conceptual framework choosing a trial court
DESCRIPTION
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court. +. +. SPECIFIC JURISDICTION. Organization of casebook Chronological Historical tour Categorical In personam v. in rem Contract v. tort. SPECIFIC JURISDICTION. Application of “minimum contacts” Specific v. general jurisdiction - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court
Choosing aTrial Court
(Federal or State Court)
Subject MatterJurisdiction
Personal (Territorial)Jurisdiction
VenueVenue Transfer
Forum non conveniens+ +
SPECIFIC JURISDICTION
Organization of casebook Chronological
Historical tour Categorical
In personam v. in rem Contract v. tort
SPECIFIC JURISDICTION
Application of “minimum contacts” Specific v. general jurisdiction Contract v. tort International Elaboration of “sub-tests”
SPECIFIC JURISDICTIONBlack Letter Law
McGee State interest
Hanson “purposeful availment”
SKILLS: STRATEGIC THINKING
Why did defendants take WWVW to S.Ct.? As pl’s initially configured the lawsuit, could defendants remove to federal court?
Why not? How does dropping Seaway & WWVW affect
removal? What action will remaining defendants take on
remand from Supreme Court? What about the 1 year time limit in §1441(b)
SKILLS: READING CASESThe Caption Mystery
What’s with the caption in
WWVW? Who is Woodson?
What’s with the caption in Asahi? Superior Court as the defendant???
SKILLS: READING CASESThe Caption Mystery
Extraordinary writs &
interlocutory appeals Prohibition, mandamus Cf. certiorari
SKILLS: READING CASESVotes & Holdings
Justice O’Connor Part II-A Rule Choice
Factual Problem Addressing? Rule Choice Options? O’Connor’s Rule Choice? Reasons? Who joined?
SKILLS: READING CASESVotes & Holdings
Justice Brennan Part II-A Rule Choice
Rule Choice? Reasons? Who joined?
SKILLS: READING CASESVotes & Holdings
Justice Stevens Part II-A Rule Choice
Rule Choice? Reasons? Who joined?
SKILLS: READING CASESHolding v. Dictum
Part IIA: Stream of Commerce Analysis Has the court (dis)approved?
O’Connor: Holding or dictum?
SKILLS: READING CASESVotes & Holdings
Justice O’Connor Part II-B Rule Choice
What part of Shoe test addressing? What factors consider? How apply to Asahi? Why? Who joined?
Holding or Dictum?
TAKEAWAY
Skills: Strategic thinking “Thinking like a lawyer”
Structuring lawsuit Procedural rules interact
TAKEAWAYS
Skills: Reading Cases Understanding captions & methods of appellate
review Holding v. Dictum
Counting votes in split opinions need to do how to do
TAKEAWAYS
Black Letter Law International Shoe “subtests”
State interest (McGee) “Purposeful availment” (Hanson) Foreseeability (Hanson, WWVW) Fairness factors (WWVW, Asahi)
Plaintiff’s interest Defendant’s interest Forum state’s interest Interstate judicial system’s interest