conditions - icao eur region meetings seminars and...workshop on implementation of the new global...

SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS

Workshop on Implementation of the New Global Reporting Format (GRF) for Runway Surface

Conditions - ICAO EUR Region

(Paris, France, 10-11 July 2019)

1. Introduction

1.1. The Workshop on Implementation of the New Global Reporting Format (GRF) for Runway

Surface Conditions in the ICAO EUR Region was held at the ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Office in Paris,

France from 10 to 11 July 2019.

1.2. The list of participants and contact list are provided at Appendix A and Appendix B. A total of

98 experts from 29 States, 5 International Organizations (ACI, CANSO, EASA, IATA and ICAO), 1 Airline

and 1 Industry participated in the workshop. The workshop agenda is at Appendix C.

1.3. The Secretariat of the workshop was Mr. Chris Keohan assisted by Mr. Abbas Niknejad and

Ms. Natalia Savvina from the ICAO EUR/NAT Office.

2. Overview of GRF

2.1. The subject was addressed in PPT/01 presented by Andrew Badham (United Kingdom). A

description of the GRF methodology, both ground and airborne aspects, history and development process

was provided.

2.2. It was noted that the Aerodrome Design and Operations Panel (ADOP) was tasked to address

the ICAO Air Navigation Commission Job Card AP001: Runway surface conditions have contributed to

many safety events and investigations have revealed shortfalls in the accuracy and timeliness of assessment

and reporting methods currently provided in ICAO provisions and guidance material. This task was

assigned to the Runway Friction Task Force (FTF) of ADOP, which developed the GRF. GRF provides a

common language of contaminant types, runway condition codes and direct input to performance

assessment. Note that only contaminant types that have aircraft performance data are included in GRF

(therefore, contaminants such as sand, mud are not included as contaminants since there is no aircraft

performance data associated with these contaminants).

2.3. GRF contains a Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM) that includes assessment

criteria (runway condition code and runway surface description) that is linked to downgrade assessment

criteria (aeroplane deceleration or directional control observation and pilot braking action advisory report).

2 GRF Workshop (EUR, Paris) – Summary of Discussions

3. ICAO documentation

3.1. The subject was addressed in PPT/06, presented by Andrew Badham (United Kingdom) on

behalf of Lars Kornstaedt (Airbus). The workshop was briefed on proposed amendments to ICAO

documentation: Annex 3 - Meteorological Service for International Air Navigation, Annex 6 - Operation of

Aircraft, ICAO Doc 10064 - Aeroplane Performance Manual, Annex 8 – Airworthiness of Aircraft, Annex

11 – Air Traffic Services, ICAO Doc 4444 - Air Traffic Management, Annex 14 - Aerodromes, ICAO Doc

9981 - Aerodromes, Circular 355 – Assessment, Measurement and Reporting and Runway Surface

Conditions and Annex 15 - Aeronautical Information Services.

3.2. The workshop noted that the applicability date of these changes to the provisions related to

GRF is 5 November 2020.

3.3. The workshop also noted that GRF applies to all States, even those that do not experience snow

and ice since many aircraft overruns are the result of operations on wet/flooded runways.

3.4. Annex 8 provisions described take-off performance on a contaminated runway. In addition, the

provisions include a mandate to split landing performance information into 1) at time of take-off data

(dispatch) and 2) at time of landing data (in-flight).

3.5. Annex 6 provisions added a mandate to provide an AIREP when conditions are worse than

reported. Also, a mandate of in-flight check with appropriate landing margin before starting approach was

added to the provisions.

3.6. ICAO Doc 10064 was developed in light of GRF and expected to be available by the end of

2019.

3.7. A chapter on operations on contaminated runways included a description of the Runway

Condition Report (RCR) for Operators and Pilots; introduction to the Assessment Process applied by the

Aerodrome; description and use of the RCAM and Runway Condition Code (RWYCC); considerations for

making AIREPs of Braking Action and a training syllabus.

3.8. A chapter on landing included a derivation of landing performance data for time of arrival;

publication of data and limitations; fall-back generic factors in case no data is provided by the manufacturer;

regulatory background; considerations for performance assessment in approach preparation; and

considerations for flight crew and pilot procedures for landing on length-limited runways.

3.9. A chapter for take-off operations emphasized that contaminant drag (using contaminant type

and depth) must be accounted for when making take-off computations. Since typical manufacturer data

certified to Certification Specifications (CS)25 pre-amendment 2 does not cover many contaminant in the

RCAM (missing: frost, dry snow, wet snow, compacted snow at temperature above -15C, slippery when wet

and ice cold and dry), the Aircraft Performance Model (APM) offers advice on how to compute for missing

contaminants conservatively.

3.10. The workshop noted a major difference between information needed for operators when landing

(RWYCC) versus take-off (RWYCC, contaminant type and depth).


3.11. The workshop noted with concern the use of ATIS in providing more than the minimum

information required due to volume limitations. The minimum information required is: aerodrome location

indicator, date/time of assessment – time of completion of assessment in UTC, lower runway designation

number, Runway Condition Code - RWYCC, condition description over total runway length – observed on

each runway third, starting from threshold having the lower runway designator number. Examples of extra

information are e.g. snowbanks, drifting snow, depth (mm) of loose contaminant for each runway third. One

possible solution to this issue could be to provide two ATIS frequencies, one for departure and one for

arrivals.

3.12. The workshop also noted that dispatch served as a link of providing the most updated

information to the pilot since SNOWTAM is used mainly for flight planning. In addition, there are various

examples of when information is needed and who would provide the latest runway condition assessment

information. That is, at top of decent this information could come from dispatch. During arrival/approach

segments, this information would most likely come from ATC via radio communications. When entering the

terminal area, this information would likely be retrieved via ATIS (noting that the GRF information on ATIS

is provided in accordance to the active runway).

4. Case studies

4.1. The subject was addressed in PPT/09, presented by Phillip Davenport (United States). A

detailed case study examining the planning, training, implementation activities as well as challenges and

lessons learnt by United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was provided to the workshop.

Parallel testing of the Take-off and Landing Performance Assessment (TALPA) was conducted with the

legacy system for 2 winter seasons. Tools such as templates to provide the runway assessment were

provided to reduce errors in reporting this information. An awareness campaign was also conducted that

used e.g. Webinars and Frequently Asked Questions. The main challenges identified in this implementation

was time to implement; managing resistance to change; ceasing the dissemination of friction measurements

to pilots. The workshop noted and emphasized that friction measurements should not be reported to pilots.

4.2. The workshop noted that the FAA monitors their runway assessment reporting (via archived

NOTAM) with reports from pilots (via archived AIREPs). Data analysis would be shared with any interested

participant of the workshop. This would also be considered as best practice to be used in the ICAO EUR

Region.

5. Implementation view (airports)

5.1. The subject was addressed in PPT/04, presented by Joerg Simon (Munich Airport). To achieve

GRF implementation, the airport operator was provided the following steps: read the manuals (e.g. Doc

9981, PANS-ADR, Second Edition, ICAO Circular 355 and EASA NPA 2018-14); conduct training on the

new methods and procedures to the relevant airport staff noting that personnel conducting runway surface

condition assessments would need enhanced training; provide a timely adjustment of locally used software

for the reporting (e.g. new forms for SNOWTAM); and inform the stakeholders of the change.

6. Implementation view (airlines)

6.1. The subject was addressed in PPT/11, presented by Anthony Van Der Veldt (IATA). The

workshop noted that IATA’s position on GRF is as follows: One global standard for assessing and


reporting runway surface conditions is a first for our industry and welcomed by our members and should

help to drive down the number of runway excursion incidents where a contaminated runway was a

contributing factor. Furthermore, IATA suggested a simple implementation map should be considered, to

allow operators to easily determine the extent of GRF implementation. In addition, any differences from

ICAO GRF should be promulgated in a timely manner.

7. Implementation view (ANSP)

CANSO

7.1. The subject was addressed in PPT/10, presented by Philipp Wachter (CANSO). CANSO their

perspective as to why GRF is important to ATC: to anticipate and manage the flow of air traffic; to help

minimize delays; to manage staffing, sectors openings; identify which airports remain valid alternates; and

assist crews in their decision making process. A very strong emphasis was placed on training in order to

successfully implement GRF.

MicroStep

7.2. The subject was addressed in PPT/07, presented by Pavol Nechaj (MicroStep – MIS industry

partner of LPS SR, ANSP of Slovakia) which highlighted that 22% of all accidents from 2010 to 2014 were

related to runway excursions according to an IATA Safety Report. This risk could be mitigated by on-board

and ground systems that may warn pilots, controllers or both when conditions warrant. The scope of

concerned SESAR Solution Pj03b-06 was described including airborne systems such as Runway Overrun

Awareness and Alerting System (ROAAS) and On-board Braking Action Computation System (OBACS)

and ground system named Runway Condition Awareness Management System (RCAMS).

7.3. The Airport Runway Weather Information System (ARWIS) was described to provide

continuous assessment of the runway surface condition as well as provide a short term forecast of runway

condition. ARWIS also disseminates RCR and provides operational alerts on deteriorated runway conditions

when they are detected or forecasted.

7.4. The workshop noted that a fully automated assessment would not be available by the

implementation date of 5 November 2020 and that a human assessment is still needed for the time being.

8. State Perspective

France

8.1. The subject was addressed in PPT/05 presented by Christine Roure & Antoine Dejean de la

Batie. France provided the workshop an example of a States perspective of implementation, planning and

regulatory approach. In particular, France was part of the TALPA trial at 12 aerodromes (2 overseas) for 3

winter seasons (2014-2017). A correlation between RWYCC and AIREPs revealed that improvements to

reporting RWYCC were still needed noting that this correlation between RWYCC and AIREPs could only

be done for 1/3 of all the data (AIREPs were less numerous than the RWYCC).

8.2. A French steering committee was created in October 2017 that consisted of Aircraft

manufacturers, Airlines, Airports, AIS, ANSPs, CAA, Pilots and Weather Service along with ICAO and

EASA. Terms of reference of the steering committee were developed which basically contained high level


implementation tasks. An awareness campaign was also conducted through seminars, symposiums, forums,

conferences and meetings. National regulations were in the process of being updated. Guidance material is

being developed and the CAA will assist in training, but not be responsible for training.

8.3. France noted that the main challenges of implementation included: stakeholder involvement at

an operational level; good practical coordination to achieve a globally harmonized methodology and staff

training in accordance with the concept. France also suggested testing implementation in real conditions

during winter 2019-2020.

8.4. PPT/08 presented by Hervé Bilot and Antoine Dejean de la Batie was provided to the

workshop. This presentation described the French Early Implementation and Runway Weather Information

System noting France has approximately 150 airports (105-115 in France and 40-45 airports overseas) that

GRF implementation applies. These airports vary from large international airports to small national airports

and airports on islands.

8.5. A test of this system in the form of operational organization for information management is

expected beginning November 2019 at 1 medium EASA airport and 1 national one. This test involves airport

operators, ANSP, regional CAA, airlines and AIS. Developing an experimental agreement is in progress.

Feedback in Spring 2020 will assist in taking appropriate corrective actions noting an initial internal

feedback will be available in January 2020 allowing more implementation adjustments if necessary.

8.6. EASA would consider how to collect and share the analysis of GRF conducted in the winter

2019-2020 season from EUR States conducting these tests.

8.7. The airport selection for this test considered colder locations that would increase the probability

of various RCR and SNOWTAM. Strasbourg and Colmar were selected which also have commercial and

non-commercial flights and significant enough traffic that will test the GRF.

8.8. As part of the planning for this test, various documents are being produced for various

stakeholders to assist in training. Concerns identified included: identifying all processes to adjust (notably

between airports and operators and ATS) and adjusting if necessary AIS applications and transmission

times. Concerns associated with airports’ operators included: increasing charge (more SNOWTAM) and no

more communication of friction measures which pilots use (but again are not correlated with performance).

EASA

8.9. The subject was addressed in PPT/03, presented by Vasileios Stefanioros (EASA). EASA

focused on the implementation of GRF, challenges and the way forward. Given that there are 592

aerodromes in the EASA scope and the occurrence of runway excursions is a significant risk,

implementation of GRF is a high priority of EASA. Four different rulemaking tasks address the following:

Air Operations, Aerodromes, ATM/ANS, AIS and Rules of the Air. Rulemaking is compliant to ICAO

provisions. Basic principles of the GRF are kept at the rule level to prohibit deviations while procedural

issues are included in the acceptable means of compliance to allow some flexibility in the implementation.

The latter gives States flexibility on how to conduct their assessment without prescribing specific

technology. Furthermore, extensive guidance material is provided in order to explain the GRF. Adoption of

regulations (Reg. (EU) 965/2012, 2017/373, 139/2014, 923/2012, 2017/373) expected by early 2020. EASA

emphasized to EU States to apply EU Regulations to those aerodromes this applies and harmonize this


regulation to those aerodromes that fall under the national procedures. Challenges identified included

different level of experience and exposure on operations on contaminated runways; management of change;

and determining how to ensure accurate assessments, especially at busy runways.

8.10. EASA will assess implementation of GRF in the years to follow November 2020 and if issues

are identified, EASA will be actively involved in any proposed changes to the global provisions.

9. AIS aspects

9.1. The subject was addressed in PPT/02, presented by Abbas Niknejad (ICAO Paris). The

workshop was provided with AIS/AIM aspects of implementing GRF, in particular origination and

dissemination of SNOWTAM. The workshop was briefed on the changes to the SNOWTAM definition,

provisions and format, introduced in the PANS-AIM (former amendment 39B to Annex 15).

9.2. It was noted that the maximum validity of SNOWTAM (and thus RCR) is 8 hours. It was also

noted that a new RCR (and then SNOWTAM) should be initiated when a significant change occurs in the

runway surface condition, as described in the PANS-ADR. Significant change would be any change to the

following: the RWYCC; the contaminant type; the contaminant coverage; depth of the contaminant

(standing water and slush: 3 -15 mm, wet snow: 5 mm and dry snow: 20 mm); and any other change that

could be considered significant.

9.3. The workshop was provided with some recommendations for implementation such as: updating

State’s regulatory framework; establishment of a national implementation team & plan that takes into

account the modified ICAO provisions; training, awareness, education; coordination between AIS, affected

aerodromes, ATS units and Users (operators/airlines) of the new requirements and changes (through

circular, etc.); revision/updating of the software/templates used to issue/receive SNOWTAM

(NOTAM/SNOWTAM system); updating the formal arrangements between aerodromes and AIS; and

publication of an Aeronautical Information Circular (AIC) for awareness and readiness.

9.4. It was highlighted that two methods of disseminating GRF are through SNOWTAM and in

some cases through voice communications by ATS (radiotelephony & ATIS). The workshop also noted that

guidance on upgrading and downgrading of the RWYCC is provided in ICAO Doc 9981.

10. Training requirements/ resources

ACI

10.1. The subject was addressed in PPT/12, presented by Olivier Sciara (ACI). The following topics

were addressed: course development timeline; course content; RCAM; when to issue a new Runway

Condition Report; Worksheet and Examples for Winter Conditions; Worksheet and Examples for Wet

Conditions; example descriptions; and testimonials and feedback. The course will take approximately 3

hours and has the capability to start and stop anytime. Furthermore, a certificate is issued when completed.

The course will remain in your online library for reference and it can be referenced as often as possible. For

more information or register, access www.olc.aero or contact [email protected].

IATA

http://www.olc.aero/

mailto:[email protected]


10.2. The subject was addressed in PPT/13, presented by Anthony Van Der Veldt (IATA). GRF

training for the airlines is in development and expected to become available in December 2019. This training

will focus on airline operations (e.g. pilot has to perform landing and take-off calculations). IATA also plans

to conduct a seminar catered to airlines in Madrid in Q1 2020.

CANSO

10.3. CANSO informed the workshop that it would develop guidance and training for its stakeholders

in the coming months.

10.4. The workshop noted that the training material from the various stakeholders (e.g. ACI, CANSO

and IATA) is being coordinated at ICAO HQ.

11. Conclusions

11.1. The workshop noted other GRF workshops planned:

• 10-11 December 2019; Frankfurt (ACI); confirmed

• 28-29 January 2020; Helsinki (Finavia); confirmed

• Q1 2020; Madrid (IATA); tbd

• Q4 2019-Q2 2020; Astana (Kazaeronavigatsia); tbd

11.2. The workshop also developed a GRF implementation check list as provided at Appendix D

which was mainly developed in relation to the summary provided at PPT/01 as well as input by the meeting.

11.3. The workshop closed at 1640 on 11 July 2019.

____________________


List of Appendices

Appendix A – Lists of the Participants

Appendix B – Contact List

Appendix C – Agenda

Appendix D – GRF Implementation Check List

//__________ END ___________//

A-1 GRF Implementation Workshop – Summary of Discussions – Appendix A A-1

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

Last updated: 18/07/19

AUSTRIA

Kurt KLÖSCH

BELARUS

Maria KASYANAVA

Viachaslau KISELEVICH

CZECHIA

Ivan HARASTA

DENMARK

Steffen GAMMELGAARD WILLUMSEN

Birger JEPPESEN

Jesper UHD

ESTONIA

Heikko JÄE

Arno TAREMÄE

FINLAND

Heikki HEINIJOKI

FRANCE

Denis AUDEMAR

Jean-Marc BARBAGGIO

Sebastien BELON

Hervé BILOT

Alexandre BOGDANOVIC

Juliette BONET

Norbert BURNAND

François BUTAULT

Magali CLOVIS

Sophie DALMASSO

Antoine DEJEAN DE LA BATIE

Marion FARAT

Thomas IACONO

Fabrice IBRAHIM

François JULLEMIER

Jeremy KITAIGORODSKI

Jean-Marc LAPENE

Sophie PRADEN

Christine ROURE

Stéphane RUEL

GEORGIA

Kakhaber ABRAMISHVILI

GERMANY

Jens ESSERS

Sören FÜRBAS

Thomas MAYER

Joerg SIMON

Hans-Jürgen ZIMMER

GREECE

Aristeidis PATRIKAKOS

HUNGARY

Judit KREJCAREK

Gábor MENRÁTH

Eva ORBÁNNÉ TÓTH

ISRAEL

Or ZAKEN-AMIT

ITALY

Matteo BRUNO

Michele BUFO

Simone CESCON

Franco D’AMICO

Felice DE LUCIA

Andrea DEL GIUDICE

Andrea FLORIAN

Domenico MELE

Gianni PEZZATO

Matteo SANTIN

LATVIA

Dāvis BLAUS

Ingus KRUMINS

LITHUANIA

Aušra KAROSAITĖ

LUXEMBOURG

Rémi CHEENNE

Sven KASEL

Bob LARY

Régis OSSANT

A-2 GRF Implementation Workshop – Summary of Discussions – Appendix A A-2

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

Last updated: 18/07/19

MONTENEGRO

Milan AVRAMOVIC

MOROCCO

Fatima Zohra BOURRIBAB

Asma ELMALKI

Amine MINAOUI

NETHERLANDS

Edward DE KRUIJF

Edwin GROVENSTEIN

Erwin KRUIT

MOLDOVA

Serghei PODLESNII

NORTH MACEDONIA

Nada ANDONOVSKA

Goran JANDREOSKI

Igor RISTOMANOV

POLAND

Hanna DZIDO

Bartosz KONIUSZEWSKI

SERBIA

Vladimir PAVLOVIC

Vladimir SLOVIC

SLOVAKIA

Pavol NECHAJ

SPAIN

Olga María MARTÍNEZ CÁNOVAS

Antonio Esteban OLIVARES BRAVO

Alberto QUINTANA GARCIA

Víctor Manuel SOMOZA PASCUAL

Esteban PAJARES MUÑOZ

SWITZERLAND

Shaban SHKRELI

Kathrin STÄUBLI

UKRAINE

Lesia GRYGORIEVA

Larysa GURIEIEVA

UNITED KINGDOM

Andrew BADHAM

UNITED STATES

Philip DAVENPORT

ACI EUROPE

Olivier SCIARA

CANSO

Philipp WÄCHTER

EASA

Vasileios STEFANIOROS

IATA

Anthony VAN DER VELDT

ICAO

Berk BOZKURT

Oguzhan HASDENIZ

Arnaud DESJARDIN

Christopher KEOHAN

Abbas NIKNEJAD

Natalia SAVVINA

SAS

Geneth DALEY

TIME TO FLY

Claire LE BIEZ

Benoît SCHNEIDERMANN

B-1 GRF Implementation Workshop – Summary of Discussions – Appendix B B-1

GRF Workshop

Contact List

Date of issue: 18/07/2019

AUSTRIA

Kurt KLÖSCH

AIM, Head

Austro Control - Österreichische Gesellschaft

für Zivilluftfahrt mbH

Wagramer Strasse 19

A-1220 Vienna

AUSTRIA

Phone: + 43 05 17 03 32 50

Cellphone: + 43 664 6100 394

E-mail: [email protected]

BELARUS

Maria KASYANAVA

ASTC Minsk National Airport Republican

Unitary Enterprise

"ter. National airport Minsk

220054 Minsk

BELARUS

Cellphone: +375-33-615-57-40


Viachaslau KISELEVICH

ASTC Minsk National Airport Republican

Unitary Enterprise

"ter. National airport Minsk

220054 Minsk

BELARUS

Cellphone: +375-33-328-62-23


CZECHIA

Ivan HARASTA

Airfield Operations Specialist

Letiště Praha, a. s. - Prague airport

K letišti 1019/6

161 00 Praha 6

CZECHIA

Phone: +420 220 111 097

Cellphone: +420 607 052 944


DENMARK

Steffen GAMMELGAARD WILLUMSEN

Copenhagen TWR, Manager

NAVIAIR

Naviair Allé 1

DK 2770 Kastrup

DENMARK

Phone: +45 3248 2190

Cellphone: +45 4086 3848


Birger JEPPESEN

Department of Aerodrome Operations, Senior

Flight Procedure and Aerodrome Design

Engineer

Københavns Lufthavne A/S - Copenhagen

airport

Postboks 74, Lufthavnsboulevarden 6

2770 Kastrup

DENMARK

Phone: +45 32 31 36 78

Cellphone: +45 31 41 57 70



Printed 18.07.19

Jesper UHD

Airside Operations, Senior Advisor

Københavns Lufthavne A/S - Copenhagen

airport

Postboks 74, Lufthavnsboulevarden 6

2770 Kastrup

DENMARK


ESTONIA

Heikko JÄE

Head of IBOF (Integrated Briefing Office)

Estonian Air Navigation Services

Lennuliiklusteeninduse AS

Kanali põik 3, Rae küla,

10112 Harjumaa

ESTONIA

Phone: +372 625 8264

Cellphone: +372 5377 8584


Arno TAREMÄE

NOTAM expert

Estonian Air Navigation Services

Lennuliiklusteeninduse AS

Kanali põik 3, Rae küla,

10112 Harjumaa

ESTONIA


FINLAND

Heikki HEINIJOKI

Technical & Enviromental Services, Head of

Airport Engineering

Finavia

P.O. Box 50

01531 Vantaa

FINLAND

Phone: +358 40 774 9674


FRANCE

Jean-Marc BARBAGGIO

Direction Générale de l'Aviation Civile

50, rue Henry Farman

75720 Cedex 15 Paris

FRANCE

E-mail: Jean-

Marc.BARBAGGIO@aviation-

civile.gouv.fr

Sebastien BELON




FRANCE

E-mail: Sebastien.BELON@aviation-

civile.gouv.fr

Hervé BILOT




FRANCE

E-mail: herve.bilot@aviation-

civile.gouv.fr


Printed 18.07.19

Juliette BONET

Unité Opérationnelle Aires Aéronautiques -

CDGR, Responsable du pôle Operations

ADP INTERNATIONAL

Roissy Pôle, Continental Square 1, Bâtiment

Jupiter

1 place de Londres BP 81 007

95 931 Roissy Charles de Gaulle

FRANCE

Cellphone: +33 6 89 30 16 69


Norbert BURNAND

General Aviation Manager, Airside Operation

Manager

Aéroport Marseille Provence - Marseille

Airport

BP7

13727 Marignane

FRANCE

Phone: (+33) 4 42 14 22 36


François BUTAULT

DSNA/SDPS/EXT, Pôle Relations

extérieures, Chef de programme




FRANCE

Phone: +33(0)1 58 09 48 95

E-mail: francois.butault@aviation-

civile.gouv.fr

Magali CLOVIS

DSNA DO, Subdivision Regulations and

Methods, Deputy head

Direction Organisation Stratégique

Direction de la Technique et de l'Innovation

DSNA/DTI/CNS/NAV

9 rue de Champagne

91200 Athis-Mons

FRANCE

Phone: +33 1 69577215

E-mail: magali.clovis@aviation-

civile.gouv.fr

Sophie DALMASSO

Responsable Suivi de Conformité

Aéroportuaire & Système de Gestion de la

Sécurité Aéronefs SC / SGS, Compliance

Monitoring and SMS Manager

Aéroport Nice Côte d'Azur

BP 3331

06206 Nice

FRANCE

Phone: +33 (0)4 93 21 35 85

Fax: +33 (0)4 93 21 42 65

E-mail: sophie.dalmasso@cote-

azur.aeroport.fr

Antoine DEJEAN DE LA BATIE




FRANCE

E-mail: antoine.dejean-de-la-

[email protected]


Printed 18.07.19

Marion FARAT

techniques et sécurité, Chargée d’études

Aéroport de Lille - Lille airport

CS90227

59812 Lesquin Cedex

FRANCE

Phone: +33 (0) 3 20 49 67 68

Fax: +33 (0) 3 20 49 68 10


Thomas IACONO




FRANCE

E-mail: thomas.iacono@aviation-

civile.gouv.fr

François JULLEMIER

Airport Technical & Maintenance Senior

Manager

ADP INTERNATIONAL

Roissy Pôle, Continental Square 1, Bâtiment

Jupiter

1 place de Londres BP 81 007

95 931 Roissy Charles de Gaulle

FRANCE

Phone: +33.1.74.25.57.84

Cellphone: +33.6.49.51.60.31


Jeremy KITAIGORODSKI

Airports Project Manager

CGX - Toulouse Office

142 A rue du Village d’Entreprises, Bât. 1

F31670 Labège

FRANCE

Phone: +33 (0)5 63 37 82 78

Cellphone: +33 (0)6 14 66 68 00

Fax: +33 (0)5 63 37 82 87

Jean-Marc LAPENE




FRANCE

E-mail: jean-marc.lapene@aviation-

civile.gouv.fr

Sophie PRADEN

Bureau Veritas Exploitation - Aeronautics &

Space Division, Aviation Safety Consultant -

Airport and CAA

Bureau Veritas

12 rue Michel Labrousse, BP 64797

31047 Toulouse

FRANCE

Phone: + 33 5 61167270

Cellphone: +33 680919483

E-mail:

[email protected]

Christine ROURE

Direction de la coopération européenne et

réglementation de sécurité, Adjointe au chef

de pôle sécurité aéroportuaire Direction de la

sécurité de l'aviation civile




FRANCE

Phone: +33 1 58 09 48 87

E-mail: christine.roure@aviation-

civile.gouv.fr


Printed 18.07.19

Stéphane RUEL

Département Exploitation Terminaux et Piste,

Airside Operations Manager

Aéroport Nice Côte d'Azur

BP 3331

06206 Nice

FRANCE

Phone: + 33 (0)4.93.21.40.67

Cellphone: + 33 (0)6.73.79.29.49

E-mail: Stephane.RUEL@cote-

azur.aeroport.fr

GEORGIA

Kakhaber ABRAMISHVILI

Flight safety inspector AGA

Georgian Civil Aviation Agency (GCAA)

Tbilisi International Airport

0158 Tbilisi

GEORGIA

Phone: (+995) 32 294 80 10 - 111


GERMANY

Jens ESSERS

Operations and Safety, Duty Traffic Manager

Düsseldorf Airport

Flughafenstraße 105

40474 Düsseldorf

GERMANY

Phone: +49 211 421 2220

Cellphone: +49 172 2696157

Fax: +49 211 421 2735


Sören FÜRBAS

Safety, Senior Consultant EASA &

Operational Standards

Flughafen Berlin Brandenburg GmbH -

Berlin Airport

12521 Berlin

GERMANY

Phone: + 49-30-6091 70197

Cellphone: +49-170 783 97 58

E-mail: soeren.fuerbas@berlin-

airport.de

Thomas MAYER

Director

IDRF - Interessengemeinschaft der

regionalen Flugplätze IDRF e. V.

Seckenheimer Landstraße 172

68163 Mannheim

GERMANY

Phone: +49 621 82037574

Cellphone: +49 172 5304487

Fax: +49 621 82037573


Jörg SIMON

Business Division Aviation, EASA Manager

Operations, Head of Airport Operations

Flughafen Muenchen GmbH - Munich

airport

P.O. Box 23 17 55

85326 Muenchen-Flughafen

GERMANY

Phone: +49 89 975 211 10

Cellphone: +49 172 61 70 67 6

Fax: +49 89 975 148 211 10

E-mail: joerg.simon@munich-

airport.de

Hans-Jürgen ZIMMER

Duty Traffic Manager

Düsseldorf Airport

Flughafenstraße 105

40474 Düsseldorf

GERMANY

E-mail: hans-

[email protected]


Printed 18.07.19

GREECE

Aristeidis PATRIKAKOS

Main Terminal Building, Airside Operations,

Head

Athens International Airport S.A.

Spata

19019 Athens

GREECE

Phone: +30 210 3531 437

Fax: .+30 210 3532 298


HUNGARY

Judit KREJCAREK

Head of AIS

HungaroControl

Igló utca 33-35.

H-1185 Budapest

HUNGARY

E-mail:

[email protected]

Gábor MENRÁTH

HungaroControl

Igló utca 33-35.

H-1185 Budapest

HUNGARY

E-mail:

[email protected]

Eva ORBÁNNÉ TÓTH

Head of NOTAM Unit

HungaroControl

Igló utca 33-35.

H-1185 Budapest

HUNGARY

Phone: +3612934437

E-mail:

[email protected]

ISRAEL

Or ZAKEN-AMIT

Aerodrome Inspector

Civil Aviation Authority of Israel

GOLAN Building, Golan St., P.O. Box 1101

Airport City

70100

ISRAEL

Phone: +972-3-9774676

Cellphone: +972- 54-3128756


ITALY

Matteo BRUNO

SAVE Venice Marco Polo Airport -

Pavement Maintenance

SAVE Group

Viale G. Galilei, 30/1

30173 Tessera

Venice

ITALY


Simone CESCON

Station Supervisor of Treviso Airport

AERTRE S.p.a. Treviso Airport

Via Noalese 63/E

31100 Treviso

ITALY



Printed 18.07.19

Franco D’AMICO

Ente Nazionale per l'Aviazione Civile

(ENAC)

Viale del Castro Pretorio, 118

00185 Rome

ITALY


Felice DE LUCIA

ENAV SpA

Via Salaria, 716

00138 Rome

ITALY


Andrea DEL GIUDICE

Rome-Ciampino airport, Airport

Management, Operational Planning and

Aviation Projects

Rome Airport

Aeroporto G.B.Pastine

Via Appia Nuova

1651

ITALY

Phone: + 39 06 6595.30960

Cellphone: +39 348 2399722


Andrea FLORIAN

SAVE Venice Marco Polo Airport - Safety

Operations

SAVE Group

Viale G. Galilei, 30/1

30173 Tessera

Venice

ITALY

Fax: +39 041 2606229


Domenico MELE

Ente Nazionale per l'Aviazione Civile

(ENAC)

Viale del Castro Pretorio, 118

00185 Rome

ITALY


Gianni PEZZATO

Safety Manager

AERTRE S.p.a. Treviso Airport

Via Noalese 63/E

31100 Treviso

ITALY

Phone: +39 0422 31 5106

Cellphone: +39 348 9819870


Matteo SANTIN

Post Holder Movement Area

Aeroporto Valle d'Aosta LIMW

Loc. Les Iles, 9, 11020 Saint-Christophe

(Ao)

ITALY

Phone: +39 0165303344

Cellphone: +39 3440451182

Fax: +39 0165303321



Printed 18.07.19

LATVIA

Dāvis BLAUS

Aerodrome Technical Manager

SJSC RIGA International Airport

10/1 RIGA Airport

Marupe district

LV 1053

LATVIA

Phone: +371-6880-6168


Ingus KRUMINS

Aerodrome Management and Safety

department, Safety Management System

Manager

SJSC RIGA International Airport

10/1 RIGA Airport

Marupe district

LV 1053

LATVIA

Phone: +371 67207851

Cellphone: +371 29422191

Fax: +371 67211767


LITHUANIA

Aušra KAROSAITĖ

Air Navigation Services Division, Specialist

Transport Competence Agency (TKA)

I. Kanto g. 2

LT-44296 Kaunas

LITHUANIA

Phone: +370 (8 5) 273 9247


LUXEMBOURG

Rémi CHEENNE

Aerodrome Senior Expert

Air Navigation Administration (ANA)

4, route de Trèves

L-2632 FINDEL

LUXEMBOURG


Sven KASEL

Deputy Head of Aeronautical Operations

Department, Head of AIM


4, route de Trèves

L-2632 FINDEL

LUXEMBOURG

Phone: (+352) 4798 23003

Cellphone: (+352) 621 340 538


Bob LARY

Service Aerodrome, Works and Winter

Operations Coordinator


4, route de Trèves

L-2632 FINDEL

LUXEMBOURG

Phone: (+352) 4798-23029

Cellphone: (+352) 621 585 077


Régis OSSANT

Aerodrome inspector

Direction de l'Aviation Civile

4, rue Lou Hemmer

L-1742 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Phone: + 352 247-74919

Fax: + 352 467790



Printed 18.07.19

MONTENEGRO

Milan AVRAMOVIC

Supervisor for airports

Civil Aviation Agency

Bul. Josipa Broza Tita bb

81000 Podgorica

MONTENEGRO

Phone: +382 20 625 529

Fax: +382 20 625 517


MOROCCO

Fatima Zohra BOURRIBAB

Airport Certification and Normalisation, State

Engineer


Av. Azzaytoune B.P. 1073, Rabat Principal

Hay Riad

10000 Rabat

MOROCCO


Asma ELMALKI

Chef de Service de la Planification

aéroportuaire



Hay Riad

10000 Rabat

MOROCCO


Amine MINAOUI

Airport Certification and Normalisation, State

Engineer



Hay Riad

10000 Rabat

MOROCCO


NETHERLANDS

Edward DE KRUIJF

Manager Day-to-Day Operations

Lelystad Airport

NETHERLANDS

Phone: +31 320-284790

Cellphone: +31 6-51694204


Edwin GROVENSTEIN

Airport Operations, Senior Officer

Compliance

SCHIPHOL AIRPORT

Postbus 75200

SCHIPHOL AIRPORT

1117 ZT

NETHERLANDS

Phone: +31 (0)6 5169 4201


Erwin KRUIT

Compliance Monitoring Manager

Groningen Airport Eelde

Machlaan 14a | 9761 TK Eelde

NETHERLANDS

Phone: +31 50 - 3097014



Printed 18.07.19

MOLDOVA

Serghei PODLESNII

Airports, Main Specialist

Republic of Moldova CAA

80/2 Dacia bd

MD-2026 Chisinau

REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

Phone: + 373 22 823 555

Fax: + 373 22 529 118


NORTH

MACEDONIA

Goran JANDREOSKI

TAV Airports Coordinator

TAV Airports

Skopje

NORTH MACEDONIA


Nada ANDONOVSKA

Head of NOTAM section

M-NAV

Bosfor Nr.7, Mralino

Ilinden

REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA

Phone: +389 23 148 280

E-mail:

[email protected]

Igor RISTOMANOV

AIS/NOF, Notam officer

M-NAV

Bosfor Nr.7, Mralino

Ilinden

REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA

E-mail:

[email protected]

POLAND

Hanna DZIDO

Aerodrome Department, Senior Specialist

Civil Aviation Authority

ul. Marcina Flisa 2

02-247 Warszawa

POLAND

Phone: (+48) 22 520 74 92

Cellphone: (+48) 881036874


Bartosz KONIUSZEWSKI

Head of NOTAM Office

Polish ANS Agency - PANSA

Wiezowa 8 St

02-147 Warsaw

POLAND

Phone: (+48 22) 574 71 77

Cellphone: (+48) 609 119 141

Fax: (+48 22) 574 71 79

E-mail:

[email protected]

SERBIA

Vladimir PAVLOVIC

Civil Aviation Directorate of the Republic of

Serbia

Skadarska 23

11000 Belgrade

SERBIA


Vladimir SLOVIC

Civil Aviation Directorate of the Republic of

Serbia

Skadarska 23

11000 Belgrade

SERBIA



Printed 18.07.19

SLOVAKIA

Pavol NECHAJ

Meteorologist & SESAR Project manager

MicroStep-MIS

Čavojského 1

841 04 Bratislava

SLOVAKIA

E-mail: pavol.nechaj@microstep-

mis.com

SPAIN

Olga María MARTÍNEZ CÁNOVAS

Operations Division, Central Services,

Operations Technician

AENA S.M.E., S.A.

Calle Peonías, 12

28042 Madrid

SPAIN

Phone: +34 671725389


Antonio Esteban OLIVARES BRAVO

Adolfo Suárez Madrid-Barajas Airport,

Trainer and Assessor - Movement Area

AENA S.M.E., S.A.

Av. de la Hispanidad, s/n

28042 Madrid

SPAIN

Phone: +34 913243020


Esteban PAJARES MUÑOZ

ATM, Airports Operations, Technical

Specialist

Entidad Pública Empresarial - ENAIRE

Parque Empresarial Las Mercedes

Avda. de Aragón, 330 (Campezo 1), Edificio

2

28022 Madrid

SPAIN


Alberto QUINTANA GARCIA

Aerodrome Safety Division, Airport Focal

Point

AESA

28020

Avenida General Perón n.º 40, Portal B, 1ª

planta

Madrid

SPAIN

Phone: +34 913968318


Víctor Manuel SOMOZA PASCUAL

Operations Division, Central Services, Head

of Flight Field Department

AENA S.M.E., S.A.

Calle Peonías, 12

28042 Madrid

SPAIN

Phone: +34 671728179



Printed 18.07.19

SWITZERLAND

Kathrin STÄUBLI

Project Manager Aerodromes

Federal Office of Civil Aviation

Mühlestrasse 2

3063 Ittigen

3003 Bern

SWITZERLAND

Phone: +41 (0) 58 483 94 43

Cellphone: +41 (0) 79 109 91 79

E-mail:

[email protected]

UKRAINE

Lesia GRYGORIEVA

Head of Aerodrome Operators Oversight

Division

State Aviation Administration Of Ukraine

14 Peremogy ave.

01135 Kyiv

UKRAINE

Phone: +380 44 351 55 23

Cellphone: +380 67 778 87 44

E-mail:

[email protected]

Larysa GURIEIEVA

Aerodrome Certification Division, State

inspector of oversight for safety of aviation

State Aviation Administration Of Ukraine

14 Peremogy ave.

01135 Kyiv

UKRAINE

Phone: +380 44 351 52 78

Cellphone: +380 67 258 34 79


UNITED KINGDOM

Andrew BADHAM

Safety and Airspace Regulation Group,

Policy Lead - Aerodromes

Civil Aviation Authority

3SW Aviation House

Gatwick Airport South

RH6 0YR West Sussex

UNITED KINGDOM

Phone: +44 (0)1293 573032

Cellphone: +44 7802 158339

Fax: + 44 (0) 1293 503974


UNITED STATES

Philip DAVENPORT

Airport Certification Safety Inspector

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Ave., SW

20591 Washington D.C.

UNITED STATES

Phone: +1 202 267 7072

Fax: + 1 202 493 1416


ACI EUROPE

Olivier SCIARA

Safety, ATM and Technical Manager

Union des Aéroports Français (UAF)

35 rue Vaugelas

75015 Paris

FRANCE

Phone: +33 1 40 65 15 07

Cellphone: +33 6 61 39 11 28

Fax: +33 1 47 34 16 07


CANSO Philipp WÄCHTER

Safety Manager

Austro Control - Österreichische Gesellschaft

für Zivilluftfahrt mbH

Wagramer Strasse 19

A-1220 Vienna

AUSTRIA

E-mail:

[email protected]


Printed 18.07.19

EASA

Vasileios STEFANIOROS

FS.4 - Air Traffic Management/Air

Navigation Services (ATM/ANS) &

Aerodromes Department, Senior Regulations

Officer - Aerodromes

European Aviation Safety Agency

Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3

Postfach 10 12 53

D-50452 Koeln

GERMANY

Phone: +49 221 89990 5093

Cellphone: +49 157 763 61550

Fax: +49221899905093

E-mail:

[email protected]

IATA

Anthony VAN DER VELDT

Safety & Flight Operations - Europe,

Assistant Director

International Air Transport Association

350, Avenue Louise

BE-1050 Brussels

BELGIUM

Phone: +32 476 16 20 63

Cellphone: +31616604126

Fax: +3226485135


SAS

Geneth DALEY

Flight Operations Engineer

Scandinavian Airlines System

Frösundaviks Allé 1

SE - 195 87 Stockholm

SWEDEN

Phone: +46 70 997 3209


TIME TO FLY

Claire LE BIEZ

Airport Division Manager

Time to Fly

29 Avenue de l’Europe

Le Bourget Aéroport

93350

FRANCE

Phone: +33(0)6 27 27 37 29


Benoît SCHNEIDERMANN

Time to Fly

29 Avenue de l’Europe

Le Bourget Aéroport

93350

FRANCE

E-mail:

[email protected]

GRF Implementation Workshop – Summary of Discussions – Appendix C

Workshop on Implementation of the New Global Reporting Format for

Runway Surface Conditions – ICAO EUR Region

Agenda (10-11 July 2019)

Time Subject Objectives In charge Support from

Day 1 – 10 July 2019

0930 Introduction

ICAO RO ICAO Paris

0945 Overview of GRF A description of the GRF methodology, both ground and airborne aspects, history, development process

ICAO FTF Andrew Badham

(PPT01)

1030 Coffee Break

1050 ICAO documentation Introduce ICAO provisions (in Annex 14,

Circ. 355, Doc. 9981 and Doc. 10068) ICAO FTF Andrew Badham on

behalf of Lars

Kornstaedt

(PPT06)

1130 Case Studies A detailed case study examining the

planning, training, implementation

activities, challenges and lessons learnt

US FAA Phillip Davenport

(PPT09)

1215 Lunch

1330 Implementation view

(airports) Implementation perspective from 1 (or

more) airport, perhaps representing the

regional environment

Munich Airport Joerg Simon

(PPT04)

1445 Implementation view

(airlines) Implementation perspective from 1 (or

more) airlines, perhaps representing

the regional environment

IATA

(also ex. of an

airline)

Anthony Van Der

Veldt

(PPT11)

1515 Coffee Break

1535-

1630

Implementation view

(ANSP) Implementation perspective from 1 (or

more) ANSP, perhaps representing the

regional environment

CANSO

MicroStep – MIS

industry partner

of LPS SR, ANSP

of Slovakia

Philipp Wachter

(PPT10)

Pavol Nechaj

(PPT07)

GRF Implementation Workshop – Summary of Discussions – Appendix C

Day 2 – 11 July 2019

0930 State Perspective Example of a States perspective of

implementation, planning, regulatory

approach etc.

France

Christine

Roure/Antoine

Dejean de la Batie

(PPT05)

Hervé Bilot/Antoine

Dejean de la Batie

(PPT08)

1030 Coffee Break

1050 State Perspective Example of a States perspective of

implementation, planning, regulatory

approach etc.

EASA Vasileios

Stefanioros

(PPT03)

1215 Lunch

1330 AIS aspects AIM aspects (including promulgation by SNOWTAM)

ICAO Abbas Niknejad

(PPT02)

1400 Training

requirements/resources Training requirements and resources ACI: GRF on-line

course

IATA

CANSO

Olivier Sciara

(PPT12)

Anthony Van Der

Veldt

(PPT13)

Philipp Wachter 1515 Coffee

1535-

1600

Conclusions

ICAO Chris Keohan

Practical Information

Meeting location information and a list of hotels and other practical information can be found on the

ICAO portal: RO_EURNAT -> ICAO EUR/NAT Public Website Management -> Practical Information or at

the following link https://www.icao.int/eurnat/pages/welcome.aspx (Practical Information).

https://www.icao.int/eurnat/pages/welcome.aspx

D-1 GRF Implementation Workshop – Summary of Discussions – Appendix D D-1

Appendix D - GRF implementation check list.docx July 2019

APPENDIX D

GRF IMPLEMENTATION CHECK LIST

ID TASK WHO WHEN Remarks

GRF 1 Establish a National GRF implementation team at the State Level State GRF implementation

team to include:

- CAA (responsible

entity for

implementation)

- Aerodromes

- ANSP(ATM/AIM/

MET)

- Airlines/Flight Ops

- Any other relevant

stakeholder, as

required

By Sep 2019

GRF 1-1 Develop a National GRF Implementation Plan, detailing tasks, champions

and timelines

State GRF implementation

team

By Nov 2019

GRF 2 Educate by reviewing the following documentation:

- PANS ADR

- ICAO Circular 355

- Annex 14

- ICAO GRF global Symposium presentations

https://www.icao.int/Meetings/grf2019

- ICAO Doc 10064 (check when available with HQ)

- Other relevant ICAO provisions – consequential amendments due

to GRF (e.g. PANS-AIM, PANS-ATM, etc.)

Educate by attending:

- ICAO Regional Workshops (GRF Workshop (Paris))

- https://www.icao.int/EURNAT/Pages/Other-Meetings.aspx

Educate by conducting:

- State Level Workshops/Seminars


team

- In coordination

with national

bodies representing

airports, ANSPs,

Airlines

By Feb 2020

(consider refresher

by Nov 2020)

Advise

difficulties to ICAO

EUR/NAT

https://www.icao.int/Meetings/grf2019

https://www.icao.int/EURNAT/Pages/Other-Meetings.aspx




GRF 3 Promote GRF at the national level in context of safety by developing:

- brochures

- website material

- AIC (Aeronautical Information Circular)


team

- distribution should

also include

GA/BA and

Military

By Feb 2020

GRF 4 Train relevant stakeholders on GRF

Note that different stakeholders may have different training needs (e.g.

aerodromes, pilots, ATS, AIS, aerodromes in warm climates vs. operators

that fly to locations with winter conditions, etc.)

Train relevant groups that interface with customers on GRF so they

can brief their customers when on audit/inspections

Relevant stakeholders:

- ACI

- IATA

- IFATCA

- IFALPA


team assures training for:

- ADR/ATM

- CAA/FO inspectors

By Apr 2020

(consider refresher

by Nov 2020)

By Apr 2020

(consider refresher

by Nov 2020)

GRF 5 Update SNOWTAM Format/template (NOTAM/SNOWTAM systems) State GRF implementation

team assures SNOWTAM

template is updated by:

- AIM

By Nov 2020

GRF 6 Train on the new SNOWTAM Format State GRF implementation

team assures training on

SNOWTAM format by:

- AIM

By Apr 2020

(consider refresher

by Nov 2020)

GRF 7 Update AIP, as required State GRF implementation

team assures AIP is updated

by:

- AIM

By Nov 2020




GRF 8 Conduct parallel test of GRF this winter

Conduct analysis using archives of SNOWTAM & AIREPS

(this should also be considered after implementation to identify errors)


team coordinates parallel

test with the necessary

stakeholders:

- Airport operators

- ANSP

- Regional CAA

- Airlines

- AIS

Nov 2019 - Apr

2020

conditions - icao eur region meetings seminars and...workshop on implementation of the new global...

Documents