concepts and proto-concepts in cognitive science
DESCRIPTION
Concepts and proto-concepts in cognitive science. Ron Chrisley Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science Centre for Research in Cognitive Science School of Informatics University of Sussex SweCog Summer School in Cognitive Science Marston Hill, August 9 th -13 th 2010. Overview 1. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
S
Concepts and proto-conceptsin cognitive science
Ron ChrisleySackler Centre for Consciousness ScienceCentre for Research in Cognitive Science
School of InformaticsUniversity of Sussex
SweCog Summer School in Cognitive ScienceMarston Hill, August 9th-13th 2010
Overview 1
➢ The concept: The workhorse of orthodox cognitive science
➢ Concepts are constituents of mental content that are:➢ Articulable➢ Recombinable➢ Rational➢ Deployable
➢ Because of these features, concepts present the objective world as the objective world
➢ Often thought to be required for any intentional explanation of cognitive phenomena
2 SweCog Summer School 2010
Overview 2
➢ However, there seem to be mental phenomena not adequately characterized in terms of concepts:1. the fineness of grain of experience2. the incorrigibility of illusion3. non-circularity requirements on a theory of perception4. the graded nature of development and evolution5. commonalities in perception for those who do not share
the same concepts6. the minds of animals and infants7. the context-sensitivity and situatedness of some cognitive
processes8. the phenomenology of non-objectual thought3 SweCog Summer School 2010
Overview 3
➢ Proposal: Employ a notion of non-conceptual content that does not suffer from these limitations
➢ Non-conceptual constituents of content can be called proto-concepts
➢ Challenges for non-conceptual content:➢ Specification➢ Relation between conceptual and non-conceptual
content (McDowell)➢ Conceptual objections (McDowell)➢ Empirical objections (e.g., Clark)
4 SweCog Summer School 2010
The limits ofconceptual explanation
➢ However, there seem to be mental phenomena not adequately characterized in terms of concepts:1. the fineness of grain of perceptual experience2. the incorrigibility of illusion3. non-circularity requirements on a theory of perception4. the graded nature of development and evolution5. commonalities in perception for those who do not share
the same concepts6. the minds of animals and infants7. the context-sensitivity and situatedness of some cognitive
processes8. the phenomenology of non-objectual thought
➢ Probably won’t have time to discuss all of these15 SweCog Summer School 2010
Alternative specifications
➢ Therefore, an alternative means of content specification is needed➢ A point not fully appreciated in literature➢ Has restricted non-conceptual content research to
theoretical, general discussions, rather than explanatory applications of particular non-conceptual contents
➢ Alternatives have been proposed by➢ Peacocke (scenarios)➢ Bermudez (augmented success semantics)➢ Chrisley (various, including enactive depictions)
➢ Gives purpose to the debate16 SweCog Summer School 2010