congressional scorecard€¦ · other aspects of a member’s record are welcome. write to afscme...
TRANSCRIPT
1386-
16
114th CongressFirst Session • 2015
How to Judge a Member’s Voting Record
AFSCME selects a few roll-call votes from the hundreds cast
by members of Congress every session. In choosing these
votes, AFSCME attempts to fairly represent a lawmaker’s
position on issues determined to be important to AFSCME
members — first and foremost as workers, but also as citizens
and union brothers and sisters.
This voting scorecard is one of the key factors used
in making judgments on AFSCME campaign support,
endorsements or contributions from PEOPLE — AFSCME’s
Political Action Committee, or PAC. Other important
factors often include the member’s official leadership
position, seniority on important committees, leadership in
a state’s congressional delegation, and accessibility and
responsiveness to AFSCME’s lobbying efforts.
Visit AFSCME’s website at afscme.org to obtain AFSCME
weekly reports, letters to congressional members and
votes. Questions concerning the selection of the votes or
other aspects of a member’s record are welcome. Write
to AFSCME Department of Federal Government Affairs,
1625 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036-5687, or call
800-732-8120 or 202-429-5021.
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO
Congressional Scorecard
2 386-
16
2015 House Vote Descriptions
1. Undermining Job-Based Health Coverage
AFSCME Position: No
The SAVE Act (H.R. 30) would weaken employer responsibility
to provide health coverage to workers under the Affordable
Care Act, reducing the number of workers with employer-
based health insurance. The bill would also increase the
deficit. The bill passed on January 8 by a vote of 252-172. Roll
Call vote 14.
2. Crippling Regulatory Protections
AFSCME Position: No
The Regulatory Accountability Act (H.R. 185) would cripple the
ability of federal agencies to issue regulations to protect our
health, the environment and to make our jobs more safe. The
bill passed January 13 by a vote of 250-175. Roll Call vote 28.
3. Tax Breaks for Business
AFSCME Position: No
The bill (H.R. 636) would expand, and make permanent,
selected tax breaks for businesses without offsetting the lost
revenue by closing tax loopholes. The failure to offset the
revenue loss would increase the federal deficit and increase
pressure to cut federal spending that supports services
carried out by state and local governments. The bill passed on
February 13 by a vote of 272-142. Roll Call vote 82.
4. Nullifying Important Labor Rule
AFSCME Position: No
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a regulation
to help reduce delays in private-sector union elections and
make them more transparent. House Joint Resolution 29
would nullify the NLRB regulation. The resolution was passed
on March 19 by a vote of 232-186. Roll Call vote 128.
5. Republican Leadership Budget Cuts
AFSCME Position: No
The Republican Leadership Budget (H. Con. Res. 27) for
fiscal year 2016 would cut tax rates for the wealthiest, while
increasing the tax burden for millions of middle- and low-
income families. The budget would make irresponsible cuts to
Medicare and Medicaid and reduce investments in education
and other vital services. The budget resolution passed on
March 25 by a vote of 228-199. Roll Call vote 142.
6. Trade Promotion Authority or Fast Track
AFSCME Position: No
Trade Promotion Authority (H.R. 2146) provides that the Trans-
Pacific Partnership and other trade agreements be considered
under special “fast track” procedures, which prohibit Congress
from amending a trade agreement. The bill passed on June 18
by a vote of 218-208. Roll Call vote 374.
7. Gutting Federal Regulations That Protect Health and Safety
AFSCME Position: No
The REINS Act (H.R. 427) would require that both chambers
of Congress approve any major regulation issued by a
federal agency before the regulation could be implemented.
If Congress fails to act, the regulation could not take effect.
This would bring a halt to regulations such as those designed
to keep workplaces and our food supply safe, protect the
environment and prevent banks from cheating consumers. The
bill passed on July 28 by a vote of 243-165. Roll Call vote 482.
8. Eliminating Health Care Coverage
AFSCME Position: No
This bill (H.R. 3762) would gut the Affordable Care Act, causing
millions to lose their health care coverage. It would also
eliminate funding for public health services. The bill passed on
October 23 by a vote of 240-189. Roll Call vote 568.
9. Rolling Back Retirement Security
AFSCME Position: No
This legislation (H.R. 1090) would block the Department of
Labor (DOL) from issuing a regulation to help protect workers
and retirees who participate in retirement savings plans
established by their employers. The DOL regulation would
require advisors/brokers to put the interests of workers and
retirees ahead of their own interests when giving investment
advice. The bill passed on October 27 by a vote of 245-186.
Roll Call vote 575.
10. Eliminating Bargaining Rights
AFSCME Position: No
The Tribal Labor Sovereignty Act (H.R. 511) would exempt
casinos, hotels, mines and other enterprises on tribal lands
from the National Labor Relations Act. Workers employed by
these enterprises would lose the ability to organize and have
a voice in the workplace. The bill passed on November 17 by
a vote of 249-177. Roll Call vote 633.
3Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
2015Votes
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
Alabama
1 Byrne (R) 8 8 8 8 8 ? 8 8 8 8 0% 0 18 0%
2 Roby (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
3 Rogers, M. D. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 12 95 11%
4 Aderholt (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 15 140 10%
5 Brooks, M. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 2 39 5%
6 Palmer (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 1 9 10%
7 Sewell (D) 4 4 4 4 ? 8 ? 4 4 8 75% 37 2 95%
Alaska
AL Young, Don (R) ? 8 8 8 8 ? 8 8 8 8 0% 106 259 29%
Arizona
1 Kirkpatrick (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 40 3 93%
2 McSally (R) 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 10% 1 9 10%
3 Grijalva (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 106 0 100%
4 Gosar (R) ? 8 ? ? 8 ? 8 8 8 8 0% 1 34 3%
5 Salmon (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 10% 1 26 4%
6 Schweikert (R) 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 10% 1 39 3%
7 Gallego (D) ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 9 0 100%
8 Franks (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 106 0%
9 Sinema (D) 8 8 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 70% 21 6 78%
Arkansas
1 Crawford (R) 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 10% 4 37 10%
2 Hill (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
3 Womack (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
4 Westerman (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
4 Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
2015Votes
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
California
1 LaMalfa (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 27 0%
2 Huffman (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100%
3 Garamendi (D) 4 ? 8 ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 88% 45 3 94%
4 McClintock (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 56 3%
5 Thompson, M. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 131 8 94%
6 Matsui (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 89 0 100%
7 Bera (D) 8 4 8 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 70% 21 6 78%
8 Cook (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 3 24 11%
9 McNerney (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 100% 71 4 95%
10 Denham (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 37 10%
11 DeSaulnier (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 10 0 100%
12 Pelosi (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 251 2 99%
13 Lee, B. (D) 4 4 ? 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 142 1 99%
14 Speier (D) 4 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 57 0 100%
15 Swalwell (D) 4 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 26 0 100%
16 Costa (D) 8 8 ? 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 67% 77 9 90%
17 Honda (D) 4 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 122 0 100%
18 Eshoo (D) 4 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 191 8 96%
19 Lofgren (D) 4 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 175 6 97%
20 Farr (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 90% 191 4 98%
21 Valadao (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 23 15%
22 Nunes (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 102 2%
23 McCarthy (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 73 4%
24 Capps (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 143 5 97%
25 Knight (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
26 Brownley (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 24 3 89%
5Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
2015Votes
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
27 Chu (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 52 0 100%
28 Schiff (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 123 3 98%
29 Cardenas (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 90% 26 1 96%
30 Sherman (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 152 3 98%
31 Aguilar (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 80% 8 2 80%
32 Napolitano (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 133 0 100%
33 Lieu (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 8 89% 8 1 89%
34 Becerra (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 90% 185 3 98%
35 Torres (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 10 0 100%
36 Ruiz (D) 4 4 ? 4 ? 4 4 4 4 8 80% 21 3 88%
37 Bass (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 38 0 100%
38 Sanchez, Linda (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 104 0 100%
39 Royce (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 193 2%
40 Roybal-Allard (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 189 1 99%
41 Takano (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100%
42 Calvert (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 5 191 3%
43 Waters (D) I 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 220 3 99%
44 Hahn (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 37 1 97%
45 Walters (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
46 Sanchez, Loretta (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 8 89% 147 7 95%
47 Lowenthal (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100%
48 Rohrabacher (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 14 242 5%
49 Issa (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 123 2%
50 Hunter (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 2 25 7%
51 Vargas (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100%
52 Peters, S. (D) 8 4 8 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 70% 23 6 79%
53 Davis, S. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 90% 113 2 98%
6 Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
2015Votes
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
Colorado
1 DeGette (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 149 1 99%
2 Polis (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 90% 55 2 96%
3 Tipton (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
4 Buck (R) 8 8 8 8 4 4 8 4 8 8 30% 3 7 30%
5 Lamborn (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 6 4 60%
6 Coffman (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 55 5%
7 Perlmutter (D) 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 73 1 99%
Connecticut
1 Larson, J. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 137 1 99%
2 Courtney (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 74 1 99%
3 DeLauro (D) 4 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 230 4 98%
4 Himes (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 90% 54 2 96%
5 Esty (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 26 1 96%
Delaware
AL Carney (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 41 0 100%
Florida
1 Miller, J. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 116 3%
2 Graham, G. (D) 8 8 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 70% 7 3 70%
3 Yoho (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 27 0%
4 Crenshaw (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 6 119 5%
5 Brown, C. (D) 4 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 196 0 100%
6 DeSantis (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 27 0%
7 Mica (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 8 192 4%
8 Posey (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 5 53 9%
9 Grayson (D) 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 42 0 100%
10 Webster (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 1 38 3%
7Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
2015Votes
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
11 Nugent (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 1 40 2%
12 Bilirakis (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 7 69 9%
13 Jolly (R) 8 8 8 8 4 ? 8 8 8 8 11% 3 14 18%
14 Castor (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 100% 70 0 100%
15 Ross (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
16 Buchanan (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 9 66 12%
17 Rooney (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 55 4%
18 Murphy, P. (D) 8 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 80% 21 6 78%
19 Clawson (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 ? 8 8 8 11% 1 11 8%
20 Hastings (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 188 1 99%
21 Deutch (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 8 89% 45 1 98%
22 Frankel (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100%
23 Wasserman Schultz (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 90% 86 1 99%
24 Wilson, F. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 40 0 100%
25 Diaz-Balart (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 17 90 16%
26 Curbelo (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
27 Ros-Lehtinen (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ? 0% 64 179 26%
Georgia
1 Carter, E. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
2 Bishop, S. (D) 4 8 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 80% 170 27 86%
3 Westmoreland, L. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 2 89 2%
4 Johnson, H. (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 75 1 99%
5 Lewis (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 257 5 98%
6 Price, T. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 91 0%
7 Woodall (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
8 Scott, A. (R) 8 8 8 ? 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 39 3%
9 Collins, D. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 1 26 4%
8 Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
2015Votes
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
10 Hice (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
11 Loudermilk (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
12 Allen (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
13 Scott, D. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 90% 102 4 96%
14 Graves, T. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 ? 8 8 8 0% 0 47 0%
Hawaii
1 Takai (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? ? 100% 8 0 100%
2 Gabbard (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 25 2 93%
Idaho
1 Labrador (R) 8 8 8 ? 4 4 8 8 8 8 22% 3 34 8%
2 Simpson (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 11 125 8%
Illinois
1 Rush (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 186 0 100%
2 Kelly, R. (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 ? ? 4 4 88% 20 1 95%
3 Lipinski (D) 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 85 4 96%
4 Gutierrez (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 189 1 99%
5 Quigley (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 90% 51 2 96%
6 Roskam (R) 8 8 8 ? 8 8 8 8 ? 8 0% 3 70 4%
7 Davis, D. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 152 1 99%
8 Duckworth (D) ? ? ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 22 1 96%
9 Schakowsky (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 137 0 100%
10 Dold (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 4 20% 2 8 20%
11 Foster (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 46 2 96%
12 Bost (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 10% 1 9 10%
13 Davis, R. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 ? 8 8 8 4 10% 4 22 15%
14 Hultgren (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 40 2%
15 Shimkus (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 17 137 11%
9Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
2015Votes
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
16 Kinzinger (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 10% 3 38 7%
17 Bustos (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 24 3 89%
18 Schock (R) - resigned - 8 8 8 ? 8 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0% 3 48 6%
18 LaHood (R) - 9/10/15 - n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 8 8 8 0% 0 3 0%
Indiana
1 Visclosky (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 268 23 92%
2 Walorski (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 27 0%
3 Stutzman (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 42 2%
4 Rokita (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
5 Brooks, S. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 27 0%
6 Messer (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 27 0%
7 Carson (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 63 0 100%
8 Bucshon (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
9 Young, T. (R) 8 8 8 ? 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 39 3%
Iowa
1 Blum (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
2 Loebsack (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 70 4 95%
3 Young, D. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
4 King, S. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 106 0%
Kansas
1 Huelskamp (R) 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 10% 3 38 7%
2 Jenkins, L. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 58 0%
3 Yoder (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 40 0%
4 Pompeo (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 40 0%
Kentucky
1 Whitfield (R) ? 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ? 8 0% 21 156 12%
2 Guthrie (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 55 5%
10 Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
2015Votes
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
3 Yarmuth (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 76 0 100%
4 Massie (R) 8 8 8 8 4 4 8 8 8 8 20% 6 21 22%
5 Rogers, H. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 38 283 12%
6 Barr (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 27 0%
Louisiana
1 Scalise (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 60 2%
2 Richmond (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 40 0 100%
3 Boustany (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 5 84 6%
4 Fleming (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 2 56 3%
5 Abraham (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
6 Graves, G. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
Maine
1 Pingree (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 57 0 100%
2 Poliquin (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 1 9 10%
Maryland
1 Harris (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 1 40 2%
2 Ruppersberger (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 90% 100 4 96%
3 Sarbanes (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 76 0 100%
4 Edwards (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 61 0 100%
5 Hoyer (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 309 14 96%
6 Delaney (D) 8 4 8 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 70% 20 5 80%
7 Cummings (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 163 1 99%
8 Van Hollen (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 107 0 100%
Massachusetts
1 Neal (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 246 9 96%
2 McGovern (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 156 0 100%
3 Tsongas (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 64 0 100%
11Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
2015Votes
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
4 Kennedy (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 26 0 100%
5 Clark, K. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 19 0 100%
6 Moulton (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 10 0 100%
7 Capuano (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 135 0 100%
8 Lynch (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 113 0 100%
9 Keating (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 40 1 98%
Michigan
1 Benishek (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 39 3%
2 Huizenga (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
3 Amash (R) 8 8 8 8 4 4 8 8 8 8 20% 9 32 22%
4 Moolenaar (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
5 Kildee (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 90% 26 1 96%
6 Upton (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 50 223 18%
7 Walberg (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
8 Bishop, M. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
9 Levin (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 294 10 97%
10 Miller, C. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 15 92 14%
11 Trott (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
12 Dingell (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 10 0 100%
13 Conyers (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 350 8 98%
14 Lawrence (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 9 1 90%
Minnesota
1 Walz (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 80% 70 6 92%
2 Kline (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 105 2%
3 Paulsen (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 55 4%
4 McCollum (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 90% 124 1 99%
5 Ellison (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 75 0 100%
12 Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
2015Votes
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
6 Emmer (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
7 Peterson (D) 8 8 8 4 4 4 8 8 4 8 40% 160 76 68%
8 Nolan (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 25 2 93%
Mississippi
1 Nunnelee (R) - deceased - ? ? n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0% 0 26 0%
2 Kelly, T. (R) - 6/02/15 - n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a ? 8 8 8 8 0% 0 4 0%
3 Thompson, B. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 192 2 99%
4 Harper (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 55 4%
5 Palazzo (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 39 3%
Missouri
1 Clay (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 121 3 98%
2 Wagner (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 26 0%
3 Luetkemeyer (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 55 4%
4 Hartzler (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 40 0%
5 Cleaver (D) 4 ? 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 85 0 100%
6 Graves, S. (R) 8 8 8 ? 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 7 116 6%
7 Long (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
8 Smith, J. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 20 0%
Montana
AL Zinke (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
Nebraska
1 Fortenberry (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 8 83 9%
2 Ashford (D) 8 8 8 4 4 8 4 4 8 8 40% 4 6 40%
3 Smith, Adrian (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 76 0%
Nevada
1 Titus (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 90% 42 1 98%
2 Amodei (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 34 6%
13Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
2015Votes
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
3 Heck, J. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 38 7%
4 Hardy (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
New Hampshire
1 Guinta (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
2 Kuster (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 24 3 89%
New Jersey
1 Norcross (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 11 0 100%
2 LoBiondo (R) 8 8 8 4 4 4 8 8 8 4 40% 64 118 35%
3 MacArthur (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 4 20% 2 8 20%
4 Smith, C. (R) 8 8 8 4 8 4 8 8 8 4 30% 139 185 43%
5 Garrett (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 5 102 5%
6 Pallone (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 234 22 91%
7 Lance (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 8 50 14%
8 Sires (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 75 0 100%
9 Pascrell (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 151 3 98%
10 Payne (D) 4 4 4 ? ? ? 4 ? 4 4 100% 23 0 100%
11 Frelinghuysen (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 14 167 8%
12 Watson Coleman (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 10 0 100%
New Mexico
1 Lujan Grisham (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 8 89% 25 1 96%
2 Pearce (R) 8 8 ? 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 11% 3 84 3%
3 Lujan (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 90% 57 1 98%
New York
1 Zeldin (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 4 20% 2 8 20%
2 King, P. (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 4 20% 48 150 24%
3 Israel (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 121 4 97%
4 Rice, K. (D) 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 80% 8 2 80%
14 Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
2015Votes
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
5 Meeks (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 ? 4 4 4 89% 140 2 99%
6 Meng (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 26 1 96%
7 Velazquez (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 197 2 99%
8 Jeffries (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100%
9 Clarke, Y. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 74 0 100%
10 Nadler (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 196 1 99%
11 Grimm (R) - Resigned - n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a -- 8 23 26%
11 Donovan (R) - 5/05/15 - n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 4 8 8 8 4 40% 2 3 40%
12 Maloney, C. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 196 3 98%
13 Rangel (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 8 89% 370 10 97%
14 Crowley (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 139 0 100%
15 Serrano (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 238 3 99%
16 Engel (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 249 1 100%
17 Lowey (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 250 6 98%
18 Maloney, S. (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 24 3 89%
19 Gibson, C. (R) 8 8 8 8 4 4 8 8 8 4 30% 16 25 39%
20 Tonko (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 58 0 100%
21 Stefanik (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
22 Hanna (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 10% 6 33 15%
23 Reed, T. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 40 7%
24 Katko (R) 8 8 8 8 4 4 8 8 8 4 30% 3 7 30%
25 Slaughter (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 260 7 97%
26 Higgins (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 91 0 100%
27 Collins, C. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 3 24 11%
North Carolina
1 Butterfield (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 90 0 100%
2 Ellmers (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
15Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
2015Votes
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
3 Jones (R) 8 8 4 8 4 4 8 4 4 8 50% 52 124 30%
4 Price, D. (D) 4 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 150 5 97%
5 Foxx (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 91 0%
6 Walker (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 10% 1 9 10%
7 Rouzer (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
8 Hudson (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 27 0%
9 Pittenger (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 27 0%
10 McHenry (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 87 2%
11 Meadows (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 4 8 8 20% 2 25 7%
12 Adams (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 11 0 100%
13 Holding (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 27 0%
North Dakota
AL Cramer (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 25 4%
Ohio
1 Chabot (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 5 159 3%
2 Wenstrup (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 26 0%
3 Beatty (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 26 1 96%
4 Jordan (R) 8 8 8 ? 8 4 8 8 8 8 11% 1 74 1%
5 Latta (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 64 2%
6 Johnson, B. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 40 2%
7 Gibbs (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 39 3%
8 Boehner (R) - resigned - ? ? ? ? 8 8 ? ? ? n/a 0% 3 197 2%
9 Kaptur (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 278 18 94%
10 Turner (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 15 91 14%
11 Fudge (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 56 0 100%
12 Tiberi (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 8 117 6%
13 Ryan, T. (D) 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 104 1 99%
16 Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
2015Votes
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
14 Joyce (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 4 20% 5 21 19%
15 Stivers (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 40 2%
16 Renacci (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 40 2%
Oklahoma
1 Bridenstine (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 2 25 7%
2 Mullin (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 27 0%
3 Lucas (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 ? 8 8 8 0% 5 174 3%
4 Cole (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 103 4%
5 Russell (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 1 9 10%
Oregon
1 Bonamici (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 90% 33 1 97%
2 Walden (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 11 120 8%
3 Blumenauer (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 90% 153 3 98%
4 DeFazio (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 100% 250 18 93%
5 Schrader (D) 8 8 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 8 60% 48 10 83%
Pennsylvania
1 Brady, R. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 143 1 99%
2 Fattah (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 177 2 99%
3 Kelly, M. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 40 2%
4 Perry (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 1 26 4%
5 Thompson, G. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 55 5%
6 Costello (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 10% 1 9 10%
7 Meehan (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 10% 8 33 20%
8 Fitzpatrick (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 10% 8 33 20%
9 Shuster (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 7 114 6%
10 Marino (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 38 5%
11 Barletta (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 38 5%
17Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
2015Votes
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
12 Rothfus (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 1 26 4%
13 Boyle (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 10 0 100%
14 Doyle (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 170 10 94%
15 Dent (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 17 74 19%
16 Pitts (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 152 1%
17 Cartwright (D) 4 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 26 0 100%
18 Murphy, T. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 10% 23 84 21%
Rhode Island
1 Cicilline (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 40 0 100%
2 Langevin (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 123 1 99%
South Carolina
1 Sanford (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 11 66 14%
2 Wilson, J. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 112 3%
3 Duncan, Jeff (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 1 40 2%
4 Gowdy (R) 8 ? 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 40 0%
5 Mulvaney (R) 8 8 ? 8 4 4 8 8 8 8 22% 2 38 5%
6 Clyburn (D) 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 4 100% 188 5 97%
7 Rice, T. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 26 0%
South Dakota
AL Noem (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 40 0%
Tennessee
1 Roe (R) 8 8 ? 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 54 5%
2 Duncan, John (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 24 234 9%
3 Fleischmann (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 39 0%
4 DesJarlais (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ? 0% 1 36 3%
5 Cooper (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 90% 86 19 82%
6 Black (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 40 0%
18 Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
2015Votes
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
7 Blackburn (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 105 1%
8 Fincher (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
9 Cohen (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 75 0 100%
Texas
1 Gohmert (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 5 85 6%
2 Poe (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 6 85 7%
3 Johnson, S. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 220 2%
4 Ratcliffe (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
5 Hensarling (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 106 1%
6 Barton (R) 8 ? 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 13 262 5%
7 Culberson (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 5 119 4%
8 Brady, K. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 154 1%
9 Green, A. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 89 0 100%
10 McCaul (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 88 2%
11 Conaway (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 89 1%
12 Granger (R) 8 8 8 ? 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 148 2%
13 Thornberry (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 181 1%
14 Weber (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 27 0%
15 Hinojosa (D) 4 4 ? ? ? 8 4 4 4 ? 86% 138 7 95%
16 O'Rourke (D) ? 4 4 4 ? 8 4 4 4 4 90% 24 1 96%
17 Flores (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
18 Jackson Lee (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 173 3 98%
19 Neugebauer (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 103 0%
20 Castro (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100%
21 Smith, L. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 22 243 8%
22 Olson (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 58 0%
23 Hurd (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
19Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
2015Votes
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
24 Marchant (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 10% 2 85 2%
25 Williams (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 27 0%
26 Burgess (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 3 102 3%
27 Farenthold (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 1 40 2%
28 Cuellar (D) 8 8 8 4 4 8 8 4 8 8 30% 69 22 76%
29 Green, G. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 192 5 97%
30 Johnson, E. B. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 ? 4 4 4 89% 190 7 96%
31 Carter, J. (R) ? 8 8 8 8 8 ? 8 8 8 0% 0 103 0%
32 Sessions, P. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 153 1%
33 Veasey (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100%
34 Vela (D) 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 90% 24 2 92%
35 Doggett (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 171 6 97%
36 Babin (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
Utah
1 Bishop, R. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 100 3%
2 Stewart (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 27 0%
3 Chaffetz (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 55 2%
4 Love (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
Vermont
AL Welch (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 74 2 97%
Virginia
1 Wittman (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 7 58 11%
2 Rigell (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 40 0%
3 Scott, R. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 199 2 99%
4 Forbes (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 7 114 6%
5 Hurt (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 40 2%
6 Goodlatte (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 8 193 4%
20 Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
2015Votes
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
7 Brat (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 1 10 9%
8 Beyer (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 8 80% 8 2 80%
9 Griffith (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 2 38 5%
10 Comstock (R) 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 10% 1 9 10%
11 Connolly (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 90% 54 4 93%
Washington
1 DelBene (D) 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 4 4 8 70% 24 3 89%
2 Larsen, R. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 90% 119 5 96%
3 Herrera Beutler (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 38 5%
4 Newhouse (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
5 McMorris Rodgers (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 84 5%
6 Kilmer (D) 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 4 4 8 70% 24 3 89%
7 McDermott (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 242 6 98%
8 Reichert (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 17 73 19%
9 Smith, Adam (D) 4 4 4 ? ? 4 4 4 4 4 100% 136 9 94%
10 Heck, D. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 90% 25 1 96%
West Virginia
1 McKinley (R) 8 8 8 8 4 4 8 8 8 4 30% 13 28 32%
2 Mooney (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 1 9 10%
3 Jenkins, E. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 1 9 10%
Wisconsin
1 Ryan, P. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ? 0% 4 134 3%
2 Pocan (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100%
3 Kind (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 8 80% 146 9 94%
4 Moore (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 8 89% 88 2 98%
5 Sensenbrenner (R) 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 10% 24 312 7%
6 Grothman (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 10 0%
21Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.
2015Votes
Un
de
rmin
ing
Jo
b-B
ase
d H
ea
lth
Co
vera
ge
Cri
pp
ling
Re
gu
lato
ry P
rote
ctio
ns
Ta
x B
rea
ks
for
Bu
sin
ess
Nu
llify
ing
Imp
ort
an
t La
bo
r R
ule
Re
pu
blic
an
Le
ad
ers
hip
Bu
dg
et
Cu
ts
Tra
de
Pro
mo
tio
n A
uth
ori
ty o
r F
ast
Tra
ck
Gu
ttin
g F
ed
era
l Re
gu
lati
on
s T
ha
t P
rote
ct
He
alt
h a
nd
Sa
fety
Elim
ina
tin
g H
ea
lth
Ca
re C
ove
rag
e
Ro
llin
g B
ack
Re
tire
me
nt
Se
curi
ty
Elim
ina
tin
g B
arg
ain
ing
Rig
hts
Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SessionSupportPercent
Career Cumulative Record
AFSCME Position N N N N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right
386-
16
7 Duffy (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 40 0%
8 Ribble (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 41 0%
Wyoming
AL Lummis (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 10% 2 56 3%