confidential & proprietary-page 0 graduate school of business aluminium smelting and communities...
Embed Size (px)
TRANSCRIPT

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 1Confidential & Proprietary-Page 1
Graduate School of Business
Aluminium Smelting and Communities of Practice
by
Miles G Nicholls

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 2Confidential & Proprietary-Page 2
Graduate School of Business
This presentation is based on a paper delivered to the 36th Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute in San Francisco, USA, November 19th – 22nd, 2005:
“The Role of Communities of Practice in Determining Best Practice in Production Processes Involving ‘Alchemy’ – A Mixed-
mode Modelling Approach”
Miles G Nicholls Barbara J CargillGraduate School of Business Faculty of Business and EnterpriseRMIT University Swinburne University of Technology

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 3Confidential & Proprietary-Page 3
Graduate School of Business
The Portland Aluminium Smelter
Initially a consulting project
The aim was to model the entire smelter with a view to determining ‘best practice’ (commenced 1988 – finished 1998)
The smelter is an approximately $2b plant, a green-field 250 acre site near Portland, Victoria, Australia (largest smelter in Southern Hemisphere)
Unique management structures operating and providing an unusual occurrence of a ‘real’ bi-level model.

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 4Confidential & Proprietary-Page 4
Graduate School of Business
Problem Summary
The smelter takes in raw materials (primarily alumina, coke and
pitch) and places them in a “bath” of chemicals in a special “pot”.
Large quantities of electricity are then passed through the bath
via anodes (blocks of carbon) suspended in the bath (the cathodes
are underneath). The molten aluminium then collects at the bottom
of the pot and is syphoned off.
The task was to model the entire plant in order to “maximise
production of aluminium and keep ancillary plant activities to a
minimum”.

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 5Confidential & Proprietary-Page 5
Graduate School of Business
The Site

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 6Confidential & Proprietary-Page 6
Graduate School of Business
The Site

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 7Confidential & Proprietary-Page 7
Graduate School of Business
The Process

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 8Confidential & Proprietary-Page 8
Graduate School of Business
The Monthly Mathematical Model

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 9Confidential & Proprietary-Page 9
Graduate School of Business
The Monthly Mathematical Model
Only two variables, kilo Amperes (kA) and Setting Cycle (SC)
(1.1) relates to all kA based raw material consumption
(1.2) relates to all SC based raw material consumption
(1.3) ensures the anode will not be ‘overused’
(1.4) relates to kA and SC based consumption of Coke
(1.5) and (1.6) are maximum and minimum limits of ‘spent’ anodes that are used in the making of new anodes
kA and SC are typically 300 and 28 respectively
The multiple month model more complicated and involves more variables.

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 10Confidential & Proprietary-Page 10
Graduate School of Business
The ‘Behind the Scenes’ Link
Theoretically, the production of aluminium is calculated thus:
ATt = 0.008052 kAt PDt (2)
Estimated output is arrived at as follows:
AEt = 0.008052 kAt CEt-1 PDt (3)where:
CEt-1 = ASt-1 / ATt-1 (4)
and ASt is the actual aluminium siphoned from the pot
Note that AEt and CEt-1 are averages over all pots and that every constraint (other than (1.2)) contains CEt-1

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 11Confidential & Proprietary-Page 11
Graduate School of Business
Real World Problems
The Current Efficiency (CE), a key parameter, has three major problems :
it is a lagged estimation (CEt-1)
it is variable and often highly unpredictable on a pot to pot basis (limited success in modelling pots in a ‘real world’, ‘on- line’ and in a real time mode – thus no accurate CE)
it is inaccurate because the actual production of aluminium cannot be measured (other than in a laboratory pot)
Therefore the solution of the model provides a “best practice” solution that could be some distance from the “optimal”

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 12Confidential & Proprietary-Page 12
Graduate School of Business
The ‘Alchemy’
Pots are very individual in their behaviour. If they run too hot, or drop to too low a DC voltage they will become less productive and may take many days to recover
Pots often suffer an ‘anode effect’ which is a disaster for a pot. This effect sees molten aluminium behaving like a wave and this disrupts productivity, often for many days
Power is frequently turned off by the suppliers on agreed ‘power outages’ arrangements and this also destabilises the pot
All these problems are left to the ‘Operators’ to deal with in their own way based on their ‘experience’ and ‘shared knowledge’. This is the ‘alchemy’.

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 13Confidential & Proprietary-Page 13
Graduate School of Business
Communities of Practice
Aluminium smelting has been around since the late 1890’s and much “folk lore” has built up over that time as to how to deal with pots
To some extent the smelter’s Operators had already formed a ‘Community of Practice’, but it was very tenuous and fledgling
With encouragement, such a Community of Practice could potentially save millions (a 1% increase in CE could mean a $2m - $5m increase in the bottom line depending on the size of the smelter)
Communities of Practice are not only limited to ‘pot rooms’ in a smelter, but it is the point of biggest impact

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 14Confidential & Proprietary-Page 14
Graduate School of Business
Communities of Practice
Communities of Practice (C of P) are essentially informal groups of
people in a single organization (as in the case of ‘commercial in
confidence’ operations of smelters and other manufacturing entities)
or in more ‘common knowledge’ areas, across organizations as well.
As Louis (2005), Davies et al (2003) and Burk (2000) indicate, the C
of P are founded on common knowledge or common work tasks
where the coming together of people to share stories and discuss
work practices (i.e., sharing explicit and tacit knowledge) gives
support, knowledge and a sense of belonging to people. These
interactions can occur in a real or virtual sense depending on the
nature of the organization and whether the C of P exists beyond one
such work site.

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 15Confidential & Proprietary-Page 15
Graduate School of Business
Communities of Practice
Communities of Practice (C of P) in this paper are classified as a hybrid of ‘best practice’ and ‘knowledge stewarding’ (Vestal, 2003)
Membership of C of P is not necessarily fixed but may vary considerably (as will its leadership)
The aluminium smelting industry is ideally suited to the informal emergence of C of P which are essentially (in this instance) a sharing of experiences of the pot room Operators
Anecdotally, at least one C of P was in existence within the Portland smelter (Urpani, 1996)

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 16Confidential & Proprietary-Page 16
Graduate School of Business
Communities of Practice
It is clear, where there exists aspects of the production process (i.e., the sub-process) that are not well understood and for which a ‘model’ can’t be constructed (‘soft’ or ‘hard’) in order to determine the ‘best practice’ operation of the process, a combined approach of ‘hard’ modelling coupled with a C of P associated with the sub-process will provide the focus, knowledge improvement and long term better understanding of the operations
Further, it should be noted that a critical value of the C of P is the learning loop for the perpetuation of knowledge in the operators over time. Unless there is some process in place that nurtures the C of P and also attempts to bring the tacit knowledge into more explicit forms, there is a risk to the enterprise of knowledge loss over time

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 17Confidential & Proprietary-Page 17
Graduate School of Business
Mixed-mode Modelling

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 18Confidential & Proprietary-Page 18
Graduate School of Business
The Solution Methodology
The solution approach used for this problem is illustrated in Figure 3 and is termed ‘mixed-mode modelling’
Mixed-mode modelling in this application sees the combination of hard and soft models ‘solved’ by a heuristic involving C of P and non-linear bi-level programming (for the multiple month model)
Employing this approach will not only see an increase in the ‘bottom line’ of the business but also a retention of the bodies of explicit and tacit knowledge possessed by the Operators and thus the company

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 19Confidential & Proprietary-Page 19
Graduate School of Business
The Solution Methodology

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 20Confidential & Proprietary-Page 20
Graduate School of Business
Conclusion
Many problems in OR/MS appear ‘crisp’ and their parameters seem robust and meaningful
However, in many industries, the key process parameters and indeed parts of the processes themselves are not really understood or able to be reliably estimated or codified respectively. The aluminium smelting industry is such an example
This paper suggests a mixed mode modelling approach (combining Communities of Practice and mathematical programming) to arrive at best practice and also perpetuate the existence of essential explicit and tacit knowledge within the aluminium smelter

Confidential & Proprietary-Page 21Confidential & Proprietary-Page 21
Graduate School of Business
Conclusion – Gains
A decrease in the variability of a pot’s production
An increase in the quality (purity) the aluminium produced
Better behaved pots and a consequential more even temperature leading towards less build up of bath around the sides of the pot leading to a more accurate estimation of a pots production
A reduction in pot disturbances leading to the greater reliability is any estimates of production obtained from it
Consequential increases in current efficiency (which is also a more reliable ‘guestimated’ figure)
Providing a more realistic basis for determining best practice from the solution of the macro model of the smelter