h e s c o r e is s u m m e d

    t o g i v e t h e t o t a l s c o r e f o r t h e p a r t , a n d a

    h a n d l i n g / f e e d i n g r a t i o i s c a l c u l a t e d w h i c h i s g i v e n

    t h e t o t a l s c o r e d i v i d e d b y t h e n u m b e r o f A p a r ts . A

    t a r g e t o f 2 .5 i s r e c o m m e n d e d .

    A f i t t in g an a ly s i s is ca r r ie d o u t w h ich is b ased o n th e

    p r o p o s e d a s s e m b l y s e q u e n c e . E a c h p a r t i s s c o r e d o n

    t h e b a s i s o f w h e t h e r i t r e q u i r e s h o l d i n g i n a f i x tu r e ,

    t h e a s s e m b l y d i r e c t i o n , a l i g n m e n t p r o b l e m s , r e s t r i c te d

    v i s i o n , a n d t h e r e q u i r e d i n s e r t i o n f o r c e . T h e t o t a l

    s c o r e is d i v i d e d b y t h e n u m b e r o f A p a r t s t o g i v e th e

    f i t ti n g r a ti o . A g a i n , it is r e c o m m e n d e d t h a t t h i s r a t i o

    s h o u l d a p p r o a c h 2 . 5 f o r a n a c c e p t a b l e d e s i g n .

    T h i s L u c a s m e t h o d i s b a s e d , in p a r t , o n t h e o r i g i n a l 1 98 0

    c o l l a b o r a t i v e w o r k o f t he a u t h o r a n d P r o f e s s o r S w if t

    d e s c r i b e d a b o v e .

    I n a n o t h e r m e t h o d , S o n y C o r p o r a t i o n c l a i m s t o h a v e

    d e v e l o p e d a u n i q u e s e t o f r u l e s f o r i n c r e a s e d p r o d u c t i v i t y

    i n v o l v i n g d e s i g n - f o r - a s s e m b l y c o s t e f f e c t i v e n e s s ( D A C ) .

    I n h i s p ap er , Y am ig iw a 12 r e i t e r a te s th e v iew th a t i t is

    i m p o s s i b l e t o d e s i g n f o r a s s e m b l y e a s e u n l e s s o n e s t a r t s

    a t t h e t i m e o f c o n c e p t i o n b e f o r e t h e b l u e p r i n t f o r t h e

    p r o d u c t i s d r a w n u p . T h e i m p r o v e m e n t o f a d e s i g n a t i ts

    i n c e p t i o n i s r e f e r r e d t o a s t h e c o n c e p t o f f e e d - f o r w a r d

    d e s i g n , a s o p p o s e d t o m a k i n g i m p r o v e m e n t s l a t e r w i t h

    f e e d b a c k f r o m t h e m a n u f a c t u r i n g p r o c e s s .

    I n t h e D A C m e t h o d , f a c t o r s f o r e v a l u a t i o n a r e

    c l a s si f ie d i n t o 3 0 k e y w o r d s . T h e e v a l u a t i o n s a r e d i s p l a y e d

    o n a d i a g r a m u s i n g a 1 0 0 - p o i n t s y st e m f o r e a c h o p e r a t i o n ,

    t h u s m a k i n g j u d g m e n t a t a g l a n c e e a s y . A l i s t o f

    P r o d u c t d e s i g n f o r m a n u f a c t u r e a n d a s s e m b l y : G B o o t h r o y d

    A S S E M B L Y P R O C E D U R E

    [ n s e r t r e c e i v e r b a s e

    i n r e a d i n e s s

    i n s e r t h o l d e r f o r r e c e i v e r

    c a p i n r e c e i v e r b a s e

    I n s e r t h o l d e r

    for

    m i c r o p h o n e i n r e c e i v e r b a s e

    I n s e r t m i c r o p h o n e i n

    r e c e i v e r b a s e

    I n s e r t r e c e i v e r c a p i n

    r e c e i v e r b a s e

    C l a m p r e c e i v e r c a p a n d

    m i c r o p h o n e w i t h h o l d e r

    I n s e r t a n t i - k i n k d e v i c e i n

    r e c e i v e r b a se , m o u n t c a b l e

    L o c k r e c e i v e r t o p i n

    ~osi t ion

    Screw

    r e c e i v e r b a s e t o

    r e c e i v e r t o p

    0 05 1 15 2 2.5 3 3.5

    F M : f u n c t i o n a l c o n t e n t C h a r a c t e r i s t i c v a l u e o f s u b a s s e m b l y :

    AM: a s s e m b l y e x p e n d i t u r e K 5 = 0 . 2 50

    K M : c h a r a c t e r is t i c v a l u e o f t h e W e a k t e c h n i c a l a s p e c t o f a s s e m b l y ~ 1

    a s s e m b l y

    procedure

    Figure 12 Evaluation of subassembly from technical viewpoint of

    assembly (University of S tuttgart. Germany)

    Sh a h ~

    - - O -

    Insert ion from above

    B e f o r e i m p r o v e m e n t

    DAC dlagrarl- o,mat

    Core

    operation DAC 50

    Shaft press f i t P 80 /

    Bearing press f i t T 90

    C r i n g 2 0 [ ]

    Screw t ig h len~rlg 90

    80

    Figure

    13 Design-for-assem bly cost-effectiveness (DA C) exam ple

    (Sony Corporation) 2

    o p e r a t i o n s i s p r e s e n t e d o n t h e D A C d i a g r a m , a n d a b a r

    i s d r a w n t h a t r e p r e s e n t s t h e s c o r e f o r t h a t p a r t i c u l a r

    o p e r a t i o n ( s e e

    Figure 13).

    O p e r a t i o n s w i t h l o w s c o r e s a r e

    e a s i l y i d e n t i f i e d . S i n c e 1 9 8 7 , D A C h a s b e e n i n t r o d u c e d

    i n v a r i o u s c o m p a n i e s i n J a p a n a n d o v e r s e a s . E m p h a s i s

    i s g i v e n t o th e e a s e w i t h w h i c h a n o p e r a t i o n c a n b e c a r r i e d

    o u t a u t o m a t i c a l l y , a n d t h e m e t h o d i s u s e d t o i l l u s t r a t e

    p r o b l e m s w i t h t h e e f f i ci e n c y o f t h e a s s e m b l y s y s t e m .

    P C B D E S I G N F O R A S S E M B L Y

    I n 1 9 8 5, A d ach i

    et al.

    o f t h e N E C C o r p o r a t i o n r e p o r t e d 13

    t h a t t h e y w e r e d e v e l o p i n g t e c h n i q u e s f o r d e s i g n f o r e a s e

    o f a s s e m b l y o f p r i n te d - c i r c u i t b o a r d s. T h e i r p r i m a r y

    i n t e r e s t s i n d e s i g n f o r a s s e m b l y w e r e i n r e d u c i n g

    p r o d u c t - s t r u c t u r e c o m p l e x i t y t o a v o i d c o m p l i c a t e d

    a s s e m b l y m o t i o n s , a n d r e d u c i n g t h e v a r i e t y o f p a r t s s o

    t h a t t h e y c o u l d b e a c c o m m o d a t e d i n a u t o m a t i c f ac il it ie s .

    T h u s , a p r o d u c t d e s i g n w h i c h h a s t h e f o l l o w i n g t w o

    a t t r i b u t e s i s d e f i n e d a s ' a p r o d u c t d e s i g n e d f o r e a s e o f

    a s s e m b l y ' :

    T h e p r o d u c t c a n b e a s s e m b l e d b y a f e w s i m p l e

    m o t i o n s .

    T h e v a r i e t y o f p a r t s a n d s u b a s s e m b l i e s h a s b e e n

    m i n i m i z e d .

    C o m p u t e r - A i d e d D e s i g n V o l u m e 2 6 N u m b e r 7 J u l y 1 9 9 4 5 11

  • 7/24/2019 Computer-Aided Design Volume 26 Issue 7 1994

    8/16

    Produc t des ign fo r manu fac ture and assembly : G Boothroyd

    I

    ] P r 0 d u c t a s p e c t ~

    I

    P r o d u c t

    Q u a l i t y

    A p r o d u c t d e s i g n f o r e a s e o f a s s e m b l y I

    I

    i

    I

    h l . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .

    C o n t r o l ( W o r k ) a s p e c t I

    : E l - : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    o To f fi w i t h s pec i f i c a t i on o f

    p r oduc t i on f ac i l i t i e s

    o B a s e d o n a p r o d u c t t r e n d

    Q u a n t i t y o T o m i n i m i z e t h e v a r i e t y o f

    p a r ts a n d s u b - a s s e m b l i e s

    D e l i v e r y o T o s y n c h r o n i z e w i t h d e v e l o p -

    m e n t o f p r o d u c t i o n f a c il it ie s

    C o s t o

    T o s i m p l i f y th e s t r u c t u r e

    o T o u s e s t a n d a r d p a r t s

    D e s i g n

    T o m i n im i z e d e s i g n c h a n g e s

    T o a d j u s t d e s i g n e n g i n e e r i n g

    t o p r o d u c t i o n e n g i n e e r i n g

    T o p r e - e v a l u a t e i n p r o d u c t

    d e s i g n p h a s e

    T o b e s t a n d a r d i z e d

    T o s h o r t e n t h e d e s i g n t e r m

    T o r e f l e c t f e e d b a c k i n f o r m a -

    t i o n f r o m p r o d u c t i o n

    p r o c e s s e s q u i c k l y

    T o o p t i m i z e t h e t r a d e o f f

    b e t w e e n f u n c t i o n a n d c o s t

    T o m i n i m i z e i m p a c t s o n

    p r o d u c t io n p r o c e s s e s

    - 1

    i

    D

    Q u a l i t y o

    0

    0

    Quantity o

    D e l i v e r y o

    0

    C o s t o

    0

    Produc t ion Cont l~ : v ,

    Q u a l i t y

    Q u a n t i t y

    0

    T o b e a b l e t o i m p r o v e c o n t r o l

    q u a l i t y

    f i b be eas y t o c on t r o l and

    p u r c h a s e p a d s

    O

    D e l i v e r y o f b s ho r t en t he c on t r o l t er m ,

    Cost o T o m i n i m i z e t h e c o n t r o i

    m a n - h o u r

    Q u a l i t y

    Q u a n t i t y

    D e l i v e r y

    C o s t

    0

    Work

    T0 m a k e p r o d u c t

    q u a l i t y s t a b l e

    o To m ak e* , m an - ho u r

    r e q u i r e m e n t s s t a b le

    o T o m a k e o u t p u t

    s t ab l e i

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i

    o 7 0 p r o d u c e i u s t

    i n t i m e

    o T o s p e e d u p t h e

    w ork t im { :

    o T o b e e a s y t o w o r k

    ( b e a u t o m a t e d )

    o T o e l i m i n a t e r e w o r k s

    Figure 14 Product-design equirements for ease of assembly IN E(,') ~

    The authors present a chart (see Figure 14) which lists all

    the product -desi gn features that lead to ease of assembly.

    The PCB evaluation tool was developed first because

    the proportionate cost of PCBs had been increasing. The

    tool is based on a 100-point evaluation method, with

    demerit marks being given for five factors that would

    hamper automation. In this method, PCB designers

    evaluate the level of ease of automation. The five factors

    that would hamper automation are as follows:

    There are man y parts that canno t be inserted

    automatically.

    Man y different parts are used.

    There is much soldering and retouching.

    There are man y parts which must be inserted after

    soldering.

    There are numer ous wire harnesses.

    These factors are quanUfied on ,i worksheet, where .~

    formula is used to calculate demerit marks t,; bc

    subtracted from the initial 100 point~.

    This evaluation tool has been applied m sevcraJ

    NEC Corporation divisions, and it has resulted i.q

    improvements in automation insertion ratios, and

    achieved improved cooperation between design and

    production,

    However, it appears that the NEt_ tool was not the

    first systematic analysis tool for PCBs. In fact, some six

    years earlier, the Xerox Corporation had published a

    meth od for assessing the manufac turabili ty of PCBs ~

    In this method, ten leading cost drivers (attributes) in the

    design of PCBs are identified. The designer gives a rating

    of 1 5 for each attribute which is then multiplied by at

    coefficient developed from historical data.

    Tabh, 4

    lists

    the attributes and coefficients. The sums of the products

    512 Com puter -A ided Des ign Vo lume 26 Numbe r 7 Ju ly 1994

  • 7/24/2019 Computer-Aided Design Volume 26 Issue 7 1994

    9/16

    Table 4 Xerox manufacturability index for PCB assemblies:

    polynomial coefficients and attributes 15

    i K i Attributes

    0 -2.823 8 Constant value

    1 0.4034 Piggybacks

    2 0.6177 Solderside component s

    3 0.1105 Heat tolerance

    4 0.8445 Large assemblies

    5 0.0731 Screws and mechanica ls

    6 0.1477 Harnesses

    7 0.8485 Componen t spacing

    8 0.6004 % autoinsert

    9 0.0676 Orientation

    10 0.1105 Component size

    P r o d u c t d e s ig n f o r m a n u f a c t u r e a n d a s s e m b l y : G B o o t h r o y d

    E x i s t i ng

    Design Redesign

    C os t o f

    one cavity and core

    $ 8,032 $11,625

    Cycle Time (s) 42.8 13.3

    N um b er o f c av i t ies r equ i r ed 6 2

    Co s t o f p rod uc t i on mo ld $36,383 $22,925

    C os t pe r pa r t

    ( inc . 5 cents fo r mate r i a l ) 25 .1 cents 16.8 cents

    F i g u r e 15 DFM analysis of injection-moulded heater cover22

    of a t t ribu tes and coef f ic ien ts g ive the m anufac tu rab i l i ty

    index fo r the PCB.

    D E S I G N F O R M A N U F A C T U R E

    Des ign fo r assembly has genera ted a r evo lu t ion in des ign

    prac t ices , no t p r inc ipa l ly because i t u sual ly r educes

    assembly cos t s , bu t because i t has a f a r g rea ter impact

    o n t h e t o t a l m an u f ac t u r in g co s t s o f a p r o d u c t . T h e r ea s o n

    is tha t DFA s impl i f ies the p roduct s t ruc tu re , r educes the

    n u m b er o f p a r ts , an d t h e r eb y r ed u ces th e t o t a l co s t o f

    the par t s . How ever , to judg e the ef fec ts o f DF A a t the

    ea r l y d e s i g n s t ag e , co m p an i o n m e t h o d s f o r t h e ea r l y

    es t imat ion o f par t c os t s mu s t be made avai lab le , and ,

    acco r d i n g l y , m an y o f t h o s e w h o h av e d ev e l o p ed D F A

    m et h o d s a r e n o w t u r n i n g t h e i r a t t en t i o n t o m e t h o d s o f

    assessme nt o f par t -man ufac tu r ing d i ff icu lt ies .

    Fo r exam ple , the H i tach i r esearcher s 15 have in t rodu ced

    a M ach i n i n g P r o d u c i b i l i t y E v a l u a t i o n M e t h o d w h i ch,

    com bined w i th the i r AE M , g ives an overa l l p roducib i l i ty -

    ev a l u a t i o n m e t h o d ( P E M ) .

    S i m i la r ly , T o s h i b a C o r p o r a t i o n 16 h a s d ev e l o p ed a

    P r o ces s ab i l it y E v a l u a t io n M e t h o d w h i ch , co m b i n ed w i t h

    o t h e r m e t h o d s , i n c l u d i n g an a s s em b l ab i l i t y - ev a l u a t i o n

    m e t h o d , p r o v i d es an o v e r a l l p r o d u c i b i l i t y - ev a l u a t i o n

    method . P rocessab i l i ty i s def ined as be ing p ropor t ional

    to the par t ' s cos t . The par t ' s cos t i s de termined by the

    se lec t ion o f the par t -p rocess ing m ethod , and then by the

    des ign o f the par t shape . V ar ious p rocess ing meth ods ar e

    cons idered fo r a par t i cu lar par t . The par t ' s cos t i s then

    determ ined fo r a ll comb inat ion s o f the se lec ted p rocess ing

    methods and su i tab le mater ia l s . Then the par t ' s des ign

    is eva lua ted to see whe ther i t f it s a par t i cu lar p rocess ing

    me thod , and , f ina lly, a p rocessab i l i ty eva lua t ion i s

    car r ied ou t .

    S i nce 1 9 8 5 , B o o t h r o y d , D ew h u r s t an d K n i g h t h av e

    d ev e l o p ed m e t h o d s f o r d e s i g n e rs t o o b t a i n co s t e s t im a t e s

    fo r par t s and too l ing dur ing the ear ly phases o f design .

    Stud ies ha ve been com ple ted fo r ma ch ined par t s 17,

    in jec t ion-mo ulded par t s ~s, d ie- cas t par t s 19, shee t -meta l

    s tampings 2 and pow der -m eta l par t s 2~ . The ob jec t ive o f

    t h e s e s t u d i e s w as t o p r o v i d e m e t h o d s w i t h w h i ch t h e

    des igner o r des ign team can qu ick ly ob ta in in fo rmat ion

    on cos t s befo re de ta i led des ign has taken p lace . For

    example , an analys i s 22 o f an in jec t ion-m oulded hea ter

    cover gave the r esu l t s shown in

    Figure 15.

    I t was ev iden t

    tha t cer ta in wal l th icknesses were too la rge , and tha t ,

    th rough som e fa i r ly minor des ign changes , the p rocess ing

    co s t co u l d b e r ed u ced b y 3 3 %. I f t h e s e s tu d i e s h ad t ak en

    p lace a t the ear ly des ign s tage , the des igner cou ld a l so

    have cons idered the cos t fo r an equ iva len t shee t -meta l

    par t fo r example . In f ac t , the use o f these analys i s

    techn iques i s now a l lowing des igner s and purchas ing

    manager s to chal lenge supp l ie r s ' es t imates . I n one

    ex am p l e , i t h a s b een r ep o r t ed t h a t P o l a r o i d C o r p o r a t i o n

    has save d $16 000 -20 000 on the cos t o f too l ing fo r an

    in jec t ion-m oulded par t 23.

    R E S U L T S O F D F M A A P P L I C A T I O N S

    D F M A p r o v i d es a s y s t em a t i c p r o ced u r e f o r an a l y s i n g

    p r o p o s ed d e s ig n s f r o m t h e p o i n t o f v iew o f a s sem b l y an d

    manufac tu re . Th is p rocedure r esu l t s in s impler and more

    re l iab le p roducts which ar e l ess expens ive to assemble

    and manufac tu re . In add i t ion , any r educt ion in the

    n u m b er o f p a r t s i n an a s s em b l y p ro d u ces a s n o w b a l l

    eff ec t on co s t r educt ion , beca use o f the d rawings and

    speci f ica tions tha t a r e no longer needed , the vendor s tha t

    ar e no longer needed , and the inven to ry tha t i s e liminated .

    Al l o f these fac to r s have an im por ta n t e ff ec t on overhead s ,

    which , in man y cases , fo rm the la rges t p rop or t ion o f the

    to ta l p roduct cos t .

    D F M A t o o l s en co u r ag e d i a l o g u e b e t w een d e s i g n e r s

    an d t h e m an u f ac t u r i n g en g i n ee r s an d an y o t h e r

    ind iv iduals who p lay a par t in de termin ing f ina l p roduct

    cos t s dur ing the ea r ly s tages o f design. Th is mea ns th a t

    team work ing i s encouraged , and the benef i t s o f

    s imul tane ous o r concu r ren t eng ineer ing can be ach ieved .

    Defence con t r ac to r s have an especia l ly d i f f icu l t

    p r o b l em i n ap p l y i n g d e s i g n f o r m an u f ac t u r e an d

    assembly . Of ten , the des igner s do no t know who wi l l

    b e m an u f ac t u r i n g t h e p r o d u c t t h ey a r e d e s ig n i n g b ecau s e

    the des ign wi l l even tua l ly go ou t fo r b id af te r i t has

    been fu l ly de ta i led . Under these c i r cumstances , com-

    m u n i ca t i o n s b e t w een de s i gn an d m an u f ac t u r i n g a r e n o t

    poss ib le . I n add i t ion , defence con t r ac to r s do no t have

    the norm al incen t ives w i th r egard to min imiz ing the f ina l

    p r o d u c t co s t . W e h av e a ll h ea r d h o r r o r s t o r i e s ab o u t t h e

    r id icu lous ly h igh c os t o f seeming ly s imple i t ems such as

    to i le t sea t s and door l a tches used by the mi l i t a ry . Th is

    mean s tha t the defence indus t ry in genera l i s an ex t r em ely

    fer ti le a r ea fo r the success fu l app l ica t ion o f DF M A.

    T e x a s I n s t r u m e n t s

    The f i r s t case s tudy descr ibed here has been p rov ided by

    t h e D e f en s e S y s tem s an d E l ec t ro n i c s G r o u p o f T ex as

    C o m p u t e r - A i d e d D e s i g n V o l u m e 2 6 N u m b e r 7 J u l y 1 99 4 5 13

  • 7/24/2019 Computer-Aided Design Volume 26 Issue 7 1994

    10/16

    Pro d u c t d e s ig n fo r ma n u fa c tu re a n d a s s e mb ly : G B o o th ro y d

    ~ ~ . RETAININGING

    4 PLS

    SPRINGSE*fS

    j - ~ 5 PLS

    . - . .ET2,22.G

    tN PLS

    SCREW COUPLING P

    2 PLS {DFIILL

    (LOCKIITE AND PIN

    OPERATION OPERATION

    REQUIRED) REQUIRED)

    Figure 16 Or igina l design of reticle assem bly for thermal gunsighP4

    RETICLE i ~ -.~_ ,

    Figure 17 New design of reticle assem bly after DFM A 2a

    I n s t r u m e n t s , D a l l a s , T X , U S A 2 ~ . T h e o r i g i n a l d e s i g n

    s h o w n i n Figur e 16 i s f o r a r e t i c l e a s s e m b l y f o r a t h e r m a l

    g u n s i g h t u s e d i n a g r o u n d - b a s e d a r m o u r e d v e h ic l e. I t i s

    u s e d t o t r a c k a n d s i g h t t a r g e t s a t n i g h t , u n d e r a d v e r s e

    b a t t l e f i e l d c o n d i t i o n s , a n d i t i s u s e d t o a l i g n t h e v i d e o

    p o r t i o n o f t h e s y s t e m w i t h t h e t r a j e c t o r y p a t h o f t h e

    v e h i c le ' s w e a p o n t o e n s u r e a c c u r a t e r e m o t e - c o n t r o l l e d

    a i m i n g . I t m a k e s s t e a d y , p r e c is e a d j u s t m e n t s o f a c r i ti c a l

    o p t i c a l e l e m e n t , w h i l e h a n d l i n g b a l l i s t i c s h o c k f r o m t h e

    v e h i c le ' s w e a p o n s y s t e m s a n d m e c h a n i c a l v i b r a t i o n s

    g e n e r a t e d b y t h e v e h i cl e ' s e n g i n e a n d r o u g h t e r ra i n . I t

    m u s t a l s o b e l i g h t w e i g h t , a s t h i s i s a m a j o r c o n s i d e r a t i o n

    f o r a l l s u c h s y s t e m s .

    T h e a s s e m b l y c o n s is t s o f a c a r r i a g e s u b a s s e m b l y .

    h o u s i n g , d r iv e s h a f t a n d c o u p l i n g , c o n n e c t o r b r a c k e t , t w o

    s h a ft s , s p r in g s , a n d a s s o c i a t e d h a r d w a r e . T h e c o u p l i n g i s

    d r i v e n b y a s i m i l a r c o u p l i n g o n t h e s y s t e m w h i c h d r i v e s

    t h e c a r r i a g e s u b a s s e m b l y i n a l a t e r a l d i r e c t i o n o n t h e t w ~

    s h a f t s . S p r i n g s a r e u s e d t o n e g a t e a n y b a c k l a s h i n t h e

    g e a r s . T h e c u r r e n t d e s i g n r e q u i r e s o v e r 12 h ~ ,i

    m e t a l - f a b r i c a t i o n t i m e . a n d m o r e t h a n 2 h o f a s s e m b l y

    t im e ,

    T h e g l g r o u p p e r f o r m e d a d e s i g n -l k )r - a ss e m b l y a na l y, ~ h

    l o d e t e r m i n e w h a t c o u l d b e d o n e t o s i m p l if y t h e d e s ig n

    a n d m a k e i t l e ss e x p e n s i v e . T h e r e s u l t s o f t h e a n a l y s i s

    s h o w e d t h a t f a s t e n e rs a n d r e o r i e n t a t i o n s o f t h e a s s e m b b

    w e r e t h e t w o m a i n c o n t r i b u t o r: ~ ~ o t h e a s s e m b l y t i m e

    S p e c i a l o p e r a t i o n s f o r d ri l li n g a n d p i n n i n g c o u p l e r s a n d

    a p p l y i n g a d h e s i v e t o s c r e w s w e r e a l s o m a j o r c o n t r i b u t o r s .

    T h e m a i n o b j e c t iv e d u r i n g t h e r e d e s i gn w a s t o r e d u c e

    h a r d w a r e , e l i m i n a t e u n n e c e s s a r y p a r t s , s t a n d a r d i z e t h e

    r e m a i n d e r , a n d r e d u c e o r e l i m i n a t e r e o r i e n t a t i o n s . O n c e

    t h e a n a l y s i s h a d b e g u n , s e v e r a l d e s i g n a l t e r n a t i v e s w e r e

    p r o p o s e d w i t h i n a m a t t e r o f h o u rs . E v e n t u a l l y , t he b e s t

    f e a t u r e s o f t h e a l t e r n a t iv e p r o p o s a l s w e r e c o m b i n e d ~ o

    p r o d u c e a n e w d e s i g n ( s e e Fiqur c 71 .

    T h e n e w d e s i g n i n c o r p o r a t e d t h e u s e o f a c a m ~,7~

    p r o v i d e t h e c o n v e r s i o n f r o m r o t a t i o n a l t o l i n e a r m o t i o n .

    T h e c a m t a k e s u p l e s s r o o m t h a n t h e g e a r b o x

    a r r a n g e m e n t ; t h i s a l l o w s t h e d r i v i n g p o i n t t o b e m o v e d

    f r o m t h e e n d o f t h e c a r r i a g e a s s e m b l y t o w a r d s t h e m i d d l e ,

    r e d u c i n g t o r q u e o n t h e c a r r i a g e a n d r e s u l t i n g i n a

    s m o o t h e r m o t i o n . T h e c a m a l s o e l i m i n a t e s t h e n e e d f o r

    a c o u p l i n g a n d a d r i l l - a n d - p i n o p e r a t i o n . V i r t u a l l y a l l

    t h e f a s te n e r s w e r e e l i m i n a t e d b y r e d u c i n g t h e n u m b e r o f

    p a r t s t h a t n e e d e d t o b e s e c u r e d , a n d i n c o r p o r a t i n g t h e

    u s e o f s e l f - s e c u r i n g p a r t s , s u c h a s p r e s s - f i t s h a f t s a n d

    b u s h i n g s . T h e t w o m a j o r m e t a l - f a b r i c a t i o n i t e m s w e r e

    c h a n g e d t o c a s t a l u m i n i u m l i n j e c t i o n - m o u l d e d p l a s t i c

    w a s r u le d o u t b e c a u s e o f l o w p r o d u c t i o n v o l u m e a n d

    b a l l i s t i c - s h o c k r e q u i r e m e n t s ) , a n d t h e c o n n e c t o r b r a c k e t

    w a s i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o t h e h o u s i n g , t h u s e l i m i n a t i n g t w o

    p a r t s , a s s o c i a t e d h a r d w a r e , a n d a s p e c i a l o p e r a t i o n t o

    a p p l y a d h e s i v e t o t h e s c r e w s . T h e f a b r i c a t i o n t i m e w a s

    a l s o g r e a t l y r e d u c e d , o w i n g t o t h e u s e o f a c a s t i n g r a t h e r

    t h a n a m a c h i n e d c o m p o n e n t , a n d t h e e l i m i n a t i o n o f

    u n n e c e s s a r y p a r t s a s i n d i c a t e d d u r i n g t h e d e s i g n - f o r -

    a s s e m b l y a n a l y s i s . T h i s n e w d e s i g n w a s a l s o a n a l y s e d

    u s i n g th e d e s i g n - f o r - a s s e m b l y p ro c e d u r e , a n d T ab le 5 l i s t s

    t h e r e s u l t s f o r t h e o r i g i n a l d e s i g n a n d f o r t h e r e d e s ig n .

    I t c a n b e s e e n f r o m T abh , 5 t h a t v e r y i m p r e s s i v e r e s u l t s

    w e r e o b t a i n e d i n a ll a s p e c t s o f th e m a n u f a c t u r e o f th i s

    a s s e m b l y . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e s a v i n g s in o v e r h e a d s , w h i c h

    a r e p a r t i c u l a r l y h i g h i n t h e d e f e n c e i n d u s t r y , w i l l b e

    e n o r m o u s . I n t h e o r i g i n a l d e s i g n , t h e r e w e r e 2 4 d i f f e r e n t

    p a r t s , a n d i n t h e n e w d e s i g n t h e r e a r e o n l y e i g h t . T h i s

    m e a n s t h a t t h e d o c u m e n t a t i o n , a c q u i s i t io n a n d i n v e n t o r y

    o f 1 6 p a r t t y p e s h a s b e e n e l i m i n a t e d . O n e c a n o n l y

    i m a g i n e w h a t t h e p o t e n t i a l s a v i n g s w o u l d b e if D F M A

    w e r e a p p l i e d t h r o u g h o u t t h e d e f e n c e i n d u s t r y

    B r o w n S h a r p e

    T h e n e e d f o r a l o w - c o s t , h i g h - a c c u r a c y c o o r d i n a t e -

    m e a s u r i n g m a c h i n e ( C M M ) w a s th e i m p e t u s b e h in d t h e

    d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e M i c r o V a l p e r s o n a l C M M b y B r o w n

    5 1 4 Co m p u te r - A id e d De s ig n Vo lu m e 2 6 Nu m b e r 7 J u ly 1 9 94

  • 7/24/2019 Computer-Aided Design Volume 26 Issue 7 1994

    11/16

    Product design for manufacture and assembly: G Boothroyd

    Table

    5 Results of DFM A redesign of reticle assembly25

    Original Redesign Improve ment, %

    design

    Assem bly time , h 2.15 0.33 84.7

    Num ber of different parts 24 8 66.7

    Tota l num ber O parts 47 12 74.5

    Tota l num ber of operations 58 13 77.6

    M etal fab rica tion time , h 12.63 3.65 71.1

    W eight, lb 0.48 0.26 45.8

    & S h a r p e 25. T h e p r i m a r y d e s i g n c o n s i d e r a t i o n w a s t o

    p r o d u c e a C M M w h i c h w o u l d s e ll f o r o n e - h a l f o f t h e p ri c e

    o f t h e e xi s ti n g p r o d u c t . T h e C M M w a s t o c o m p e t e w i t h

    l o w - p r i c e d i m p o r t s w h i c h h a d p e n e t r a t e d t h e C M M

    m a r k e t t o a n e v e n g r e a t e r e x t e n t t h a n i m p o r t s h a d i n

    t h e a u t o m a t i v e i n d u s t r y . S in c e t h e C M M c u s t o m e r i s n o t

    d r i v e n b y p ri c e al o n e , t h e n ew C M M w o u l d h a v e t o b e

    m o r e a c c u r a t e t h a n t h e c u r r e n t d e s i g n , w h i l e a l s o b e i n g

    eas ie r to in s ta l l , u se , ma in ta in an d r ep a i r .

    B r o w n & S h a r p e s t a r t e d w i t h a c l e a n s h e e t o f p a p e r .

    I n s t e a d o f d e s i g n i n g t h e b a s i c e l e m e n t s o f th e m a c h i n e

    a n d t h e n a d d i n g o n p a r t s w h i c h w o u l d p e r f o r m s p e c i f i c

    f u n c t i o n s r e q u i r e d f o r t h e o p e r a t i o n o f t h e m a c h i n e , i t

    w a s d e c i d e d t o b u i l d a s m a n y f u n c t i o n s i n t o t h e r e q u i r e d

    e l e m e n t s a s w a s f e a s i b l e . T h i s c o n c e p t w a s c a l l e d

    i n t e g r a t e d c o n s t r u c t i o n . H o w e v e r , u n t i l t h e D F A

    m e t h o d o l o g y w a s a p p l i e d , t h e c o s t o b j e c t i v e s c o u l d n o t

    b e m e t w i t h t h e o r i g i n a l d e s i g n p r o p o s a l . A f t e r D F A , f o r

    e x a m p l e , t h e s h a p e o f t h e Z r ai l w a s c h a n g e d t o a n

    e l o n g a t e d h e x a g o n , t h u s p r o v i d i n g t h e n e c e s s a r y

    a n t i r o t a t i o n f u n c t i o n . A s a r es u l t , t h e n u m b e r o f p a r t s

    r e q u i r e d t o p r o v i d e t h e a n t i r o t a t i o n f u n c t i o n w a s

    r e d u c e d f r o m 5 7 t o f o u r . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e t i m e r e q u i r e d

    t o a s s e m b l e a n d a l i g n t h e a n t i r o t a t i o n r a i l w a s

    e l i m i n a t e d . S i m i l a r s a v i n g s w e r e m a d e i n o t h e r a r e a s ,

    s u c h a s t h e l i n e a r - d i s p l a c e m e n t m e a s u r i n g s y s t e m a n d

    t h e Z - r a i l c o u n t e r b a l a n c e s y s t e m . O n i t s i n t r o d u c t i o n a t

    t h e

    Qual i ty Show

    in Ch icag o , I L , U SA , in 1 9 8 8 , th e

    m a c h i n e b e c a m e a n i n s t a n t s u c c e s s , s e t t i n g n e w i n d u s t r y

    s t a n d a r d s f o r pr i c e a n d e a s e o f o p e r a t i o n . T h e p r o d u c t

    h a s p r o v e d p o p u l a r n o t o n l y i n th e U S A a n d E u r o p e ,

    b u t a l s o i n J a p a n .

    N C R

    F o l l o w i n g a y e a r - l o n g c o m p e t i t i o n f o r t h e U S A ' s

    ' o u t s t a n d i n g e x a m p l e o f a p p l ie d a s s e m b l y t e c h n o l o g y a n d

    t h i n k i n g ' , Assembly Engineering m a g a z i n e s e l e c t e d B i l l

    S p r a g u e o f N C R C o r p o r a t i o n , C a m b r i d g e , O H , U S A , a s

    t h e PAT ( P r o d u c t i v i t y T h r o u g h T e c h n o l o g y ) r e ci p ie n t.

    S p r a g u e , a s e n i o r a d v a n c e d - m a n u f a c t u r i n g e n g i ne e r , w a s

    r e c o g n i z e d f o r h i s c o n t r i b u t i o n i n d e s i g n i n g a n e w

    p o i n t - o f - s a l e t e r m i n a l c a l l e d t h e N C R 2 7 6 0 . T h e D F A

    m e t h o d o l o g y , u s e d i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h s o l i d m o d e l l i n g ,

    a s s i s t e d N C R e n g i n e e r s i n m a k i n g s i g n i f i c a n t c h a n g e s

    f r o m t h e p r e v i o u s d e s i g n . T h o s e c h a n g e s t r a n s l a t e d i n t o

    d r a m a t i c r e d u c t i o n s a n d s a v i n g s , a s f o l l o w s 2 6 :

    6 5 % f ew er su p p l ie r s ,

    7 5 % l es s a s s e m b l y t i m e ,

    1 0 0 % r e d u c t i o n i n n u m b e r o f a s s e m b l y t o o l s ,

    8 5 % f e w e r p a r t s ,

    a t o t a l l i f e ti m e m a n u f a c t u r i n g c o s t r e d u c t i o n o f 4 4 %

    ( t r an s la t in g in to sav in g s o f mi l l io n s o f U S d o l la r s ) .

    0

    i G B E FO R E

    F igure 1 8 O l d a n d n e w d e s i g n s of D i g i t a l m o u s e 2 7

    A F T E R

    I n d e e d , S p r a g u e e s t i m a t e d t h a t t h e r e m o v a l o f o n e s i n g l e

    s c r e w f r o m t h e o r i g i n a l d e s i g n w o u l d r e d u c e l i f e t i m e

    p r o d u c t c o s t s b y a s m u c h a s $ 1 2 5 00 .

    D i g i t a l E q u i p m e n t

    A m u l t i f u n c t i o n a l d e s i g n t e a m a t D i g i t a l E q u i p m e n t

    C o r p o r a t i o n r e d e si g n e d t he c o m p a n y ' s c o m p u t e r m o u s e z 7.

    T h e y b e g a n w i t h t h e c o m p e t i t i v e b e n c h m a r k i n g o f

    D i g i t a l ' s p r o d u c t s a n d m i c e m a d e b y o t h e r c o m p a n i e s .

    T h e y us e d D F M A s o f t w a r e t o c o m p a r e s u c h f a c to r s as

    a s s e m b l y t i m e s , p a r t c o u n t s , a s s e m b l y o p e r a t i o n s , l a b o u r

    c o s t s, . a nd t o t a l c o s t s o f t h e p r o d u c t s . T h e y a l s o c o n s u l t e d

    w i t h h o u r l y - p a i d p e o p l e w h o a c t u a l l y a s s e m b l e d t h e m i ce .

    G o r d o n L e w is , t h e D F M A c o o r d i n a t o r a n d t e a m l e a de r ,

    s t a t e d t h a t D F M A g i v es t h e d e si g n t e a m a ' f o c a l p o i n t

    s o t h a t [ t h e y ] c a n g o i n a n d p i n p o i n t t h e p r o b l e m s f r o m

    a m a n u f a c t u r i n g p e r s p e c t i v e a n d a d e s i g n p e r s p e c t i v e ' .

    ' I t ' s t h e 8 0 / 2 0 r u l e ' , s a i d M r L e w i s . ' Y o u s p e n d 8 0 % o f

    y o u r t i m e o n 2 0 % o f y o u r p r o b le m s ' . ' D F M A i s o n e o f

    t h e t o o l s t h a t h e l p s d e s i g n t e a m s i d e n t i f y t h e r i g h t 2 0 %

    o f t h e p r o b l e m s t o w o r k o n ' , h e s a id .

    Figure 18

    s h o w s t h e o l d a n d n e w m i c e . I n t h e n e w

    D F M A d e s i gn , 1 3 0 s o f a s s e m b l y f o r a b a l l - c a g e d e v i c e

    h a s b e e n r e d u c e d t o 1 5 s f o r t h e d e v i c e t h a t h a s r e p l a c e d

    Computer-Aided Design Volume 26 Number 7 July 1994 515

  • 7/24/2019 Computer-Aided Design Volume 26 Issue 7 1994

    12/16

    P r o d u c t d e s i g n f o r m a n u f a c t u r e a n d a s s e m b l y : G Boothroyd

    i t . O t h e r c h a n g e s t o t h e p r o d u c t s t r u c t u r e h a v e a l s o

    b r o u g h t c o s t s a v in g s . F o r i n s t a n c e , t h e a v e r a g e o f s e v e n

    s c r e w s i n t h e o r i g i n a l m o u s e h a s b e e n r e d u c e d t o z e r o

    w i t h s n a p f i t s . T h e n e w m o u s e a l s o r e q u i r e s n o a s s e m b l y

    a d j u s t m e n t s , w h e r e a s t h e a v e r a g e n u m b e r f o r p r e v i o u s

    d e s i g n s w a s ei g h t . T h e t o t a l n u m b e r o f a s s e m b l y

    o p e r a t i o n s h a s d e c r e a s e d f r o m 8 3 i n t h e o l d p r o d u c t t o

    5 4 i n t h e n e w m o u s e . A l l t h e s e i m p r o v e m e n t s a d d u p t o

    a m o u s e t h a t i s a s s e m b l e d i n 2 7 7 s , r a t h e r t h a n 5 9 2 s f or

    t h e c o n v e n t i o n a l o n e . C y c l e t i m e , t o o , h a s b e e n r e d u c e d

    b y D F M A . A s e c o n d d e v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t t h a t a d h e r e d

    t o t h e n e w m e t h o d o l o g y w a s f i n i s h e d i n 1 8 w e e k s ,

    i n c l u d i n g t h e h a r d - t o o l i n g c y c l e . ' T h a t ' s u n b e l i e v a b l e ' .

    a d m i t t e d M r L e w i s . ' N o r m a l l y i t t a k e s 18 w e e k s t o d o

    h a r d t o o l i n g a l o n e ' .

    M o t o r o l a

    D F M A m e t h o d s h a v e b e e n u s e d a t M o t o r o l a t o s im plit~ ,'

    p r o d u c t s a n d r e d u c e a s s e m b l y c o s t s . A s p a r t o f t h c

    c o m m i t m e n t t o t o t a l c u s t o m e r s a ti s fa c t io n , M o t o r o l a h a s

    e m b r a c e d t h e s i x - s i g m a p h i l o s o p h y f o r p r o d u c t d e s i g n

    a n d m a n u f a c t u r i n g . I t s e e m e d o b v i o u s t h a t s i m p l e r

    a s s e m b l y s h o u l d r e s u l t i n i m p r o v e d a s s e m b l y q u a l i t y .

    W i t h t h e s e p r e c e p t s i n m i n d , t h e y s e t a b o u t d e s i g n i n g

    t h e n e w g e n e r a t i o n o f v e h i c u l a r a d a p t o r s z S.

    T h e p o r t a b l e - p r o d u c t s d i v i s i o n o f M o t o r o l a d e s i g n s

    a n d m a n u f a c t u r e s p o r t a b l e 2 - w a y H a n d i - T a l k i e TM r a d i o s

    f o r t h e l a n d m o b i l e - r a d i o m a r k e t . T h i s i n c l u d e s s u c h u s e rs

    a s p o l i c e , f i r e m e n a n d o t h e r p u b l i c - s a f e t y s e r v i c e s , m

    a d d i t i o n t o t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d u t i l i t y f i e l d s . T h e s e

    r a d i o s a r e b a t t e r y - o p e r a t e d , a n d a r e c a r r i e d a b o u t b y t he

    user .

    T h e d e s i g n t e a m e m b r a c e d t h e i d e a t h a t d e s i g n i n g a

    p r o d u c t w i t h a h i g h a s s e m b l y e f fi c i e n cy w o u l d r e s u l t in

    l o w e r m a n u f a c t u r i n g c o s t s , a n d t h e p r o v i s i o n o f t h e h i g h

    D ef ec t s , Pa r t s / M i l l i on

    I ]

    10000

    1000

    100

    1

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    M a n u a l A s s e m b l y E f f i c i e n c y %

    Figure

    19 Im pro ved assembly-design efficiency results m term s (H

    increased reliability at Mo torola2s

    Table 6 Redesign

    of vehicular adaptor (Motorola) ~

    Old New Improvem ent,

    p r o d u c t p r o d u c t %

    DFA assem bly efficiency,% 4 36 800

    Assem bly time , s 2742 354 87

    Assem bly cou nt 217 47 78

    Faste ners 72 0 100

    a s s e m b l y q u a l i t y d e s i r e d . T h e y a l s o c o n s i d e r e d t h a t a n

    i m p o r t a n t p a r t o f a n y d e s ig n w a s t o b e n c h m a r k

    c o m p e t i t o r s " p r o d u c t s a s w e l l a s t h e i r o w n , A t t h e t i m e .

    M o t o r o l a p r o d u c e d t w o t y p e s o f v e h i c u la r a d a p t o r c a l le d

    C o n v e r t - a - C o m TM ( C V C ) f o r d i f f e r e n t r a d i o p r o d u c t s .

    Sev er a l o f th e i r co m p e t i to r s a l so o f f e r ed s imi la r u n i t s f o ,:

    t h e i r r a d i o p r o d u c t s . T h e r e s u lt s o f th e r e d e s i g n e ff o r ts

    w e r e s o e n c o u r a g i n g t h a t M o t o r o l a s u r v e y e d s e v e r a l

    p r o d u c t s w h i c h h a d b e e n d e s i g n e d u s i n g t h e D F A

    m e t h o d o l o g y t o s e e i f t h e r e m i g h t b e a g e n e r a l c o r r e l a t i o n

    o f a s s e m b l y e f f ic i e n c y w i t h m a n u f a c t u r i n g q u a l i t y .

    Fiqur,

    I 9 s h o w s w h a t t h e y f o u n d . T h e d e f e c t l e ve l s a r e r e p o r t e d

    a s d e f e c ts p e r m i l l i o n p a r t s a s s e m b l e d , w h i c h a l l o w s J

    q u a l i t y e v a l u a t i o n t o b e m a d e t h a t i s i n d e p e n d e n t o f t h e

    n u m b e r o f p a r t s i n t h e a ss e m b ly ' . M o t o r o l a ' s s i x - s i g m a

    q u a l i ty g o a l i s 3.4 de /ec ts per mi l l ion part ,s assembled.

    Each r esu l t in

    Figure 19

    r e p r e s e n t s a p r o d u c t w i t h a n

    a n a l y