concurrent symposium : sle - defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - dr vaidehi...

42
Defining Treatment Targets in Lupus: Need of the Hour Vaidehi R Chowdhary 26/11/16

Upload: ira-con

Post on 14-Feb-2017

57 views

Category:

Healthcare


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Defining Treatment Targets in Lupus: Need of the Hour

Vaidehi R Chowdhary26/11/16

Page 2: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Objectives

•Define treat-to-target (T2T) strategy•Applicability to Systemic lupus erythematous (SLE)

•Recommendations for T2T•Challenges

Page 3: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Question: My biggest challenge in management of SLE patients is- 1. Treatment related mortality and morbidity2. Achieving remission or low disease activity3. Measures, clinical and biologic, to assess

disease activity4. Management of fibromyalgia, pain and

depression

©2010 MFMER | slide-3

Page 4: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Treat-to-target (T2T): Definition

•Therapeutic strategy aimed to treat patients to a goal which is capable of improving disease outcome

•T2T used for management of diabetes, hypertension tailored to a specific measurable goal (A1C or blood pressure)

Page 5: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

T2T Strategy in Rheumatology•Clinical course, long-term damage and functional status of rheumatoid arthritis, improves remarkably when disease activity is low and treatment is tailored to a specific measurable goal

Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:631–7

Page 6: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

What is treat-to-target in SLE (T2T/SLE)

• European lupus experts panel met May 08, 2012 to discuss T2T approach in SLE

• Systematic literature review (SLR) performed and results graded for the level of evidence (LoE) on a scale of 1–5, and grade of the recommendation (GoR) on a scale from A (highest) to D (lowest)

• 4 overarching principles, 11 recommendations Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):958-67

Page 7: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Overarching Principle 1The management of SLE should be based on shared decisions between the informed patient and her/his physician(s)

Page 8: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Overarching Principle 2Treatment of SLE should aim at ensuring long-term survival, preventing organ damage, and optimizing health-related quality-of-life, by controlling disease activity and minimizing comorbidities and drug toxicity

Page 9: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Overarching Principle 3The management of SLE requires an understanding of its many aspects and manifestations, which may have to be targeted in a multidisciplinary manner

Page 10: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Overarching Principle 4Patients with SLE need regular long-term monitoring and review and/or adjustment of therapy

Page 11: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Recommendation 1 GoR C (SLE)/A (LN)The treatment target of SLE should be remission of systemic symptoms and organ manifestations or, where remission cannot be reached, the lowest possible disease activity, measured by a validated lupus activity index and/or by organ-specific markers

Page 12: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Persistence of disease activity causes damage and mortality

©2010 MFMER | slide-14

Rheumatology 2012;51:491498

Mortality, HR 1.15New Organ Damage HR 1.08

Page 13: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Control of DA associated with lower damage

©2010 MFMER | slide-15

Autoimmunity Reviews 13 (2014) 770–777

Page 14: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Recommendation 2 GoR B (SLE)/A (LN)

Prevention of flares (especially severe flares) is a realistic target in SLE, and should be a therapeutic goal

Page 15: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Recommendation 3GoR B

It is not recommended that the treatment in clinically asymptomatic patients be escalated based solely on stable or persistent serological activity

Page 16: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Treatment of serologically active clinically Quiescent lupus (SACQ)• N=41, DBRCT, Prednisone 30 mg X 2 weeks, 20 X 1

week and 10 mg X 1 week versus placeboFlares in placebo 6 versus 0 in the prednisone group (P 0.007)• Toronto cohortPatient with SACQ accrued less damage over 10 years

©2010 MFMER | slide-18

Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Nov;54(11):3623-32

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Apr;64(4):511-8.

Page 17: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Recommendation 4GoR A

Since damage predicts subsequent damage and death, prevention of damage accrual should be a major therapeutic goal in SLE

Page 18: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Number of patients with damage over 26 year period

©2010 MFMER | slide-20

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Jun;48(6):673-5

Page 19: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Recommendation 5GoR B

Factors negatively influencing health-related quality of life (HRQoL), such as fatigue, pain and depression should be addressed in addition to control of disease activity and prevention of damage

Page 20: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Recommendation 6GoR B

Early recognition and treatment of renal involvement in SLE patients is strongly recommended

Page 21: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Baseline Predictors of ESRD in LN

©2010 MFMER | slide-23

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Jun;62(6):873-80.

Page 22: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Recommendation 7GoR B

For lupus nephritis, following induction therapy, at least 3 years of immunosuppressive maintenance treatment is recommended to optimize outcomes

Page 23: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Duration of maintenance treatment• Chinese study, predictors of a composite outcome of doubling

of serum creatinine, ESRD and Mortality Maintenance immunosuppresion < 3 years , HR 4.62(1.35-15.8)

• Patient reducing MMF ≤ 18 months after remission

©2010 MFMER | slide-25

Am J Med. 2006 Apr;119(4):355.e25-33J Rheumatol. 2011 Jul;38(7):1304-8

6.8-fold higher risk of relapse compared to those taking a stable dose

Page 24: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Recommendation 8GoR B

SLE maintenance treatment should aim for the lowest glucocorticoid dosage needed to control disease, and if possible, glucocorticoids should be withdrawn completely

Page 25: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Glucocorticoid dose and damage

©2010 MFMER | slide-27

J Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;36(3):560-4

Hazard Ratio for organ damage Cumulative steroid dose

1.16 (95% CI 0.54, 2.50) > 0-180 mg/month

1.50 (95% CI 0.58, 3.88) > 180-360 mg/month

1.64 (95% CI 0.58, 4.69) > 360-540 mg/month

2.51 (95% CI 0.87, 7.27) > 540 mg/month

Page 26: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Recommendation 9GoR C*Prevention and treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome-related morbidity should be a therapeutic goal in SLE; therapeutic recommendations do not differ from those in primary antiphospholipid syndrome* Based on low-quality randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled cohort studies

Page 27: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Recommendation 10GoR B

Irrespective of the use of other treatments, serious consideration should be given to the use of anti-malarials (AM)

Page 28: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Effect of AM in SLE graded according to quality of evidence –Systematic Review

©2010 MFMER | slide-30

Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jan;69(1):20-8.

Page 29: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Effect of AM in SLE graded according to quality of evidence

©2010 MFMER | slide-31

Page 30: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Recommendation 11, GoR C*Relevant therapies adjunctive to any immunomodulation should be considered to control comorbidity in SLE patients

* Mechanism based reasoning

Page 31: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Treat-to-target (T2T): Is it effective? • Proof of concept, Asia Pacific lupus collaboration• Lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS)- SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)-2K ≤4 - no new lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment- (SELENA)-SLEDAI physician global assessment (scale 0-3)

≤1- use of glucocorticoids at a dose ≤7.5 mg/ day prednisone

equivalent; and- well-tolerated standard maintenance doses of

immunosuppressive or biologic agents

Page 32: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Treat-to-target (T2T): Is it effective?

• 191 pts, average FU 3.9 years• Patients who spent greater than 50% of their

observed time in LLDAS had significantly reduced organ damage accrual compared with patients who spent less than 50% of their time in LLDAS (p=0.0007) and

• significantly less likely to have an increase in SDI of ≥1 (relative risk 0.47, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.79, p=0.005).

Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Sep;75(9):1615-21.

Page 33: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Challenges in T2T/SLE

©2010 MFMER | slide-37

Page 34: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Challenge 1 –Assessment of DA• Clinical heterogeneity of SLE makes a unique

disease activity assessment instrument difficult- Should target be a composite lupus activity index or

a separate one for each organ?- best index to use in clinical practice?- cut off threshold for the index?- weighted score e.g. proteinuria or arthritis both give

a SLEDAI of 4- Most indices do not include patient reported

measures

©2010 MFMER | slide-38

Page 35: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Challenge 2 –Definition of Remission• Urowitz: Complete absence of clinical and

serological disease activity for at least 5 years in patients with SLE who no longer require immunosuppressive drugs (other than chloroquine-based drugs)

• Achieved in only 1.7% of patients in the Canadian cohort

©2010 MFMER | slide-40

J. Rheumatol. 32, 1467–1472 (2005).

Page 36: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Challenge 2 –Definition of Remission• Complete remission• - clinical serological healing in patients who

are free of any treatment• Clinical remission -absence of signs, symptoms, urinary and hematological abnormalities in patients who are at least corticosteroid free

©2010 MFMER | slide-41

Page 37: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

©2010 MFMER | slide-42

Target of Lupus Activity

Minimal disease activity, SLEDAI-2k ≤ 1

Page 38: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Challenge 2 –Definition of Remission

• Definition of treatment targets for individual organs have to be defined (e.g. platelet count)

• Time constituent? e.g. Stable disease for 6 months?

• Need for biomarker correlating with disease outcomes (serologically active, clinically quiescent lupus SACQ)

©2010 MFMER | slide-43

Page 39: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Challenge 3•Lack of many effective therapeutic options for SLE

©2010 MFMER | slide-44

Page 40: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Summary- T2T/SLE• Promising concept but treatment targets

need definition• Composite index versus organ based

definition of outcomes• Concept of remission, disease activity

and continuation of therapy needs to be defined

©2010 MFMER | slide-45

Page 41: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Conclusions• Important step towards clinical care of SLE patients

•Should be studied across diverse populations

©2010 MFMER | slide-46

Page 42: CONCURRENT SYMPOSIUM : SLE - Defining treatment targets in lupus : need of the hour - Dr Vaidehi Chowdhary

Thank YouQuestions : [email protected]

©2010 MFMER | slide-47