connect l.a.'s lost opportunity for job creation · 5/29/2012  · l.a.'s lost...

4
6/2/12 LA.'s lost opportunity to create local jobs with light-rail contracts - latimes.com 1/5 latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-janis-jobs-rail-los-angeles-20120529,0,5915293.story Comments 24 Email Share 0 OP-ED Boosting employment should be a decisive factor when the city awards contracts. By Madeline Janis May 29, 2012 Membership Serv ices Jobs Cars Real Estate Subscribe Rentals Classifieds Custom Publishing Place Ad OPINION LOCAL U.S. WORLD BUSINESS SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT HEALTH LIVING TRAVEL OPINION DEALS IN THE NEWS: HOSNI MUBARAK JOHAN SANTANA CELTICS ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE 'SNOW WHITE' Search L.A.'s lost opportunity for job creation 66 Recommend On April 30, the L.A. Metropolitan Transportation Authority voted to award an $890-million contract for 235 light rail cars to Kinkisharyo International, a Japanese firm that will build a significant portion of the cars in Osaka, Japan, rather than in California. Just a week later, on May 9, the Bay Area Rapid Transit agency voted to award a $2.5-billion contract for the manufacture of 775 rail cars to a Canadian firm that will build many of the car components in Mexico. With the awarding of these two contracts, California lost the opportunity to create more than 2,000 good American jobs building rail cars for our transit systems. That argument was made clearly and repeatedly by a broad- based coalition of labor, community and business leaders Recommended on Facebook Cartoons » Photos: Flip through Ted Rall's editorial cartoons Videos » Connect Like 236k advertisement EDITORIALS OP-ED ENDORSEMENTS LETTERS OPINION L.A. READERS' REP Want to succeed in business? Call m om U.S. manufacturing's next phase ALSO Early morning commuters debark the Metro Blue Line at Vernon and Long Beach Avenues in Vernon. (Los Angeles Times / May 25, 2012) Bart_Reed Like 236k

Upload: others

Post on 24-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Connect L.A.'s lost opportunity for job creation · 5/29/2012  · L.A.'s lost opportunity for job creation Recommend 66 On April 30, the L.A. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

6/2/12 LA.'s lost opportunity to create local jobs with light-rail contracts - latimes.com

1/5latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-janis-jobs-rail-los-angeles-20120529,0,5915293.story

Comments 24 Email Share 0

OP-ED

Boosting employment should be a decisive factor when the city awards contracts.

By Madeline Janis

May 29, 2012

Membership Serv ices Jobs Cars Real Estate Subscribe Rentals Classifieds Custom Publishing Place Ad

OPINION

LOCAL U.S. WORLD BUSINESS SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT HEALTH LIVING TRAVEL OPINION DEALS

IN THE NEWS: HOSNI MUBARAK JOHAN SANTANA CELTICS ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE 'SNOW WHITE'Search

L.A.'s lost opportunity for job creation

66Recommend

On April 30, the L.A. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

voted to award an $890-million contract for 235 light rail

cars to Kinkisharyo International, a Japanese firm that will

build a significant portion of the cars in Osaka, Japan, rather

than in California. Just a week later, on May 9, the Bay Area

Rapid Transit agency voted to award a $2.5-billion contract

for the manufacture of 775 rail cars to a Canadian firm that

will build many of the car components in Mexico. With the

awarding of these two contracts, California lost the

opportunity to create more than 2,000 good American jobs

building rail cars for our transit systems.

That argument was made clearly and repeatedly by a broad-

based coalition of labor, community and business leaders

Recommended on Facebook

Cartoons »

Photos: Flip through Ted Rall's editorialcartoons

Videos »

Connect

Like 236k

a d ve rt i se m e n t

EDITORIALS OP-ED ENDORSEMENTS LETTERS OPINION L.A. READERS' REP

Want to succeed in business? Callmom

U.S. manufacturing's next phase

ALSO

Ea r ly m or n in g com m u ter s deba r k th e Metr o Blu e Lin e a t V er n on a n d Lon g Bea ch A v en u es in

V er n on . (Los A n g eles Tim es / Ma y 2 5 , 2 01 2 )

Bart_Reed Like 236k

Page 2: Connect L.A.'s lost opportunity for job creation · 5/29/2012  · L.A.'s lost opportunity for job creation Recommend 66 On April 30, the L.A. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

6/2/12 LA.'s lost opportunity to create local jobs with light-rail contracts - latimes.com

2/5latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-janis-jobs-rail-los-angeles-20120529,0,5915293.story

who supported the losing bidders. But not everyone agreed

that creating jobs should be a top priority in awarding a

contract. The transit agencies said that when giving out a

contract for rail cars, the most important thing is building the

best possible rail cars at the best possible price. Jobs are a

nice side benefit, they argued, but they are secondary in the

contracting process.

I disagree, and I think that in both of these cases, the transit

agencies made a mistake. In fact, I'd go further: It's critically

important that we build consensus among public officials

across the country in the years ahead that job creation

should be considered one of the primary criteria in the

purchase of equipment for public use. In Los Angeles,

taxpayers will be spending billions of dollars over the next

decade building and retooling their 21st century

transportation system; creating good middle-class jobs for

local workers should not be given second billing.

We are already part of the way there. The federal Buy

America law, in effect since 1983, requires that all transit-

related goods and equipment purchased with federal dollars

need to be substantially made in America. This means that at

least 60% of the rail car components must be made in

America, and final assembly must occur in the U.S. Last year,

the California Legislature went further and allowed local

transit agencies to give extra points to bidders that commit to

building more of their rail cars in the U.S. than their

competitors.

That's an important start. Now we need to create a process in

which the quality and number of U.S. jobs to be created can

be legally considered by public officials in a manner equal to

the consideration of things like cost and performance.

In the recent L.A. rail car procurement process, MTA

officials started out on the right path. They included language

in the request for proposals that required all bidders on the

rail car contract to create a "U.S. employment plan" that

emphasized the creation of permanent living-wage jobs and

training opportunities for unskilled people. And they

promised to conduct a "trade-off analysis" in which the value

of the jobs plan could be deducted from the proposed cost of

the rail cars.

But the MTA staff didn't follow its own criteria. It rejected a

proposal from Siemens Industry Inc. that would have created

1,100 direct full-time equivalent U.S. jobs in favor of Kinkisharyo's plan, which will create 438

direct FTE jobs, according to our analysis. While Siemens proposed to spend $5 million on

workforce training and to build a rail car factory in East Los Angeles, Kinkisharyo made vague

promises to work with local nonprofit groups and to build a temporary facility somewhere in the

U.S.

The MTA staff claimed to have chosen Kinkisharyo because of a 5% lower cost and "better expected

performance," but it failed to answer the fundamental question of why Kinkisharyo wasn't required

to fully comply with the sensible requirements of the U.S. employment plan language.

In 2008, L.A. County voters adopted Measure R — the primary source of funding for the purchase of

these rail cars — precisely because public officials promised that the tax revenue would be invested

in desperately needed job creation and traffic reduction. Measure R itself stated that one of the

purposes of the half-cent sales tax increase was to "stimulate the local economy [and] create jobs." A

2008 study by the L.A. County Economic Development Corp., commissioned by the MTA to

support the tax, projected that Measure R would create more than 500,000 jobs, including 33,000

manufacturing positions.

Even once everyone agrees on the importance of job creation in the procurement process, transit

agencies will still need to establish clear procedures on how to value jobs and job creation. Should a

part-time, temporary job be counted the same as a full-time job with extensive training

opportunities? Is the creation of a temporary facility as valuable as the construction of a permanent

Watch: D.A. candidates discuss their positionson realignment and the death penalty

Endorsements »

June 5 Primary: Find all of therecommendations by The Times' editorial board

Photos: A crazy weekin Holly wood

Summer Reading Guide

Rielle Hunter's tell-allabout Edwards affair

Better hair with lesscare

Ads by Google

Daum: The Ann Romney trap

Ford's CEO has no regrets about callfor bailout

The JOBS Act litmus test: Howmuch risk is too much?

Sorting through the Republican andDemocratic jobs spin

See more stories »

Ads by Google

Page 3: Connect L.A.'s lost opportunity for job creation · 5/29/2012  · L.A.'s lost opportunity for job creation Recommend 66 On April 30, the L.A. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

6/2/12 LA.'s lost opportunity to create local jobs with light-rail contracts - latimes.com

3/5latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-janis-jobs-rail-los-angeles-20120529,0,5915293.story

Comments 24 Email Share 0

FROM AROUND THE WEB

manufacturing facility in a poor neighborhood? These are questions that the MTA failed to address

in its procurement decision. Yet research shows that building permanent, environmentally sound

manufacturing facilities in poor neighborhoods can breathe life into those communities and into the

larger regional economy.

Public officials charged with expending precious tax dollars on equipment need to select companies

that manufacture their products in the United States.

Madeline Janis is an attorney and national policy director of the L.A. Alliance for a New Economy,

a nonprofit organization. From 2002 to 2012, she was a member of the Board of Commissioners of

the L.A. Community Redevelopment Agency.

Copy r ig h t © 2 01 2 , Los A n g eles Tim es

66Recommend

[what's this]

We're Getting a Divorce, Now What? | Wome n&Co.

7 Things Your Hands Say About Your Health |

Caring.com

21 Unanswered Questions That They Don’tWant You To Look Into | YOLOHUB

10 Worst-Rated States for Retirement | AARP.org

10 surefire ways to blow your job interview |

Bankrate .com

MORE FROM THE TIMES

Low mortgage rates attracting more short-termborrowers

Four witnesses in Trayvon Martin case changetheir stories

Roger Federer wins again at French Open, willface one of his fans

Lingerie retailer Frederick's of Hollywoodseeks suitors

'Hatfields & McCoys' is a History-changingsuccess

Transit SystemsCommuting to work is taking less work: Siemens Mobility Solutions. www.siemens.com/Transit-Systems

Struggle with Depression?Even with Current Treatment? Consider our Research Study. www.priresearch.com

Ads by Google

Most Viewed Latest News

Videos

100 Activities for Summer »

$100 for $350 towards TeenAdventure Summer Program

Save. Share. Connect.

RSS » Tw itter » Fa cebook » Mobile » Letter s »

Ice likely to improve for Game 2 of Stanley CupFinal 06/02/2012, 10:26 a.m.

The true cost of IKEA: logging old-growth forests06/02/2012, 9:10 a.m.

State gets a slew of film tax credit applications06/02/2012, 9:00 a.m.

Boxer Rau'shee Warren keeps dreaming theOlympic dream 06/02/2012, 8:19 a.m.

Try This: Get the jump on animal push-ups06/02/2012, 12:00 a.m.

Page 4: Connect L.A.'s lost opportunity for job creation · 5/29/2012  · L.A.'s lost opportunity for job creation Recommend 66 On April 30, the L.A. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

6/2/12 LA.'s lost opportunity to create local jobs with light-rail contracts - latimes.com

4/5latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-janis-jobs-rail-los-angeles-20120529,0,5915293.story

Comments are filtered for language and registration is required. The Times makes noguarantee of comments' factual accuracy. Readers may report inappropriate comments byclicking the Report Abuse link next to a comment. Here are the full legal terms you agree toby using this comment form.

Diamond Jubilee: Wellwishes from 'Mummie' to anew queen

Vatican butler arrested indocuments leak

Porn v ideo shot onColiseum grounds

Old Polaroid y ields a long-dead uncle

Cedar Point plans a record-setting winged coaster

More spotlights...

L.A. for less than the price of sunblock. Only 99¢ for the first four weeks.

Comments (24) Add / View comments | Discussion FAQ

astrobob1 at 3:47 PM May 30, 2012

The very best quality Cars at the best price is the best policy.Those cars will be around for fifkty years, long after those politicians and Union Bosses arelong gone. And the Public Riders will thank those who gave them the best rides!!!!

David in Fresno at 11:45 AM May 30, 2012

"The transit agencies said that when giving out a contract for rail cars, the most importantthing is building the best possible rail cars at the best possible price."I am truly astonished at the number of commenters who support this decision. In myopinion the "best possible pirce" is one that removes someone from the unemployment rollsand produces a taxpayer. I seriously doubt that the bid parameters considered these twoelements (and others I don't know about such as parts suppliers, etc) in the equation. This isanalagous to awarding the contract for waste disposal to the people who will, for the lowestdirect cost to homeowners, dump garbage into the nearest ravine which eventually becomestoxic, kills fish, and poisons the water supply. All that should have been included in the costof the original contract.Outsourcing is ruining America. The worst idea in the past 100 years is the idea that FreeTrade is somehow beneficial. The only time we have had full-employment and the ability toprovide 500,000 new jobs evey year to immigrants from Europe was the Golden Age of1875-1910, when we had extremely high tariffs and no income taxes. If we are ever to haveprosperity in this country again we must return to waht has been shown to have worked inthe past.

Tonatiuh at 6:09 AM May 30, 2012

The opinions expressed by most people on this post, tend to be racist, ignorant, and oftendownright un-American. Today, they have been mostly un-American, downrighttreasonous. These conservatives "thinkers" would rather see California go bankrupt, theunemployment level rise even more, services cut even more, than to see good jobs go tounionized American workers. They are fine with these good jobs going to Japan, or Canada,or even Mexico (a country they utterly hate for their own racist reasons), rather than tounionized American workers. Weakening America from the inside, by worsening oureconomic crisis is treason. These so called "conservatives" are engaging in treason, and theythink theirs, it's a defensible position. So, let them keep blaming all the problems on Liberals,unions, illegal aliens, government entities, and Democrats. We know who the real traitorsare, the ones actively working to make sure that California keeps sinking, by advocating theoutsourcing of good jobs, just to punish labor unions. Such hatred!!

Looking for something to do this summer? Hereare 100 ideas from which to choose.